Video & Transcript Research : 'condemnation actions'

Page 1 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 8th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 291 requires a condemner to pay certain landowner attorney fees if the condemner fails to
  • I've worked around some condemnation.
  • And in that regard, we do both condemners and landowners.
  • I think condemnation rate is super low.
  • And one of the things on there was condemnation issues.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Such a declaration means that viewpoint discrimination and subsequent action taken against Texans on
  • Senate Bill 291 requires a condemner to pay certain landowner attorney fees if the condemner fails to
  • Senate Bill 291 requires a condemner to pay certain attorney's fees if the condemner fails to provide
  • When you look at facing condemnation. ...giving up property that you don't want to sell.
  • The condemner is always worried about speed—get it done faster, faster, faster—saving money.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • There has been no action or response to anyone submitting those affidavits.
  • We're recommending that the parties be engaged in mediation before any legal action takes place.
  • For this, I am acting as the spokesman for Grassroots America, We the People, Political Action Committee
  • Teachers are having actions forced upon them.
  • The actions that we're talking about protecting with this bill are actions that rise to the level of
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, we now will move on with our first presentation, and this is a discussion concerning condemnation
  • I think it's important that any condemning entity stays in touch with that landowner to let them know
  • Yeah, and I just don't like this condemnation. That's exorbitantly offensive.
  • And, you know, condemnation, eminent domain, is there for a purpose, for the public good.
  • They need to answer for their actions They need to answer for their actions because<00:37:17.400
Summary: The Joint Agriculture Committee met in October with a quorum present and approved the September minutes. The main presentation focused on condemnation of agricultural land and eminent domain, featuring testimony from Stephanie Barnett of a family-run livestock and farming business in Todd County, with support from Kentucky Farm Bureau. Barnett described a state road project that would take about 29 feet of frontage and affect entrances, fencing, a sign, drainage, a water well, and parking, saying the process involved poor communication, correspondence sent to the wrong address, and limited opportunity to negotiate changes such as a turning lane or relocated entrances. She said the business was not opposed to progress, but wanted the property restored and fairly compensated for the full impact on the operation, not just the land value. Committee members broadly agreed that eminent domain is sometimes necessary but should be handled with more transparency, communication, and fairness. Several members said the issue affects both rural and urban property owners and raised concerns about fair market value, compensation for agricultural infrastructure improvements, long-term impacts on farm operations, and the cost and delay of litigation. One member asked about the firm involved and suggested hearing from the people responsible for the correspondence problems; Barnett said she would share names after negotiations conclude. Another member noted that the maps had already been drawn before the landowner was brought in and said local meetings and clearer public input could reduce conflict. Chairman Dossett said he was interested in pursuing legislation for the upcoming session focused on property owner protection, fair treatment, and fair compensation, not just for agricultural land but for all Kentucky property owners. Members discussed possible ideas such as requiring better notice, more public transparency, and accounting for related costs like wells, fencing, drainage, and access changes. No votes or formal actions were taken beyond the approval of minutes and the discussion of potential future legislation.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • First, yeah, let's condemn violence directed at the judiciary. I'm all for that.
  • I got affirmative action.
  • I agree that the department should take whatever appropriate action there is.
  • I don't know enough about what actually happened. happened to say what that action would be.
  • That's why God created class actions isn't it? Yes Senator. Thank You Mr. Chairman.
Summary: The committee meeting primarily involved discussions around key nominations and pressing legal issues pertaining to the Department of Justice. Notable discussions included the nomination of John Eisenberg for assistant attorney general for national security, where concerns over the revival of the China Initiative were raised. Senators expressed significant apprehensions regarding previous actions taken under this initiative and its implications for national security. Additionally, there were critiques of the broader implications of executive actions that challenge judicial authority, aligning with ongoing dialogues about the integrity of the judiciary and executive oversight.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Committee, February 17, 2026

Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's only allowed to take that kind of an action if it's authorized to take that kind of an action.
  • And so it's take that kind of an action.
  • And so what we're require that action.
  • There's one of the plans is no action.
  • or your previous actions have been.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/25

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Someone said that there's a need for bold action.
  • There's no need for bold action.
  • there's 's no need for bold action there's 's no need for bold action there's<01:11:56.840> a
  • Then we said that we had to have bold action against fraud that was not bold action because both agencies
  • against fraud that was not bold action against fraud that was not bold action<01:42:59.639> because
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Committee, February 16, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • It applies to all causes of action It applies to all causes of action occurring<00:08:58.959>
  • <00:09:04.399> where also apply to pending actions where also apply to pending actions where
  • Suit within the original action.
  • That cause of action does not action.
  • without uh further congressional action. without uh further congressional action.
Bills: HB0103, HB0070, HB0091
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 16, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • They took actions in 477 of those.
  • exploitation investigations.<01:19:55.920> They<01:19:56.159> took<01:19:56.480> actions
  • They took actions in 477 investigations. They took actions in 477 of<01:19:58.239> those.
Bills: HB0103, HB0070, HB0091
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 18, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm Julie Baker, volunteer state director for Convention of States Action in Wyoming, and I live just
  • of state calls for an Article V constitutional convention should be determined by the most recent action
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Committee, February 18, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • But in 1992 Congress decided to defund that action that was being taken by the ATF.
  • c><00:26:46.960> to<00:26:47.279> defund<00:26:47.840> that<00:26:48.559> action
  • Congress decided to defund that action Congress decided to defund that action that<00:26:49.600>
  • the Constitution, Wyoming Constitution, state or federal law, it would be an additional cause of action
  • law enforcement, that should already be unconstitutional and there should be a right of cause of action
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Banking and Insurance Jan 13th, 2026

Banking and Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • ministry is not providing the right disclosure, then they are putting themselves out there at risk for action
  • It does not create any new penalties or causes of action against a public adjuster.
  • This bill will also prohibit a money service business from avoiding disciplinary action by clarifying
  • This bill will also prohibit a money service business from avoiding disciplinary action by clarifying
Summary: The Committee on Banking and Insurance met with a quorum and took up several bills, beginning with SB 834 on insurance requirements for nonprofit religious organizations and health care sharing ministries. The bill repeals a recent restriction on licensed insurance agents marketing or selling faith-based health care sharing programs. Supporters argued the change restores free speech and consumer education while preserving existing fraud and disclosure protections; opponents said allowing agents and brokers could create consumer confusion and has been associated with bad actors. A title amendment was adopted, and after debate the committee reported the bill favorably. The committee also heard and passed SB 642, which extends reporting and duty requirements to foreign and alien bail bond insurers, and SB 394, a technical bill updating reinsurance intermediary manager law to match current DFS practice. SB 266, which lets vulnerable adults rescind public adjuster contracts without penalty, was reported favorably after testimony from supporters in the insurance and elder law communities and a public adjuster who said the intent was good but the bill may need refinement. SB 832, a residential property insurance transparency bill requiring rate breakdown reports and a consumer resource center, also passed after discussion about consumer clarity and whether the required cost categories can be compiled as written. Later, the committee approved SB 540, which creates cybersecurity requirements for mortgage and money service businesses, closes a regulatory gap for certain investment advisers, adjusts OFR examination-payment deadlines, changes de novo charter requirements, allows virtual credit union meetings, and makes other financial regulation updates. Several amendments were adopted, including a substitute amendment removing fintech sandbox provisions. Finally, SB 1028 on Citizens Property Insurance Corporation was reported favorably after debate over a commercial lines clearinghouse intended to reduce Citizens’ exposure and shift more business to the private market; members discussed taxpayer risk, market competition, and consumer protections. The meeting ended with adjournment.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • My name is Eric Martinez, and I'm the Executive Director of Monomega Action, an organization based in
  • distinction; body cams are for criminal, but if body cam footage was the reason for your administrative action
  • resources to begin the process of healing, but their recovery will be limited without understanding the actions
  • I serve as the Executive Director of Act for Us, an action fund based in San Antonio.
Bills: SB7, SB14, SB 7, SB 14
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Texans also have a private right of action to ensure the law is followed.
  • That's where that action would occur. That action should be brought. You're correct.
  • And the private cause of action, however, does not require that.
  • The civil action in these bills just... scares the living daylights out of me.
  • And they had to threaten legal action.
Bills: SB7, SB14, SB 7, SB 14