Video & Transcript Research : 'Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence'

Page 1 of 485
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 30th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence will come to order.
  • That's current jurisprudence in Texas, I believe.
  • Before 1939, the rules of civil procedure were basically in statute.
  • The legislature adopted the rules of civil procedure as statute.
  • Law that dealt with civil procedure. That was the intent of the bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • That complaint went nowhere, yet I can't pursue a civil demand for civil penalties of $250.
  • I'm sure there's nowhere else in the world you'd rather be than the Committee on Judiciary and Civil
  • Jurisprudence to celebrate your birthday.
  • I understand, but in an effort, when we're in an era... to the judiciary, especially a judiciary that
  • What this bill does is it adjusts our civil fine.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence will come to order. We'll call the roll. Leach?
  • I think that to get a fair and balanced judiciary, we have to fairly compensate our judges.
  • towards our judiciary.
  • It's a central tenet of any good civil society. You can't run it without it. Thank you all.
  • From a civil background, I had a largely civil docket in Collin County, and what I would say is that
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JDC Public Hearing 01-30-2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:09:01.360><c> rights</c> hate crimes or other uh civil rights hate crimes or other uh civil rights
  • </c> DS Kim, testifying for the judiciary. DS Kim, testifying for the judiciary.
  • </c><00:15:23.680><c> This</c> the judiciary for this measure. This the judiciary for this measure.
  • ><c> periodic</c><00:30:02.159><c> meetings</c> judiciary does have um periodic meetings judiciary does
  • </c><00:36:39.200><c> rights</c> positions, two civil rights positions, two civil rights investigators
Bills: SB2055, SB2152
Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard SB 2055, which would create a Civil Rights Commission helpline for reports of harms from federal deployments in Hawaii and require annual reporting and a public hearing. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission supported the concept but said the bill should be broadened to cover civil rights and human rights violations more generally, and recommended using existing 211/Aloha United Way infrastructure. Testimony was largely in support, with a few opponents. Members focused on whether the proposed line was really a 24-hour legal hotline or a reporting/referral mechanism, what jurisdiction the commission would have over federal employees, and the estimated costs. The committee chair indicated the bill would move forward with amendments, including adopting HCRC recommendations and adding appropriations for Aloha United Way, database/website development, and staffing. The committee then heard SB 2152, a proposed constitutional amendment to raise the mandatory retirement age for state judges and justices from 70 to 75. Judge Robert D.S. Kim, the Office of the Public Defender, Earthjustice, Community Alliance on Prisons, the State of Hawaii Organization of Police Officers, United Public Workers, the League of Women Voters, ILWU Local 142, CARES, and others testified in support, arguing that experienced judges improve stability, reduce vacancies, and preserve institutional knowledge. Opponents or skeptical comments were limited, but one member questioned whether the measure was just a temporary fix rather than a broader solution to judicial succession and mentoring. Members also asked about existing retention and fitness safeguards, including Judicial Selection Commission retention hearings and the Commission on Judicial Conduct’s ability to investigate complaints about a judge’s physical or mental ability to serve. The discussion noted that the measure would still leave those processes in place. No final vote on SB 2152 was taken in the portion provided, but the committee appeared to be moving toward decision-making after questions concluded.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025 at 02:04 pm

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • But if the judiciary isn't holding it up, then that's where our problem is. Thank you.
  • We provide free civil legal services to victims of domestic and dating violence, sexual assault, human
  • Or is that just a criminal thing versus a civil?
  • This issue highlights the need for reforms that align civil protection standards with those found in
  • Ten jurors are going to have to decide that since it's a civil case.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 28th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • In his State of the Judiciary, Justice Blacklock spoke about how CPS cases consist of high stakes situations
  • that are in the Family Code now would be essentially stripped out, which, if the court, our federal judiciary
  • Well, how is our federal judiciary going to view that?
  • perspective on matters that involve family violence protective orders from the standpoint of the judiciary
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, welcome to Senate Judiciary. We've got several matters set Judiciary.
  • Can that family sue for civil damages? Please take a step back. civil damages?
  • Dees, welcome to the Senate Judiciary. Uh, good morning, committee Judiciary.
  • It does not prohibit civil enforcement. It does not prohibit civil enforcement.
  • I I Judiciary, Mr. Chairman. Yes, sir. I I Judiciary, Mr. Chairman. Yes, sir.
Bills: HB265, HB146, SB254, HB202, HB3, HB42, SB18
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • These statistics were gathered with Texas funds to inform the judiciary about what is beneficial for
  • But if the judiciary isn't holding it up, then that's where our problem is. Thank you.
  • We provide free civil legal services to victims of domestic and dating violence, sexual assault, human
  • Or is that just... it's just a criminal thing versus a civil?
  • Ten jurors are going to have to decide that since it's a civil case.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 16th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence will come to order.
  • Chair and the members of the Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence.
  • My bill is bringing the civil aspect to it. So I have...
  • Changes okay, so this is civil.
  • It can be, I mean criminal charges are there, but civil remedies are not.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 7th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • rights, existing statute renders the information obtained inadmissible for use against a person in civil
  • obtained from the person without that information is not admissible for use against the person in any civil
  • code for cases involving family violence to supersede any conflicting rules of the Texas Rules of Civil
  • the Title IV-D associates and judges to conduct virtual court hearings and general depositions in civil
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • On Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence will come to order. The clerk will call the roll. Leach? Here.
  • We strongly support the enforcement of laws, civil penalties, and ethical rules concerning barratry to
  • And I think a lot of—of course, we're in the Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee.
  • Civil rights. And there's more.
  • The bill is on an existing section of Texas law, section 75.0. 06 of the Civil Practice and Remedies
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence will come to a close. Order.
  • Members, this is Chairman Cecil Bell's bill we heard on March 12, relating to the civil liability of
  • Members, this is Chairman Guillen's bill that we heard last week relating to civil liability arising
  • This is Speaker Moody's bill that we heard last week, relating to civil liability arising from a firearm
  • Thank you, Vice Chair Johnson and members of the Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence will come to order.
  • I want to talk about what I think is a completely upside-down notion of what the civil jurisprudence
  • As we sit here in the Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee, I know that you're fully aware of
  • As we sit here in the Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee, I know that you're fully aware of
  • Chairman and members of the House Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee, while the AKC certainly
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 4961, which would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision. The author said the bill is intended to create incentives to maintain insurance and to address what he described as an unfair system for insured drivers. Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Eagle Forum testified in support, while the Texas Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, warning the bill could also affect pedestrians, passengers, children, and others who did not choose whether a vehicle was insured. The bill author clarified that passengers would be included in the bill’s coverage. No vote was taken and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5570 would extend a legislative attorney CLE exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate to boards or commissions. The author said the measure is meant to ease time burdens and encourage service, and a witness supported it as a modest incentive for public service. A committee member noted a discrepancy in the number of affected attorneys, and the author agreed to verify the correct figure. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 2969, which would restrict the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech based on sincerely held beliefs. The author and several witnesses from Texas Values, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Cecilia Wood argued the bill protects lawyers of faith from an ABA model rule they described as a speech code. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 4260, which would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction, drew opposition from the County Judges and Commissioners Association, which argued existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would burden rural officials. The author said the bill was prompted by concerns about judges using their office to pressure others. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5134 would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect actual damages and would allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill is aimed at preventing harassment and fishing expeditions, especially in family-law disputes. Questions focused on how the standard would work and how it differs from current law; the author said the main change is fee-shifting and a clearer legislative directive. The bill was left pending. House Bill 3095, a committee substitute version of a similar uninsured-motorist bill, would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages and limit economic recovery, with several exceptions. Trial lawyers argued it was unconstitutional because it capped economic damages and could unfairly affect innocent drivers, pedestrians, and older people who no longer drive. The author acknowledged constitutional concerns and said the bill would need further work; the committee withdrew the substitute and left the bill pending. Finally, House Bill 4388 would require all judges, including county judges who perform administrative duties, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Supporters said some elected judges avoid accountability by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents argued the bill is too rigid and unnecessary because existing remedies already exist. House Bill 3964 would limit public nuisance claims to their historical role and bar such claims against lawful conduct, conduct already covered by other remedies, and products. The author and supporters said the bill is meant to prevent courts from using public nuisance to make policy, while opponents argued it would eliminate useful remedies and could affect local actions against environmental or product-related harms. The author said the bill would not affect statutory nuisance claims, private nuisance claims, or other causes of action, and would be amended to clarify some provisions. The bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence will come to order.
  • I want to talk about what I think is a completely upside-down notion of what the civil jurisprudence
  • As we sit here in the Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee, I know that you're fully aware of
  • As we sit here in the Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee, I know that you're fully aware of
  • Chairman and members of the House Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee, while the AKC certainly
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence will come to order.
  • The committee substitute for House Bill 5624 adds Chapter 75E to the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies
  • House Bill 4202 corrects this inconsistency by changing the Civil Practices and Remedies Code to allow
  • The underlying statute, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section... 1.02 was enacted in 1979.
  • I've had to remove one full-time clerk from working civil. cases just to deal with receiverships.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on the Judiciary Apr 7th, 2026

Joint Committee on the Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Also pleased to serve as the House co-chair of the Judiciary Committee.
  • So we're going to have a nice civil hearing.
  • Yes, in civil rights actions. Okay. Thank you. Any further questions from the committee?
  • Civil immigration arrests in courthouses create a chilling effect on our justice system.
  • Civil immigration arrests in courthouses undermine fundamental constitutional values.
Summary: The Joint Committee on the Judiciary held a late-file hearing on several bills. Early testimony focused on H.4876, a bill to strengthen supports for survivors of abuse, including limits on abusers’ legal standing after death, survivor notification when an abuser dies, expanded coercive control definitions, stronger privacy protections, and survivor education and resource programs. A representative testified on behalf of a constituent who could not appear publicly, describing how a lifetime restraining order and a family death exposed gaps in current law and arguing that an abuser should not be treated as next of kin for legal purposes. The committee also heard H.5111, which would strengthen the Massachusetts Antitrust Act. Representative sponsors and the Attorney General’s antitrust chief said the bill would let the state enforce antitrust law even when federal authorities are involved, expand jurisdiction over multistate conduct affecting Massachusetts, increase penalties, clarify that invitations to conspire are violations, codify labor-market protections, remove limits affecting some housing transactions, and extend the statute of limitations. Senators and the AG’s office said the bill is needed because federal enforcement is weakening. The committee also took testimony on S.2976, a related constitutional-rights bill creating a state cause of action for violations by federal officers; supporters said it would fill a gap in remedies and preserve qualified immunity defenses. Other bills drew support from advocacy groups and individuals. H.4783, which would reaffirm the rights of people experiencing homelessness, was backed by the Massachusetts Coalition for the Homeless as a response to encampment bans and criminalization of basic survival activities. H.4826, dealing with condominium owners’ rights, drew testimony that Chapter 183A is outdated and leaves owners with too little access to information and too few nonjudicial remedies, with examples of unresolved water and repair problems in condo communities. H.5244, to repeal archaic laws criminalizing pregnancy, was supported by reproductive justice advocates who said the remaining statute is being used to punish pregnancy loss and should be repealed. A large portion of the hearing was devoted to H.5116, naming the Dorchester Division of the Boston Municipal Court the Judge Leslie E. Harris Courthouse. Rep. Chris Worrell, Senators Collins and Miranda, District Attorney Kevin Hayden, community leaders, legal professionals, and members of Judge Harris’s family described him as a compassionate, community-rooted jurist and mentor who advanced second chances, diversity, and youth support. No votes were taken during the hearing; the chairs repeatedly invited written testimony and noted the committee’s reporting deadline for House bills.