Video & Transcript : 'business litigation' :

Page 1 of 500
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Civil Rights & Judiciary Jan 30th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Civil Rights & Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Harassing or fraudulent filing can impact credit decisions, housing opportunities, business banking,
  • And I'm aware that there are sort of vexatious litigants who do lots of UCC filings, and this can be
Bills: HB2640 , HB2161 , HB2304 , HB2445 , HB2590 , HB2412
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I don't agree with the philosophy at all, because I've seen the opposite for 20 years in my business.
  • Of course, this is the update on the business courts created last session.
  • So this gives clarity to litigants where venue can be held and should be held.
  • I'm a 34-year real estate litigation lawyer who's tried 400 trials.
  • He used alienation and reunification therapy as a court tactic to extend the litigation.
Summary: The committee heard several House bills, most of them relating to family law and court procedure, and left each bill pending after testimony. House Bill 1916 would clarify that the court that issued a final divorce decree retains exclusive jurisdiction over later actions involving undivided property. House Bill 1973 would require a certified birth certificate, if reasonably available, to be filed with a SAPCR petition or allow alternative proof of parentage while keeping the information confidential. House Bill 2530 would add qualifications and procedural safeguards for appointing amicus attorneys in SAPCR cases, including notice and hearing requirements, minimum qualifications, conflict rules, and limits on what amicus attorneys may do. House Bill 2524 would make Family Code references to attorney’s fees consistent by using “reasonable and necessary” language. House Bill 3180 would correct a scrivener’s error in the civil discovery rules by changing “settlement” to “statement.” The committee also heard House Bill 4213, which would change the interest rate on overdue child support from the current 6 percent simple interest to a fixed 5 percent and require the Attorney General to report on the impact of the change. Testimony was sharply divided: supporters argued lower interest could improve collections and help low-income obligors catch up, citing research and the size of child-support arrearages; opponents said lowering the rate would reduce incentives to pay and harm custodial parents and children. The Attorney General’s office raised implementation concerns about a House version that would have created a variable rate, while the committee substitute was described as restoring a simple fixed rate. After testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee also discussed House Bill 40, updating business court provisions and supplemental jurisdiction; House Bill 3421, streamlining probate procedures for original wills and copies; and House Bill 417, clarifying venue for lawsuits involving private transfer fees on real property. Each drew limited testimony and was left pending. Finally, House Bill 3783 drew extensive testimony on court-ordered counseling and reunification therapy in family cases. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would protect children and abuse victims from coercive, unregulated reunification practices, while opponents argued it was too broad, could interfere with legitimate therapy and judicial discretion, and might affect military families and other high-conflict cases. The committee heard testimony from judges, therapists, parents, survivors, and advocates, but took no final action and left the bill pending.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • As a matter of pending business, the chair lays out House Bill 1973, another bill by Representative Cook
  • As a matter of pending business, the chair lays out House Bill 2524, Representative Cook's bill sponsored
  • As a matter of pending business, the chair lays out House Bill 2530.
  • As a matter of pending business, the Chair lays out House Bill 3180, Representative Dutton's bill sponsored
  • This is of course that bill that deals with updating and continuing to refine our business courts And
Summary: The committee considered several House bills dealing with family law and civil procedure. House Bill 1916, concerning a court’s jurisdiction in suits to divide property not divided on dissolution of marriage, was reported favorably on a 4-0 vote and recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 1973, addressing proof of the identity of a child’s parents in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, was also adopted with a committee substitute, reported favorably 4-0, and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 2524, on recovery of fees, court costs, and expenses in family law proceedings, and House Bill 2530, on special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship, each received favorable 4-0 votes and were likewise recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then took up House Bill 3180, which was reported favorably 4-0 and recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The most detailed discussion centered on House Bill 40, relating to updates to business courts. Senator Hughes explained a committee amendment that made conforming changes requested by the Finance Committee and removed language creating two new judgeships, replacing it with a different judge allocation. The amendment was adopted, the amended committee substitute was adopted, and the bill was reported favorably on a 4-0 vote and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. At the end of the meeting, members briefly clarified procedural details about the House Bill 40 amendment and then closed out the agenda. The committee also noted a correction to an earlier reference to Bartleby the Scrivener, and the Chair recessed the Committee on Jurisprudence subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Delivery of Government Efficiency Mar 12th, 2025

Delivery of Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • business income.
  • or micro businesses.
  • So I want to understand this from a business standpoint. I have a business.
  • And when you start a business. business, it's kind of like having a child.
  • I am elated as a small business owner. business owner to have something like this.
Bills: HB10 , HB 12 , HB675 , HB10 , HB12
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first state to establish a specialized business court to address complex business litigation issues
  • I am the chair of the Texas Business Law Foundation, and I'm also a litigator practicing in Houston,
  • Whereas if you're litigating over a A privately owned business with multiple owners fighting, that's
  • Well, I can say that the litigation community The business community have been very pleased with the
  • I say I am pro-business.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hassan Flew, I just have one question for you, which is: HRBC is a business group.
  • And it also hurts attracting business.
  • and business communities like that in the courtroom.
  • In order for that to work on these busy dockets, judges have to juggle quite a bit.
  • In order for that to work on these busy dockets, judges have to juggle quite a bit.
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence met to hear House Bill 1761, a broad judicial package focused on increasing judicial compensation and adding accountability and efficiency measures. The chair explained that HB 1707 and HB 2100 were withdrawn from the agenda, and that HB 1761 would be taken up first because many judges and stakeholders were present. The committee substitute for HB 1761 proposed a 30% increase in base judicial pay to $182,000, changes to judicial retirement linkage, stronger judicial conduct provisions, and efficiency measures such as targeted reporting for judges not meeting benchmarks, appellate in-person meeting encouragement, and time limits on certain motions. The chair and several supporters said judicial pay had reached “emergency status,” citing Texas’s low national ranking and difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified judges. Witnesses in support included presiding and district judges, the State Bar’s judicial section, business and trial lawyer groups, and prosecutors. They emphasized that many judges work long hours off the bench, handle warrants at night and on weekends, manage heavy dockets, and face recruitment problems in both urban and rural counties. Supporters also said higher pay would help attract experienced lawyers, retain judges, and improve court efficiency. Several witnesses and members discussed judicial accountability, including public reporting of court performance and the role of the Texas Supreme Court and presiding judges in setting benchmarks. Some members raised concerns that raw statistics can be misleading because judges also do substantial off-the-bench work and often help cover other courts’ dockets. There was also testimony and discussion about the bill’s conduct and discipline provisions. A representative of the Texas Civil Rights Project opposed parts of the bill that would tie pay raises to changes affecting judicial independence, warning about subjective bail-related discipline standards and possible chilling effects. The executive director of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct cautioned against civil penalties for complainants, saying it could discourage good-faith complaints and create litigation risks. Other witnesses supported accountability reforms but urged caution about unintended consequences, especially for family and emergency cases and for judges handling warrants and other time-sensitive matters. After testimony, the committee withdrew the committee substitute and left HB 1761 pending, then recessed the committee.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 8th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Garrett. to defer the reading and referral bills until the end of today's business.
  • I've talked to so many small business individuals.
  • I'm sure you have too, Representative, who have talked about the struggle of getting their business off
  • and big business focused.
  • It's going to make it easier. businesses, for individuals to be able to do their work without having
Bills: HB10 , HB 12 , HB147 , HB1522 , HB422 , HB675 , HB204 , HB748 , HB912
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Rules Feb 3rd, 2026

Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • How does it protect Floridians related to litigation financing?
  • It does that by directing the regulation of litigation financing activities and providing that litigation
  • But litigation financing can be involved in commercial litigation, where you have large corporations
  • in litigation against each other.
  • It could be involved in smaller commercial litigation where you have family-run businesses.
Bills: S0014 , S0016 , S0024 , S0052 , S0308 , S0504 , S0506 , S0564 , S0572 , S0590 , S0594 , S0806 , S1396 , S7020 , S7024 , S7026
Committee: Senate Rules
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/21/2026 - House Appropriations

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman and Representative Griss, this is a nice, clean million dollars into the litigation fund.
  • And Representative Gress, this is a nice, clean million dollars into the litigation fund.
  • other protective resources that are outside of the litigation.
  • fund created last year solely for litigation in federal court if it gets to that level.
  • Just want to state that; that's a business fact.
Bills: HB2053 , HB2116 , HB2148
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/10/2026 - Senate Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • We hope we don't have to litigate, but this million dollars would be added to the litigation fund if
  • And so it... ...to the litigation fund if we need it, and so it—we may need it.
  • So if, hopefully, if we don't have to litigate and we continue to negotiate.
  • I'm not allowed to because they're a busy Class B airport.
  • So, seeing no further business for the committee, this committee is adjourned.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Civil Law and Procedure Mar 10th, 2026

Civil Law and Procedure

Transcript Highlights:
  • Families shouldn't be forced into expensive, avoidable litigation.
  • something that could spare parents the expense of having to go to a judge, something that will not be litigated
  • I, along with Chairman Miller, attended each meeting and provided input. not litigated or something that
  • And then it would be up to the judge, kind of, if it were litigated. Is that correct?
Bills: HB78 , HB112 , HB190 , HB292 , HB410 , HB427 , HB437
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/03/2026 - Senate Natural Resources

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's $1 million from the State General Fund in fiscal year 2027 to the Colorado River Litigation Fund
  • However, I was always very hopeful as well that we don't have to go into litigation, but we're preparing
  • One million for litigation is far less than what will be needed if we end up in that eventual situation
  • This is not a message that we're wanting to go to litigate.
  • We already have there for a retainer for a litigation. So the drought hasn't gone away.
Bills: HB2029 , HB2096 , HB2116
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 16th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Today, after we're done with our business on the floor, any new business that we don't get to will be
  • of the Texas Business Law Foundation.
  • Business Law Foundation.
  • I'm also with the Texas Business Law Foundation and sit on the Texas Business Organization Committee.
  • I mean, do they not have business...
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Just curious about whether, do we already have a business doing this within the state of Oklahoma, or
  • are we hoping to bring in a business to do this kind of work?
  • This bill will allow local food entrepreneurs to expand their businesses in new ways and will provide
  • And then it expands the definition of the producer to include a person and a business entity.
  • This is my line of business, and I'm not going to be able to vote on the measure here, but I do have
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on the Judiciary Apr 7th, 2026

Joint Committee on the Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • I had heard from a consumer and sort of small business-oriented group in Cambridge, which I think they
  • would strengthen the ability of the Attorney General's office to go after anti-competitive conduct, business
  • Other legal advocates have remarked that litigants are afraid to go to the housing courts.
  • universities are subjected to pretextual funding cuts to punish protected First Amendment behavior, if businesses
  • universities are subjected to pretextual funding cuts to punish protected First Amendment behavior, if businesses
Bills: H4783 , H4826 , H4876 , H5111 , H5116 , H5244 , S2975 , S2976
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/13/2026 - House Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Transcript Highlights:
  • How long has this company been in business, and who do you represent nationwide?
  • So you’ve been in business for 50 years, you said? Is that doing a...
  • But with EPA approval for how they carry out their business, the general concern seems addressed.
  • Representative Taylor said that with the EPA approval for how they carry out their business, the general
  • If we wind up having to go to litigation, it certainly will cost... ...much more.
Bills: HB2024 , HB2053 , HB2097 , HB2116 , HB2117
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Civil Rights & Judiciary Feb 4th, 2026 at 08:00 am

Civil Rights & Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 2255 concerns litigation finance.
  • Matt Sterling, staff to the committee, explained that House Bill 2255 concerns litigation finance.
  • funders as part of litigation financing agreements.
  • The bill would declare violations of third-party litigation financing agreements to be violations of
  • I think the issue that I'm having with this is it will absolutely affect other businesses.
Bills: HB2255 , HB2354 , HB2595 , HB2320 , HB2597
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair lays out as a matter of pending business Senate Bill 1364, 1364.
  • for litigation. And obviously, our state common law doesn't allow that.
  • So trustee business, depository business, and legal work could come to Texas.
  • For the six months it's, quote, a litigate. it in front of the PUC?
  • Members Is there any other business?
Summary: The Senate Business and Commerce Committee met with a quorum and first took up pending business, voting out several bills. Senate Bills 1697, 1569, 1202 as substituted, 1029, 1364, 1185, 924, 1008 as substituted, 264, 1376, and 1358 as substituted were reported favorably, with some sent to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted a substitute for SB 1202 and later corrected votes on several measures. SB 924 and SB 1376 drew some opposition, while the rest of the pending bills were reported without dissent or with limited nays. The committee then heard testimony on SB 1856, which would create an annual capacity-cost recovery rider for Entergy Texas customers in the MISO region. The author and Entergy argued the bill would better match rates to actual capacity costs and improve transparency, while the Texas Association of Manufacturers and the Public Utility Commission raised concerns about the short 10-day review period, rider proliferation, and the preference for full rate cases over piecemeal adjustments. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard and left pending SB 522 on CPA reciprocity, SB 1664 requiring TDUs to provide clearer, standalone rate-change disclosures, SB 1877 expanding OPUC’s access to market data, SB 1254 and SB 1255 as TDLR cleanup bills on professional employer organizations and mold assessors, SB 1341 updating manufactured housing rules, SB 1239 on sovereign debt and Texas governing law, and SB 1259 streamlining the surveyor-in-training licensing process. Additional bills discussed included SB 1977, which would cap recoverable legal expenses in electric, water, and sewer rate cases; OPUC and some consumer advocates supported the idea as a way to reduce ratepayer costs, while utility representatives warned it could discourage participation and increase rate shock. The committee also heard SB 1762 clarifying that geothermal energy conservation wells are not battery resources, and SB 783 allowing SECO to proceed with future energy-code rulemaking for state-funded buildings. Both drew supportive testimony from industry and environmental groups. All remaining bills heard during the meeting were left pending, and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/27/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Next, our e-discovery and litigation support team manages terabytes of litigation data and tens of millions
  • </c><00:37:39.440><c> by</c><00:37:39.600><c> maintaining</c> and businesses by maintaining and businesses
  • </c> Next, our e-discovery and litigation Next, our e-discovery and litigation support<00:37:50.680><
  • </c> funding of our litigation fund. funding of our litigation fund.
  • We did not have those tools litigation.