Video & Transcript Research : 'voting'

Page 96 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a record vote. Clerk, ring the... Bell. I have all members voted. Voting aye.
  • Harless voting aye. Have all members? Voted. Jones voting aye.
  • Isaac voting aye, Mr. Romero voting aye. Mr. Hunter voting aye. I have all members voted.
  • Is Isaac voting no? King voting no. Gervin-Hawkins voting aye. Mr. Cook voting no.
  • A record vote, Clerk, ring the bell. Shaheen voting aye, Isaac voting aye. All members voted.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • A record vote. Clerk, ring the bell. Harless voting aye. Speaker: Have all members voted?
  • Landgraf voting aye. Show Ms. Leo-Wilson voting aye. Have all voted?
  • Isaac voting aye. Mr. Romero voting aye. Mr. Hunter voting aye. Have all members voted? Mr.
  • Isaac voting no. King voting no. Skirvin Hawkins voting aye. Mr. Cook voting nay.
  • It's a record vote. Clerk, ring the bell. Mr. Shaheen voting aye. Isaac voting aye.
Bills: HB8, HB12, SB 3, HJR1, SB 11, SB 16, SB 14
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session 5/16/26 - Part 4

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • . vote. vote.
  • vote on this bill. vote on this bill.
  • So, I would urge a green<01:19:34.480> vote. green vote. green vote.
  • Burkel votes aye. Davis votes aye. Huldah Momanyi-Hiltsley votes no.
  • Vote. >> Vote I. >> Aim. >> Vote. >> Vote. >> Vote. >> I aim. >> Aim votes I. Burkel. >> Burkel.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The House began with a resolution recognizing May 15, 2026, as Peace Officer Memorial Day and the week of May 10-16 as Police Week in Minnesota. Members read a series of “whereas” clauses honoring fallen peace officers, including three names added to the memorial this year, and thanking the thousands of officers serving across the state. The resolution was adopted without objection, and the chamber also received a Rules and Legislative Administration report placing several bills on the calendar for the day. The main floor action was on House File 4252, the higher education finance and policy conference committee report. Supporters said the bill includes funding for identification verification systems in the MNSCU system to combat enrollment fraud, money to cover a shortfall in Fostering Independence grants for foster youth, and a small appropriation for trees at Bemidji State University. Several members praised the public conference committee process and the bipartisan work behind the bill. Others criticized the bill for not addressing the larger state grant shortfall and raised concerns about how grant dollars are allocated. The House adopted the conference report and repassed the bill 101-33. The House then concurred in Senate amendments to House File 3825, a public safety vehicle bill that also carried a package of scope-of-practice and licensing changes. Members described provisions affecting acupuncture, athletic trainers, massage therapy, mortuary science, music therapy, social work title protection, pharmacist prescribing, physical therapy, and advanced practice nursing. Supporters argued the changes improve access, affordability, workforce flexibility, and patient care, while one member warned that some scope expansions were insufficiently scrutinized and could harm the health care system. After debate, the House agreed to the Senate amendments and moved the bill forward.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session 4/27/26 - Part 2

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please vote green. much. Please vote green.
  • Mohamud Noor Mohamud Noor votes aye. Mohamud Noor votes votes votes aye.
  • voting.
  • voting.
  • members to vote no. members to vote no.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The House first took up House File 1794, which would remove the post-graduate collaborative practice requirement for advanced practice registered nurses. The author and several supporters argued the bill would reduce barriers to practice, improve access to primary care and mental health services, especially in rural areas, and align Minnesota with other states. Supporters cited backing from APRN organizations and said the Board of Nursing had no concerns, while opponents, led by Representative Liebling, argued the current one-year collaborative period is a patient-safety safeguard that gives new APRNs needed experience working with physicians before practicing independently. After debate and questions about how the current requirement works in practice, the House passed the bill 119-12. The House then considered House File 4595, which changes licensure reciprocity rules for marriage and family therapists. Representative Schumacher said the bill would expand access to mental health care at no cost by making it easier for qualified out-of-state therapists to obtain Minnesota licenses, eliminating a five-year waiting period and other barriers while maintaining standards through background checks and a jurisprudence exam. Supporters, including Representatives Bierman and Gilman, emphasized workforce shortages and the value of more therapy access for families and relationships. The Board of Marriage and Family Therapy was noted as neutral, and the bill passed unanimously, 133-0. Finally, the House began debate on House File 4493, which would authorize pharmacists to initiate, prescribe, administer, and dispense certain drugs for opioid use disorder, including buprenorphine/Suboxone. Representative Baker said the bill would save lives by allowing people to access treatment immediately through local pharmacies, especially in greater Minnesota, and help them through withdrawal when they are most likely to seek help. The transcript cuts off during the opening of discussion on this bill, before any vote or final action is shown.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Session (Full Formal with Calendar) Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am

Massachusetts Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Rush votes no. Michael F. Rush votes no. Michael F. Rush votes no. Julian Cyr votes no.
  • Robyn Kennedy votes no. Robyn Kennedy votes no. Robyn Kennedy votes no. Adam Gómez votes no.
  • Jehlen votes no. Rebecca L. Rausch votes no. William J. Driscoll Jr. votes no. Thank you.
  • Nick Collins votes no. Nick Collins votes no. Thank you. William J. Driscoll Jr. votes no.
  • Rush votes yes. Michael F. Rush votes yes. Senator Collins. Nick Collins votes yes.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Senate considered a comprehensive immigration-related bill, the Protect Act (House No. 5316), with extensive debate focused on limiting civil immigration enforcement in sensitive locations and protecting immigrants, victims, workers, and public institutions. Supporters argued the bill would reduce fear in schools, hospitals, courts, child care settings, and other community spaces, while preserving criminal law enforcement and public safety cooperation. Several senators also emphasized the economic and community contributions of immigrants, and some spoke from personal or district experience about fear, school enrollment declines, and impacts on health care and daily life. A number of amendments were debated. Amendment 6, offered by Senator Kennedy, was adopted to extend protections to DDS facilities and disability-related care settings, with supporters stressing the importance of protecting immigrant caregivers and people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Other adopted amendments included Amendment 7 on effective dates, Amendment 34 adding residential schools/programs as safe spaces, Amendment 10 on courthouse curtilage, Amendment 13 protecting health care workers from retaliation, Amendment 20 establishing an immigration commission with minority-party representation, and Amendment 69 as a corrective/technical amendment. Many other amendments, largely offered by Senator Tarr and others, were rejected, including proposals concerning 287G agreements, detainers, civil arrests, court authority, and legal defense funding; several amendments were also withdrawn. The chamber took multiple roll-call votes on contested amendments. Amendment 59 on 287G funds was defeated 5-34, Amendment 63 on status information tied to criminal offenses was defeated 7-32, Amendment 67 on felony detainers was defeated 10-29, and Amendment 75 on state-funded legal defense programs was defeated 5-34. After amendments were completed, the Senate adopted the Ways and Means recommendation, ordered the bill to a third reading, and then passed it to be engrossed by a 37-3 vote. The Senate later rejected a House amendment, appointed a conference committee, and adjourned to meet again the following Monday at 11:00 a.m.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session 5/12/26 - Part 2

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • members voting remotely. members voting remotely.
  • Coulter<00:44:37.120> Vote<00:44:37.400> no. Coulter Vote no. Coulter Vote no.
  • Coulter votes no. Mamani Coulter, no. Coulter votes no.
  • to vote green. to vote green.
  • Members, vote yes should vote on that.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The House received several Senate messages returning House File 3426 on natural resources and House File 4252 on higher education with Senate amendments, and in both cases the House refused to concur and moved to conference committee. The House also acceded to the Senate’s request for a conference committee on Senate File 4612, which concerns state government and Department of Health and Human Services provisions. Speaker appointments to the conference committees were announced for all three bills. The House then concurred in Senate amendments to House File 3522, a veterans bill allowing the Department of Veterans Affairs to temporarily close state veterans homes under a CMS order. Representative Duran said the Senate had bundled several veterans-related bills into HF 3522, including measures on SGU veterans, National Guard pay, grant requirements in the MDBA process, burial eligibility in veterans and National Guard cemeteries, honor guard eligibility, and codifying a commandos task force. The bill passed 134-0 and was read to pass. On the floor calendar, Senate File 3210, a human rights bill on disability accommodations, was laid on the table by agreement for later consideration. House File 4017, a study bill on unlawful shipments of infectious or pathological waste, was presented as a worker-safety measure; an A6 technical amendment was adopted, and the bill passed 126-8. House File 4138, dealing with social media platforms and minors, was amended with A10 and A11 changes emphasizing transparency, privacy defaults, limits on data use, and a shift from “child” to “minor” in the age provisions; Representative Bonner argued for extending protections to age 18, while Representative Scott said the bill was a first step and opposed the amendment. The A11 amendment was adopted, and debate on the bill continued as the transcript ended.
NY

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York State Senate Session - 05/21/2026

New York Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I vote aye.
  • So I'll be voting no.
  • I'll be voting no.
  • >> HOW DO YOU VOTE. >> >> I VOTE AYE.
  • >> Senator, how do you vote? >> I vote no.
Keywords: 993, senate, all
Summary: The Senate opened with routine proceedings, approval of the prior day’s journal, and several motions to restore previously passed bills to the third-reading calendar. Senate Print 2436A, an amendment to the Administrative Code of New York City, and Senate Print 7160, an amendment to the Elder Law, were both reconsidered and restored to the calendar by roll call. Amendments were also received on Senate Print 9960, which retained its place on the third-reading calendar. The chamber then paused to honor Madeline Wilson on her 100th birthday and Marilyn D. Mosley through previously adopted resolutions, with family members and guests recognized on the floor. The Senate also welcomed Columbia Kicks Cancer, a student-run East Greenbush fundraising team that raised more than $239,000 for blood cancer research and care. The Finance Committee reported Senate Print 9005C, a budget bill amending Chapter 268 of the Laws of 1996, directly to third reading, and the Senate accepted the report and the message of necessity. The bill was then taken up on the controversial calendar, leading to extended debate on Part LL, which focused on limits on state and local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, including 287(g) agreements, informal cooperation, masking rules for law enforcement, sensitive locations such as polling places, and the creation of an Office of Immigration Trust within the Attorney General’s office. Supporters argued the bill would keep state and municipal employees focused on their own duties, protect constitutional rights, and prevent New York resources from being used for federal immigration enforcement; they also said it would not bar all cooperation or prevent local police from responding to crime. Opponents argued it would hinder public safety, restrict law enforcement cooperation, and interfere with local discretion, while some raised concerns about constitutional issues and the practical effects on sheriffs, county jails, and police agencies. The debate also included a separate provision creating a civil cause of action for constitutional-rights violations by federal, state, or local officials, which supporters described as an accountability measure. Members further discussed the masking section, with supporters saying it applied broadly to officials and was intended to withstand constitutional scrutiny, while opponents cited a recent Ninth Circuit ruling striking down a similar California law. The Office of Immigration Trust and its complaint/referral process were also examined, including the role of the Governor and the State Education Department in reviewing alleged violations. No final vote on the controversial calendar bill was taken in the portion of the transcript provided.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/20/2026 - Senate Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • And with that, I vote aye. 10 aye, 0 no, 0 not voting.
  • I vote no. Explain my vote. You may.
  • And with that, I vote aye. Seven ayes, three noes, zero not voting.
  • Members, by your vote of seven ayes, two noes, and zero not voting, one not, sir, and one not voting,
  • Voting. Thank you.
Summary: The committee began with a JLBC presentation comparing the baseline budget to the governor’s proposal. JLBC said the baseline shows a positive cash balance in each year, with about $577–$578 million available above statutory formulas, but that major items such as tax conformity, state employee health subsidies, school repairs, SNAP administrative changes, and possible SNAP error-rate costs are not fully funded. JLBC also reviewed executive revenue and spending proposals, including border-security funding, sports betting tax changes, data-center tax changes, short-term rental and water surcharges, and several one-time items that JLBC said appear to be ongoing in practice. Members questioned SNAP error rates, Medicaid/Access enrollment and costs, possible fraud involving Access-to-Marketplace shifting, prison receivership risk, and the need for more oversight of waste and fraud. The committee then heard and passed SB 1032, which appropriates $1.5 million to fund the Independent Correctional Oversight Office created last year. The sponsor and several advocates said the office is needed to provide independent oversight, improve transparency, help whistleblowers, and reduce the risk of federal receivership over the prison system. Testimony from advocacy groups and former incarcerated individuals strongly supported the bill, and the committee approved it 10-0. Next, the committee considered several transportation appropriations. SB 1064 would provide $3 million to Flagstaff for improvements along U.S. Route 66; the mayor and local planning officials described safety problems, congestion, and housing growth along the corridor, while some members objected to using general fund dollars for roads instead of HURF and to bypassing the normal transportation board process. The bill passed 7-3. SB 1059 would appropriate $9.2 million for a right-turn lane at SR 87 and SR 260 in Payson, and SB 1062 would appropriate $1 million for a left-turn lane at US 60 and Superstition Mountain Drive in Gold Canyon; both were supported by local witnesses citing congestion and safety concerns and both received do-pass recommendations, 7-3 and 6-4 respectively. The committee also began hearing SCR 1004, a voter-referral measure to prohibit photo enforcement systems, with the sponsor and public commenters arguing that photo radar is unconstitutional, abusive, and tied to ticket revenue, but the transcript cuts off before any committee action on that measure.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

House Chamber - Mon Apr 21, 2025, 11:30AM HST - Day 54

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • No vote. Representative Muraoka: No vote. Okay, members, we will be taking a voice vote.
  • Beginning with HSCR 2140. voice vote. All those in favor say I. voice vote.
  • No vote. So 2143. Representative Moroka. No vote.
  • No vote. So 2146. Representative Garcia. No vote.
  • I urge my colleagues to vote Speaker. I urge my colleagues to vote no.
Keywords: 910, house, all
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Session (03/13/2025)

New Hampshire Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • that choice so I'm asking for your vote that choice so I'm asking for your vote to<00:56:44.319>
  • This should be an easy vote.
  • I urge you this should be an easy vote I urge you to<01:03:32.319> vote<01:03:32.640> no
  • ought to pass with an amendment by voted ought to pass with an amendment by voted 3<01:24:05.480
  • schools I hope you'll join me in voting schools I hope you'll join me in voting for<01:44:48.760
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/04/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • By my vote, yes.
  • I vote no. Senator Hatathlie? No. Senator Kuby? Explain my vote? Yes.
  • Six ayes, one no, zero not voting. By our vote of six ayes, one no, and zero not voting, we have...
  • I vote no. Senator Ditchell? Madam Chair, may I explain my vote? Yes.
  • I vote no. Senator Ditchell? Madam Chair, may I explain my vote? Yes.
Summary: The committee heard several criminal justice and victims’ rights bills. HB 2131 would remove the financial-gain element from weapons/explosives trafficking and impose stricter sentencing, including no early release for trafficking three or more weapons; it received a due pass recommendation on a 6-1 vote. HB 2132 would lower the fentanyl trafficking threshold from 200 grams to 100 grams and adjust related motor-vehicle language; supporters said it would help prosecutors and law enforcement, while opponents warned it would sweep in heavy users and lacked data on current prosecutions. It passed 4-3. HB 2223 would require sex offenders seeking a name change to notify prosecutors and victims, and to register under the new name with the old name as an alias; it passed 6-1. The committee also considered HB 2411, creating the crime of coerced abortion for secretly or forcibly administering abortion-inducing drugs without a pregnant woman’s knowledge or consent. Supporters argued existing laws do not clearly cover situations where the drug is given but no death occurs; opponents said assault, manslaughter, homicide, and food-contamination statutes already address the conduct and warned the bill was unnecessary and aimed at abortion access. The bill passed 4-3. HB 2043 would add unborn children to the felony-murder statute; supporters called it a cleanup measure closing a loophole, while opponents said it was an abortion/personhood measure with broader implications. It passed 4-3. HB 2046 would require victims of sex offenses to be notified of pre-hearings in probation review matters involving young sex offenders; victims and prosecutors said the change would ensure meaningful participation, and it passed unanimously 7-0. HB 2666 would increase penalties for sexual extortion involving 15-, 16-, and 17-year-olds when committed by an adult, and it passed unanimously 7-0. HB 2265 would eliminate court fees and assessments tied to public defenders, jury trials, appeals, and related criminal-case charges; supporters framed it as protecting constitutional rights, while counties warned of lost revenue, and it passed 7-0. Finally, HB 2133 would require commercial websites hosting sexual material to verify consent and age of depicted persons, retain records, and treat synthetic depictions as images; the sponsor said it was meant to curb CSAM and revenge porn, while testifiers raised concerns about breadth, record retention, and constitutional issues.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • I share for the vote. Voting on SCR 48, the chair's recommendation is to pass as is.
  • Any<00:27:44.720> no<00:27:44.880> votes? Any no votes? Any no votes?
  • Any no votes?
  • Any<00:29:00.760> no<00:29:00.919> votes? Any no votes? Any no votes?
  • Any members voting no? Any members voting no? Your<00:29:37.320> best.
Bills: SCR48
Summary: The Housing Committee met on SCR 48, which declares that affordable housing credits are perpetual and remain valid until redeemed, and asks counties to recognize them without expiration dates. Testimony was overwhelmingly supportive, with speakers saying the resolution clarifies the intent of the 2024 act and provides clear parameters for the credits. No one testified in opposition or offered questions. The committee then took up SCR 48 for decision-making and adopted the chair’s recommendation to pass the resolution as is. The measure passed with one member voting with reservations. The chair noted this was the committee’s final hearing of the year and thanked advocates, stakeholders, staff, and IT support before adjourning. The transcript also included portions of the Transportation Committee and a joint Transportation/Housing hearing. Transportation advanced SCR 31 on school bus driver licensing and workforce improvements, SCR 132 urging Honolulu to prioritize the rail extension, SCR 145 on studying a demerit point system, and SCR 110 SD 1 on evaluating state-owned logistics facilities for housing projects. SCR 110 drew support from labor groups, with a request to add labor representation to the working group. The committees adopted recommendations on those measures, including SCR 110 with amendments.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Room 224 Conference PM - 04-23-2025

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is for electronic meetings, electronic voting, and cumulative voting.
  • This is for electronic meetings, electronic voting, cumulative voting on behalf of the house myself as
  • May we vote on this measure? By all means, please. May I take the vote today? Yes. Okay.
  • May I take the vote for the Senate? Senator Koole—oh, I'm sorry, this is the old vote sheet.
  • Ready to vote? Yes. Okay.
Keywords: 912, senate, all
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Day 56 (3-31-26)

Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • votes, no nay votes, there being 38 yay votes, no nay votes, Senate<02:34:58.560> Bill<02:34:
  • Appears all members that wish to vote have voted.
  • Appears all members that wish to vote have voted. There being 37 aye votes, no nay votes.
  • Appears all members that wish to vote have voted. There being 37 aye votes, no nay votes.
  • votes, 12 nay votes, there being 24 yay votes, 12 nay votes, the<03:31:34.000> governor's<03:
Bills: HB567, HB776, HB2, HB568, HB619
AL
Transcript Highlights:
  • Voting is That is what voting is about.
  • voting early. voting early.
  • vote. I'm here to reveal how you vote. vote. I'm here to reveal how you vote.
  • equal voting power. equal voting power.
  • And they overwhelmingly voted<01:34:30.720> in<01:34:30.880> 2022 voted in 2022 voted in
Keywords: 1136, house, all
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Close vote. Declare the vote 95 to zero, nay.
  • Timmons declared a vote. Close the vote. Declare the vote: 92 in favor, 2 against.
  • Close the vote. Declare the vote: 92 in favor, 3 against.
  • Close the vote. Declare the vote: 93 in favor, 0 against.
  • Heffner, those wishing to vote or change their vote, chairs preparing to close the vote.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs (03/19/2025)

Health, Human Services & Elderly Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • vote is 15 to three motion vote is 15 to three motion passes<00:20:34.520> okay<00:20:35.159><
  • amendment, which is the vote that we're reconsidering, and then all vote no."
  • > no reconsidering and then all vote no reconsidering and then all vote no that's<00:23:17.760
  • We just voted to send that out.
  • The vote is 10 to 8.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Judiciary (01/30/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • able to vote on because we already called the vote.
  • I'll explain the situation to you once we take the vote, and then you can vote on the next one.
  • <00:07:01.960> on take the vote and then you can vote on take the vote and then you can vote
  • All right, ready for a vote.
  • No—are you changing your vote?" "Yes, I am changing my vote. Thank you."
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The House Judiciary Committee met in executive session and first corrected a procedural issue by revoting on House Bills 98 and 164, which had already been reported out unanimously. HB 98, concerning professional limited liability company assistant managers, was again voted ought to pass by a 16-0 roll call and placed on the consent calendar. HB 164, concerning local records, was reopened because of a fiscal note amendment; the committee adopted Amendment 2025-0087 unanimously and then voted ought to pass as amended 17-0. Because HB 164 goes to Finance, it will not go on consent, and the chair asked for the updated report that night. The committee then took up HR 6, a resolution condemning the judicial doctrine of disparate impact. Representative Manos moved inexpedient to legislate, arguing the resolution overreached because disparate impact is a judicial doctrine and the legislature cannot bind the courts. Representative Cordelli also supported ITL, citing drafting problems and the need for substantial revision, including an outdated reference to the New Hampshire governor. The committee voted 15-2 to ITL the resolution, and it was placed on consent; the chair asked for the report by the end of the day and noted there would be no minority report. Finally, the committee discussed HB 111, which extends the right-to-know ombudsman position. Representative Kuttab offered an amendment to address concerns raised in testimony about discouraging use of the office and shifting attorney-fee burdens; the amendment was adopted 16-1. The committee then voted 15-2 to ought to pass as amended. Supporters said the ombudsman saves money by reducing court filings and should be continued, while opponents argued the office needs restructuring and that additional funding was not justified. The bill will go to Finance, and the chair requested the report by the end of the day. The committee also began discussion of HB 66 and related bills on right-to-know access, with the chair outlining a proposed amendment to limit remote records requests to people with a New Hampshire connection, but no final action was taken in the portion provided.
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

2026 Legislative Session - Day Seventy - Thursday, May 14 - Morning Session

Missouri House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • As everyone voted, the gentleman from Butler County will record his vote. Forward his vote.
  • All those in favor will vote yes; all those opposed will vote no. Mr.
  • All those in favor vote yes; all those opposed vote no. Mr.
  • Has everyone voted? Has everyone voted? Mr. Clerk, please close the board and tally the vote.
  • There is another vote coming. There is another vote coming. Has everyone voted? Mr.
Keywords: 959, house, all
FL

Florida 2026 5th Special Session

Senate in Special Session D Apr 29th, 2026

Florida Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • All those prepared to vote on the motion...
  • Colleagues, I urge you to join me in voting down. Voting In voting down, voting no.
  • My constituents elected me by 405 votes.
  • conscience and vote as we will.
  • Secretary, I won't like the board and Senator proceed to vote. Have all senators voted?
Summary: The Senate convened in special session and took up Senate Bill 8D, later substituted with House Bill 1D, both establishing Florida’s congressional districts. The sponsor, Senator Gates, explained that the Governor had transmitted a proposed redistricting plan on short notice and argued that mid-decade congressional redistricting is legally permissible, citing population growth and the Governor’s view that race-based provisions in the Fair Districts Amendment are unconstitutional. He repeatedly said the Legislature was not being asked to prove the Governor’s legal theory, only to consider the proposal, and noted that no amendments were offered. A lengthy question-and-answer period followed, with senators raising concerns about the rushed process, lack of statewide public hearings, and the map’s effects on minority communities, compactness, communities of interest, and partisan fairness. Senators questioned whether the map cracked Latino and Black communities, whether partisan data was used, whether the Governor’s office had outside consultants, and whether the plan complied with the Florida Constitution, the Fair Districts Amendment, and the Voting Rights Act. Gates generally deferred on legal conclusions, said the Governor’s representatives had testified the map was race-neutral and used political data only as one factor, and emphasized that any constitutional challenge would be for the courts. After a motion to temporarily postpone failed by a recorded vote of 12 yeas to 23 nays, the Senate continued debate. Senators Rouson, Bernard, and others spoke in opposition, arguing the proposal was rushed, partisan, and harmful to communities of interest and minority voting power. Gates maintained that the Governor had a constitutional prerogative to propose the map and that the Legislature could accept, reject, or amend it. The House companion bill was then substituted for the Senate bill, read a third time, and the chamber moved into final debate on the congressional redistricting plan.