Video & Transcript Research : 'Class V injection well'

Page 1 of 500
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Tourism Committee Feb 18th, 2026

Tourism

Transcript Highlights:
  • would allow them to vote in November for a constitutional amendment to either be for, uh, allowing Class
  • 6 gas wells or carbon dioxide injection wells, or no, you know, they don't want them.
  • Thank you, members. amendment to either be for uh allowing amendment to either be for uh allowing class
  • 6 gas whale or carbon dioxide class 6 gas whale or carbon dioxide injection<00:09:24.480> whales<
  • whales or no, you know, they injection whales or no, you know, they don't<00:09:27.279> want<
Bills: SB266, SB287, SB266, SB287
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • wells.
  • wells.
  • These would be wastewater injection wells that have been going on for decades.
  • One of them is, I believe, 10 miles from an injection well.
  • Well, I'm not an expert in injection wells, but my understanding is that it would be all classes of injection
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress. Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending. The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • wells.
  • The removal of the exclusion criteria for the injection wells.
  • These would be wastewater injection wells that have been going on for decades.
  • One of them is, I believe it's 10 miles from an injection well.
  • Well, I'm not an expert in IUC wells, but my understanding is that it would include all classes of injection
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • 5 injection well in Bastrop and Lee County.
  • To close potential loopholes, the committee substitute would also prohibit class 5 injection wells under
  • local wells, and drinking supplies.
  • I'm a resident of Bastrop County, a well owner with a well in the Simsboro Formation of the Carrizo-Wilcox
  • Well, I don't know that it's defined that way here.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Energy 2ND REVISED Feb 26th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that's the intent is To try to make it more well known of whatever process is being discussed or program
  • Well, with that need, we've got to push these electrons to.
  • Well, what I'm trying to do here is something that is good for the people.
  • Well, so At an 80-foot setback, if there are houses on four sides, how many feet of a quarter section
  • Well, how about this: Did they own the property before the houses were built in 1983?
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources May 14th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Again, we've actually already begun drilling our well.
  • or domestic wells.
  • fees, the initialization of well fees.
  • I have an agricultural well. I have an exempt residential well.
  • We have folks whose wells are going out, uh, regularly.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources May 14th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • as well.
  • industrial wells.
  • wells.
  • I have an agricultural well and an exempt residential well.
  • I mean, this affects Jacob's Well, right? What used to be Jacob's Well. Well, yes, which, Mr.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources May 7th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • would be enough to meet the 10% threshold of that specific class.
  • classes that really aren’t similarly situated to us.
  • Thank you again for hearing us out. classes like the large volume category.
  • by first-class mail within 30 days.
  • by first-class mail within 30 days.
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard testimony on a series of water, utility, and groundwater-related bills. Early items included HB 5693, which would let Drainage District 7 hold board elections in November of odd-numbered years when a countywide election is occurring, and HB 5671, which would update the Johnson County Special Utility District by clarifying board eligibility, allowing bond issuance, and removing redundant TCEQ approval language to reduce costs and delays. Both bills were left pending after brief testimony from bill sponsors and local witnesses. The committee also heard SB 1504, which would update the Gulf Coast Authority to allow video-conference participation in meetings, and SB 1302, aimed at closing a TCEQ permitting loophole that allowed dischargers with prior denials or suspensions to reapply through an automated process without meaningful review. SB 2692 drew substantial discussion: it would change the signature threshold for outside-city-limits customers appealing municipal utility rates to the PUC by customer class. Valero supported the bill as a way to avoid requiring large-volume users to gather signatures from unrelated residential customers, while the City of Corpus Christi opposed it, arguing that lowering the threshold to one customer could trigger expensive appeals costing $500,000 to $1 million. A PUC witness said such cases are increasing and that the agency would need additional staff under the fiscal note. SB 790, creating a simplified PUC complaint process for small water and wastewater billing disputes, and SB 1663, expanding TCEQ notice requirements for nearby residents when groundwater contamination is discovered, were also heard and left pending. Additional bills included HB 3115, clarifying that the Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District cannot require meters on exempt domestic or livestock wells; SB 1055, raising the Southeast Texas Groundwater Conservation District’s production fee cap from 1 cent to 7 cents per 1,000 gallons; and SB 1625, requiring private water and wastewater utilities to report cybersecurity incidents to TCEQ and DIR. The committee then took up pending business and adopted a substitute for SB 7, which made several changes to water fund use, eminent domain coordination, and EDAP-related provisions, and voted 10-0 to report it favorably. The committee also adopted a substitute for HB 2347, a county water conservation program bill, and reported it favorably 9-1. HB 5675 and SB 2476 were each reported favorably 10-0. The meeting concluded with adjournment.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, we'll do the whole panel. Catherine, thank you, Chairman.
  • as well as some of the corporate restructuring initiatives.
  • HPA Capital Management is a well-respected investment firm based in Dallas.
  • Well, that gets confusing. A bump...
  • So for the class...
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The township well testing program has documented that a significant number of wells in this region have
  • the groundwater the township well the groundwater the township well testing<00:25:54.919> program
  • <00:26:52.679> Minnesota's program as well Minnesota's program as well Minnesota's understanding
  • well well owners<00:27:17.880> we<00:27:18.000> should<00:27:18.200> all<00:27:
  • <00:37:10.240> not Minnesota include substandard Wells not Minnesota include substandard Wells
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources (Part I) May 14th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • But in trying to get the abandoned wells and inactive wells, you know, so I see the same parallel in
  • and active wells.
  • Well, there's no reapplication of electrical support structure to turn the well back on, but at the 10
  • A lot of these wells, that field was discovered in the 20s and they continued to drill wells in the 50s
  • well, and if they want to choose gas.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Natural Resources heard several House bills dealing with environmental regulation, oil and gas safety, landfill permits, and utility cost recovery. HB 1237, by Rep. Geren and sponsored by Sen. Zaffirini, would extend TCEQ occupational license renewal deadlines from 30 days to 90 days, allow renewal up to one year with higher fees, and require a new application after longer expiration; the committee substitute clarified that applicants may continue working only until renewal is approved or denied and set a 180-day cutoff for renewal. HB 3071, sponsored by Sen. Hancock, would require TCEQ to cancel certain long-dormant municipal solid waste permits; members discussed concerns about precedent, ownership changes, and whether the bill should be narrowed, and the bill was left pending with a committee substitute expected. The committee also heard HB 2663, sponsored by Sen. Birdwell, which would require operators of inactive oil and gas wells to remove or de-energize electrical equipment after 10 years and authorize Railroad Commission penalties for false compliance. Testimony from landowners, cattle raisers, and the Sierra Club supported the bill as a wildfire-prevention measure, and the bill was left pending. HB 4384, also by Rep. Darby and sponsored by Sen. Birdwell, would let natural gas utilities defer certain infrastructure costs for later recovery through the GRIP process; utility representatives supported it as credit-positive and consistent with existing accounting, while consumer advocates opposed it as increasing rates without enough oversight. The committee discussed possible amendments to add more cost controls, and the bill was left pending. Later, the committee voted HB 2563, the companion to SB 2510, favorably to the full Senate by a 5-0 vote and ordered it certified for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then took up HB 143, which would codify interagency procedures for addressing electrical power line safety at well sites and related facilities after wildfire concerns; members said a committee substitute had been negotiated with agencies and stakeholders to clarify responsibilities, timelines, and inspection authority while reducing fiscal impact. No final vote was taken on HB 143, and the committee recessed with several bills still pending.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • going to use that well.
  • In trying to get the abandoned wells and inactive wells, I see the same parallel in what you're trying
  • Well, de-electrified...
  • to drill wells from that time.
  • So, well, in that sense, yes, it allows.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • You can move that microphone because I can hear very well.
  • This goes along well with bills from last week with Senator Parker and the Texas Stock Exchange, as well
  • HBK is a well-respected investment firm.
  • So for the Class A water utilities, which are the largest, So for the Class A water utilities, which
  • Like, well, let's do this and let's do that.
Summary: The Senate Business and Commerce Committee met with a quorum and first took up pending business, voting out several bills. Senate Bills 1697, 1569, 1202 as substituted, 1029, 1364, 1185, 924, 1008 as substituted, 264, 1376, and 1358 as substituted were reported favorably, with some sent to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted a substitute for SB 1202 and later corrected votes on several measures. SB 924 and SB 1376 drew some opposition, while the rest of the pending bills were reported without dissent or with limited nays. The committee then heard testimony on SB 1856, which would create an annual capacity-cost recovery rider for Entergy Texas customers in the MISO region. The author and Entergy argued the bill would better match rates to actual capacity costs and improve transparency, while the Texas Association of Manufacturers and the Public Utility Commission raised concerns about the short 10-day review period, rider proliferation, and the preference for full rate cases over piecemeal adjustments. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard and left pending SB 522 on CPA reciprocity, SB 1664 requiring TDUs to provide clearer, standalone rate-change disclosures, SB 1877 expanding OPUC’s access to market data, SB 1254 and SB 1255 as TDLR cleanup bills on professional employer organizations and mold assessors, SB 1341 updating manufactured housing rules, SB 1239 on sovereign debt and Texas governing law, and SB 1259 streamlining the surveyor-in-training licensing process. Additional bills discussed included SB 1977, which would cap recoverable legal expenses in electric, water, and sewer rate cases; OPUC and some consumer advocates supported the idea as a way to reduce ratepayer costs, while utility representatives warned it could discourage participation and increase rate shock. The committee also heard SB 1762 clarifying that geothermal energy conservation wells are not battery resources, and SB 783 allowing SECO to proceed with future energy-code rulemaking for state-funded buildings. Both drew supportive testimony from industry and environmental groups. All remaining bills heard during the meeting were left pending, and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.
AL
Transcript Highlights:
  • This legislation, this bill, only applies to a Class Two...
  • Well, if you move to this, it's an either-or situation.
  • Yes, V. Good afternoon, thank you for the time.
  • They also have to pay for the improvements as well.
  • Well, and to be clear, we don't either; we have a brand to protect.
Bills: HB145, HB311
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce May 5th, 2026

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, good.
  • Well, let me say this.
  • Well, no one's offered up the amendment. Okay, well, then I'm—let's not... is it offered?
  • Well, y'all famine and me.
  • , well, the successor is FDIC.