Video & Transcript Research : 'NDA'

Page 1 of 11
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Elect Committee Meeting - 2026-03-11

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • non-disclosure agreement or an NDA? non-disclosure agreement or an NDA?
  • NDAs people.
  • The NDAs in St.
  • The NDAs in St.
  • sign an NDA with a private company. sign an NDA with a private company.
Bills: HF4077, HF3798, HF3886
DE

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Administration Committee Meeting Jun 17th, 2026

Administration

Transcript Highlights:
  • I will tell you this: when I was working for a very large corporation here in Delaware, I entered NDAs
  • , and there are entities that if I told you now that I even had an NDA with that entity, I would end
  • NDAs can be very stifling.
  • Yet because of these NDAs, neighbors and residents are kept entirely in the dark until the deals are
  • Allowing NDAs between large industries and elected officials goes against all of the principles our country
Bills: SB268, SB306, SB264, SB312
Summary: The House Administration Committee met to consider a series of resolutions and bills covering arts districts, child care background checks, federal worker relief, health care reform, court transparency, school tax reassessment, municipal charter changes, constitutional amendment procedures, data center nondisclosure agreements, state employee benefits governance, and lieutenant governor vacancies. Members also noted that House Concurrent Resolution 12 had been removed from the agenda and that public comment would be limited to one minute per speaker. The committee released SCR 167 to study arts, culture, and creative districts in Delaware; HB 438 to close a loophole in the child care service letter requirement; SB 268 to provide interest-free loans, free transit, and tax deferrals for federal workers during shutdowns; SS2 for SB 1 to expand and permanently strengthen primary care investment while also addressing hospital cost growth; HCR 147 to request a Court of Chancery report on audio recordings and automated case assignment; SB 322 to replace the current post-reassessment 10% school revenue increase authority with a 2% annual increase option under safeguards; SB 306 to amend the Rehoboth Beach charter; HB 440 to require voter approval for constitutional amendments after legislative approval; SB 312 to bar nondisclosure agreements for large data center projects; SS1 for SB 289 to change State Employee Benefits Committee governance; and SB 264 to require a special election to fill a lieutenant governor vacancy. Testimony was mixed on several measures. Arts, child care, federal worker relief, primary care, court transparency, data center transparency, and the lieutenant governor vacancy bill drew mostly supportive testimony, while SB 322 and SB 306 drew both support and opposition, especially over tax impacts and the proposed spouse/partner restriction in Rehoboth Beach. HB 440 prompted debate over whether 55% voter approval was the right threshold for constitutional amendments, and SB 312 was supported as a transparency measure by residents affected by prior data center NDAs. All of the listed measures were released from committee by roll call vote, with some members voting no on HB 440, SB 306, SB 312, SS1 for SB 289, and SB 264.
US
Summary: The meeting focused on addressing the high cost of prescription drugs and the abusive practices that contribute to elevated prices affecting American families. Several bills were presented, including proposals to end pay-for-delay deals and to enhance transparency in the operations of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). The discussion was notable for its emphasis on consumer protection and ensuring that cheaper generic drugs reach the market more effectively. Members expressed frustration over past attempts to pass similar legislation stalling in the Senate, leading to renewed efforts to push these bills forward.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2026-04-09

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:04:36.080> private See NDAs are public are private See NDAs are public are private contracts
  • most instances the existence of the NDA most instances the existence of the NDA and<00:04:50.480
  • sizes that they rely on NDAs sizes that they rely on NDAs to<00:21:07.200> protect<00:21:
  • sign NDAs. sign NDAs.
  • to not sign NDAs, they could. to not sign NDAs, they could.
Summary: The Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee approved the minutes from March 25 and March 26, then took up House File 4077, a bipartisan bill authored by Representatives Greenman and Roach. The bill would prohibit municipalities from entering into non-disclosure agreements with private entities that restrict disclosure about land development, economic development, or publicly funded projects, while preserving existing Chapter 13 data practices rules and trade secret protections. The authors argued the bill is needed to prevent secret agreements and backroom decision-making that undermine public transparency, and they moved that the bill be re-referred to the general register. Several local officials and residents testified in support, including a St. Louis County commissioner, the mayor of Lonsdale, and residents from Farmington and Hermantown. Supporters said NDAs had been used in connection with data center and other development projects to keep elected officials and the public in the dark, eroding trust and limiting community input. They described the bill as a common-sense transparency measure and said existing law already protects legitimate trade secrets. Opposition came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Business Partnership, which argued that NDAs are often necessary in early-stage economic development discussions to protect sensitive business information and remain competitive with other states. They warned the bill could discourage investment, jobs, and tax growth, and said it would impose a one-size-fits-all state mandate that limits local discretion. Committee members then debated whether the bill was too broad and whether it should be narrowed to data centers; supporters responded that the issue extends beyond data centers to other forms of economic development. A roll call vote was requested on the motion to re-refer the bill to the general register, but the final vote result was not stated in the transcript excerpt.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

No NDAs for municipalities 3/11/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • or NDAs. or NDAs.
  • The NDAs in St.
  • saying that there's an NDA.
  • <00:46:21.040> This<00:46:21.320> NDA happening with these NDIs NDAs.
  • This NDA happening with these NDIs NDAs.
Keywords: 1183, house
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The mechanism of NDAs.
  • Some of the NDAs I've seen are multiple pages long.
  • So yes, we're talking about the misuse of NDAs.
  • Not a written NDA, but a verbal NDA, and everyone in this chamber understands the power that has, certainly
  • Well, what if somebody wants an NDA?
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on State and Local Government - 03/24/26

State and Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • NDA because of fear of of the law. NDA because of fear of of the law.
  • officials and staff from signing an NDA. officials and staff from signing an NDA.
  • online, but I'm guessing that the NDA online, but I'm guessing that the NDA NDA<00:21:31.720>
  • I think NDAs are good or prohibiting NDAs at whatever level is good government.
  • I think NDAs are good, or prohibiting NDAs at whatever level is good government.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 19th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Sadly, a lot of truth dies with people because of NDA.
  • The law on NDAs must be clarified because we cannot trust institutions.
  • NDAs are for trade secrets, not trauma secrets. I get asked a lot.
  • Using NDAs is a fog of ignorance and hiding behind it.
  • The BSA has NDAs with claimants. That's settled out of court.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Discussing Data Centers and Non-Disclosure Agreements – Senator Bill Lieske Mar 7th, 2026

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And uh we shouldn't be signing NDAs for those things.
  • But talk to me about the push for this to ban NDAs or at least limit them. >> Yeah, so NDAs are a challenging
  • <00:04:55.000> for uh we shouldn't be signing NDAs for uh we shouldn't be signing NDAs for
  • to to ban NDAs or at least limit them. to to ban NDAs or at least limit them.
  • Yeah, so NDAs are a challenging subject.
Keywords: 918, senate, all
Summary: The discussion focused on the growing number of data center proposals in Minnesota and the concerns they are raising in communities such as Eagan, Hermantown, Farmington, and Rosemount. The senator described data centers as having evolved from small server rooms into large industrial-scale facilities that support data storage and AI systems, and said the main issue is not whether they are needed, but where they should be located. He argued they should be treated as industrial uses and placed in industrial zones away from residential neighborhoods because of potential impacts on nearby homes, including concerns about property values, utilities, and the character of the area. The senator also discussed Senate File 607, a bill he introduced last session to address data center placement. He said the bill would require data centers to be sited in industrial areas and include an inspection to ensure adequate water and electricity resources are available. He said the bill had been scheduled for a hearing in State Government but the hearing was canceled, and he hopes to bring it back for a hearing this session. He noted that the issue is becoming more important as data center development expands and that lawmakers are still catching up to the change. A second major topic was the use of nondisclosure agreements in data center development. The senator said local governments should not be required to sign NDAs before discussing projects with constituents, especially when those agreements prevent public disclosure until projects are already far along. He said NDAs may be appropriate in limited cases, such as tours of controlled facilities where trade secrets are involved, but not when cities are buying property or rezoning land. He expressed support for efforts to ban or limit NDAs in this context and said the issue is bipartisan but also politically difficult in a closely divided legislature.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Is the NDA assumed to be a necessary tool?
  • Well, as I've said, we don't use NDAs.
  • NDAs and statute of limitations are not zero tolerance.
  • …is that the NDA also creates isolation for the victim.
  • …to someone that's initiating the NDA. Well, you know...
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House/Senate Press Conference 4/8/26

Transcript Highlights:
  • NDAs are a way to circumvent Chapter 13.
  • NDAs are a way to circumvent Chapter 13. NDAs are a way to circumvent Chapter 13.
  • We shouldn't go around it with NDAs.
  • They don't want to have to be, you know, muzzled by an NDA.
  • They want to be transparent with an NDA.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: Lawmakers held a bipartisan press availability on a bill to prohibit local governments and their officials from entering into non-disclosure agreements with private entities. Supporters said the measure is intended to protect transparency, public participation, and Minnesotans’ right to know about local decisions involving land use, public financing, and economic development, especially in cases involving data centers and other large projects. Representatives and senators from both parties described the bill as a response to examples in cities such as Rosemount, Farmington, Hermantown, North Mankato, Monticello, Pine Island, and others, where they said NDAs kept communities from learning about projects until decisions were effectively already made. The authors argued that the bill is not anti-development or limited to data centers, but instead prevents corporations from using private contracts to circumvent Minnesota’s open meeting and data practices laws. They said Chapter 13 already addresses trade secrets and other confidential information, and that the bill is meant to stop NDAs from creating secrecy around government decision-making. They also said they had heard little organized opposition so far, though they acknowledged questions about how the bill would affect early-stage business recruitment conversations and how local governments, especially smaller ones, would implement the change. Members also discussed the bill’s legislative path. They said it had previously received unanimous support in committee and was sent to the general register, then moved to the Judiciary Committee at the request of Chair Scott, who wanted a hearing. The authors said they did not believe the bill raised Chapter 13 issues requiring judiciary review, but agreed to the referral as a courtesy and said they were seeking a hearing. They reported that Senate consideration had previously ended in a tie vote, but said momentum was growing and expected stronger support this session. No vote was taken during the press event.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 04/15/26

Judiciary and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • The NDA.
  • None of the elected officials are signing an NDA or subject to an NDA.
  • <00:25:17.320> I signing an NDA or subject to an NDA.
  • I signing an NDA or subject to an NDA.
  • signed an NDA. signed an NDA.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Jan 14th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • The use of NDAs and the state of Texas.
  • > that<00:22:16.159> were NDAs are legal mechanisms that were NDAs are legal mechanisms
  • NDAs in civil discovery in civil cases.
  • The NDA did not involve a restriction.
  • 30,000 cases in California where NDAs 30,000 cases in California where NDAs were<00:35:14.960>
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on State and Local Government - 03/17/26

State and Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • NDAs breed mistrust in government. NDAs breed mistrust in government.
  • It addresses municipal NDAs.
  • It addresses municipal NDAs.
  • party NDA. party NDA.
  • NDA piece of it is the same.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • in counties that do not have health districts, or in health districts that request NDA perform these
  • There have already been budget components previously approved earlier in the session for both NDA and
  • So this is merely accompanying enabling language to transfer the program from HHS to NDA.
  • of food inspections by placing cottage food, farm-to-fork, and other programs under one entity, the NDA
  • , in addition to supporting the state meat inspection program that NDA now has.
Keywords: 909, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session - 04/20/26

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:29:06.120> to non-disclosure agreements or NDAs to non-disclosure agreements or NDAs to
  • We we should be never be signing NDAs.
  • I just nor an opponent of NDAs.
  • <01:40:43.720> Um an NDA. Thank you. Senator McQueen. Um an NDA. Thank you.
  • , conversation about transparency, NDAs, conversation about transparency, NDAs, the<01:46:46.640>
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on State and Local Government - 04/10/25

State and Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, one of the cities I represent, City of Rosemount, negotiated an NDA with Meta under an NDA.
  • with Meta under an negotiated an NDA with Meta under an NDA.<00:09:26.760> And<00:09:26.960><
  • And after it was approved, um, then NDA.
  • Is there NDA at any point in time?
  • statute they're protected by NDA statute they're protected by NDA clauses?
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • ,<00:26:47.800> they Well now because of those NDAs, they Well now because of those NDAs,
  • And we shouldn't be signing NDAs for those things.
  • Yeah, so NDAs are a challenging subject.
  • Okay, Senator, any final thoughts on data centers or NDAs?
  • Well, as I've been data centers or NDAs?
Keywords: 918, senate, all
Summary: The program covered three main topics: Minnesota’s February economic forecast, gun violence prevention efforts, and the growing debate over data centers. Minnesota Management and Budget reported a stronger-than-expected outlook, replacing a projected deficit with a $3.7 billion surplus for FY 2026-27 and a projected positive balance for FY 2028-29, though officials warned the state still faces a structural imbalance and possible federal funding losses tied to Medicaid reimbursements and fraud-related federal actions. Lawmakers also discussed affordability concerns, with Senate Republicans promoting a tax-relief package focused on property taxes, vehicle tab fees, and ending taxes on tips and overtime. A lengthy segment focused on gun violence prevention, including a Capitol rally by Annunciation Catholic Church families, students, and advocates. Senator Ron Latz said an interim working group he co-led with Senator Zeinab Mohamed gathered public and expert input and helped shape ideas for the session. He said there is no single solution, but cited measures such as red flag laws, universal background checks, an assault weapons ban, high-capacity magazine limits, safe-storage requirements, ghost gun and binary trigger bans, and more school counseling and wraparound mental health supports. Latz emphasized that he sees these as compatible with the Second Amendment and said he hopes to build bipartisan support, especially around school counseling and other “common-sense” measures. Latz said the short session and narrow margins mean compromise will be necessary, and that if a package does not pass this year, lawmakers will return to the issue next session while voters should hold legislators accountable in future elections. The final segment introduced the data center discussion, with Senator Bill Liske describing how data centers have grown from small server rooms into large industrial facilities and noting that some communities are considering moratoriums or restrictions because of neighborhood impacts.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Special Education Funding Committee May 6th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • And as I mentioned, NDSA and NDA in high school could be 10th or 11th.
  • And again, this is comprised of NDSA and NDA data.
  • even NDA Plus in its first year.
  • And I think we can do that when we set a new baseline with NDA+.
  • Okay, the NDA+ data. I've mentioned the NDA+ summative a couple times. We do have one year of data.
Summary: The committee first approved the minutes and then received a lengthy DPI presentation from Stanley Schauer on statewide reading and math assessment data for students with and without disabilities. He explained the assessment systems used over time, the absence of 2019-20 data, and how North Dakota’s standards are set by educators. Members asked about alternate assessments, cohort trends, the apparent drop in proficiency in higher grades, and the new NDA+ assessment. Schauer emphasized that the biggest pattern in the data was the relative stability of students with disabilities, the post-pandemic drop and partial recovery, and the need to focus on reducing the novice category. He also said the state plans to revisit high school standard setting and that future data could be broken out by program, disability category, and schools using science-of-math or other initiatives. Public testimony from special education staff suggested that the flat performance of students with disabilities during COVID likely reflected continued services and intensive supports, and committee members discussed whether the current disparity goal is realistic and whether growth measures would be more useful than simple proficiency buckets. After the presentation, the committee took a short break and then moved into discussion of special education funding models. Chair Richter said members should contact Schauer directly with ideas for additional data views and noted that the committee would continue its work on funding and possible model changes. Brandon Bomback of Grand Forks Public Schools began a presentation arguing that the special education funding formula, especially the weighting factor, should be reconsidered if the committee wants a system that better reflects accountability and student needs. He said his comments were based on the perspective of a larger district and focused on the special education weighting factor rather than other parts of the formula. The remainder of his presentation was not included in the excerpt.