Video & Transcript Research : 'ranked choice voting'

Page 9 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So let's move to reconsider the vote which we just took.
  • We will now vote on this bill.
  • We are going to go ahead and vote on the committee substitute.
  • We will now vote on this bill.
  • We will now vote on this bill.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So let's I move to reconsider the vote which we just took.
  • We will now vote on this bill.
  • This guarantees student choice and ensures that participation is completely voluntary.
  • We are going to go ahead and vote on the committee substitute. Thank you.
  • So I look forward to bringing you over to be supportive and voting aye.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Education Finance Committee 3/18/25

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • What's better than having students have a voice and choice than having the teacher being the sage on
  • <00:15:29.920> than<00:15:30.240> having choice than having choice than having um<00:15
  • So,<01:23:45.520> we<01:23:45.760> have<01:23:45.840> a<01:23:46.080> choice.
  • We have a very So, we have a choice.
  • We have a very very<01:23:48.719> simple<01:23:49.120> choice<01:23:49.920> before
Bills: HF630, HF1435, HF1607
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • And it shows that you can continue to offer adults a choice of products.
  • You know, I feel for that child, but that's, you know, that's a parent's choice.
  • Is this the position of Net Choice on whether the app she described is appropriate for ages 12 and up
  • I mean, that's an unusual position to take for Net Choice to say I'm not sure I want to look at apps
  • The first part of the bill on the medical damages is more rank-and-file type cases.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Government Oversight Feb 26th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Government Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any members wishing to vote or change their vote, declare the vote. 'Ayes' and 'nays'.
  • Anybody who wishes to vote or change their vote, seeing none, will the clerk declare the vote.
  • or change their vote.
  • Robert Strom, any members wishing to vote or change their vote?
  • Robert, any members wishing to vote or change their vote?
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Education Apr 29th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • We do not elect them to ignore us and take away our vote.
  • Not every issue can or should be sent back for public vote.
  • So when people tell me that they want to vote, I tell them you have the option to vote.
  • Texas has protected local choice since 1998.
  • They have to send that out to a vote, and that vote is with a certain set of circumstances.
Bills: HB4, HB54, SB 10, SB 24
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/21/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'll explain my vote. Aye. Chairman Gillette. I'll explain my vote. Mr.
  • I am voting on the bill, and I vote aye on this bill.
  • methods they've been voting with for... ...to the voting methods that they've been voting with for,
  • on Tuesday and vote.
  • Go vote in person.
Summary: The committee met to hear several measures, beginning with HCM 2001 and HCM 2002, both memorials urging Congress to review and potentially designate the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR as foreign terrorist organizations. Supporters argued the groups have documented ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood’s stated goal of undermining Western civilization, citing the Holy Land Foundation case, FBI concerns, and testimony from national-security advocates. Opponents, including CAIR representatives, Muslim community members, and civil-rights advocates, said the memorials relied on guilt by association, would stigmatize Muslims, and lacked a factual or legal basis; they emphasized CAIR’s civil-rights work and warned of First Amendment concerns and community harm. After extensive debate and questions about the relationship between national and Arizona CAIR entities, the committee approved HCM 2001 and HCM 2002 on 4-3 votes, with members on both sides explaining their votes at length. Supporters framed the measures as simple requests to Congress based on existing federal findings, while opponents called them political theater and discriminatory. The committee then recessed briefly. When the committee returned, it heard HB 2009, which would prohibit committees primarily organized to influence constitutional amendments from accepting foreign national contributions and require donor verification and disclosure of out-of-state funding. The sponsor said the bill is meant to help voters understand outside influence on Arizona constitutional initiatives and suggested it could be broadened to all ballot measures. The bill passed 4-3. The committee then took up HCR 2001, a proposed constitutional amendment on elections that would limit voting to U.S. citizens, ban foreign contributions to candidate and ballot measure campaigns, require government-issued ID, and adjust early voting and mail-ballot rules. A late amendment clarified that the citizenship requirement applies to primary, general, and municipal elections, set early voting to end the Friday before an election, and refined mail-ballot rules while preserving federal overseas military voting requirements. The sponsor argued the measure would make Arizona elections more secure and efficient, while critics said it would create barriers and longer lines. The transcript cuts off during sponsor questioning on the amendment and ballot-access provisions.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • You know, we've introduced several laws, legislations about that, but it keeps getting voted down.
  • X and the mayor says this is how we're going to do this and the city council votes unanimously.
  • I'm going to know vote for the bill.
  • I'm going to vote for the bill, but I do still say that there needs to be something in that bill that
  • And basically, uh, what this bill is, is the restoration of voting rights of individuals that have been
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Supporting the bill, we'll vote for the bill.
  • This is how I'm going to vote and the teacher that there's an inference that I expect you to vote the
  • A vote for this bill is a vote of conscience and it is a vote towards your legacy on how you viewed each
  • They have to be approved by y'all. by two-thirds vote, so you have both parties voting for these constitutional
  • I ask you to vote in favor of this bill and push it to the full Senate for a full vote and eventual passage
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/9/26

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Do you know if the choice is whether Chapter 13 data practices and open meeting laws apply to a choice
  • And I would like to ask for a yes vote.
  • So this will have the information on voting in Minnesota and... ...registering to vote and then also
  • They don't get to vote if they're not going to be eligible to vote at the next election.
  • They don't get to vote if they're not going to be eligible to vote at the next election.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/10/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • State to post the temporary voting State to post the temporary voting locations<00:23:54.840>
  • where these opportunities for uh voting where these opportunities for uh voting are<00:24:01.919
  • the what 46 days or or so of voting the what 46 days or or so of voting start<00:25:10.679> U
  • <00:29:02.480> for to vote for to vote for it<00:29:05.080> um<00:29:05.240> to<
  • I believe there's a rule not to kick non-voting members when they're already down. voting members have
Bills: HF1345, HF71, HF993, HF1943
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We had an option as a... local government to approve it when 81% of the population voted for it.
  • And of course, staying in their home is number one, and they are the largest voting bloc as well.
  • Rankings.
  • Ranked 40th in terms of competitiveness by the Tax Foundation for property tax and 7th overall.
  • As Charles and others have indicated, we voted for, Texans have voted.
Bills: SB4, SJR2, SB 4, SJR 2
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/3/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair Quam voted yes. Vice Chair Altendorf voted yes. Representative Acomb voted no.
  • Representative Coulter voted no. Representative Davis voted yes. Representative Gordon voted yes.
  • Representative Greenman voted no. Representative Lee voted no. Representative McDonald voted yes.
  • Co-Chair Quam voted aye. Vice Chair Altendorf voted aye. Representative Acomb voted no.
  • Representative Lee voted no. Representative McDonald voted aye. Representative Roach voted aye.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Apr 14th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the idea that people have a choice of actually going to their precinct to vote.
  • And the idea that people have a choice of actually going to their precinct to vote, the polling location
  • With early voting, anybody can vote at any location.
  • So a voter has the choice as to where they vote. So we've got uniformity.
  • votes.
Summary: The committee first adopted a committee substitute for Senate Bill 30 and then voted to report the substituted bill favorably to the full Senate; the roll call showed six ayes and one nay, with later unanimous-consent corrections noted for additional aye votes. The committee also reported Senate Bill 801 favorably to the full Senate by an eight-to-one vote. Both bills were left with no further action in the meeting after the votes. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2595 by Senator Middleton and Senate Bill 2876 by Chairman Hughes, both aimed at addressing masked harassment and riot-related conduct. Supporters said the bills would deter intimidation, protect public order, and respond to recent protests and anti-Semitic incidents, while opponents from civil rights, disability, and advocacy groups argued the measures were overly broad, could chill peaceful protest, and would burden people who wear masks for religious, medical, or disability-related reasons. Public testimony was taken on both bills, and both were left pending after testimony closed. Senate Bill 2753, by Senator Hall, proposed consolidating early voting and election day into a single continuous in-person voting period with common procedures and equipment, while preserving countywide voting and mail voting. The Secretary of State’s office said the bill could improve ballot secrecy and simplify administration, though witnesses raised concerns about ballot privacy, logistics, and access for disabled voters; some county election officials were neutral or supportive of the concept, while others opposed it as confusing or potentially burdensome. The bill was left pending after extensive testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 2225 on allowing spirit-based ready-to-drink beverages to be sold in grocery and convenience stores, with supporters arguing the law should focus on alcohol content rather than the source of the alcohol and that the bill would modernize an outdated code. Later, Senate Bill 1540, which would add election officials and related workers to confidentiality protections, drew support from county election officials who described threats and harassment, though one witness suggested the bill’s language may need technical adjustment to better match its intent. Finally, Senate Bill 2382, concerning statewide voter registration systems and offline counties, drew opposition from county election administrators and vendors who warned about capacity, cybersecurity, and single-point-of-failure risks, while others suggested a phased approach or API-based integration; the transcript ends with testimony still open on that bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Apr 14th, 2025

State Affairs

Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs heard Senate Bill 3031, which would expand aggravated assault to cover certain road-rage shootings involving a person in or traveling to or from a motor vehicle, when a firearm is discharged and causes injury, property damage, or fear of serious bodily injury. Senator Schwertner laid out the bill for the author, described it as closing a gap in the law, and there was no public testimony; the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2514, a measure by Chairman Hughes aimed at creating a DPS unit to identify, investigate, and monitor hostile foreign influence operations and to require ethics training for state employees. Supportive invited testimony from Dr. Jacqueline Deal, Ambassador Kelly Curry, and Michael Lucci emphasized threats from the Chinese Communist Party, transnational repression, cyber intrusion, and state-level influence efforts, and argued Texas should take a leading role. Public testimony included opposition from speakers who raised concerns about free speech, privacy, and potential overbreadth. The bill was left pending after testimony closed. Finally, the committee took up Senate Bill 30 as pending business and discussed a committee substitute. Senator Schwertner explained that the substitute would limit admissible medical expense evidence to amounts paid or up to 300% of Medicare, clarify treatment of provider testimony and attorney-referred providers, remove a requirement that plaintiffs use available health insurance to mitigate damages, strike a unanimous-verdict requirement for non-economic damages, and delete a remittitur provision. Senators questioned the impact on sexual assault and child abuse survivors, the use of Medicare as a benchmark, and whether the bill would still allow fair compensation. After discussion, SB 30 was left pending and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Criminal Justice Jan 26th, 2026

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • By your vote, SB 442 is reported favorably.
  • rights restored and to register to vote.
  • By your vote, SB 132 is reported favorably. By your vote, SB 132 is reported favorably.
  • I think I need two-thirds of the vote, and I'm in a prevailing party to vote pursuant to Senate rules
  • We need a vote of two-thirds in favor. There's no vote until next week. Oh, okay.
Summary: The committee took up a series of criminal justice and public safety bills. SB 646, allowing the use of drug testing tools such as fentanyl test strips and reagent kits to detect dangerous adulterants, was presented as a harm-reduction measure and reported favorably after supportive testimony from advocates and criminal defense groups. SB 442, extending the return period for warrants involving digital evidence from 45 days to one year, also passed unanimously amid testimony from prosecutors and law enforcement about encryption, backlogs, and large volumes of child exploitation evidence. SB 418, creating autism-related law enforcement training and a Blue Envelope Program for traffic stops and other encounters, was reported favorably with support from police, disability advocates, and families. SB 132, creating a public database to help people determine eligibility for restoration of voting rights, and SB 748, requiring notice of voting-rights restoration information on sentencing score sheets, both passed with broad support from voting-rights and criminal defense advocates. The committee also approved SB 1734, recognizing juvenile probation and detention officers as officers under Florida law and extending related training and benefits, and SB 1660, designating June as Responsible Firearm Safety Awareness Month. SB 1742, which repealed the existing “unnatural and lascivious acts” statute and created a new offense for indecent exposure of sexual organs to a minor, was amended with a delete-all amendment and then reported favorably. SB 1750, a major overhaul of career offender registration requirements, was later reconsidered after a bill-number mix-up and then reported favorably as SB 1332, with FDLE and sheriff’s association support. The most contentious measure was SB 1326, which would eliminate the traditional insanity defense and replace it with a lack-of-culpable-mental-state defense, require malingering assessments in competency evaluations, and limit downward departures based on mental illness. Criminal defense attorneys and disability advocates argued it lacked a treatment component, raised scientific and cost concerns, and could worsen public safety by sending mentally ill defendants to prison without adequate care. Supporters, including the sponsor and the Attorney General’s office, argued it would close gaps and better protect the public. After extensive debate, the bill was reported favorably on a divided vote, with several members voting no. At the end of the meeting, members recorded additional votes on some bills, and Senator Pizzo moved for reconsideration of SB 1326 for a future meeting.