Video & Transcript Research : 'zero trust'

Page 96 of 500
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Room 016 Conference PM - 04-30-2026

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Room 224 Conference PM - 04-30-2026

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that I just don't necessarily<00:15:09.520> trust<00:15:09.800> that<00:15:09.880>
  • > if<00:15:09.960> they<00:15:10.080> get<00:15:10.200> a necessarily trust
  • that if they get a necessarily trust that if they get a huge<00:15:10.560> you<00:15:10.640>
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Room 016 Conference AM - 04-30-2026

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session 04-30-2026 12:00pm

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • received and expended by single trust received and expended by single native<00:29:54.000> Hawaiian
  • I asked the nominee if, confirmed, would he endeavor to restore public trust in the judiciary?
  • If we have values guiding our election system, a publicly funded system, I believe it can be a trust
  • If we have values guiding our election system, a publicly funded system, I believe it can be a trust
  • I believe it can be a trust I believe it can be a trust infrastructure<00:33:54.960> in<00
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

RM 411 Conference AM - Thu Apr 30, 2026

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

RM 411 Conference AM - Fri May 1, 2026

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

RM 325 Conference PM - Thu Apr 30, 2026

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

RM 325 Conference AM - Thu Apr 30, 2026

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

RM 329 Conference PM - Thu Apr 30, 2026

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

RM 309 Conference PM - Thu Apr 30, 2026

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Room 224 Conference AM - 04-30-2026

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Committee on Energy, Utilities, Environment and Climate - 01/29/25

Energy, Utilities, Environment, and Climate

Transcript Highlights:
  • So I can't trust them to do so with new nuclear infrastructure in the state of Minnesota.
  • So I can't trust them to do so with new nuclear infrastructure in the state of Minnesota.
  • So I can't trust them to do so with new nuclear infrastructure in the state of Minnesota.
  • So I can't trust them to do so with new nuclear infrastructure in the state of Minnesota.
  • So I can't trust them to do so with new nuclear infrastructure in the state of Minnesota.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
Summary: The Minnesota Senate Energy Committee heard Senate File 426, authored by Senator Icorn, which would remove the 100-megawatt cap on hydropower for purposes of qualifying as an eligible energy technology under Minnesota law. Supporters said hydropower is carbon-free, reliable, flexible baseload power that can help Minnesota meet its 100% carbon-free electricity goal by 2040. Testifiers from Missouri River Energy Services and Minnesota Power described existing hydropower resources, including allocations from federal Missouri River dams, Minnesota hydro stations, and Manitoba Hydro, and argued that the bill would preserve and expand options for clean energy development. Several members raised concerns about the bill’s purpose and potential environmental impacts. Senator McEwen questioned why the size limit should be removed without specific proposed projects or more information about the need for larger dams, citing concerns about fisheries, water resources, and land use. Senator Port and others asked about costs, environmental effects, and where new projects might be built. In response, supporters said the bill is intended to open the door to future projects and allow agencies to review proposals through existing permitting and environmental processes, rather than approving any specific dam. Committee members offered mixed reactions. Senator Frentz said he supported the concept but recommended laying the bill over for further discussion and possibly sending it to the Environment Committee, noting environmental concerns and the need for more conversation. Senator Gruenhagen strongly supported the bill, arguing that it merely lifts a cap while leaving permitting and review requirements in place. Senator Hoffman also supported the bill, saying current policy blocks consideration of new projects and that the change would allow regulators to evaluate proposals on their merits. No vote was taken during the hearing, and the bill was left open for further consideration.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Ways and Means (01/21/2026)

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • education trust fund? education trust fund?
  • the um trust the um trust for<00:54:28.000> the for the for the um<00:54:31.040> that<
  • So, I see the education trust fund.
  • . >> The vote being 17 to zero.
  • Chairman Janine. >> Yes. 17 to zero. >> The vote being 17 to zero. The motion of ITL passes.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 2/17/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • prohibited from spending money in elections, so I think the set of people it would cover would be zero
  • prohibited from spending money in elections, so I think the set of people it would cover would be zero
  • the set of people it would cover would the set of people it would cover would be<00:10:49.760> zero
  • <00:10:50.760> representative<00:10:51.680> agreement<00:10:52.680> um be zero
  • representative agreement um be zero representative agreement um since<00:10:53.120> there's<00
Bills: HF72, HF66, HF69, HF73
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs (01/22/2025)

Health, Human Services & Elderly Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • we<00:18:16.360> voted<00:18:16.960> 7<00:18:17.320> to<00:18:17.559> zero
  • we voted 7 to zero to support this<00:18:19.480> bill<00:18:20.480> um<00:18:20.720>
  • note states that the impact will be zero note states that the impact will be zero that<02:03:08.520
  • state budget is zero the effect to<02:03:55.119> the<02:03:55.280> other<02:03:55.800>
  • This bill—the question is, do you trust ATS to do what it has done for the last decade, which is
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Housing Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Housing

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate 969 to establish an accessory dwelling unit trust fund.
  • Creation of an ADU trust fund from a group of participating private lenders.
  • I’ve been a long-time research partner with community land trusts across the state.
  • I work with the Greater Boston Community Land Trust Network, and we are a group of community land trusts
  • I'm a research manager at the Pew Charitable Trusts Housing Policy Initiative.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Joint Committee on Housing opened a hybrid hearing focused on housing production bills, with Chairs Julian Cyr and Rich Haggerty emphasizing Massachusetts’ housing shortage and the need to produce more than 200,000 units over the next decade. The committee then heard testimony on a wide range of proposals, including social housing, starter homes and the “missing middle,” accessory dwelling units (ADUs), single-stair residential buildings, permanent affordability homeownership, and housing for people with disabilities. Several witnesses framed the bills as tools to expand supply, lower costs, and address racial and generational wealth gaps. Representative Connolly testified for H. 1478 on the Massachusetts Social Housing Program, describing publicly owned, mixed-income housing financed through a revolving loan fund. Senator Feeney testified for S. 989 on missing middle starter homes, arguing for zoning changes, incentives, and affordability tools to support smaller starter homes and duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes. Multiple witnesses, including housing advocates, real estate representatives, and local officials, supported the ADU trust fund bill and the single-stair study bill, saying they would reduce barriers, support homeowners, and enable more family-sized and infill housing. Some witnesses opposed bills they said would weaken ADU reforms or add new restrictions, while others urged broader deregulation to speed production. A major portion of the hearing focused on H. 1576/S. 1010, the Homes for Lasting Affordability bill, which would create a permanent affordability homeownership program for low- and moderate-income buyers and support small developments with long-term affordability restrictions. Testimony from community land trust leaders, legislators, and housing advocates emphasized that permanent affordability can preserve public investment, stabilize neighborhoods, and help families build wealth over generations. Senator Miranda and Representative Worrell tied the bill to closing the racial wealth gap and expanding access to homeownership for Black and Latino residents. The committee also heard testimony on S. 971, which would reform the Housing Development and Incentive Program to require more affordability in Gateway City projects. The committee additionally heard from Senator Kennedy and disability advocates on S. 1004, which would strengthen the Alternative Housing Voucher Program for people with disabilities by codifying project-based vouchers and aligning the program more closely with other voucher systems. Witnesses described long waitlists and the lack of accessible, affordable units as major barriers that can lead to homelessness or unnecessary institutionalization. No votes were taken during the hearing; the session was devoted to testimony and questions from committee members.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • The town manager recently resigned, and the town needs an independent source of truth to regain trust
  • So, in addition to restoring trust, this independent audit would be a financially responsible way to
  • It says zero discount despite the fact that a private provider is doing the work.
  • It's a zero discount despite the fact that a private provider is doing that work.
Summary: The Legislative Auditing Committee heard several local-government audit requests and unanimously approved each one. The first item was Baker County, where county commissioners asked for an operational and financial audit because of repeated late audits, concerns about the finance office, and lack of confidence in county financial reporting. The county clerk supported an audit but argued it should be countywide and include all constitutional officers; she also described a dispute over access to the county finance system and pending litigation. After brief questions, the committee adopted a 9-0 motion directing the Auditor General to perform an operational audit of Baker County’s financial operations and records, with scope to be finalized during the audit. The committee then approved an audit request for the Concord Estates Community Development District in Osceola County. Senator Arrington said residents alleged excessive board compensation, large unexplained spending, missing financial reports, and refusal to provide records or hold open meetings. Residents and a board member testified about rising assessments, deteriorating amenities, and lack of transparency. The committee voted 10-0 to direct an operational audit of the CDD. It also approved, by 10-0 votes, operational audits of the town of Melbourne Beach, based on allegations of fiscal and operational improprieties and lawsuits that had cost the town more than $150,000, and the city of Apalachicola, where Senator Simon said longstanding water utility failures, grant issues, and consent-order problems warranted review. The final request was for a financial and operational audit of Cape Coral’s Building Department. Representative G. Lombardo said building-fee revenues appeared to be transferred for non-building purposes, permit processing was inconsistent, and the department relied heavily on a private firm while the building official had prior ties to that firm. Industry representatives testified that building funds were being diverted, service levels were suffering, and private-provider inspections were not always reflected in fee reductions. The committee adopted the motion 10-0. After completing all agenda items, the committee adjourned.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Senate Floor Session - 04/30/25

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • There being 64 eyes's and zero role.
  • There being 65 eyes's and zero role.
  • It would zero out their admin. I want to say that again.
  • It would zero out operating adjustment.
  • Um, and all while zeroing out effect.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health May 12th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • There being nine ayes and zero nays, the motion prevails.
  • There being nine ayes and zero nays, the motion prevails. OK, members. Thank you. Thank you.
  • Trust me. This bill is needed, right?
  • Because we want to make sure people trust anesthesia.
  • We want to make sure people trust cardiologists.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Judiciary Committee Jul 8th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • False guarantees, misleading settlements, undisclosed conflicts of interest erode public trust.
  • So she created a platform that gave people the ability to connect with trusted legal help, regardless
  • This experience reaffirmed to me the importance of having trusted, accredited, and locally available
  • In this case, when it burns down, that fair market value is zero. They don't have anything.
  • In this case, when it burns down, that fair market value is zero. They don't have anything.
Summary: The committee heard several bills, with most drawing support after amendments or ongoing stakeholder negotiations. SB 29, by Senator Laird, would extend a sunset on the law allowing pain-and-suffering claims to survive a plaintiff’s death; supporters, including a family member describing a medical negligence case, labor groups, consumer advocates, and disability and elder organizations, argued it prevents defendants from running out the clock, while hospitals, medical groups, and business organizations warned of higher costs and added liability. After extensive debate about data collection, settlement reporting, and the impact on health care access, the bill passed to Appropriations on a divided vote. SB 294, by Senator Reyes and presented by Senator Laird, would require employers to notify a worker’s emergency contact if the worker is arrested or detained and would create a template to inform employees of state and federal labor rights. Labor and worker advocates said the bill would help workers understand and enforce their rights amid weakened federal enforcement; there was no opposition on file, and the bill passed unanimously to Appropriations. SB 697 would modernize water-rights adjudication by allowing the State Water Board to use technology instead of requiring in-person field investigations; with no opposition, it also passed unanimously. The committee also advanced SB 37 on attorney advertising, SB 645 on peremptory challenges in civil cases, SB 303 on bias-mitigation trainings in public workplaces, and SB 464 on expanding pay-data reporting for specified state workers. SB 37 drew support from consumer and legal groups but concerns from Walker Advertising about joint advertising; members said negotiations were ongoing, and the bill passed. SB 645 would extend anti-bias jury-selection rules to certain civil rights cases; criminal-defense and defense groups said they were close to agreement, and the bill passed. SB 303 and SB 464 were both amended to narrow scope and moved forward after several opponents shifted to neutral or removed opposition. The committee also approved a consent calendar of additional bills, all sent to Appropriations.