Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial power'

Page 9 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections May 5th, 2025

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Moreover, the current law creates confusion about judicial responsibilities.
  • If they do those four things, they have judicial immunity. ...is intact.
  • I have the letter in front of me from the Judicial Advisory Council.
  • So how does someone get on the Judicial Advisory Council?
  • So, a lot of the major cities are not represented on the Judicial Advisory Council.
Bills: SB663, SB958
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that's what the judicial discretion is there for. Again, you know, just practicing.
  • I think really, you know, the... think really, you know, the judicial discretion really does clear up
Bills: HB265, HB146, SB254, HB202, HB3, HB42, SB18
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm here first as a mother who has lived the devastating reality of unchecked judicial power, and as
  • I need that fearlessness when the system bends to the powerful instead of the truth.
  • That's Senator Parker's bill about the powers.
  • The ballot box is raw power.
  • So why is the storm-hybrid mode so powerful here in the discussion?
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • less than 700 yards from a nuclear power less than 700 yards from a nuclear power plant<00:36:56.520
  • are moving forward with nuclear power. are moving forward with nuclear power.
  • "We would be happy to host nuclear power "We would be happy to host nuclear power in<00:58:52.960
  • I mean, we have been the host to all of your base load power for decades.
  • Host to all of your base load power for decades.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/25/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:03:51.280> now a concept called emergency Powers now a concept called emergency Powers
  • this concept is not an emergency powers this concept is not an emergency powers like<00:03:54.879
  • bill there it's taking away some powers bill there it's taking away some powers from<00:32:13.679
  • elections uh court include Fair judicial elections uh court security<00:43:34.920> judicial<00
  • Talking about the Board of Judicial Standards and judicial canons, whether or not applicants for judicial
Bills: HF747, HF360
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • And now that I have her, I know that I will do everything in my power for the rest of my life to protect
  • But these efforts to evade judicial review only emphasize how deeply discriminatory this bill is.
  • belongs to locally elected county. those prescribed by law to mean that the power belongs to locally
  • This is an overreach of power.
  • This is an overreach of power.
Bills: SB6, SB7, SB8, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB15, SB17
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 8, the Texas Women's Privacy Act, and heard extensive public testimony both for and against the measure. Supporters, including representatives of Texas Values and Texas Values Action, argued the bill was needed to protect women’s privacy and safety in restrooms, locker rooms, showers, prisons, domestic violence shelters, and other government-controlled spaces, and said it would provide clear, sex-based rules. Opponents, including many transgender Texans, civil rights advocates, clergy, business and public safety voices, and others, argued the bill would invite harassment, gender policing, lawsuits, and invasive inspections, while harming trans, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people as well as cisgender women who do not fit stereotypes. Several witnesses said the bill would conflict with federal law or prison standards, worsen safety in shelters and prisons, and hurt Texas’s reputation and economy. The chair repeatedly noted the compressed special-session schedule and said flood relief remained the session’s top priority. Public testimony on SB 8 was eventually closed, and the bill was left pending. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 6, dealing with consumable hemp product restrictions. Testimony on SB 6 focused on whether the bill went too far in restricting hemp-derived THC products. Opponents argued hemp and THC have medical and economic value, that the bill would criminalize conduct and burden courts, and that regulation—not prohibition—was the better approach. Some witnesses supported tighter rules such as testing, child-resistant packaging, and limits on marketing to children, but still opposed the bill’s broad THC ban, higher fees, and age restrictions. Several speakers emphasized benefits for veterans, chronic pain patients, and small businesses, and warned that prohibition would push consumers toward the illicit market. The committee heard the testimony and then continued with additional witnesses, with no final vote or disposition reported in the excerpt.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Rules Feb 2nd, 2026 at 09:12 am

Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now, what makes this land grant unique, Madam Chair, is that it's governed by the Fourth Judicial District
  • We must acknowledge the harm done by powerful institutions in an attempt to genocide my people and our
  • New Mexico has a rare and powerful opportunity to take a principled stand to be on the right side of
  • But what I do know is two things: the power of Senator Lopez and the power Of Senator Pinto.
Bills: SM13, SM14
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 30th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Power and maximizes individual liberty.
  • You got to love the last judicial hearing. I said motion. Yeah.
  • Since day one, the new statute we passed invested power in her to change them.
  • But until we do, as far as I'm concerned, I'm going to do everything in my power to make them follow
  • And again, my first thought was let's just make it indefinite, but that takes away power from future
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chapter 34 authorization agreements are like a power of attorney.
  • It's not really a power of attorney, but that's kind of the vernacular, and I do use them a lot.
  • and allow denied or delayed payments to be appealed to the presiding judge of the administrative judicial
Summary: The Senate Committee on Jurisprudence heard several family-law and probate bills. Senate Bill 2052 would codify a rebuttable presumption that a parent acts in the best interest of a child and require clear and convincing evidence to overcome that presumption in disputes involving non-parents; the author and several witnesses supported the bill as a clarification of existing case law, while one witness suggested refining the modification language. Public testimony was closed and the bill was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1923, which would allow child support to follow a child placed temporarily with kin or fictive kin under a parental child safety placement or authorization agreement; the bill’s author and a grandparent caregiver testified in support, while one witness suggested the Attorney General could handle the change administratively. That bill was also left pending. Senate Bill 1838 would standardize fee schedules and compensation rules for attorneys ad litem and related court-appointed counsel in DFPS child-protection cases. The author said the bill would clarify unclear current law, and witnesses from the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and family-defense bar supported it, though one asked that expert-witness expenses be expressly included. Senate Bill 387 would raise the bond requirement for county judges handling guardianship proceedings to at least $500,000; the author described it as a refiling of a prior bill that passed unanimously but was vetoed, and a statutory probate judge testified in support. Senate Bill 1839 would require original or paper wills to be delivered to the transferee court when probate proceedings are transferred; the committee substitute broadened the delivery methods, and the district clerk witness supported the change. All three bills were left pending. The committee also took up Senate Bill 1536, which had previously been voted out with the wrong committee substitute; members reconsidered the vote, adopted the corrected substitute, and then voted 3-0 to report the bill favorably to the full Senate, with local and contested calendar certification. Finally, Senate Bill 1940 would create a transfer-on-death mechanism for manufactured homes classified as personal property, similar to existing tools for real property and vehicles; the author and an estate-planning attorney testified that it would streamline transfers and reduce probate costs. A non-substantive committee substitute was still being prepared, and the bill was left pending.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 2/18/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <01:03:11.640> to giving these ex extraordinary powers to giving these ex extraordinary powers
  • know you've given really broad Powers know you've given really broad Powers very<01:14:19.080>
  • > on<01:14:21.199> this very broad powers and so on this very broad powers and so on this
  • <01:15:42.760> and will tell you with these powers and will tell you with these powers and
  • this position is so incredibly powerful this position is so incredibly powerful and<01:16:31.400
Bills: HF1, HF2
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Mar 12th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • in combating child sexual predators the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has created powerful
  • Judicial salaries has also been an issue that the judiciary has argued.
  • The committee's substitute aims to strengthen judicial accountability and transparency. transparency
  • by expanding the definition of judicial misconduct to include failure to meet statutes. deadlines, and
  • State Commission on Judicial Conduct notice of certain reprimands, judicial compensation, and related
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2026-04-09

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:58:42.760> review presented, includes judicial review presented, includes judicial review
  • Uh, I think two the judicial branch.
  • family medical leave where the judicial family medical leave where the judicial branch<01:18:21.320
  • we got a breakdown from the judicial we got a breakdown from the judicial branch,<01:19:29.520><
  • <01:31:27.160> branch Lee Bling, just the judicial branch Lee Bling, just the judicial branch
Summary: The Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee approved the minutes from March 25 and March 26, then took up House File 4077, a bipartisan bill authored by Representatives Greenman and Roach. The bill would prohibit municipalities from entering into non-disclosure agreements with private entities that restrict disclosure about land development, economic development, or publicly funded projects, while preserving existing Chapter 13 data practices rules and trade secret protections. The authors argued the bill is needed to prevent secret agreements and backroom decision-making that undermine public transparency, and they moved that the bill be re-referred to the general register. Several local officials and residents testified in support, including a St. Louis County commissioner, the mayor of Lonsdale, and residents from Farmington and Hermantown. Supporters said NDAs had been used in connection with data center and other development projects to keep elected officials and the public in the dark, eroding trust and limiting community input. They described the bill as a common-sense transparency measure and said existing law already protects legitimate trade secrets. Opposition came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Business Partnership, which argued that NDAs are often necessary in early-stage economic development discussions to protect sensitive business information and remain competitive with other states. They warned the bill could discourage investment, jobs, and tax growth, and said it would impose a one-size-fits-all state mandate that limits local discretion. Committee members then debated whether the bill was too broad and whether it should be narrowed to data centers; supporters responded that the issue extends beyond data centers to other forms of economic development. A roll call vote was requested on the motion to re-refer the bill to the general register, but the final vote result was not stated in the transcript excerpt.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Apr 8th, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • part of of the process of how judicial part of of the process of how judicial part of of the process
  • compet competition in large-scale power compet competition in large-scale power compet competition in
  • information technology and cyber power information technology and cyber power event. 4,600 attendees
  • We are aware that our enemies see power. We are aware that our enemies see power.
  • at work think according to the power at work think according to the power at work within us.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 8th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I pray they accept Him as their Savior today and come to experience the powerful reality that when the
  • spiritual forces of wickedness and evil evil at work in this world, and we unlock and unleash the power
  • I pray all this in the name of Jesus and in the power of the Holy Spirit.
  • We're witnessing as a country what happens when executive offices consolidate too much power without
  • Yet without judicial deference as a safeguard, a truly independent panel is our next best defense.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Committee, February 13, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • > powers.
  • to the judicial branch.
  • how is that not a separation of powers how is that not a separation of powers concern?
  • He said that, by removing agency deference, power is being given back to the judicial branch where it
  • power back to<00:17:56.320> the<00:17:56.559> judicial<00:17:57.039> branch<00:
Bills: HB0066, HJ0005, HB0010