Video & Transcript Research : 'regulatory process'

Page 9 of 500
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee Mar 5th, 2025

Ways and Means Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • As that bill moved through the process last year in the Senate, they were married, and we combined the
  • I haven't been through the adoption process; I know you have, so you probably feel a little stronger
  • The Alabama Securities Commission is our state regulatory group that our state regulatory group that
  • A lot goes on between there, the processing of the credit cards.
Bills: HB61, HB327, HB253, HB297
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It was part of the veto process and did not survive the veto process.
  • This allows for a competitive open market and process in the execution of government contracts.
  • The difference is when you make it an automatic process. I mean, it has to happen every time.
  • or claims adjudication process for home, auto, life?
  • I would think workers' compensation is a different market; it's a very different process.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Licensing & Administrative Procedures Apr 29th, 2025

Licensing & Administrative Procedures

Transcript Highlights:
  • As a result, regulatory agencies are unable to pursue disciplinary actions against such who perform.
  • Services as such payroll benefit administration workers compensation and regulatory compliance under
  • TDLR's programs do not regulate or test for mycotoxins, creating regulatory confusion and an inconsistent
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Mar 3rd, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Bill 790 allows the PUC to create a simple certified resolution process for tenant complaints about a
  • The case hearing process for a simple $25 discrepancy could take months to resolve through administrative
  • This expedited dispute resolution process will be subject to PUC rulemaking.
  • The adopted process may ultimately allow the PUC to settle a dispute through an online portal or without
  • And so we've had a couple of districts that have tried to negate some of those voices in that process
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The current process does not adequately reflect changes.
  • I learned a great deal in that process, but those.
  • process.
  • That process is extremely transparent.
  • Like it's a tried and true process. So if this bill passes, I would use that same process.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • place an undue financial burden on pipeline developers and construction companies, and lead to regulatory
  • approval for the construction of pipelines, while still ensuring counties are able to regulate the process
  • This is time-consuming, it costs money, and prolongs the application process.
  • This would be something that would help the industry by giving the TCEQ more regulatory flexibility and
  • To me, this is just a common-sense kind of tool that we can provide our regulatory body to make it easier
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Apr 23rd, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • TDI to engage in rulemaking and gives the agency authority to act as an umpire for the appraisal process
  • You heard about the stakeholder process from Mr. Betts.
  • It should be a process where you decide if you want appraisal at the beginning.
  • And that process can... ...can take some time? Yes.
  • So it should be a pretty simple process for either a local...
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Apr 23rd, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • before they initiate the IDR process.
  • So under the federal IDR process, it is very different.
  • The main difference from the federal IDR process to the state IDR process for mediation is that under
  • In this process. You don't want to answer that question.
  • Then there's an, even in this response, in this process, there was a two-month delay.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate SessionReading and Referral of Bills Mar 17th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Bills: SJR 4, SCR 36, SCR 37, SCR 38, SCR 39, SCR 40, SCR 41, SCR 42, SB 7, SB 30, SB 31, SB 32, SB 33, SB 34, SB 36, SB 37, SB 38, SB 39, SB 1851, SB 1852, SB 1853, SB 1854, SB 1855, SB 1856, SB 1857, SB 1858, SB 1860, SB 1861, SB 1862, SB 1863, SB 1864, SB 1865, SB 1866, SB 1867, SB 1868, SB 1869, SB 1870, SB 1871, SB 1872, SB 1873, SB 1874, SB 1875, SB 1876, SB 1877, SB 1878, SB 1879, SB 1880, SB 1881, SB 1882, SB 1883, SB 1884, SB 1885, SB 1886, SB 1887, SB 1888, SB 1889, SB 1890, SB 1891, SB 1892, SB 1893, SB 1894, SB 1895, SB 1896, SB 1897, SB 1898, SB 1899, SB 1900, SB 1901, SB 1903, SB 1904, SB 1905, SB 1906, SB 1907, SB 1908, SB 1909, SB 1910, SB 1911, SB 1912, SB 1913, SB 1914, SB 1915, SB 1916, SB 1917, SB 1918, SB 1919, SB 1920, SB 1921, SB 1922, SB 1923, SB 1924, SB 1925, SB 1926, SB 1927, SB 1928, SB 1929, SB 1930, SB 1931, SB 1932, SB 1933, SB 1934, SB 1935, SB 1936, SB 1937, SB 1938, SB 1939, SB 1940, SB 1941, SB 1942, SB 1943, SB 1944, SB 1945, SB 1946, SB 1947, SB 1948, SB 1949, SB 1950, SB 1951, SB 1952, SB 1953, SB 1954, SB 1955, SB 1956, SB 1957, SB 1958, SB 1959, SB 1960, SB 1961, SB 1962, SB 1963, SB 1964, SB 1965, SB 1966, SB 1967, SB 1968, SB 1969, SB 1970, SB 1971, SB 1972, SB 1973, SB 1974, SB 1975, SB 1976, SB 1977, SB 1978, SB 1979, SB 1980, SB 1981, SB 1982, SB 1983, SB 1984, SB 1985, SB 1986, SB 1987, SB 1988, SB 1989, SB 1990, SB 1991, SB 1992, SB 1993, SB 1994, SB 1995, SB 1996, SB 1997, SB 1998, SB 1999, SB 2000, SB 2001, SB 2002, SB 2003, SB 2004, SB 2005, SB 2006, SB 2007, SB 2008, SB 2009, SB 2010, SB 2011, SB 2012, SB 2013, SB 2014, SB 2015, SB 2016, SB 2017, SB 2018, SB 2019, SB 2020, SB 2021, SB 2022, SB 2023, SB 2024, SB 2025, SB 2026, SB 2027, SB 2028, SB 2029, SB 2030, SB 2031, SB 2032, SB 2033, SB 2034, SB 2035, SB 2036, SB 2037, SB 2038, SB 2039, SB 2040, SB 2041, SB 2042, SB 2043, SB 2044, SB 2045, SB 2046, SB 2047, SB 2048, SB 2049, SB 2050, SB 2051, SB 2052, SB 2053, SB 2054, SB 2055, SB 2056, SB 2057, SB 2058, SB 2059, SB 2060
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/23/2026 - House Health & Human Services

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Prior authorization is a long and lengthy process.
  • They've already fixed this two-tier process already.
  • Limiting the step process is what I hear.
  • So could you walk me through the process?
  • They stated the process would take one to two years.
Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 1121, which would prohibit hospitals from requiring lead aprons for cardiac catheterization staff when a radiation protection system is in place, while still allowing hospitals to require aprons outside the designated safety zone or when exposure levels warrant additional protection. An amendment added flexibility for radiation safety officers to require lead or other PPE if exposures approach occupational limits and removed expedited rulemaking language. Supporters, including the sponsor and interventional cardiologists, argued the devices reduce radiation and orthopedic injuries and improve recruitment and retention; hospital groups shifted to neutral after the amendment. The committee adopted the amendment and passed SB 1121 on a 9-2 vote. The committee then considered Senate Bill 1120, which would require hospitals performing cardiac catheterization procedures to equip at least 50% of those rooms with radiation protection systems by 2027. Supporters said the systems protect clinicians from radiation and long-term injury, while opponents, including hospital and radiology groups, argued the bill was overly prescriptive, could create a captive market, and might not fit all rooms or procedures. After adopting a children’s hospital exemption amendment, the committee passed SB 1120 on a 6-6 vote, with the chair breaking the tie in favor of the bill. Senate Bill 1118, an appropriation measure tied to the radiation protection system proposal, was also advanced after brief discussion, passing 6-5. The committee then took up Senate Bill 1214, which would create guardrails for non-FDA-approved stem cell and regenerative therapies, including provider standards, informed consent, advertising limits, reporting requirements, and a private right of action for violations. Supporters described it as a patient-protection and access bill, while testimony emphasized concerns about unregulated “bad actors” and patients traveling out of state for treatment. The committee adopted an amendment removing a reference to the National Law and passed SB 1214 on a 9-3 vote. The transcript then began discussion of SB 1630, which would create a Medicaid-funded home and community-based service benefit for adults with serious mental illness, with AHCCCS taking a neutral position and estimating a significant fiscal impact.