Video & Transcript Research : 'bodily autonomy'

Page 1 of 91
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Indian, Rural and Cultural Affairs Feb 3rd, 2026 at 10:04 am

Senate Indian, Rural & Cultural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Supporting this memorial affirms our commitment to human rights, bodily autonomy, and dignity.
  • For 27 years, BOLD Futures has worked in the state to highlight and center autonomy and body sovereignty
  • Sovereignty and autonomy historically for these communities and many others.
Bills: SM14
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on the Judiciary Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on the Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • And this bill seeks to protect that right to bodily autonomy.
  • The right to bodily autonomy must be protected, not just in theory, but in law.
  • The bills protect bodily autonomy.
  • These bills ensure the protection of bodily autonomy as a fundamental right. Right?
  • These bills ensure the protection of bodily autonomy as a fundamental right. Right?
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The committee hearing began with opening remarks from the House and Senate chairs outlining procedures for a large public hearing with more than 100 witnesses on 64 legislative proposals. They explained time limits, rules for in-person and virtual testimony, written testimony procedures, and the committee’s reporting deadline. Testimony then moved through a series of juvenile justice, child protection, and civil liberties bills, with witnesses generally urging favorable reports or, in one case, opposing expanded juvenile court transparency and child advocate access to records. Several witnesses supported bills aimed at juvenile justice reform. Representative Hendricks backed H. 1744 to prevent child labor exploitation and trafficking, citing federal findings of child labor in seafood processing and calling for stronger penalties and a ban on minors working in such facilities. Senator Gomez supported S. 1131 and S. 1121 to reduce juvenile fees, fines, restitution burdens, and bail-related costs, arguing they worsen racial and economic disparities. Senator Crean and other advocates supported S. 1051/H. 1695 to expand juvenile diversion eligibility, while multiple witnesses from juvenile justice and immigrant advocacy groups supported H. 1657/S. 1058 to expand juvenile expungement and to limit sharing juvenile fingerprints with federal authorities, describing recent ICE detentions of Chelsea students and the resulting fear in immigrant communities. Witnesses also supported H. 1918/S. 1240 to narrow the youthful offender statute, raising the minimum age and reducing mandatory adult-style penalties for youth. The committee also heard testimony on child safety and bodily autonomy bills. Middlesex District Attorney Marion Ryan supported H. 1752 to protect children left in extreme temperatures, explaining it would create civil penalties, allow emergency responders to remove children from cars without liability, and add criminal penalties when serious injury results. Representative Thurber and Senator O’Connor testified for H. 2011/S. 1227, a bill prohibiting coercion or mandates for health-related interventions, including vaccinations, and allowing legal remedies for violations. Senator Jalen supported S. 1136/H. 1847 to prevent false confessions by requiring recording of interrogations and banning deceptive tactics, and several innocence-project and legal-services witnesses described wrongful convictions tied to false confessions and coercive interrogations. Another major topic was H. 1626, which would require age verification for pornographic content and launch an education campaign about online sexual exploitation; Representative Cruz and survivor Udoz Wallace testified in support, describing nonconsensual image sharing and deepfake harms. Not all testimony was supportive. The Committee for Public Counsel Services opposed S. 1035, which would increase transparency in juvenile court proceedings, and H. 1689, which would expand the child advocate’s access to confidential juvenile records, arguing both would undermine privacy and trauma-informed protections for children and families. No votes or formal committee actions were taken during the portion of the hearing provided; the session consisted of opening remarks and public testimony on the listed bills.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Motion to take up HF5084, proposing an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution 5/13/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • > right freedom, bodily autonomy, and the right freedom, bodily autonomy, and the right to<00:02:
  • You would say you want bodily autonomy. Well, who is going to protect that child's bodily autonomy?
  • You would say you want bodily autonomy. Well, who is going to protect that child's bodily autonomy?
  • I fight for their bodily autonomy.
  • their bodily autonomy. their bodily autonomy.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The House debated Representative Long’s motion to suspend the rules so House File 5084 could be recalled from committee, given second and third readings, and brought to final passage. The bill was described by opponents as an extreme anti-abortion measure that would create a right to life from fertilization, potentially criminalize abortions except in narrow cases, and could affect IVF, miscarriage care, and treatment of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Supporters said the bill was about protecting unborn life and giving Minnesotans the chance to decide the issue themselves through the ballot box. Several members spoke against the motion, arguing that Minnesota has already settled reproductive rights through court decisions and recent legislation, and warning that the bill would put government into deeply personal medical decisions. They cited stories from other states where women were investigated or arrested after miscarriages or self-managed abortions, and said the proposal could treat people as criminals for seeking reproductive care. One member emphasized that the bill could be especially dangerous in cases like ectopic pregnancy, where treatment delays could threaten the pregnant person’s life. Members in favor of the bill framed the issue as one of conscience, democracy, and protection of human life from conception. They said every abortion is an act of violence against a distinct human being and argued that Minnesotans should be allowed to vote on the question. Some speakers also shared personal experiences with miscarriage, infertility, premature birth, or pregnancy loss to explain why they viewed the issue as morally serious and emotionally difficult. The debate became broader and more partisan, with some members criticizing both sides for using the issue as a political weapon rather than focusing on legislative work. The transcript does not include the final vote result, but the motion was clearly under a roll call and the chamber proceeded with extended floor debate over House File 5084.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • autonomy.
  • freedom and bodily freedom and bodily autonomy<00:01:21.960> we<00:01:22.159> know
  • The Reproductive Freedom Caucus recognizes that bodily autonomy and the individual freedom to live well
  • bodily autonomy and the recognizes that bodily autonomy and the individual<00:05:10.000> freedom
  • trans rights and all of the bodily trans rights and all of the bodily autonomy<00:06:53.240>
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence May 6th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because the intoxication assault crime currently requires serious bodily injury.
  • While the penalty for serious bodily injury would remain a third-degree felony, for bodily injury to
  • now, for intoxication assault, you have to get to serious bodily injury.
  • Adding bodily injury is tracking past decisions.
  • The standard for bodily injury, for those of you who don't know, is pain. It's pain, that's it.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Health Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/25

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a violation of trust and personal autonomy, and it highlights the need for better safeguards.
  • It offers patients more autonomy over their health care and reinforces our commitment to combating the
Bills: HF696, HF1429, HF1379
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs (02/04/2026)

Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • You have bodily autonomy. You have parental rights, bodily autonomy, free exercise of religion.
  • >> Bodily<01:19:22.960> autonomy. >> Bodily autonomy. >> Bodily autonomy.
  • <01:19:28.320> autonomy,<01:19:28.719> free parental rights, bodily autonomy, free
  • rights including bodily Fundamental rights including bodily autonomy. autonomy. autonomy.
  • of protecting parental rights bodily of protecting parental rights bodily autonomy<03:05:40.560>
Keywords: 1189, house, all
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Judiciary (01/27/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • I am tired of having to fight for my right for bodily autonomy and the autonomy of my children and my
  • I am tired of having to fight for my right for bodily autonomy and the autonomy of my children and my
  • > and<03:04:58.680> the bodily autonomy they deserve and the bodily autonomy they deserve
  • autonomy, to say yes to their own bodily autonomy, to continue to push women back down.
  • autonomy, to say yes to their own bodily autonomy, to continue to push women back down.
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The House Judiciary Committee opened with procedural remarks, including notice of an overflow room and a brief apology from Representative Andress about returning to his seat after introducing HB 114. The committee then took up HB 476, a proposed 15-week abortion ban. Chairman Lynn explained that a request to withdraw the bill had been filed, but because the bill was already scheduled for hearing, the committee would proceed with testimony and the withdrawal would require later House action. The chair also reminded witnesses to keep remarks to three minutes and asked the audience to remain respectful. Most testimony focused on abortion access, maternal health, and the likely effects of a 15-week limit. Opponents, including Nancy Pariser, Dr. Cynthia Rasmussen, Dr. Young, Bonnie Bruno, and others, argued that abortion restrictions increase maternal mortality, worsen miscarriage care, create “OB deserts,” and can delay emergency treatment in cases such as sepsis or ectopic pregnancy. Several speakers cited experiences from Texas and Georgia and warned that HB 476 contained no exceptions for rape, incest, or maternal health. Supporters of the bill, including Paul Galasso and Lynn Hill, framed abortion as the loss of unborn life and argued that 15 weeks still allows most abortions while saving lives; they also said New Hampshire’s current law is already adequate and that the bill should be strengthened rather than abandoned. Other witnesses emphasized practical and economic concerns, saying unwanted pregnancies can worsen poverty, childcare burdens, housing insecurity, and women’s lifetime earnings. Some speakers urged lawmakers to focus instead on affordable housing, childcare, and family support. No committee vote or final action on HB 476 occurred during the hearing; the meeting consisted of opening remarks and public testimony only.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Science or misinformation, misinformation, misinformation, bodily<00:25:27.600> autonomy<00:25
  • :28.400> or<00:25:28.799> governmental<00:25:29.440> control, bodily autonomy or
  • governmental control, bodily autonomy or governmental control, Hawaii<00:25:31.120> making<00
  • At the heart of it is guaranteeing everyone's fundamental right to bodily autonomy and privacy.
  • <00:29:29.679> autonomy<00:29:30.159> and fundamental right to bodily autonomy and
Summary: The joint hearing covered House Bill 251, which would require hospitals to report costs associated with Medicare and uninsured patients, and House Bill 1875, which would expand protections for gender-affirming health care services. On HB 251, the Department of Health said it supported the intent but described the bill as complicated and potentially impractical as drafted because the department lacks the expertise to produce the required analyses without outside help. Hawaii Health Systems Corporation echoed those concerns, while the Queen’s Health System said it was willing to work with the department to provide the information. In committee discussion, officials explained that hospital support in Hawaii includes public hospital appropriations and the provider tax program, which uses hospital and nursing home contributions to draw federal matching funds; a department witness estimated the net benefit at about $150 million for hospitals and $20 million for nursing facilities, though exact figures would be provided later. On HB 1875, the Insurance Division testified with concerns that the bill’s language on prohibited actions by malpractice insurers was broad and vague, and that a rate-increase prohibition could conflict with actuarially based insurance pricing. The division also noted it was not the primary enforcement agency for the statute. In contrast, many testifiers strongly supported the bill, including the Hawaii State Commission on the Status of Women, the Hawaii State LGBTQ+ Commission, the Hawaii Public Health Institute, PFLAG Oahu, the ACLU of Hawaii, the Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii, the Hawaii County Democratic Party, and others. Supporters argued that gender-affirming care is medically necessary, evidence-based, and protected by privacy and bodily autonomy principles, and that the bill would protect patients and providers from outside political interference. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the portion of the hearing provided.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

House Chamber - Adjournment Sine Die Fri May 2, 2025, 12:00PM HST - Day 60

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So bodily autonomy all the way. My body, my choice. It all stays intact. Thank you, Madam Speaker.
  • <01:10:15.920> autonomy immunized, assert your bodily autonomy immunized, assert your bodily
  • So bodily<01:10:25.360> autonomy<01:10:25.840> all<01:10:26.000> the<01:10:26.159
  • <01:10:26.320> My<01:10:26.560> body,<01:10:26.880> my bodily autonomy all the
  • My body, my bodily autonomy all the way.
Keywords: 910, house, all
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Public Safety Feb 17th, 2026 at 08:30 am

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 1264 expands the definition of great bodily injury to include.
  • And this bill ensures domestic abuse resulting in great bodily injuries is treated as. A felony.
  • Could you repeat the question as far as great bodily harm?
  • If it's over 10% of the body, then that would be considered great bodily injury.
  • Other than changing the definition of great bodily injury, that's duplicate section cleanup.