Video & Transcript Research : 'Birmingham legislative office'

Page 1 of 500
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Feb 11th, 2026

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> city of Birmingham to speak. city of Birmingham to speak.
  • Most of the visitors to the city of Birmingham that shop or stay or whatever in the city of Birmingham
  • Most of the visitors to the city of Birmingham that shop or stay or whatever in the city of Birmingham
  • Most of the visitors to the city of Birmingham that shop or stay or whatever in the city of Birmingham
  • And if I'm piece of legislation.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations Committee, February 9, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Legislator session, 1.15 million. Legislator interim, 2.24 million. Session staff, 575,000.
  • </c> Legislator session 1.15 million. Legislator session 1.15 million.
  • ><c> million</c> Legislator interim 2.24 24 million Legislator interim 2.24 24 million session<00:01:
  • </c><00:02:06.719><c> out</c><00:02:06.880><c> of</c> legislators in session and out of legislators in
  • . $34,000 to pay, um, for new legislators to attend the new legislator training after they're elected
Bills: HB0105, HB0107, SF0002
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Appropriations Committee, February 9, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:03:20.879><c> The</c><00:03:21.120><c> remaining</c> legislative action.
  • The remaining legislative action.
  • The second part of page two begins the change from the old legislatively determined appropriation into
  • Uh, the second large change is moving the source of funding from a legislatively determined biennial
  • </c> source of funding from a legislatively source of funding from a legislatively determined<00:46:37.040
Bills: HB0105, HB0107, SF0002
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate State Governmental Affairs Committee Apr 9th, 2025

State Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is about the Office of Information Technology.
  • This piece of legislation deals with the emergency management agency of Alabama.
  • This allows us to tear this building down and dispose of the things that are in it by the legislative
  • So, it's not just legislation. So, it's not just them at the state house. Hey, Grinch Jr.'
  • The attorney general's office that handles... attorney general's office that handles innumerable confidential
Bills: HB207, SB269, SB279, SB291, SB266
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

LMG Public Hearing - Wed Feb 18, 2026 @ 2:00PM HST

Legislative Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Our suggestion would be to have the child advocate office be part of the Office of the Ombudsman, but
  • Our suggestion would be to have the child advocate office be part of the Office of the Ombudsman, but
  • ,</c><00:18:42.640><c> but</c> official is no longer in office, but official is no longer in office,
  • We have the State Procurement Office with comments. The Legislative Reference Bureau with comments.
  • </c><00:27:39.679><c> We're</c> Legislative Reference Bureau. We're Legislative Reference Bureau.
Summary: The House Committee on Legislative Management heard testimony on several measures. HB 1805, relating to child welfare, drew support from the University of Hawaii and concerns from the Attorney General about the bill’s definition of state agency and possible separation-of-powers and supremacy clause issues. During decision-making, the committee opted to move the child advocate function to the Attorney General’s office, accepted the Attorney General’s suggested scope and jurisdiction amendments, set the salary at 90% of the Department of Health deputy director’s salary, and passed the bill with amendments. HB 2110, relating to nepotism, received support from the Hawaii State Ethics Commission, which said the bill would apply the rule consistently and noted the existing good-cause exception process. The committee later deferred the bill, saying existing House rules on nepotism were already strict and that the proposal would be duplicative in statute. HB 2180, relating to voting boards, had no oral testimony in the room during the hearing, but the committee later amended it into a blank appropriations vehicle for the House of Representatives and passed it with amendments. HB 2184, relating to lawmaker safety, drew concerns from the Campaign Spending Commission that the bill would require redaction of address information and could create implementation issues, and the Attorney General noted missing language regarding appointed officials and an internal cross-reference issue. The committee adopted amendments to address those concerns and passed the bill with amendments. HB 2219, relating to disclosure of privileged communications to the Ombudsman, was clarified by the Ombudsman’s office as not requiring disclosure of privileged material, only preserving privilege if such material is voluntarily provided; the bill passed with amendments. HB 2469, relating to a regular session review working group, received testimony from the State Procurement Office, the Legislative Reference Bureau, and others in support and opposition, and the committee passed it with amendments after changing references and funding language.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Mar 19th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • , juvenile probation officers, and certain hired law enforcement officers into criminal liability for
  • We had 36 officers of DPS the first year.
  • DPS officers there today.
  • I mean, not every officer is.
  • I need to repeat that, the Comptroller's Office has been doing this since the year 2000. for this legislation
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm director of the Legislative Budget Office.
  • go</c> for the legislative budget office to go for the legislative budget office to go back<00:53:19.040
  • > access</c> the Legislative Budget Office has access the Legislative Budget Office has access to<00:
  • budget office to for the legislative budget office to perform<00:57:41.880><c> that</c><00:57:42.080
  • 13:50.520><c> Budget</c><01:13:50.760><c> Office</c> think for the Legislative Budget Office think for
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions Mar 3rd, 2026

Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions

Transcript Highlights:
  • of legislative privilege.
  • So in terms of my office, not anyone else's office, my office, what emails... ...what emails would be
  • I don't have a request for individual emails from legislators' offices in my audit or today.
  • Just as the legislative audit would empower the office of the state auditor to require involuntary cooperation
  • .which is why the auditor is mistaken when she characterizes the power granted to her office in the legislative
Bills: H5004
Summary: The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions held a public hearing on Initiative Petition 25-14, H 5-004, “an act to improve access to public records.” Chairs Cindy Friedman and Alice Peisch outlined the Article 48 process and explained that the committee was hearing expert testimony, then proponents, then opponents, before any public testimony. The first expert, Will Clark of the National Conference of State Legislatures, gave a general overview of public records laws across the states, emphasizing that all states have some form of open-records law but that exemptions, timelines, fees, and coverage of legislatures vary widely. He discussed legislative exemptions, legislative privilege, and court cases showing that outcomes often turn on the exact language of state constitutions, statutes, and chamber rules. Rebecca Murray, General Counsel for the Secretary of the Commonwealth, testified about Massachusetts public records administration, saying requests and appeals have risen sharply since the 2017 law update, with state agency requests increasing from 22,572 in 2017 to 47,776 in 2025 and appeals reaching a record 4,051 cases in 2025. She said the initiative would extend the law to the General Court and the Governor’s office and add exemptions for those branches, while warning that the volume and complexity of requests could require more resources. The proponents, led by Jesse Littlewood of the Coalition for Healthy Democracy, Scotia Hila of Act on Mass, and Auditor Diana DiZoglio, argued that Massachusetts is an outlier for exempting the legislature and governor from public records law and that the proposal would create needed accountability without exposing personal constituent communications or internal deliberations. They said the measure would make records such as committee votes, final bill drafts, amendments, expenditures, attendance records, minutes, and public testimony available, while preserving exemptions for constituent services, draft legislation, internal staff communications, and policy development discussions. DiZoglio emphasized that the initiative is aimed at basic administrative and financial records, citing her own difficulty obtaining receipts, contracts, and procurement documents, and said the public should be able to see how taxpayer dollars are spent. Committee members questioned the witnesses extensively about the scope of exemptions, constituent privacy, legislative privilege, and whether the measure could reach communications with nonprofits or lobbying-type interactions; proponents responded that privacy and constituent-service exemptions were intended to remain in place, though some members pressed for clearer statutory language. The hearing also included a contentious exchange over whether the initiative could affect legislative communications and whether the Senate had already taken a position against the measure. Some members raised concerns about separation of powers, legislative privilege, and the possibility of exposing constituent communications or internal deliberations, while proponents argued that the initiative was narrowly tailored and that any legal disputes could be resolved in court. No votes or formal actions were taken at the hearing. The committee concluded the testimony portion after hearing from the proponents and their questions, with the matter left pending for further consideration.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions Mar 3rd, 2026

Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions

Transcript Highlights:
  • of legislative privilege.
  • So in terms of my office, not anyone else's office, my office, what emails... ...anyone else's office
  • I don't have a request for individual emails from legislators' offices in my audit or today.
  • Just as the legislative audit would empower the office of the state auditor to require involuntary cooperation
  • Which is why the auditor is mistaken when she characterizes the power granted to her office in the legislative
Bills: H5004
Summary: The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions held a public hearing on initiative petition 25-14, H5-004, “an act to improve access to public records,” which would extend Massachusetts public records requirements to the General Court and the Governor’s office. The committee first heard from two subject-matter experts: William Clark of the National Conference of State Legislatures, who gave an overview of how public records laws and legislative exemptions vary by state and discussed legislative privilege and court cases, and Rebecca Murray of the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s office, who described Massachusetts public records trends, including sharp increases in requests, appeals, and fee/time-extension petitions since the 2016 law update. Murray said the proposal would add the legislature and governor to the law and create two new exemptions specific to those offices, while also noting resource pressures on the public records system. The proponents, led by Jesse Littlewood of the Coalition for Healthy Democracy, argued the measure would close a major accountability gap by applying the same public records rules that already cover cities and towns to the state legislature and governor. They said the proposal is limited and includes carve-outs for personal information, constituent services, internal staff communications, draft legislation, policy development discussions, and communications among legislators, while making final decisions, expenditures, committee votes, and other administrative records public. Auditor Diana DiZoglio, speaking for the campaign, said the public should be able to see basic records such as receipts, contracts, invoices, and budget documents, and argued that transparency would improve trust and help her own efforts to audit legislative spending. Committee members questioned the witnesses extensively about the scope of the exemptions, especially whether constituent communications, lobbying-style communications, and sensitive casework would remain protected. Proponents said constituent service communications and deliberative legislative discussions would be exempt, but some members pressed for clearer statutory language and raised concerns about legislative privilege, separation of powers, and whether the initiative could be used to alter internal legislative rules. No vote was taken at the hearing; it was an informational and testimonial session only.
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama Senate State Governmental Affairs Committee Jan 28th, 2026

State Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, this is the bill we bring forth from the Legislative Council each year, basically adopting all the
  • passed in the last session, incorporating those into those black books that some of us have in our offices
  • Uh, this is a bill that we are asking the legislature to expand the mission of the Office of Minority
  • c><00:10:11.120><c> mission</c><00:10:12.240><c> of</c><00:10:12.560><c> the</c><00:10:12.880><c> office
Bills: SB200, SB206, SB200, SB206
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 2/18/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • It creates the Office of Inspector General within, uh, under the Legislative Audit Commission, and let
  • I think this is very similar to the Office of the Legislative Auditor and the policies and procedures
  • He said they were essentially doing the same and similar with the legislative audit office.
  • He said they were essentially doing the same and similar with the legislative audit office.
  • office so with the legislative audit office so that's<01:08:39.000><c> that</c><01:08:39.080><c> was
Bills: HF1, HF2
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm the deputy director and chief information officer of the Legislative Research Commission.
  • ><c> um</c> legislative last legislative session um legislative last legislative session um and<00:05
  • </c> office is much longer. office is much longer.
  • I'm the Executive Director of Public Policy for the office, so I lead our legislative efforts.
  • </c> office, we have two primary functions. office, we have two primary functions.
Summary: The committee first approved the July 9 minutes without objection and heard from Jay Hartz and Jonathan Harris of the Legislative Research Commission. Members asked about Capitol and legislator security in light of recent targeted shootings in other states. Hartz said LRC had removed members’ home addresses from its website, was reviewing other state-government records for similar information, and was working with the Speaker, Senate President, Kentucky State Police, and outside security experts on broader safety measures. He also said LRC is exploring commercial products to help block personal contact information from public view, but declined to name vendors publicly. Harris added that driver’s license scans at the Capitol are handled by Kentucky State Police, while LRC has a process for flagging high-volume or concerning contacts for police review. The LRC also reported that redistricting work has already begun, with census coordination underway, evaluation of redistricting software including Mapitude and open-source tools, and plans to make the same tools available to the public in the LRC library. The committee then heard from Kentucky Wired Operations Company CEO Robert Morphonius, COO Tom Snyder, and counsel Patrick Hughes about the Kentucky Wired network. They explained the corporate structure: Kentucky Wired Operations Company is a private for-profit special purpose entity that designs, builds, operates, and maintains the network; Kentucky Wired Infrastructure Company is a nonprofit instrumentality used for financing; and Open Fiber Kentucky handles commercialization of excess capacity under a wholesale agreement. They said Kentucky Wired Operations is in the operations and maintenance phase, with those obligations continuing until 2045, and that technical changes to the network generally require KCNA approval through formal change-order processes. They also said the company conducted a market test in June 2023 under Schedule 19 of its contract, considered proposals including Open Fiber and the incumbent service provider, and retained the existing provider. Members asked about KCNA’s role, procurement, network customers, and revenue. The witnesses said Quac operates outside normal state procurement because its process is governed by contract, while KCNA acts as the Commonwealth’s oversight authority and filter for changes. They identified current network users as including AOC, KCTCS, postsecondary education, and other Commonwealth agencies, with all requests routed through KCNA; they also said a separate change process for Exceliccom is in litigation. On funding, they said the operation is paid through monthly appropriations, with roughly a million dollars a month for the service provider and a couple hundred thousand for Quac’s oversight, not including debt service, which is bundled into the availability payment. The discussion ended as members began asking about responsibility for damage-related costs such as squirrel-related outages.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Administrative Rules May 4th, 2026

Administrative Rules

Summary: The committee considered three resolutions, all presented by Chairman Kendrick with full PCS substitutes. H.J.R. 1096 approved a medical marijuana rule that had originally been treated as a major rule but was later determined not to be one; members asked no questions and the resolution was adopted unanimously. H.J.R. 1099 was described as a direct result of H.B. 1576 from the prior session concerning Oklahoma Health Care Authority rules; it also drew no questions and passed unanimously. H.J.R. 1100 addressed a rule from the Oklahoma Management and Enterprise Services that was discovered late to be a major rule; after brief discussion and no substantive questions, it too passed unanimously. During the meeting, members voted on each resolution after motions for adoption and do pass. The recorded votes were unanimous in favor on all three measures, with no nay votes. After H.J.R. 1100 passed, Chairman Kendrick noted there would be one more committee meeting the next morning at 9 a.m. to address a late-arriving resolution, and he offered to discuss the late major-rule issue with Representative Chapman after adjournment.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

State Committee Meeting - 2025-04-10

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • For those who may not know, the state government finance budget bill funds the offices of And the state
  • constitutional officers, the legislature, over 30 state agencies, boards, commissions, and councils,
  • The budget funds the offices of the Department of Labor, the Department of Commerce, Minnesota IT, which
  • And legislative oversight provisions, one being from Chair Nash for the Office of the Legislative Auditor
  • and one being from Representative Norris for the Attorney General's Office to enhance Medicaid fraud
Bills: HF2783
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

State Committee Meeting - 2025-04-08

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The amendment 2783 as amended On line 2.21, there is the Office of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor
  • Next, you will see in section 4, the AG's office to expand the issuance of subpoenas.
  • Section 5 is the monitoring office of the legislative auditor.
  • Share some brief thoughts on the appropriation for the Attorney General's Office in this budget.
  • I'm the Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer of the Minnesota State Board of Investment.
Bills: HF2783