Video & Transcript Research : 'Texas Government Code Chapter 418'

Page 99 of 500
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is also wrong because it represents a true breakdown of our constitutional system of government.
  • Remember, this is the federal government that polluted the lands, nobody else.
  • On Alaska native lands, again, polluted by the federal government.
  • If it is only the federal government that has caused this, that's one thing, but if the federal government
  • Government had fee, was polluted by the fossil fuel industry, and then transferred it without settling
Bills: SB347, SB351
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Chamber Meeting Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:17 am

New Mexico House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Whereas, J.B. was born April 25, 2002, in Dallas, Texas, and moved to Santa Fe when he was six years
  • old. 2002 in Dallas, Texas, and moved to Santa Fe when he was six years old.
  • The school code, the public schools code, defines law enforcement in a different section. Mr.
  • And this is from the Public Schools Code, not from this bill, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
  • And on page 5, the local school board or governing body are the ones responsible for this. Mr.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm going to call this meeting of the State Government Finance and Policy Committee to order.
  • In this covered by chapter 16C or 16B.
  • breach would be governed by that language,<00:31:43.200> correct?
  • Government Finance Committee. Government Finance Committee.
  • But we are changing Chapter 13.64, is that correct? Mr. Chair. That is correct.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/3/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • consensus that allowing the government consensus that allowing the government to<00:08:24.479>
  • > of<00:09:13.360> facial Number three, government use of facial Number three, government
  • <00:10:14.399> And banning or governing its use. And banning or governing its use.
  • case Texas versus Kennedy. case Texas versus Kennedy.
  • If successful, Texas v.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes from February 24 and February 26. It then took up House File 3661, a bill originally authored by Representative Gomez and presented by Representative Feist, which would ban government use of facial recognition technology and be re-referred to the Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee. The committee adopted the A1 amendment, described as a technical amendment based on House Research recommendations, before hearing testimony on the bill. Representative Feist said the bill is aimed at preventing serious privacy and civil-liberties harms, including secretive surveillance, racial and gender bias, and the lack of statewide rules governing government use of facial recognition. Supportive testimony came from Chad Marlo of the ACLU, who argued the issue is bipartisan, the technology has accuracy problems, and government use is expanding against vulnerable groups. Chris Wayland of Restore the Fourth Minnesota also supported a ban, emphasizing the inability to opt out of facial recognition and the lack of standards, disclosure, and community input. Rich Newmeister urged stronger transparency measures, including agency policies and public notice in buildings using the technology. Major Spencer Baky of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office opposed an outright ban, saying facial recognition is used only as an investigative lead, not for positive identification or real-time surveillance, and that results are corroborated before use. He said the office has used the tool in hundreds of investigations and supports a statutory framework with safeguards instead of a ban. In member discussion, Representative Hudson argued a blanket ban was too broad and suggested a more targeted evidentiary approach, while Representative Moller and Representative Kurr expressed concern about misuse and the federal government's use of the technology. Representative Durant asked whether there was a current Minnesota problem and whether stakeholders and law enforcement had been involved in drafting the bill. No final vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided, beyond adoption of the amendment and the committee’s continued consideration of HF 3661.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Apr 15th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • As you can see, this bill is really about transparency in government.
  • wanted to make it clear that the league supports policies that uphold transparent and accountable government
  • Public records requests are a tried-and-true mechanism for public engagement and government transparency
  • um the LP Gas Board, when they do their due diligence, if there is a safety violation, which was a code
  • So if you change the setbacks from 25 ft, 50 ft or whatever, you're adding to a code that we already
Bills: HB407, SB306, SB320, SB321
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 12, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, chapter 171 governs our public lands, and as Deputy uh alluded to, section 171-58 talks about how
  • So,<01:40:35.840> chapter<01:40:36.320> 171<01:40:36.800> governs<01:40:37.119><
  • c> our<01:40:37.360> public<01:40:37.600> lands So, chapter 171 governs our public
  • lands So, chapter 171 governs our public lands and<01:40:38.480> um<01:40:38.719> as<01
  • council, we've been very active when the code council was still active in administering Chapter 107.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1846, relating to shoreline mitigation districts. DLNR and the Office of Planning opposed the bill, arguing it would improperly shift regulatory roles between the agencies and prioritize private land interests over public trust and natural and historic resources. Supporters, including the Shoreline Preservation Coalition, Kahana Bay residents, and Hawaii Realtors, said regional planning is needed to address severe erosion, especially in Kahana, and that better coordination between state and county agencies could help move stalled projects forward. Testifiers emphasized that shoreline conditions vary by area and that science-based, region-specific solutions are needed. Members asked questions about whether existing law already allows regional planning and emergency shoreline responses. DLNR said it already has authority to process regional projects and cited an existing draft EIS for Kahana Bay that would proceed through normal permitting and public hearing channels. Supporters responded that the bill would provide a clearer regional planning framework and help communities facing urgent erosion impacts. No vote was taken on HB 1846 in the portion provided. The committee then took up HB 2205, relating to emergency erosion mitigation. DLNR opposed the bill, saying it already has authority to issue emergency permits and had recently done so quickly for a collapsed sidewalk at Queen Surf Beach, and warning that the bill’s language could weaken Act 16 by changing a prohibition on shoreline hardening to a requirement to merely minimize it. Kahana Bay representatives and other supporters argued the bill would create a limited, regulated short-term pathway for emergency shoreline solutions while long-term plans are developed, and said current permits have expired or stalled, leaving dangerous sandbags and no practical relief. Additional testimony from a private homeowner stressed that erosion is threatening homes and that private owners are often bearing the cost of protecting public shoreline access. The discussion remained focused on balancing emergency protection, public access, and long-term shoreline management, and no final action was taken in the excerpt provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government Apr 22nd, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Senate Committee on Local Government will come to order. We'll call the roll in a second.
  • We'll call James Pope, Susan Spittaro, Brandy Winch, Texas Realtors, and Shannon Obrook.
  • Texas Realtors supports SB 23 and SJR 85 because we understand that our seniors...
  • Mike Taylor, and I am representing the Texas Silver-Haired Legislature.
  • Hale here on behalf of the Texas Association of Builders, today in support of Senate Bill 23.
Bills: SB23, SJR85
Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government heard testimony on Senate Bill 23 and its companion constitutional amendment, Senate Joint Resolution 85, both by Senator Bettencourt. The bills would increase the additional homestead exemption for elderly and disabled homeowners from $10,000 to $60,000, which proponents said would significantly reduce property taxes and help seniors and disabled Texans age in place. Bettencourt and supporters described the measure as part of a broader property tax relief package, estimating combined savings of about $950 for over-65 and disabled homeowners when paired with other recent homestead exemption changes. Witnesses largely supported the proposal. Testimony in favor came from a lawyer, a private citizen, Texas Realtors, the Texas Silver-Haired Legislature, and the Texas Association of Builders, all emphasizing relief for fixed-income seniors, housing stability, and the ability to remain in their homes. Several witnesses noted rising property taxes, medical costs, and the challenges seniors face in moving or affording home modifications. One witness from Every Texan said a flat homestead exemption is the most equitable way to cut property taxes, but argued against additional tax cuts generally, favoring a circuit-breaker approach and warning that permanent tax cuts could reduce funding for schools and other needs. The committee also discussed data showing many over-65 homeowners already pay no school property taxes in some counties and that the proposed changes would increase that share. After closing public testimony, the committee voted on the measures. Senate Bill 23 was reported favorably to the full Senate by a 7-0 vote, and S.J.R. 85 was also reported favorably by a 7-0 vote. The transcript also shows Senate Bill 898 being laid out and passed unanimously earlier in the meeting, with a recommendation for the local and uncontested calendar.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice (Part II) Feb 12th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • My name is Crystal Gomez and I'm here representing the Texas chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers
  • to Texas taxpayers.
  • Pretrial detention in Texas is not carefully limited.
  • Every Texan deserves to feel safe, but SJR 5 would take Texas down the wrong path by undermining Texas
  • SAR 5 enshrines in the Texas Constitution a new provision that would trap thousands of Texas, disproportionately
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Feb 20th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Pledges of Allegiance to the United States and Texas Flags.
  • Salute, I honor the Texas flag, I pledge allegiance to the United States of America, and to the Texas
  • Baytown embodies that vision. the resilience and spirit of Texas.
  • The Texas Rural Education Association continues to honor Mr.
  • The Asian American Pacific Islander community is a vital and growing part of Texas. Texas.
Keywords: 1184, house, all
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

EIG-GVO, GVO DEFER Public Hearings 01-30-2025

Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • property to government building.
  • property to government building.
  • The docket to look at intrastate, you know, building or government property to government building.
  • measures adopted okay thank you 418 measures adopted okay thank you 418 quite<00:59:03.680> a
  • comments if not 418 comments if not 418 sd1<00:59:45.319> any<00:59:45.520> no<00:
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The joint hearing began with SB 133 on energy, which drew opposition testimony from James Abraham, who said the bill was unnecessary because the Public Utilities Commission had already opened a proceeding to investigate wheeling, including intergovernmental wheeling, and should be allowed to finish its collaborative process. The committees then moved to SB 161 on county permitting and inspection, where several agencies submitted written comments or opposition, while the Grassroots Institute and HCDA-related testimony supported the measure. Members raised concerns about accountability and whether state agencies would report back on projects approved under any permitting exemption, and witnesses suggested annual reporting or amendment language to address that issue. The hearing then turned to SB 232 and SB 588, both related to renewable energy permitting. Testimony on SB 232 was largely supportive, but Rocky Mold of the Hawaii Solar Energy Association said SB 232 was an older version of a bill and that SB 588 was the preferred, updated measure. Members discussed whether the bill should be limited to residential or behind-the-meter customer-sited systems rather than utility-scale projects, and Mold clarified that the proposal was intended for customer-sited systems, not utility-scale facilities. For SB 588, the Department of Land and Natural Resources warned that state or county laws inconsistent with the National Flood Insurance Program could jeopardize flood insurance eligibility and related federal assistance, while Mold argued the bill’s FEMA floodway exemption was needed to avoid blocking solar installations on existing structures. The chair expressed concern about risking federal funding and questioned whether the exemption could be narrowed without defeating the bill’s purpose. SB 412, also on renewable energy, received supportive testimony from the State Energy Office and others. Members questioned whether a single coordinating entity should compile agency assessments, and Mark Glick said the Energy Office could take on that role if given the duty and sufficient staff. The committee then discussed SB 635 on energy efficiency, which would require state agencies to use energy-efficient lighting. Mark Glick testified that much of the work was already underway through benchmarking and related contracts, and a DAGS representative said the state was already assessing 590 buildings over 10,000 square feet, with results expected around 2027. Members suggested amending the bill to require annual status reports so the committees could track progress and avoid duplication. No votes were taken during the hearing.
MD

Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session, 3/12/2026 #1

Maryland Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you see some folks wearing red today, those are my guest friends from AARP Chapter 939 from Prince
  • Dear President Ferguson, pursuant to Title 2, Section 26-202 of the Maryland Code, it is my pleasure
  • Dear President Ferguson, pursuant to Title 2, Section 26-202 of the Maryland Code, it is my pleasure
  • Uh, Senate Bill 418 is on third reading for final passage. Any discussion?
  • Uh, Senate Bill 418 is on third reading for final passage. Any discussion?
Summary: The Maryland Senate convened with a quorum, heard an invocation from Pastor Delman Coates, and received several guest introductions, including the doctor of the day, student visitors, homeschool advocates, community leaders, and the Braver Angels group. The chamber also journalized remarks welcoming Dr. Coates and recognized a prayer breakfast, with members offering brief thanks and acknowledgments before moving to legislative business. The Senate handled several messages and nominations, including withdrawal of an appointment, Johns Hopkins Police Accountability Board nominations, and Prince George’s County Board of License Commissioners nominations, all referred to Executive Nominations. The chamber also received House Bill 156 and an Executive Nominations Committee report recommending confirmation of a slate of appointments, which was special ordered for later consideration. A motion to return Senate Bill 463 to second reader and special order it for Tuesday was adopted without objection, and Senate Bill 473 was also special ordered for Tuesday. On third reading, the Senate passed a large number of bills, including measures on ignition interlock participation, school construction, port hearing notice, veteran status notation for educators, correctional officer scholarships, benefits exploitation, veterans trust fund applications, presidential electors, advance enrollment for children of active service members, retired law enforcement handgun permits, high-risk pregnancy discharge communication, charitable organization audit thresholds, child care criminal history checks, water pollution discharge permits, blockchain task force creation, franchise registration reform, licensing portability for foreign service members and spouses, Medicaid collaborative care cost-sharing, gift card fraud, school for the deaf board membership, vehicle dealer hearings, massage therapy advertising, protective body armor reporting, lithium-ion battery safety, pharmacy prescriber agreements for opioid use disorder treatment, human relevant research fund contributions, state and higher education email requirements, and auto insurance producer commissions. Most passed unanimously or by wide margins; Senate Bill 348 and Senate Bill 585 passed with 30 and 32 votes in favor, respectively. Senate Bill 140, concerning benefits exploitation, drew extended debate over constitutionality and pending litigation, with one senator citing an Attorney General opinion and another citing a Supreme Court case on neutral principles in church property disputes; the bill ultimately passed with 40 votes. Members later changed several votes on the floor, including on Senate Bills 172, 376, 428, and 48. The session ended while the clerk was beginning to read Senate Bill 629, with the remaining calendar not completed in the transcript.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you. governs the work and the governs the work and the meal<00:24:28.679> breaks meal breaks
  • was required by the federal government was required by the federal government in<00:42:16.640>
  • <00:59:51.960> 22, system session law 2023 chapter 22, system session law 2023 chapter 22,
  • Opposed, same sign. a local unit of government um could a local unit of government um could actually<
  • <01:47:12.440> to agency or local unit of government to agency or local unit of government
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 2/20/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • In addition, nothing in our industry goes into the ground without local government permits.
  • In addition, nothing in our industry goes into the ground without local government permits.
  • Derrick Lefor, for the record, head of government affairs for Gateway Fiber.
  • chapter 7560 creates the Office of Pipeline Safety, which enforces these one-call laws.
  • <00:37:17.400> 216d Minnesota State Law chapter 216d Minnesota State Law chapter 216d establishes
Bills: HF47, HF335
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • 379 of the tax code.
  • which is already addressed in chapter which is already addressed in chapter 379<00:02:27.560>
  • So, it is not 379 of the tax code.
  • That is a simple in the insurance code.
  • If you're on a government program, either the federal or state government is paying for the most of your