Video & Transcript Research : 'absentee voting'

Page 9 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • vote.
  • With early voting, anybody can vote at any location.
  • Without absentee voting, these people would not be able to make it to polling stations without taking
  • voting.
  • Does it abolish absentee voting? Senator, I'll go ahead, if you wish. Is that a yes or a no? No.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Apr 14th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • votes.
  • Without absentee voting, these people would not be able to make it to polling stations without taking
  • Without absentee voting, these people would not be able to make it to polling stations without taking
  • voting.
  • Does it abolish absentee voting? Senator, I'll go ahead, if you wish. Is that a yes or no?
Summary: The committee first adopted a committee substitute for Senate Bill 30 and then voted to report the substituted bill favorably to the full Senate; the roll call showed six ayes and one nay, with later unanimous-consent corrections noted for additional aye votes. The committee also reported Senate Bill 801 favorably to the full Senate by an eight-to-one vote. Both bills were left with no further action in the meeting after the votes. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2595 by Senator Middleton and Senate Bill 2876 by Chairman Hughes, both aimed at addressing masked harassment and riot-related conduct. Supporters said the bills would deter intimidation, protect public order, and respond to recent protests and anti-Semitic incidents, while opponents from civil rights, disability, and advocacy groups argued the measures were overly broad, could chill peaceful protest, and would burden people who wear masks for religious, medical, or disability-related reasons. Public testimony was taken on both bills, and both were left pending after testimony closed. Senate Bill 2753, by Senator Hall, proposed consolidating early voting and election day into a single continuous in-person voting period with common procedures and equipment, while preserving countywide voting and mail voting. The Secretary of State’s office said the bill could improve ballot secrecy and simplify administration, though witnesses raised concerns about ballot privacy, logistics, and access for disabled voters; some county election officials were neutral or supportive of the concept, while others opposed it as confusing or potentially burdensome. The bill was left pending after extensive testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 2225 on allowing spirit-based ready-to-drink beverages to be sold in grocery and convenience stores, with supporters arguing the law should focus on alcohol content rather than the source of the alcohol and that the bill would modernize an outdated code. Later, Senate Bill 1540, which would add election officials and related workers to confidentiality protections, drew support from county election officials who described threats and harassment, though one witness suggested the bill’s language may need technical adjustment to better match its intent. Finally, Senate Bill 2382, concerning statewide voter registration systems and offline counties, drew opposition from county election administrators and vendors who warned about capacity, cybersecurity, and single-point-of-failure risks, while others suggested a phased approach or API-based integration; the transcript ends with testimony still open on that bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Apr 14th, 2025

State Affairs

Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs heard Senate Bill 3031, which would expand aggravated assault to cover certain road-rage shootings involving a person in or traveling to or from a motor vehicle, when a firearm is discharged and causes injury, property damage, or fear of serious bodily injury. Senator Schwertner laid out the bill for the author, described it as closing a gap in the law, and there was no public testimony; the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2514, a measure by Chairman Hughes aimed at creating a DPS unit to identify, investigate, and monitor hostile foreign influence operations and to require ethics training for state employees. Supportive invited testimony from Dr. Jacqueline Deal, Ambassador Kelly Curry, and Michael Lucci emphasized threats from the Chinese Communist Party, transnational repression, cyber intrusion, and state-level influence efforts, and argued Texas should take a leading role. Public testimony included opposition from speakers who raised concerns about free speech, privacy, and potential overbreadth. The bill was left pending after testimony closed. Finally, the committee took up Senate Bill 30 as pending business and discussed a committee substitute. Senator Schwertner explained that the substitute would limit admissible medical expense evidence to amounts paid or up to 300% of Medicare, clarify treatment of provider testimony and attorney-referred providers, remove a requirement that plaintiffs use available health insurance to mitigate damages, strike a unanimous-verdict requirement for non-economic damages, and delete a remittitur provision. Senators questioned the impact on sexual assault and child abuse survivors, the use of Medicare as a benchmark, and whether the bill would still allow fair compensation. After discussion, SB 30 was left pending and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Mar 5th, 2025

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • We will not take a vote today. We will not take a vote today, no. We don't have...
  • Okay, well, you're looking at a girl that won by six votes.
  • Now, the largest precinct I found had 2,900 votes.
  • You told me that you had someone copy a ballot and voted... ...you had someone copy a ballot and voted
  • She voted eight times. It was at a testing center. Okay, that's...
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Each vote was 15 to 16 or 16 to 15.
  • Last year when delegates voted on the individual planks, 51% of those in attendance voted against the
  • When that vote was adjusted to a voting strength percentage, the plank barely passed and had the lowest
  • Are you going to vote for something that says, oh, I don't know, we're going to outlaw poultry?
  • And then going further, if Texas is not on board, it's doubtful the other states will pull enough votes
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • for more than 91% of the voting shares.
  • There's the perception that votes have gotten better; the proxy votes have gotten better.
  • We're still seeing some pretty disturbing votes. Let's talk about recent votes, some examples.
  • BlackRock voted in 2020 before BlackRock voted on a shareholder proposal urging Jack-in-the-Box to determine
  • And BlackRock's vote was crucial to passage.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Delivery of Government Efficiency Apr 23rd, 2025

Delivery of Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • Seeing none, we'll reserve your right to vote. Thank you. The chair calls James Quintero.
  • It's through the provision of this type of information that policymakers can encourage informed voting
  • There being ten ayes, one nay, zero present, not voting, and two absent, the motion prevails.
  • They're not voting; two absent, the motion prevails.
  • I respectfully urge you to... vote in support of this bill. Thank you.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I am directed by the House to inform the Senate that the House is taking a vote. Thank you.
Bills: SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, SB1, HB4
Summary: The Senate briefly convened and received a message from the House stating that the House was taking a vote. No bills, motions, or substantive policy matters were discussed in the exchange. Pursuant to a previously adopted motion, the Senate then adjourned until 7 p.m. on Thursday, August 21.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We're going to, later today, tonight, we're going to vote.
  • We're not going to vote on it right now, but she has another scheduled appointment that she needs to
  • We have four people registered for the bill, zero against, and no one wants to vote against it.
  • SB1887 rejects peer-reviewed science, and I urge you to vote against it. Thank you.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It restricts that from being used wherever the vote is taking place.
  • Both, whenever the time comes to vote.
  • It's part of the reason why I voted the way I did.
  • The same citizens that vote for our congressional delegation are the same citizens that vote for our
  • I think that's my vote. Is that okay with you? Thank you, Chairman. Yeah, absolutely.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm here to ask you to vote no on HB3225.
  • Vote against this bill. Thank you. Go ahead, Ms. Foote.
  • I urge you to vote against HB 229.
  • Please vote no on HB229. Thank you for your testimony.
  • I urge you to vote against HB 229.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) May 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • You know, you're not eligible to vote until you're 18.
  • I'm here to ask you to vote no on HB 3225.
  • Vote against this bill. Thank you. Vote against this bill. Thank you. Go ahead, Ms. Foote.
  • I urge you to vote no.
  • Vote no.
Summary: The committee took up House Bill 186, which would require social media platforms to verify users are 18 or older before allowing account creation. Invited witnesses in support, including Mary Elizabeth Castle and David Dunmoyer, argued the bill would protect children from harmful algorithms, addictive design, bullying, sexual exploitation, and mental health harms, and emphasized parental rights and the idea that minors should not enter binding contracts with platforms. Committee members questioned them about how algorithms work, whether parents could realistically monitor content, and whether the bill would still allow educational use; the witnesses said the bill was narrowly aimed at harmful social media use and not educational content. Public testimony on HB 186 was largely in opposition, though several student witnesses said they supported the bill’s goals but wanted the age lowered to 16 or the bill amended to allow parental consent or joint accounts. Opponents argued the bill would be ineffective because teens could bypass age checks, would cut off access to educational tools, school communications, recruiting and NIL opportunities, and would burden free speech and privacy. Some witnesses also said social media helps teens with mental health, community, and creative or professional opportunities, while others warned the bill could disproportionately harm disabled and marginalized users. After public testimony closed, HB 186 was left pending. The committee then heard House Bill 5138, which Chairman Hughes said would respond to a court ruling limiting the Attorney General’s authority to prosecute election crimes unless invited by local prosecutors by changing the statute to require AG prosecution. Public testimony on HB 5138 was brief and opposed by at least one witness who argued it would further erode local control and expand state preemption. The bill was left pending after testimony. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 3225, a library bill aimed at keeping sexually explicit books and materials out of children’s sections in municipal libraries and requiring age verification for checkout, including digital access, with parental consent and other revisions added in the House. Supporters said the bill would protect children from explicit material and keep such content in adult sections, while opponents argued it would amount to censorship, be costly and difficult to implement, and could be used to target LGBTQ+ or other marginalized content. Library workers, parents, students, and advocates testified that existing library sections already separate age-appropriate materials and that the bill could reduce access to books, burden libraries, and infringe on parental choice and free expression.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

House and Governmental Affairs May 12th, 2026

House and Governmental Affairs

Summary: The House and Governmental Affairs Committee met on May 12 with a quorum present and took up several measures. It first heard HCR 74, which would establish a Louisiana-United Kingdom Trade Commission modeled after the existing Louisiana-Ireland commission. The author said the commission would serve as an umbrella group to promote exchanges in trade, academics, financial services, economic development, and the arts, with no compensation for members. After brief questions and supportive testimony from a member familiar with the Ireland commission, the committee reported HCR 74 favorably. The committee then considered SCR 38, which repeals Joint Rule No. 7 related to the Atchafalaya Basin Program Oversight Committee. The author explained that the repeal was tied to a separate study commission on Atchafalaya Basin water quality, aimed at addressing sediment buildup, stagnant hypoxia, and harm to the fishing industry. Members discussed sediment management and water quality concerns, and the committee adopted a technical amendment to the title before reporting the resolution favorably, as amended. Finally, the committee began hearing Senate Bill 495 on campaign finance disclosures. The author described a series of changes, including raising the threshold for unitemized individual contributions to $200, adjusting when a PAC is considered to be participating in an election, extending the annual report deadline from February 28 to March 15, and allowing leadership PAC funds to cover replacement or repair of items damaged in connection with public office. The transcript cuts off during the bill presentation, so no final action on SB 495 is shown.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session May 10th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Leach voting aye, Mr. Morales voting aye, Ms. Hinojosa voting aye. Have all members voted? Mr.
  • Hinojosa voting aye. Mr. Guerra voting aye. All voted.
  • Patterson voting aye. Ms. Flores... voting aye. Ball voted.
  • Harris voting... Voting aye. Have all members voted? Have all members voted?
  • Oliverson voting nay, Ms. Hinojosa voting aye. All members voted? Have all members voted?