Video & Transcript Research : 'adjacent landowners'

Page 1 of 123
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Mar 26th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm just curious about the landowners.
  • We've talked for years about somehow incentivizing these landowners, more so than what we're already
  • Did landowners ask for this? In some cases, yes.
  • A study to see how to do that better and enhance cooperation between the state and private landowners
  • And you're going to have those landowners that may actually support.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • I've always tried to add basic protections in place for landowners for solar, wind, whether it's decommissioning
  • And in addition to the concern I have about eliminating a rural landowner from being able to participate
  • in something like that... ...eliminating a rural landowner from being able to participate in something
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • They're going to try and work with landowners around critical infrastructure, transmission lines, and
  • substations and things like that to put some fire breaks in place and particularly those landowners
  • instance, with battery storage, as you all know, in the past, I've worked really hard on putting landowner
  • What protects the landowner? Do they have to put up surety bonds?
  • But if they go out of business, now this landowner has this battery shortage facility on their property
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Environment, Climate and Legacy - 03/17/26

Environment, Climate, and Legacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We worked with the majority of the adjacent landowners where we needed to acquire either fee title or
  • I do have one of the landowners with me today who lives right adjacent to the project and has been a
  • Now, we have addressed a lot of the issues and concerns of adjacent landowners and downstream.
  • We will be reducing frequent flood events for adjacent landowners for agricultural land in the 2-year
  • > willing a landowner adjacent, um, I'm willing a landowner adjacent, um, I'm willing to,<01:06:03.039
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Mar 27th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • HB 24 would return power to the actual landowner, returning property.
  • Property rights back to the owner versus adjacent landowners and return authority to the elected city
  • higher 60% adjacent landowner requirement.
  • and you yourself are a landowner, then you're a landowner.
  • You know, if you're an actual landowner, then your voice carries more weight.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Committee, February 17, 2026

Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • >> Um, Um, so another one was on the written comments from adjacent landowners.
  • So on the written comments, say an adjacent landowner does not reply or doesn't even know this is happening
  • And then another one would be, um, say a year into this, uh, and the adjacent landowner is really realizing
  • the written comments, say an adjacent the written comments, say an adjacent landowner<00:37:36.160
  • landowner is really uh and the adjacent landowner is really realizing realizing realizing the<00:38:
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Special Committee on Rural Issues Jan 14th, 2026

Special Committee on Rural Issues

Transcript Highlights:
  • They're going to be capturing something that's adjacent to your property that's open to public use.
  • They don't care what you're doing on your property. ...nature trail adjacent to your property.
  • But my bill is to affect the landowner themselves.
  • They're trying to catch somebody doing something on the public area adjacent.
  • I mean, I doubt landowners are going to take it off and destroy it, but I mean...
Keywords: 959, house, all
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 1927 proposes that should a private landowner wish to remove an ashtunipa tree from their land, for
  • decision-making tool to help support landowner goals but also develop better, improved ways to manage
  • But today, if just 20% of the adjacent property owners protest, that could be... be one person.
  • And the landowner doesn't like it, so the 20% threshold is still there, but for adjacent landowners,
  • A private landowner came to us with a large parcel of land, over 105,000 square feet.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part II) Apr 7th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 1927 proposes that should a private landowner wish to remove an ash juniper tree from their land for
  • Frustrated landowners tell me there are no programs to fund more selective management for this region
  • In the Meta Center for the Water and Environment to develop a landowner decision making tool to help
  • uh support landowner goals but also develop a better, uh, improved ways to manage these lands.
  • But For adjacent landowners, we would go to a 60% protest threshold.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The rural landowner cares about his animals, his land, and his water resources.
  • from responsibility for damages resulting from actions or omissions by the landowner.
  • in the state of Texas, for free, at will, with no notice to the adjacent landowner.
  • Could you provide more context about how this impacts landowners and potential buyers?
  • They have one public notice that is mailed to adjacent landowners but does not have an opportunity for
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • This ensures that current and future landowners are aware of their presence.
  • And the thing is is that there's no guarantee that the private landowner.
  • So, um, you will notice that there was a cemetery adjacent to your property.
  • It's not necessarily a cemetery adjacent to your property.
  • Um, And like Chairman Leach was saying though, I, I recognize that landowners.
Bills: HB113
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources (Part I) May 21st, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • I represent rural landowners and small nonprofit groups around the state.
  • Pipelines, which I fight every day for rural landowners. I'm not trying to stop them.
  • The rural landowner cares about his animals, his land, his water resources.
  • landowner.
  • Composting notifications have one public notice that is mailed to adjacent landowners, but does not have
Summary: The committee heard and laid out several natural resources and environmental bills, with testimony focused on balancing development, public health, wildlife protection, and regulatory authority. SB 3074 would allow the governor, lieutenant governor, and legislators to communicate in writing with TCEQ about matters before the commission, with safeguards requiring the communication to be part of the record and allowing other parties to respond; a committee substitute narrowed it to written communications about permits only, limited legislator communications to facilities in their districts, and adjusted conflict-of-interest rules. HB 3556, as substituted, would require notice to Texas Parks and Wildlife for certain very tall structures in specified coastal counties and give TPWD a limited right to seek injunctive relief if mitigation is insufficient to prevent material harm to migratory birds; supporters said it would address ignored wildlife recommendations and protect key flyways, while opponents argued the bill was too broad, singled out wind energy, and gave one agency unusually strong enforcement power. HB 49 would expand liability protections for produced-water recycling and beneficial use; supporters said it would encourage reuse of a large wastewater stream and reduce disposal pressures, while opponents warned it could shield operators from responsibility before the science and standards are mature. HB 4413 would authorize mass-balance accounting for renewable biomass feedstocks, and HB 3866 would regulate intermediate bulk container recycling facilities near homes, with a committee substitute adding a grandfather clause and making implementation contingent on funding. The committee also heard bills affecting air and energy regulation. HB 5033 would create a trigger to end vehicle emissions inspections if federal law changes to allow it; the substitute removed a Supreme Court-related trigger, and the lone public witness opposed the bill, warning it would worsen air quality and harm nonattainment areas. HB 4112 would clarify that on-site storage of high-level radioactive waste is allowed at current and future nuclear reactors and university research reactors only for waste generated at that site; the substitute clarified the language and removed an inoperative permit condition, and witnesses from environmental and nuclear groups said the clarification was needed to prevent unintended restrictions while avoiding off-site storage. HB 2440 would prohibit state agencies from using air-quality rules to ban or restrict vehicles based on energy source, including internal combustion vehicles, and no public testimony was offered. HB 4271 would require TCEQ to hold public meetings on request for composting facility authorizations; the substitute limited the requirement to future applications and was presented as a transparency measure after a denied local request and extensive public comments. Additional bills addressed landowner protections and Railroad Commission oversight. HB 3619 would require the Railroad Commission to restore surface land after plugging or replugging operations and indemnify landowners from damages tied to authorized entry; a witness supported the bill but urged fixing a separate statutory loophole that he said allowed operators to enter unrelated tracts without notice. HB 4042 would extend Railroad Commission pipeline safety and fee provisions to propane distribution systems by removing the word “natural” from the relevant definitions. HB 4426 would set a 10-year permit term for commercial surface disposal facilities, allow renewal based on compliance history, and require renewal applications 120 days before expiration. The committee took no votes because a quorum was not initially present, and each bill was left pending after testimony and discussion.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources, February 12, 2026

Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • The 10th Circuit has said that landowners, private landowners, and checkerboarded land do not have a
  • The 10th Circuit has said that landowners, private landowners, and checkerboarded land do not have a
  • Is it the the law the the landowner?
  • Um, but something I think is worth pointing out, landowners and landowner groups weren't brought to the
  • I am a private landowner that participated.
Bills: HB0015, HB0017, HB0019
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

FL House Floor Session - 2026-03-13 (10:00AM Session)

Florida House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • to over 250 feet of water slides that are less than... ...concrete stair structure adjacent to over
  • Once wetlands are filled, floodwaters have nowhere to go except to adjacent properties.
  • He said this is not for developers; it is for landowners.
  • That's the only option that landowners have.
  • On lines 47 through 49, does this language mean that a property that is adjacent to...
Summary: The Senate convened with opening prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and several member introductions of guests and staff. The chamber then took up returning messages from the House and acted on several bills, including transportation facility designations (SB 628), affordable housing/Live Local Act changes (HB 1389), utility services (HB 1451), education (HB 1279 substituted for SB 7038), data centers (SB 484), and land use/development regulations (SB 208/HB 399). Several other measures were temporarily postponed, including education, emergency services, and environmental rule ratification bills. On SB 628, the Senate concurred in the House amendment and passed the bill 31-4. On the affordable housing bill, senators discussed the fourth iteration of the Live Local Act, including a new provision allowing certain affordable housing on religious institution property, removal of accessory dwelling unit language, and changes to tax exemption and expiration provisions; the Senate concurred in the House amendment and passed the bill 35-0. On the utility services bill, the House amendment shortened the surcharge phase-out timeline and advanced reporting dates; the Senate concurred and passed the bill 30-6. The education package was substituted with the House companion, amended to include agreed-upon provisions on student health and safety, early learning, math, virtual instruction, career and technical education, school choice, accountability, tuition protections, and financial aid, and passed 36-1. The data centers bill drew extensive debate over transparency and ratepayer protections. Senators questioned the removal of the Senate’s nondisclosure agreement prohibition, the 12-month confidentiality period, and whether costs could be shifted to residential and commercial customers. Supporters said the amendment strengthened ratepayer protections and maintained local land-use authority, while critics objected to the loss of transparency and the possibility of local NDAs. After debate, the Senate concurred in the House amendment and passed the bill 31-6. The land use and development bill generated the most contentious discussion. Amendments addressed a Fontainebleau/Miami Beach resort water park issue, a sunset provision, and a major rural boundary/property rights proposal affecting counties such as Orange and Seminole. Senators debated whether the rural boundary language protected property rights or undermined local planning and environmental safeguards, with concerns raised about takings, county liability, and the use of an Attorney General opinion. The transcript cuts off during extended debate on that amendment, so no final vote on the land use bill is shown in the excerpt.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • This ensures that current and future landowners are aware of their presence.
  • You will notice that there was a cemetery adjacent to your property.
  • I know of at least two adjacent, maybe the only way I'll give you an example: Fairfield Lake Park.
  • And so what I'm wondering is, if we pass this bill, what does that landowner have to do?
  • We have to balance the needs of everybody—the landowner versus the public.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Agriculture & Livestock Apr 8th, 2025

Agriculture & Livestock

Transcript Highlights:
  • It prohibits. municipalities from adopting or enforcing an ordinance that requires an ag landowner to
  • maintain. vegetation in the public right-of-way adjacent to their land.
  • Not one city has reimbursed landowners, farmers, or ranchers for that. overreach.
  • And they are bullying the landowners, the farmers, the ranchers, all of us.
  • To be able to save face with the landowners, you have to back off, because those landowners are developers
Bills: HB2013, HB4163, HB4810
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Agriculture & Livestock Apr 8th, 2025

Agriculture & Livestock

Transcript Highlights:
  • In recent years, some municipalities have adopted ordinances requiring private landowners to maintain
  • It prohibits municipalities from adopting or enforcing an ordinance that requires an ag landowner to
  • maintain vegetation in the public right of way adjacent to their land.
  • It keeps cities from pushing responsibilities onto landowners for areas that are outside their control
  • And not one city has, uh, reimbursed landowners, farmers, or ranchers for that overreach.