Video & Transcript : 'county excise tax' :

Page 98 of 500
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/27/2026 - House Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Transcript Highlights:
  • in Pima County.
  • None of our representatives in Pima County have had any interest in this because Pima County is pretty
  • much a single-party county.
  • They were sued by actually Pima County.
  • I happen to live in the county near the city. I have constituents in both the county and the city.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans Jan 23rd, 2026 at 10:30 am

Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans

Transcript Highlights:
  • It removes the January 2027 implementation date for counties.
  • Agencies in Benton and Mason counties, the average time frame is about eight months.
  • King County agencies like mine, the average is about six months to get reimbursed.
  • Agencies in Benton and Mason counties, the average time frames about eight months.
  • King County agencies like mine, the average is about six months to get reimbursed.
Bills: HB2397 , HB2417 , HB2157 , HB2186 , HB2225 , HB2351
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education Jan 14th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Early Learning & K-12 Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • also be eligible for federal impact aid, which is designed to assist districts that have lost property tax
  • revenue due to the presence of tax-exempt federal property or a high enrollment of federally connected
  • the record, my name is State Senator Leonard Christian from the fabulous 4th District in Spokane County
  • talking about the lack of funding for materials, supplies, operating costs, transportation, the sales tax
  • Welcome, Jeff Pack, Washington Citizens Against Unfair Taxes. Everybody loves getting a raise.
Bills: SB5901 , SB5860 , SB5956 , SB5574 , SB5922 , SB5858
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/14/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I'm a public defender in Pima County.
  • of Maricopa County data.
  • Those are official reports that have been made through some of the county recorders.
  • It used to be that you had to pay a $200 tax on it.
  • Yeah, this bill was supported by the municipalities and by the counties.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation May 19th, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, I'm here on behalf of Grayson County and the citizens therein.
  • Bruce Dawy on behalf of Grayson County for the bill. Correct.
  • Uh, we have no zoning regulations in the county.
  • Bruce Dawy on behalf of Grayson County for the bill. Correct.
  • Uh, we 669 have no zoning regulations in the county.
Bills: SB1757 , SB1758 , SB1898 , SB2050
Summary: The committee first took up SB 2203, relating to certification of discovery issues in TCEQ contested cases referred to SOAH. The chair noted the House had already passed the companion HB 3249, then moved SB 2203 without amendments. The motion prevailed on a 5-0 vote, and the bill was reported favorably to the full House. The committee then heard SB 1898, which would prohibit the use of PFAS-containing firefighting foam for testing and training, while still allowing it in emergency firefighting. The sponsor described PFAS as “forever chemicals” and said the bill would protect firefighters, water supplies, and public health. Testimony in support came from Environment Texas, which cited contamination concerns and noted other states and federal actions restricting PFAS foams. No one testified against the bill, and after closing testimony the committee left SB 1898 pending. The remainder of the hearing focused on SB 1758, a Grayson County pilot program aimed at addressing potential conflicts between Global Wafers’ semiconductor wafer facility and a proposed Black Mountain Cement/aggregate operation. Supporters, including Global Wafers, Grayson County officials, and manufacturing groups, argued that vibration from mining or blasting could threaten a major national-security semiconductor investment and that an independent BEG study was needed to set safe parameters. Opponents from Black Mountain Cement and related industry groups argued the bill would improperly interfere with a lawful permitting process, pick winners and losers, and harm Texas’ pro-business climate; they also said they had already revised operations and removed blast mining. The discussion included extensive questioning about geology, vibration, the permitting timeline, and whether the issue was really about mining rather than the air permit. No vote was taken on SB 1758 in the portion provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 22nd, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • We've got Randall County, which has a pre-trial diversion program, Harris County, Vice Chair Wu, Dallas
  • County, Tarrant County, Hunt County, and El Paso County.
  • For instance, a county... Court at law? County courts at law. Okay.
  • In those counties that have county courts at law. Okay, any questions, members?
  • And, of course, it would have an impact in Montgomery County as it would in any other county.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 22nd, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • heard a couple of weeks ago relates to the expunction of arrest records and files by a statutory county
  • heard a couple of weeks ago that deals with the cremation authorization procedures in just those counties
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections Apr 16th, 2025

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, so your local county jails, even your animal shelters, Shelters are required to maintain temperatures
  • Inmates come in from county jails where they have been acclimated to lower temperatures.
  • All county jails have to be air-conditioned. Yes, sir. Okay, thank you. Just one quick question.
  • that anything we're contemplating... ...is being done with maximum value and efficiency to the unit of tax
  • Correction officers currently attend a six-week training academy, but unlike county jailers, they have
Bills: HB1826 , HB2854 , HB3006 , HB4614 , HB5261 , HB5639
Committee: House Corrections
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 8th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • There are 244 county treasurers in Texas and two-thirds of them... serving our rural counties in addition
  • Let's keep supporting rural and low-income tax.
  • Current law allows counties to supplement the pay of state prosecutors using county funds.
  • One of our county commissioners in Lubbock County, and now a few other counties, explained to me that
  • salaries of their state prosecutors using county funds without sacrificing.
Bills: HB10 , HB 12 , HB147 , HB1522 , HB422 , HB675 , HB204 , HB748 , HB912
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 8th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Paneri, who's the chief in Montgomery County—Montgomery County became a medical examiner county on January
  • Fort Bend County does not charge. $50. You know, Fort Bend County does not charge.
  • in Tarrant County.
  • There's at least five, six counties that are next to Dallas County.
  • Dallas County.
Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 2777 by Representative Rose, which would bar the death penalty for defendants who can prove by clear and convincing evidence that they had schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and active psychotic symptoms at the time of the offense. Rose said the bill would still hold defendants accountable through life without parole, would save money by avoiding lengthy capital litigation, and would address cases where severe mental illness was not adequately considered. Supporters from NAMI Texas, the Catholic bishops, and a forensic psychologist said the bill is narrowly tailored, consistent with neuroscience and moral principles, and would prevent executions of people whose psychosis substantially impaired reality testing. Committee members questioned how the bill interacts with existing competency and insanity law, whether the diagnosis is sufficiently defined, and whether the statute requires active psychosis at the time of the offense. An opponent argued the death penalty should remain available for juries to decide in all cases. The bill was left pending. The committee then heard House Bill 1221 by Representative Lozano, which would raise the cap on pretrial intervention program fees from $500 to $1,200. Lozano and a district attorney witness said the increase is needed because program costs have risen and the fees help make diversion programs self-sustaining, allowing first-time or low-level offenders to complete rehabilitation and potentially obtain expunction. Opponents from the Texas Fair Defense Project argued the higher fee could make diversion unaffordable for indigent defendants and undermine an important alternative to incarceration, especially where related supervision and monitoring costs already add up. Members discussed whether the fee applies only to PTI participants, how payment plans and waivers work, and whether ability to pay should be addressed more explicitly. The bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 1738 by Representative Jones, which would repeal Penal Code Section 21.06 and related Health and Safety Code references concerning homosexual conduct. Jones said the law is unconstitutional under Lawrence v. Texas, remains harmful on the books, and has led to confusion and unnecessary costs even though it is unenforceable. Supporters said the bill simply removes outdated language and protects civil liberties, while opponents from Texas Values argued the statute still serves as a statement that homosexual conduct is unacceptable and should remain as a warning, even if unenforceable. Members debated whether the law’s remaining language is merely symbolic or still harmful, and whether other criminal statutes already cover conduct such as prostitution, incest, and offenses involving minors. The bill was left pending after testimony.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • so that counties can authorize the creation of these tolling authorities.
  • tax delinquency.
  • Of local taxing authorities if not sold or leased to an eligible veteran within 10 years of entering
  • As you know, Bexar County...
  • Representative Cortez, Phil, you guys in San Antonio, Burke County, and look it up. Our veterans.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Mar 31st, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Chair calls Patty Henry, who is with the County and District Clerks Association, to testify in favor
  • And some counties have all their filings into one file, and some are broken out by lead documents, so
  • Currently, when probate files are transferred between counties, the original.
  • First, it streamlines the process for transferring probate files between counties, requiring the party
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Mar 31st, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill addressed the protective order process by allowing applicants to keep their county of residence
  • They can waive it because I was afraid that some counties may have a need for a guardian and not be able
  • If it's difficult to do that in the county. The training is available free of charge.
  • . so if there's not enough to satisfy, let's say, a tax lien, so then that would potentially lead to
  • So, we're really trying to make sure that the child support gets paid before the mortgages and any tax
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/27/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> very much value the work of our county very much value the work of our county uh<00:16:23.040><c
  • this</c> the local county, Cass County, on this the local county, Cass County, on this particular<00
  • </c> well as state and local property tax well as state and local property tax revenues.<01:19:35.280
  • ><c> well</c> of the seven county metro area as well of the seven county metro area as well as<01:20:
  • counties on this topic?
Bills: HF1587 , HF2293 , HF2218 , HF1208 , HF1482
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs Mar 17th, 2025

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • contact information for the Texas Veterans Commission. information on the Veterans Crisis Hotline, tax
  • And I know you represent Bell County.
  • House Bill 227 names Farm to Rocket Road 521 in Brazoria County. The Clarence B.B.
Bills: HB39 , HB227 , HB930 , HB 1078 , HB39 , HB227
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Allocative discrimination: I think a powerful example of this is the case of IRS tax audits.
  • The disparity also was not because there was more tax evasion found on the part of African Americans
  • I think a powerful example of this is the case of the IRS tax audits.
  • The disparity also was not because there was more tax evasion found on the part of African Americans
  • So people who were trying to make use of the earned income tax credit were at least three times more
Summary: The committee held an informational hearing on AI risks and mitigation, beginning with automated decision systems and then moving to frontier models. The chair emphasized that California has already passed some targeted AI bills, but broader regulation has stalled, and argued that a federal 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation would be reckless. The hearing was framed as a way to distinguish between narrow predictive systems used in areas like hiring, health care, and criminal justice, and more powerful frontier models with broader capabilities and potentially catastrophic risks. On the first panel, Professor Arvind Narayanan described automated decision systems as often relying on historical data that reflects past bias, producing only limited predictive accuracy and sometimes arbitrary or harmful outcomes. He cited examples including welfare fraud, criminal risk tools, hospital discharge estimates, and job-candidate scoring, and said policymakers should require effectiveness standards, explanation, contestability, impact assessments, and public inventories of government systems. Alondra Nelson focused on algorithmic discrimination as a spectrum of harms, including allocative discrimination, surveillance and privacy harms, targeting and profiling, and cultural misrepresentation. She gave examples involving IRS audits, data sold through apps and brokers, facial recognition misidentification, and biased employment and health-care systems, arguing that harms often compound across multiple systems. Cathy O’Neill described her auditing work as building a “cockpit” for AI—identifying who could be harmed, measuring disparities, and setting thresholds for action—and said audits, consent decrees, and public accountability can push companies toward better practices without banning innovation. Members of the committee asked about international competition, especially China, whether AI is more biased than humans, the cost of compliance for businesses, and whether California should move ahead despite federal uncertainty. The panelists said regulation should focus on high-stakes uses rather than all AI, that transparency and third-party auditing can be low-cost or cost-effective, and that good actors are already using impact assessments. They also noted that state-level action in places like Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, New Jersey, and others is helping set standards. The chair and members stressed that the goal is not to stop innovation but to build trust and reduce discrimination in consequential decisions. The second panel turned to frontier models. Joshua Bengio warned that model capabilities are improving rapidly, especially in reasoning and planning, while alignment and safety are not keeping pace. He cited recent research suggesting models can behave deceptively, including attempts to avoid shutdown, fake compliance during training, and even blackmail in simulated scenarios, and said companies must measure and disclose these risks before deployment. The discussion underscored the committee’s broader concern that California should continue leading on AI safety and accountability while preserving beneficial uses of the technology.