Video & Transcript Research : 'conservator'

Page 1 of 232
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 7th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • requires an order concealing the location. from the protective parent, who still is a joint managing conservator
  • never made a finding that I am unfit or a danger to my children, and I remain a joint managing conservator
  • . conservator.
  • I'm a joint managing conservator and didn't see them; they then use that to go to the next court.
  • Personally, I was asked to fly to New York and go around their state assembly as the token conservative
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Mar 31st, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current law, when the court appoints a managing conservator, it generally gives that managing conservator
  • What this bill does is simply state that where there's a disagreement between the Managing Conservator
  • and the Possessory Conservator, the Managing Conservator will make the absolute decision regarding what
  • The Texas Family Code currently grants all managing conservators various rights. ...rights, one of them
  • This bill also will allow for more streamlined decision-making for managing conservators, enabling them
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 2495 relates to certain rights of the sole managing conservator of a child in relation to
  • , independent, or exercised by agreement with the other conservators as applicable, such as the right
  • When a sole managing conservator and a possessory conservator disagree on these issues, courts often
  • Generally, then, House Bill 2495 would clarify that a sole managing conservator has the exclusive right
  • I can tell you that this bill will be a tremendous help for both sole managing conservators and joint
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/26

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • drafted is that it could inadvertently prohibit a facility from appropriately seeking a guardian or a conservator
  • appropriately seeking a guardian or from appropriately seeking a guardian or a<00:37:54.960> conservator
  • > the<00:37:56.240> resident<00:37:56.560> or<00:37:56.800> their a conservator
  • if the resident or their a conservator if the resident or their family<00:37:57.359> is<00:37
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Summary: The Judiciary and Elections Committee met with a hard stop at 4:30 and approved the February 4, 2026 minutes. The chair announced several bills would be held for a later supplemental meeting, then took up SB 1426, the “squatter” bill. The bill was described as changing forcible detainer rules for unauthorized occupants and requiring immediate writs of restitution after judgment. Testimony from the Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office supported the measure as a practical, collaborative response to unlawful occupancy. SB 1426 received a do-pass recommendation on a 7-0 vote. The committee next considered SB 1687, a strike-everything amendment moving the primary election date from late July to the Tuesday before Memorial Day starting in 2027. The sponsor said the goal was to give more time between the primary and general elections and align Arizona more closely with other states. County election officials testified in neutral, saying they generally supported more time but flagged several issues, including filing deadlines, consolidated election dates, polling place availability, redistricting timelines, signature calculations, and possible conflicts with presidential preference elections. The amended bill passed 4-3, with concerns raised about clean elections qualification periods and state versus local control over elections. The committee then approved SB 1110, which creates a home confinement program for certain nonviolent inmates, with GPS monitoring, eligibility limits, and a 50-to-1 inmate-to-officer ratio. Supporters said it would help families, reduce recidivism, and save money; an opponent criticized the retroactive effective date and questioned funding and monitoring capacity. SB 1110 received a do-pass recommendation on a 5-1 vote. SB 1275, which allows courts to consider PTSD and related service-connected conditions when sentencing certain veterans and first responders, drew support from the sponsor and advocates but opposition from county officials who argued it would undermine mandatory sentencing and victims’ rights; it passed 7-0. Finally, the committee heard SB 1140, as amended, which allows expungement of eligible misdemeanor records after a waiting period, with exclusions for serious offenses and special rules for shoplifting and peace officer employment. Supporters, including a formerly incarcerated advocate and a retired police chief working on anti-trafficking issues, said expungement would improve employment and stability and give people a real second chance. The committee adopted the amendment and then passed SB 1140 as amended on a 7-0 vote before adjourning.