Transcript Highlights:

• publication is a reasonable safeguard that helps prevent the exploitation of minors and the spread of non-consensual
• publication is a reasonable safeguard that helps prevent the exploitation of minors and the spread of non-consensual
• This legislation protects free speech, journalism, and Consensual content.
• Child support is not the proper mechanism to address this issue.
• Child support is not the proper mechanism to address this issue.

Bills: HB2043, HB2045, HB2046, HB2048, HB2064, HB2074, HB2126, HB2133, HB2144

Keywords: felony murder, unborn child, homicide, Arizona Revised Statutes, life imprisonment, death penalty, drive-by shooting, gun violence, firearms, felony, vehicle forfeiture, driver license revocation, drive by shooting, public safety, criminal penalties, education, funding, school districts, state aid, education reform

Transcript Highlights:

• And then on performance measures, analysts were came to a consensus on all performance measures.
• obviously, to LFC's budget hearings, to your hearings, to the Senate Finance, to the revenue, the consensus
• What's the mechanism to do that? I don't know. If there is an answer in this room.
• So maybe it'd be adding a 50K to that mechanism and changing the recommended language already recommended
• As you can see, the LLC and executive reached a consensus on performance measures.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I think there's a consensus that the current limitation is too low, and that I think Mr. Thank you.
• I think there's a consensus that the current limitation is too low, and that I think Mr.
• And so using the debt repayment mechanism of Proposition 2 to set aside funds for that is another option
• different ways in the presentations today, how much of the bigger reserves, and so it seems we have consensus
• We may need to have a mechanism in the revised prop that gives us a clear path to paying down those debts

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Accountability and Oversight held a hearing on proposals to reform California’s Budget Stabilization Account, or rainy day fund, ahead of the May Revision. Members and witnesses reviewed how Proposition 2 (2014) changed reserve rules, including mandatory deposits, a 10% cap on the fund, and limits tied to the Governor’s declaration of a budget emergency. LAO staff explained that California’s revenues are highly volatile, that current reserve rules are complicated by interactions with Proposition 98 and the Gann limit, and that under current law reserves would cover only about one-third of funding shortfalls in a benchmark scenario over 50 years. The LAO presented its report recommending a larger reserve target, including raising the cap to 50% by 2055 and pairing that with either broader, more flexible deposit rules or a simpler approach that deposits all excess capital gains. The Department of Finance described the Governor’s proposal to raise the cap from 10% to 20% and exempt BSA deposits from the state appropriations limit, while Assembly Member Valencia presented ACA 1, which would make similar changes and was described as an evolving proposal. Testimony generally supported saving more during boom years, but differed on how much to hardwire into the Constitution versus leave flexible, and on whether to broaden the deposit formulas beyond capital gains. Public witnesses and committee members raised additional issues, including whether reserve reforms should also address debt repayment, the treatment of unemployment insurance fund debt, and whether the Gann limit should be adjusted to better allow reserve growth. Supporters argued that stronger reserves would protect Californians from cuts during downturns and help the state weather volatility and federal funding threats. Some advocates warned that reforms should not come at the expense of current public needs, while taxpayer representatives cautioned against turning the BSA into a pass-through account that weakens constitutional spending limits. The hearing ended without a vote, with the committee chair noting the complexity of the issue and adjourning after public comment.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think that there is a broad consensus that we need to do something to ensure that lawmakers are safe
• I think that there is a broad consensus that we need to do something to ensure that lawmakers are safe
• so if leaders and members want to do things in those areas, we will figure out a way to make the mechanics
• areas, we will figure out a way to make areas, we will figure out a way to make the<00:12:45.520><c> mechanics
• </c> the mechanics work. the mechanics work. Thank<00:12:48.200><c> you.</c> Thank you. Thank you.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• or where the individuals may be in an otherwise consensual intimate relationship.
• I can tell you a very common scenario where something may start as consensual, but for whatever reason
• I know you already know this, but there is already a mechanism in place for individuals who or prosecutors
• There's a mechanism in statute and in case law that allows a defendant to go to a judge and say this
• We already have a mechanism in statute and the status quo to be able to address problems of vindictive

Bills: HB75, HB108

Keywords: building standards, youth camps, floodplains, safety regulations, environmental policies, drainage utilities, flood management, land use regulation, county authority, drainage fees, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This legislation was brought together on a consensus out of the worker wage recovery work group.
• So this particular bill in its consensus, a beautiful love fest that it came together, is something that's
• This legislation was brought together on a consensus out of the worker wage recovery work group. on a
• consensus out of the worker wage recovery work group that was created by this legislature and this full
• consensus language came to being in that work group by labor representatives employer representatives

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills. Second Substitute House Bill 2479 would create a wage recovery program within L&I to advance part of unpaid wages to low-wage workers facing immediate hardship, funded by civil penalties, while also increasing and restructuring wage theft penalties and complaint prioritization. Supporters, including the prime sponsor, labor advocates, and employer representatives from the work group, said it would help workers get paid faster and was a consensus proposal; questions focused on how the current complaint process works and whether general fund money would be needed. Engrossed House Bill 1941, as amended, would allow licensed cannabis producers to form agricultural cooperatives, with the striking amendment limiting any cooperative to three producer licenses; supporters said cannabis producers should have the same cooperative tools as other agricultural sectors, while some testimony urged future changes for interstate commerce and warned against consolidation. Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2476 would expand the spirits, beer, and wine theater license from 120 to 200 seats per screen and add stronger alcohol-control measures when minors are present; theater operators and LCB supported the change, and committee questions focused on youth access and enforcement. House Bill 1526 would allow snack bar licensees to sell wine by the glass in addition to beer; the sponsor said it simply modernizes the license, and LCB noted a likely fee alignment issue and a small revenue impact. Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1155 would void non-compete agreements and expand related notice and non-solicitation rules, with testimony split between labor and worker advocates supporting broader worker mobility and business and health care groups seeking narrower exemptions for executives, physicians, and financial institutions. Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2303 would prohibit employers from requesting or coercing employees to accept microchip implants, with no testimony offered. Substitute House Bill 2405 would create a three-year pilot for earlier PTSD treatment coverage in workers’ compensation for eligible occupational disease claims, with L&I supporting it as a way to improve outcomes and reduce long-term costs. The committee also took public testimony on these bills, with strong pro and con positions noted on the wage recovery, cannabis cooperative, and non-compete measures. In executive action, the committee adopted a striking amendment and passed House Bill 1069, narrowing it to Department of Corrections employees and making supplemental retirement bargaining mandatory, despite concerns from one member about the change. The committee also adopted a striking amendment on House Bill 1347 concerning cannabis testing labs, then passed it to Rules; passed Second Substitute House Bill 1701 on liquor licensees sharing property; passed House Bill 291 on employee information for public employers to Ways and Means; passed Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2229 updating engineer registration provisions; passed House Bill 2264 on unemployment eligibility for workers in employer-initiated layoffs; passed Substitute House Bill 2472 adding enforcement for sprinkler contractors and fitters; and passed Second Substitute House Bill 2345 on paid family and medical leave premium allocation. A striking amendment to Second Substitute House Bill 1128 creating a child care workforce standards board was not adopted, and the bill then passed to Rules. The committee also announced it would hold House Bill 1066 for later action and planned to return the next day for its final executive session.

Transcript Highlights:

• This legislation was brought together on a consensus out of the worker wage recovery work group.
• So this particular bill in its consensus—a beautiful love fest that it came together—is something that's
• out of the worker wage recovery work group that was created by this legislature and this full consensus
• So this particular bill in its consensus, a beautiful love fest that it came together is something that's
• Current enforcement mechanisms can take months, and repeat offenders often exploit loopholes to avoid

Bills: HB1526, HB1069, HB1347, HB2091, HB2264

Keywords: liquor license, snack bar, state regulations, alcohol sales, business licensing, collective bargaining, retirement benefits, employee rights, public sector, supplemental benefits, education, funding, student loans, affordability, higher education, public employers, employee information, bargaining representatives, labor relations, union representation

Transcript Highlights:

• we ask that whatever you are bringing before the committee that you do it in a collaborative and consensus-building
• We've come to a lot of great consensus recommendations through our process... ...them into our process
• We've come to a lot of great consensus recommendations through our process, and I'd like to turn it back
• And these are also consensus recommendations.
• increasing the availability of regional-scale ag-related infrastructure, funding and financing mechanisms

Summary: The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee opened its 2026 session with committee housekeeping, member introductions, and a reminder that schedules are set a week in advance and amendments must be submitted by the prior day’s deadlines. Chair Reeves emphasized solution-oriented, collaborative, and respectful participation, then outlined that the committee would focus on three interim reports relevant to its work this session: municipal water efficiency, ecosystem services, and food policy. The first presentation, from the William D. Ruckelshaus Center and WSU, reviewed Washington’s municipal water efficiency statute and regulation. Presenters said interviewees largely agreed on the need for better data collection, more technical assistance for smaller systems, and more state funding for both agency staffing and water system infrastructure. Most opposed shifting oversight of the conservation program from the Department of Health to Ecology, and the report recommended keeping oversight at DOH while improving collaboration across agencies and tribes. The presenters also urged broader statewide water planning, more consistent reporting using the AWWA water audit method instead of leakage percentage, re-evaluating the 500-connection threshold, and addressing outdoor water use, rebates, reuse, and public education. Members asked about creating a new office for water oversight, but the presenters said that idea was generally viewed as too costly and impractical under current budget conditions. DNR then presented its 2025 ecosystem services work group report. The department described ecosystem services markets it studied, including regulatory and voluntary forest carbon, avoided wildfire emissions, and water leasing, with lower potential identified for blue carbon, biodiversity, and water quality markets. DNR said about 15,000 acres of state forest land may have carbon-market potential, but emphasized that the analysis was broad and not project-specific, so the report recommends pilots, continued market monitoring, use of third-party developers, and clarification of authority through House Bill 2170. Committee members asked about economic feasibility, timber tradeoffs, and how success would be defined, and DNR said those questions would be better addressed in future, more detailed project-level work. The final presentation covered the Food Policy Forum’s 2025 report to the legislature. Speakers described broad consensus recommendations on food security, local foods in schools, farm-to-food-bank programs, a state farm bill, commercial access, and food system infrastructure. They highlighted pressures on agriculture from development, flooding, drought, water shortages, and the need to preserve farmland and support farmers, food banks, and local procurement systems. The committee chair thanked the presenters and noted that several related bills and policy proposals would be heard later in session. No votes were taken; the meeting concluded after the presentations and brief member questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• The city can avoid shifting the financial burden to property taxes or other funding mechanisms, keeping
• taxes on property owners is a serious matter, and it should only be done when there's overwhelming consensus
• 2022 and 2023 back to back. and we're successful, my only recommendation is that there be the 75% consensus

Transcript Highlights:

• disruptions, the city can avoid shifting the financial burden to property taxes or other funding mechanisms
• And it should only be done when there is overwhelming consensus and in an appropriate manner.
• handout regarding Pflugerville ISD, they came in with back-to-back VADERs and were successful. 75% consensus

Bills: SB1277, SB1531, SB2452, SB2520, SB2521, SB2529, SB2538, SB2539, SB2541, SB2873

Keywords: municipal sales tax, street maintenance, local option tax, Tax Code Chapter 327, sales and use tax, street repair, sidewalk maintenance, water infrastructure, wastewater system, stormwater system, local election, ballot language, reauthorization, municipal finance, infrastructure funding, Texas municipalities, street and sidewalk tax, special district tax, public works, property tax

Transcript Highlights:

• There's less consensus on what constitutes a school-age child.
• There's less consensus on what constitutes a school age child.
• But this is real consensus. This is excellent work.
• And should we start planting that seed in November that this is consensus?
• The first transitions of payment mechanisms are painful.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We uniquely work to get consensus from 16 properties, including city, federal, commercial, and residential
• This cost recovery mechanism, like similar efforts recently passed in Vermont and New York, will make
• consensus scientific methods, scientists can quantify the economic losses a region like Massachusetts
• Secondly, using peer-reviewed consensus scientific methods, scientists can attribute those losses back
• Thirdly, using peer-reviewed consensus scientific methods, scientists can estimate the net present value

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee hearing focused on a broad set of climate, energy, and environmental justice proposals. Early testimony strongly supported the Climate Change Superfund or “Polluter Pays” bill (H.1014/S.58), which would assess the largest fossil fuel emitters for a one-time fee based on historic emissions to fund climate adaptation. Sponsors argued the bill is modeled on Superfund cleanup principles, would target only the largest multinational polluters, would not be passed on to consumers, and would direct a significant share of funds to environmental justice communities. Committee members asked about the number of companies covered, consumer impacts, and whether the bill would address other forms of environmental destruction; sponsors said it was limited to major fossil fuel companies with a Massachusetts footprint and did not cover other pollution sources. The committee also heard testimony on a fusion energy compact proposal (S.673) that would direct the administration to develop a framework for a New England regional compact to accelerate fusion research, workforce development, and supply-chain growth. Supporters from MIT and the Association of Independent Colleges and Universities said fusion could become a major clean-energy and economic opportunity, but acknowledged the technology is not yet commercially viable and still has unresolved technical, cost, and waste-management questions. Members pressed on environmental impacts, siting, waste, costs, and whether the bill would create a compact or only a framework; sponsors said it would only create the framework and that the administration would need to negotiate with other states. Another major topic was a pilot program for nature-based climate solutions (H.971/S.??), backed by legislators, Boston Harbor Now, and UMass Boston’s Stone Living Lab. Witnesses said the bill would help speed permits for research and demonstration projects such as living shorelines, marsh restoration, and hybrid “green-to-gray” flood protections, while maintaining safeguards and protecting Indigenous and historic resources. Committee members asked how the proposal would interact with other permitting reforms and whether it could conflict with housing or wetland-related streamlining; supporters said it was complementary and aimed at making projects faster, more affordable, and more data-driven. The hearing also covered climate-safe buildings and climate adaptation funding bills. Supporters of H.1004/S.583 said current building codes do not adequately account for future flooding, heat, and wind, and the bill would add climate expertise to the building board, allow stretch resilience codes, expand floodplain standards, and create a retrofit program. Related testimony backed H.938/S.572, which would create a dedicated climate and community resilience fund financed by a small fee on property insurance premiums; advocates said it would provide stable long-term revenue for adaptation, especially in environmental justice communities, and help replace unreliable federal funding. One witness from CLF supported the climate-safe buildings and funding bills but opposed S.560/H.939 as too broad. The committee also heard testimony on airport air-quality legislation (H.997) calling for more monitoring and mitigation of ultra-fine particulate pollution around Logan Airport and Massport communities. No votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> Okay, Senator McKelvie, your funding mechanism, though, is different than this one. Okay.
• Senator Mckel, Senator Mckel, &gt;&gt; your<00:19:39.039><c> funding</c><00:19:39.360><c> mechanism</
• c><00:19:39.919><c> though</c><00:19:40.480><c> is</c> &gt;&gt; your funding mechanism though is &gt;
• I mean, so the funding mechanism<00:19:44.640><c> you</c><00:19:45.120><c> enjoyed</c><00:19:45.520><
• mechanism you enjoyed with the federal government<00:19:46.400><c> is</c><00:19:46.640><c> different

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several health-related measures, with most of the discussion focused on bills addressing tobacco/vape enforcement, psychology licensure, hospital price transparency, prior authorization, and medical cannabis. The chair opened by explaining the one-minute testimony limit and that written testimony had been reviewed. For SB 2175 on disposable electronic smoking devices, the Department of Health said the bill’s placement in litter-control law was not a good fit because disposable e-cigarettes contain hazardous materials like lithium and nicotine, but it supported the intent and pointed to a related measure. Public health and tobacco-control advocates strongly supported the bill, citing youth use, toxic waste, battery fires, and the need to tighten definitions and remove exemptions; a long list of organizations and individuals were noted in support, with no opposition mentioned. For SB 2410, which would create a state directory and enforcement tools for authorized e-cigarette products, the Attorney General’s office strongly supported the measure and said it would help enforce the FDA-authorized list of products through certification, inspections, and civil penalties. The Department of Health said thousands of illegal products remain on the market and cited youth usage rates, while public health groups also supported the bill. One tobacco industry-related witness was noted in opposition. SB 2080, the psychology interjurisdictional compact, drew support from the Department of Corrections, which said it had severe staffing shortages and that the compact would help fill gaps, especially for forensic psychology and neighbor island facilities. Some committee members raised concerns about whether the compact would loosen licensure standards and reduce licensing revenue, and the Board of Psychology was said to be meeting and had not taken a formal position; testimony also noted the need for resources if the compact were adopted. The committee also heard SB 2276 on surgical assistance, with DCCA in opposition and a supporter from the field, but little discussion followed. SB 2277 on hospital price transparency drew support from consumer and patient advocates, who argued that clearer pricing would reduce medical debt and help patients shop for care; DCCA and the Department of Health offered comments, with the department suggesting an alternative enforcement model using outside review entities and noting that implementation would require significant staffing and funding. The Healthcare Association of Hawaii opposed the bill, saying federal transparency rules already cover the issue and state law could create duplication. SB 2282 on prior authorization received comments from insurers and providers; HMSA asked that the bill be set aside pending the report of the prior authorization working group created by Act 151, while the Hawaii Medical Association said prior authorization is a major burden but deferred to regulators on resources. Finally, SB 2413 on medical cannabis was supported by the Office of Medical Cannabis and others, who said the bill would close a patient-access gap by allowing viable seed sales; one witness suggested clarifying jurisdictional language and allowing dispensaries to sell seeds to each other. The committee then began SB 2425 on health insurance, where an addiction treatment provider testified that insurers’ refusal to honor assignment-of-benefits payments can delay reimbursement and create relapse risk for patients, but the transcript cuts off before further action on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• The real work of leadership is making decisions, hoping you can earn consensus, and facing the impact
• The real work of leadership is making decisions, hoping you can earn consensus and facing the impact.
• I mean, I think the overall consensus federally right now is that if we don't curtail some type of federal
• And so, again, this is a mechanism to try to, at the end of the day, give Oklahomans an opportunity to
• House Bill 4073 is an accounting mechanism where we're sweeping certain ARPA monies and repatriating

Bills: HB4028, HB4075, HB4077, HB4074, HB4076, SB1221, SB1921, SB2118, SB1932, SB2134, HCR1025, SB1432, HCR1024, HCR1022, SB1122, HB4029, HB4063, HB4073, HB4078, SB1936, SB44, SB237, SB248, SB1360, SB985, SB1204, SB1239, SB1307, SB2143, SB1428, SB1390, SB1400, SB1405, SB1732, SB1832, SB1859, SB1989, SB2018, SB1427

Keywords: tax deduction, venture capital, economic development, Oklahoma, investment, water resources, appropriations, funding, state treasury, infrastructure projects, emergency act, emergency management, disaster relief, pandemic response, state appropriations, HB4074, Health Care Workforce Training Commission, Health Care Workforce Revolving Fund, health workforce, health care workforce

Summary: The House opened with roll call, prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and several recognitions and introductions, including Deer Creek students, Skiatook Chamber members, Sand Springs youth leaders, and international visitors studying U.S. energy policy. The chamber also honored the Nurse of the Day, Marla Lyceum, and heard a lengthy farewell speech from Minority Leader Munson reflecting on her service, constituent work, leadership, and bipartisan relationships. Members then took up several special presentations and resolutions, including HCR 1024 recognizing Route 66 Day and its economic importance, HCR 1022 honoring National Lineman Appreciation Day, and a citation for Langston University Day at the Capitol. The House also recognized Deputy Kenton Blumenthal as Oklahoma’s 2025 Officer of the Year for heroic actions during a dangerous pursuit. Later, the House introduced the pages of the week. On legislation, the House passed SB 1122 on ad valorem tax, which supporters said would equalize tax treatment for broadband infrastructure and promote business fairness, over some concern about tax policy and revenue impacts. The chamber also passed HB 4029, HB 4063, HB 4073, HB 4078, and SB 1936, with emergency clauses adopted on the first four. HB 4063, which referred two previously approved state questions to a special August election, drew extended debate over ballot timing, turnout, and whether combining the questions was appropriate; it ultimately passed and the special election referral was approved. SB 1936, which elevates falsely impersonating a law enforcement officer to a D1 felony, passed unanimously.

Transcript Highlights:

• I've been involved in this just because I don't really like the mechanism that is being employed.
• labor and management have had discussions and have worked together to essentially come to a kind of consensus
• I was involved, but they worked together to essentially come to a consensus. That's my view.

Keywords: 993, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on Codes met in a different room due to scheduling conflicts and considered a series of bills, mostly criminal procedure, penal law, civil rights, and executive law measures. Several bills had previously passed the Senate unanimously and were quickly moved through committee, including measures sponsored by Senators Harkham, Scootis, Bernardis, Scarsella Spanton, Conrad, Ryan, Jimenez, and others. The committee also considered Senate Print 1004A by Senator Brisport, which would amend the Criminal Procedure Law and Mental Hygiene Law to address prolonged detention of incapacitated individuals; Senator Palumbo supported the bill’s intent but objected to the mechanism, and the bill was reported to finance with Palumbo in the negative and Gallivan without recommendation. Senator Bailey’s Senate Print 4525, focused on language access in criminal procedure, drew supportive comments about ensuring non-English speakers are not denied justice, but it was reported with Senator Kavanagh without recommendation and Senators Murray and Palumbo in the negative. The committee also advanced Senate Print 5110A by Senator Scarcella Spanton, which would increase protections for HPD inspectors by making assaults on them a low-level felony; members expressed concern about increasing penalties but agreed the bill had merit, and it was reported with Kavanagh without recommendation and Brisport and Sepúlveda in the negative. The most extended discussion centered on Senate Print 3021C by Senator Hinchy, which would require a uniform tattoo policy for state and local law enforcement. Members debated First Amendment concerns, subjectivity in determining what is “offensive,” and whether the bill should set clearer guardrails or simply require agencies to adopt a policy. Supporters said the bill aimed to create statewide consistency and reflect changing norms around tattoos, while critics worried about subjective enforcement and potential constitutional issues. The bill was moved by Senator Myrie and reported, with Senators Sepúlveda and Brisport without recommendation. The meeting then adjourned after the chair thanked members for the discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• There are funding mechanisms where there is an opportunity for that development.
• If you have HVAC skills, if you have welding skills, if you have general problem-solving and Mechanical
• Performance measures, both analysts did reach a consensus on all performance measures and targets.
• Both analysts reached a consensus on all performance measures and budget targets.
• Again, the analysts reached consensus. consensus on all measures and targets.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, we kind of reached a consensus. This was a special meeting of a certain class.
• The consensus there was if the trainer was a teacher, that would be best to have as the example of the
• We just have to look for a consensus that helps protect kids.
• So what really comes down to is how do we get the funding mechanisms, how do we get the programs, how
• next month we can collaborate and brainstorm kind of an awareness campaign and then create some mechanisms

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• What should be overwhelming consensus. This should be a point of pride in California. Mr. DeMaio.
• There was no consensus at that time that it was truly heinous and an injustice, but today there is.
• Can we not speak to the best of our consensus? by supporting this resolution today?
• And that once a bill is on concurrence, there is no mechanism for it to be amended.
• However, there is no mechanism for a bill that's on concurrence to be amended. Mr.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• taking an official stance, not because of neutrality, but because we are just unable to come to consensus
• to answer any questions. ...not because of neutrality, but because we are just unable to come to consensus
• can fairly evaluate multiple options and arrive at outcomes that are better reflective of a group consensus
• So instead of— Mechanism for European colonization.
• It operates largely on an honor system and does not include a clear enforcement mechanism that keeps

Bills: HB2210, HB2123, HB2206, HB2281, HB2411

Keywords: local representation, fair elections, government accountability, voter rights, transparency, foreign nationals, elections, Washington state, voter participation, government oversight, voting rights, uniform standards, overseas voting, civilian voting, state legislation, tribal relations, government, state policy, sovereignty, federalism

Summary: The committee began with member introductions and then heard House Bill 2123 on foreign national participation in elections. Staff explained that current law requires certifications from candidates, political committees, and political advertising sponsors that foreign nationals were not involved in financing or decision-making. The proposed substitute would raise the threshold for when those certifications are required, and an amendment would raise it further, effectively limiting the requirement mostly to ballot measure activity. Prime sponsor Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon said the existing paperwork burden makes campaigns harder without solving much, and that the bill would reduce unnecessary requirements while preserving protections where federal law does not already bar foreign money, especially in ballot measures. The committee then took up House Bill 2210 on ranked choice voting for local elections. Staff described the bill as allowing local governments to adopt ranked choice voting, changing the top-two primary structure to a top-five process for participating jurisdictions, and setting rules for ballot design, tabulation, and voter education. Rep. Lisa Gregerson framed the bill as a temporary tool to protect fair elections amid federal uncertainty and possible Voting Rights Act changes. Supporters, including Fair Vote Washington, Washington Bus, Sightline Institute, and several advocates, argued ranked choice voting could improve representation, expand voter choice, and help communities of color, young voters, military and overseas voters, and underrepresented groups. Opponents, including Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, several county auditors, and other witnesses, said the system is confusing, costly, and may increase ballot errors or lower turnout, especially for language-minority and disabled voters. The hearing on HB 2210 was paused partway through to move to other bills. House Bill 2411, on expanding the state shared leave program, would allow state employees to use donated leave if they are victims of hate crimes or if they or a family member are affected by immigration enforcement actions. Rep. Osman Salahuddin said the bill fills a gap exposed by a recent ICE detention case involving a state employee and would help workers remain employed during traumatic disruptions. OFM, the Office of Equity, and the Washington Federation of State Employees supported the bill, saying it is a low-cost way to help coworkers support one another. Some witnesses questioned whether the bill would apply to people without legal status, while others argued that state employment already requires legal documentation. Online and in-person opponents criticized the bill as unnecessary or as benefiting undocumented people. The committee also heard House Bill 2281, which would strengthen government-to-government consultation with tribes and add protections for tribal traditional cultural places. Staff said the bill would require timely notice, meaningful consultation, and a higher legal standard before state agencies could burden tribal cultural practices, with a possible superior court claim if the standard is violated. Vice Chair Rep. Chris Stearns said the bill is meant to protect Native identity and sacred sites from destruction and to use a strict-scrutiny-like standard when state actions burden tribal religious practices. Tribal and faith-based supporters backed the bill as a needed safeguard for sacred places and sovereignty, while industry groups warned it could create broad veto power, permitting uncertainty, and significant costs. The hearing on HB 2281 was then closed. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 2206, which adopts the Uniform Military and Overseas Voters Act to expand and standardize voting access for military and overseas voters in state and local elections. Staff said the bill would broaden the definition of overseas voters and improve ballot access and enforcement. Secretary of State Steve Hobbs strongly supported the measure, and a witness who had lived overseas as a child described herself as one of the small number of people affected and asked for clearer review of UOCAVA status. An opponent argued the bill would allow never-residents to vote in Washington and cited North Carolina court decisions rejecting similar provisions. A Verified Voting representative supported a committee amendment to remove stray electronic portal language. The hearing on HB 2206 was still underway at the end of the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• However, there is no enforcement mechanism. These appraisals are supplied.
• However, there is no enforcement mechanism to ensure that if a condemning... ...entity fails to do so
• The mechanism was put in there, there's been two cases, two matters, of 5,000-plus occupants.
• The mechanism is there; this would be inconsistent with the very thing that was passed and is in the
• I mean, we work really hard with the landowners to get a consensus bill.