Video & Transcript Research : 'supervision fees'

Page 9 of 489
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education Apr 8th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • The fee has not changed since 1980, number one.
  • where the fee is.
  • But fee-wise, it would be in line with university fees. Thank you. Yes, sir. Okay.
  • Do they see in their tuition and fees as compared to a resident of Texas?
  • They would see the same increase because it would be a mandatory fee.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The district had a fee schedule that's locked into statute.
  • They requested a change in that statute so they can raise their fees.
  • They threaten you with the fees that they're going to impose on the community whether they win or lose
  • We could be saddled with thousands of dollars in legal fees. bills that we can't afford.
  • Marta Fee, separate legislation, separate law.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Mar 5th, 2025

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a focus for us on this, and so it would add a $5 tag fee.
  • I know people call ours different prices, but $5 is a nominal fee.
  • But I don't want us to levy a fee and have everyone… want us to levy a fee and have everyone opt out
  • We're not talking about different fees, are we?
  • Are we talking about everybody having the same fee or different fees for different counties?
Bills: HB52, HB89, HB141, HB52, HB89, HB141
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • With me is Ron Elwood, supervising attorney of Legal Aid of Minnesota.
  • It's at those campsites where there's just a flat fee. That's it. That's where you see that happen.
  • It's at those campsites where there's just a flat fee. That's it. That's where you see that happen.
  • It's at those campsites where there's just a flat fee. That's it. That's where you see that happen.
  • just a flat fee. That's it. just a flat fee. That's it.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 22nd, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • actions against unlawful zoning ordinances, and it allows prevailing parties to recover attorney's fees
  • It adds hundreds of thousands of dollars. in legal fees.
Bills: SB2215, SB2639
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Rules Feb 17th, 2026

Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • There is no royalty cost that the airport is paying, and there's no franchise fee that the airport is
  • associated with the connection, including fees for infrastructure required to service the property,
  • I do have one question, because these convenience fees are charged by many other people.
  • storage fee, only dealing with storage.
  • aircraft entering into a specific radius of the airspace of the airport assessing this fee.
Summary: The Committee on Rules met with a quorum and considered a long agenda of bills, many of them retained from the prior week. The most debated measure was CS for SB 706, which would preempt naming of major commercial service airports to the state and designate Palm Beach International Airport as the Donald J. Trump International Airport, subject to FAA approval and a trademark agreement. Amendments were offered and rejected, including proposals to prevent private financial benefit from the naming. Several senators spoke in opposition, citing concerns about naming an airport after a sitting president, lack of local input, and the trademark/licensing arrangement; supporters argued there was no cost to the airport and that the bill simply set a state naming policy. The committee reported the bill favorably after a roll call vote. The committee also reported favorably CS for SB 546 on conservation land notice requirements, CS for CS for SB 1014 on municipal utility service to properties outside city limits, CS for SB 1500 on uncontested probate proceedings, SB 962 on excluding farms from certain zoning definitions, and CS for SB 820 on problem-solving court reporting requirements. The committee then approved several bills from Senator DiCeglie and Senator Arrington. SB 840, addressing land-use regulations for local governments affected by natural disasters, was supported by local-government and environmental advocates who said it would restore local control after SB 180’s hurricane-related restrictions; the sponsor said it was intended to correct unintended consequences of last year’s law. CS for SB 856, requiring online listing platforms to show estimated ad valorem taxes on residential listings, was amended to exclude social media platforms and broaden liability protections; the sponsor and a county property appraiser described it as a consumer-transparency measure. CS for SB 110, clarifying homestead exemption treatment for long-term leases that end at death, was also reported favorably. The committee took up a controversial strike-all amendment to SB 212, which focused on public swimming pools and added residency and related restrictions for certain sex offenders and offenders on community control or probation. The amendment drew strong opposition from advocates and affected families, who argued it would worsen homelessness, impose broad geographic restrictions, and lack evidence of improving child safety; supporters said it was a targeted public-safety measure. Despite the objections, the committee reported the bill favorably. The committee also approved SB 684 on electronic signatures for total-loss vehicle and vessel titles, SB 394 on reinsurance intermediary managers, SB 434 on property tax assessment treatment for wind-hardening improvements, CS for CS for SBs 658 and 608 on water-safety requirements for rental properties with pools or nearby water, SB 748 on adding voting-rights restoration information to sentencing score sheets, and CS for SB 824 requiring school districts to inventory unimproved real property. The meeting ended while the committee was beginning SB 848 on stormwater treatment, with an amendment being introduced as the transcript cut off.
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Mar 31st, 2026

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • . >> Same assessment fee. Any questions from the committee?
  • willing to do this willing to do this >> same<00:08:43.120> assessment<00:08:43.519> fee
  • 43.839> Any<00:08:44.080> questions<00:08:44.399> from >> same assessment fee
  • Any questions from >> same assessment fee. Any questions from the<00:08:44.800> committee?
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/27/25

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • reemphasizes that that 17-year-old is not their own boss; they have to report to someone who's going to supervise
  • have to report to someone who's<00:30:58.159> going<00:30:58.320> to<00:30:58.519> supervise
  • c><00:30:59.120> them<00:30:59.360> while<00:30:59.559> they who's going to supervise
  • them while they who's going to supervise them while they are<00:30:59.799> on<00:31:00.000>
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections Apr 30th, 2025

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • required approval for certain hospital visits as a condition for release on parole or to mandatory supervision
  • It's eligibility after five years for both... ...It's either community supervision or conviction; same
  • It also seeks to reduce the fees associated with obtaining this document.
  • For community supervision, this can leave more victims vulnerable to continued threats and intimidation
  • prioritize victim safety by making defendants convicted of... ...stalking ineligible for community supervision
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you reduce that impact fee, the impact fee should be at cost and therefore you would hurt the city's
  • those fees back.
  • We get very little from fees, from court fees.
  • that probably, first of all, the impact fees... ...fees probably are not a hundred thousand dollars
  • And so those impact fees, if the developer then negotiates to get those impact fees paid, there's still
Bills: HB26, HB73, SB 14, HB46
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first restriction the bill addresses is the 5% limit on finance lender fees.
  • , closing costs, including lender fees, closing costs, including lender fees, can<01:19:06.360>
  • This private program will be continuously supervised by the Minnesota Department of Commerce.
  • The private program will be continuously supervised by the Minnesota Department of Commerce.
  • The private program will be continuously supervised by the Minnesota Department of Commerce.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Health and Public Affairs Feb 9th, 2026 at 02:06 pm

Senate Health & Public Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do think we need a separate, whole entire bill looking at impact fees, which have to do with the cost
  • point about working with the developments to get rid of the costs, if we could redo how we do impact fees
  • They don't have to focus on the subscription fee; instead, they can focus on really the life-saving operations
  • The other piece of this is that this saves the county millions of dollars in fees, where they can focus
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 2328 would establish a standardized $25 fee per entity for cases where electronic service
  • By streamlining the expunction notification process, standardizing service fees, and extending record
  • Currently, an expunction is filed by the petitioner and it's a $350 filing fee, and if they retain an
  • It's a $350 filing fee, and if they retain an attorney, they have to pay that attorney's fees, and then
  • The first is that the fee, there is a fee under this bill that is mandatory.
Bills: HB115
Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence reconvened with a quorum present and announced it would likely not vote that night because of confusion over the bill list; members were told a definitive list would be circulated the next morning and a formal meeting would be scheduled later. The chair then heard a series of bills, generally taking testimony and leaving each pending without action. House Bill 1847 would set maximum caseload standards for private attorneys handling indigent criminal appointments through the Texas Indigent Defense Commission; House Bill 2417 would expand compensation eligibility for some wrongfully imprisoned people; House Bill 2813 would require earlier and more specific victim notice of scheduled court proceedings; and House Bill 2309 would expand state and local authority in certain civil asset forfeiture cases involving human trafficking, health care fraud, and organized crime. Each bill was laid out by its author or a member, with no opposition witnesses registered, and each was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 4733, which would require sealing records for people acquitted of charges when they were not convicted on the related allegation; House Bill 2328, which would modernize expunction service by encouraging electronic notice, setting a standardized fee when electronic service is unavailable, extending clerk retention of expunction orders, and preserving certain mental health commitment orders; and House Bill 115, which would revise Texas’s “junk science” post-conviction writ law by providing counsel, changing the relief standard, requiring written decisions, and easing procedural barriers. Testimony on HB 2328 was mixed: county clerks supported the bill as a cost-saving modernization, while legal advocates warned that permanent retention of expunction orders could undermine true expunction and create privacy risks. HB 115 drew support from innocence and defense organizations, with some concern about a provision affecting subsequent writs. All were left pending after testimony. Later, the committee heard House Bill 2046, which would allow affirmative family-violence findings for any Penal Code offense rather than only Title V offenses; testimony from a Dallas County prosecutor and a committee member emphasized that family violence can involve arson, burglary, fraud, and other non-Title V conduct, and the bill was left pending. House Bill 1765 would tighten restrictions on no-knock warrants by requiring higher-level approval, judicial review, and identifiable officers; members discussed the dangers highlighted by the Harding Street raid and similar incidents, and the bill was also left pending. The meeting ended with the chair noting that some bills had been removed from the agenda at the author’s request and that members should be prepared to finalize the vote list the next day.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 15th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • And what this does is attorneys representing indigent clients are often paid flat fees, for example $150
  • free card because the state of Texas does not want that child to engage in sex with an adult for a fee
Bills: HB200