Transcript Highlights:

• proceedings in the last few years because we seek to protect the rights of all participating in the legislative
• SJR 2 urges Congress and the President to enact federal legislation that affirms and protects the rights
• I was an auditor at LACO, and so I know how important it is to have our classified workers and what they

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Public Employment and Retirement heard several retirement and school employment measures. SB 301 by Sen. Grayson would prevent CERL-covered cities and districts from amending retirement contracts to exclude certain employee groups, closing a loophole similar to one previously addressed for CalPERS. The bill was supported by California Professional Firefighters and received no opposition. SB 443 by Sen. Rubio would clarify that employees transferring into a joint powers authority can retain CalPERS classic status even when the JPA expands later; the city of La Verne, a flood management agency, and AFSCME supported the bill, and it also drew no opposition. Both bills were moved out of committee on unanimous votes and sent to Appropriations, with the consent calendar items SB 521, SB 581, and SB 853 also approved. The committee then heard SB 494 by Sen. Cortese, which would give classified school employees the right to have disciplinary appeals heard by an administrative law judge rather than by the school board. Supporters, including CSEA, AFSCME, and CFT, argued the bill would create parity with teachers and community college faculty and provide a fairer appeal process. Opponents, including the California School Boards Association, county superintendents, school business officials, and community college groups, argued it would remove local control, impose a one-size-fits-all process, and shift costs to districts. The bill was passed out of committee and referred to the Committee on Higher Education. The committee also considered SJR 2 by Sen. Cortese, a resolution urging Congress and the President to enact federal protections for classified school employees, including better wages, benefits, safety, and workplace rights. Support came from CFT, CSEA, and other labor groups, with no opposition. The resolution was adopted and moved forward. At the end of the hearing, the committee reopened the roll to add votes, and all listed measures ultimately passed unanimously or near-unanimously before the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Last week, the Speaker of the House asked me to carry this piece of legislation for the purpose that
• We send out compliance auditors to ask them to report all these things, but we haven't had a stick.
• There were several legislators there, and what came up is the crime.

Bills: HB287, HB280, HB57, HB252, HB286, SB36, HB287, HB280, HB57, HB252, HB286, SB36

Keywords: law enforcement, transparency, reporting, public safety, regulation, accountability, public nuisance, event liability, local government, community health, legal action, education, property acquisition, municipality, land use, annexation, competitive bidding, procurement, disclosure statements, state contracts

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:15:35.600> history, matters, legislative history, matters, legislative history, comparisons
• <00:26:01.600> and rules about recusals for legislators and rules about recusals for legislators
• . legislators. legislators.
• specific um you know either legislative specific um you know either legislative recommendations<
• pretty robust turnout of uh legislative pretty robust turnout of uh legislative staff<04:08:08.479

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Bills: SB2138, SB2054, SB2987, SB2908, SB2702, SB2924, SB3248, SB2635, SB3127, SB3001, SB2294, SB2037, SB2797, SB2765, SB2961, SB2210, SB2948, SB3108, SB3240, SB2045, SB2675, SB2338, SB2451, SB2552, SB2553, SB3089, SB3176, SB3285, SB2234, SB2219, SB2312, SB2336, SB2343, SB2849, SB2928, SB2930, SB3332, SB2927, SB2983, SB2906, SB2353, SB2848, SB2340, SB2845, SB3246, SB3077, SB3254, SB2934, SB2571, SB2248, SB2471, SB2298, SB2413, SB2425, SB3045, SB2843, SB2595, SB2907, SB3204, SB2311, SB2532, SB2528, SB2313, SB3300, SB2530, SB2693, SB2010, SB3156, SB2697, SB2991, SB3153, SB2812, SB2527, SB2376, SB3081, SB3218, SB3219, SB3333, SB2232, SB2192, SB2378, SB2070, SB3011, SB2676, SB2957, SB2434, SB2673, SB3301, SB2247, SB2453, SB2457, SB2075, SB2811, SB2601, SB2258, SB2612, SB3263, SB3261, SB3334, SB2613

Keywords: SB2138, Hawaii National Guard, state tuition assistance, STAP, graduate degree, graduate education, tuition assistance, University of Hawaii, UH, Department of Defense, adjutant general, enlisted personnel, warrant officers, company grade officers, military education, veterans benefits, higher education, state residency, professional development, retention

Transcript Highlights:

• And what happens is during that time, UPC symbols change, ingredients change, department auditors from
• And what happens is during that time, UPC symbols change, ingredients change, department auditors from
• And what happens is during that time, UPC symbols change, ingredients change, department auditors from
• unrealistic, unreasonable advocacy of just making a statement and not an actual serious piece of legislation

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 3603, and Representative Olson first offered and had adopted an A1 author’s amendment. Olson then explained that the bill would direct the Commissioner of Children, Youth and Families to seek a USDA waiver allowing Minnesota to bar SNAP purchases of items subject to state sales tax, such as prepared foods, chips, soft drinks, and candy. He argued the goal was to promote healthier nutrition, noted that other states have similar waivers, and said the change could help Minnesota qualify for significant federal rural health care funding. Public testimony was divided. Patrick Garofalo of the Minnesota Grocers Association opposed the bill, saying SNAP is a supplemental program and that the proposal would be difficult to administer at retail stores, create confusion, and expose retailers to serious penalties for mistakes. He argued the state tax code is not a nutrition standard and pointed out inconsistencies, such as some candy-like products still being taxable or some healthy items being treated as prepared food. Will Hagen of Minnesota Retailers also opposed the bill, warning it would require costly point-of-sale changes, retraining, and would turn store employees into enforcers while creating cross-border shopping problems. Matt Schmidt of the American First Policy Institute supported the concept, saying SNAP should emphasize nutrition and that restricting unhealthy purchases would reduce taxpayer subsidies for junk food and soda. Members then debated the bill’s logic and practicality, including questions about which snacks would or would not be allowed under the tax-based standard. Representative Sencer-Mura offered an H2 amendment, framed as applying the same restrictions to legislators’ own per diem spending; Representative Hansen responded that the comparison was not equivalent and raised concerns about household circumstances and accessibility. The H2 amendment was put to a vote and did not prevail. The committee then continued member discussion on the bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• This legislation protects owning them. This legislation protects taxpayer<00:02:59.120> dollars.
• And while the proponents of this legislation suggested it is dissimilar to legislation passed in other
• Is legislation.
• This legislation can might happen.
• <01:18:40.640> auditors included what the state auditors included what the state auditors

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, have you been in conversations with leadership or with other legislators about legislative remedies
• workforce alignment is a legislative workforce alignment is a legislative mandate.<01:09:27.600>
• through legislative report request. through legislative report request.
• :51.199> and And lastly, legislative direction and And lastly, legislative direction and policy
• And so this next round of auditor.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• is inexpedient to legislate. is inexpedient to legislate.
• legislative sessions. legislative sessions.
• legislation.
• The auditors must be an auditor.
• , holding hearings on that legislation, debating that legislation, and inserting that legislation into

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . legislation. legislation.
• Finally, this bill will incorporate recommendations from the Office of the Legislative Auditor.
• <02:08:23.800> This<02:08:24.000> includes Legislative Auditor.
• This includes Legislative Auditor.
• Several provisions also implement recommendations from the Office of Legislative Auditors following its

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The measure directs the state auditor and inspector to conduct periodic reviews of the authority to ensure
• bills and clarification regarding international medical graduates related to duplicate sections in legislation

Bills: SB1328, SB1380, SB1436, SB1558, SB1572, SB1651, SB1805, SB1831, SB1836, SB2014, SB2023, SB2044, SB2179, SB933

Keywords: parents' rights, healthcare consent, minors, medical records, protection, legal guardianship, hospital, fetal death, miscarriage, healthcare, state health department, vital records, patient rights, child care, licensing, definitions, foster care, child welfare, mental health, substance abuse

Transcript Highlights:

• catalog project has modernized job classifications and pay structures, which will help us fulfill the legislative
• about us being behind, I think the 2024 audit did understand has been prepared and submitted to the auditor

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The legislation currently reads electric utility. We are adding water utility to that.
• Section two, legislative findings about the need for the creation of the authority.
• And this is very important because this is what's tied this piece of legislation up.
• And this is very important because this is what's tied this piece of legislation up.
• publish annual financial statements and submit annual reports to the lieutenant governor, speaker, auditor

Keywords: Energy - Room 409, 3 March, 2026; 1:30 P.M., 925, all

Summary: The committee first considered House Bill 1049, which was explained as a House vehicle used to insert two previously introduced Senate bills: the rural water oversight committee bill and a measure expanding PSC authority to reject certain certificated areas for municipalities serving customers more than one mile outside city limits, with water utilities added to the existing electric utility language. The committee adopted the strike-off amendment and then passed the amended bill, which was reported out. Next, House Bill 1305 was taken up. The bill would expand oversight of municipally owned electrical distribution systems by allowing the Public Service Commission to conduct audits, but it included a reverse repealer because further work was still needed. The sponsor said he wanted to ensure systems that do not need auditing are not unnecessarily included. The committee adopted the strike-off amendment and then reported the bill. The final and most detailed item was a bill creating the Metro Jackson Water Authority. The sponsor described it as a response to Jackson’s water crisis and warned that without action the city could face bankruptcy and bondholder enforcement. The bill would create a new authority covering Jackson water and wastewater service areas, establish a board with appointments by the mayor, governor, lieutenant governor, and others, transfer operations when the court-ordered process ends, and give the authority powers over rates, contracts, bonds, procurement, reporting, and related financial matters. A committee member asked whether population-based language would capture any city other than Jackson; the sponsor said Jackson is the only city over 100,000 population and acknowledged a drafting issue, noting the reverse repealer was included because the bill was not yet perfect. After the strike-off was adopted, the committee voted to report the bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Item B1 is a letter from the Auditor of State. It does contain positions. Refer to personnel.

Summary: The committee met briefly to organize a long agenda and stated that its main purpose was to refer letters and requests to the appropriate committees, while passing over items not needing referral until the following Tuesday. No substantive debate on policy issues occurred; the discussion was procedural and focused on routing agency and governor’s letters. Under agency communications, letters from the Auditor of State, Supreme Court, Secretary of State, and Lieutenant Governor were referred to the Personnel Committee because they contained positions. Under the governor’s letters, numerous items were referred either to Personnel or Special Language, including requests involving the Department of Education, Finance and Administration, Health, DHS divisions, Correction, Agriculture, Public Safety, Shared Administrative Services, Commerce/Workforce Services, Energy and Environment, and the Finance Disbursing Officer. Several items contained positions, several contained special language, and some contained both. The meeting concluded with notice of a busy schedule for the following week: Personnel at 8:00 a.m. on Tuesday and Wednesday, JBC at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, Claims after JBC on Tuesday, Peer Review after JBC on Wednesday, and Special Language at 8:00 a.m. on Thursday. No votes or substantive actions beyond referrals were recorded, and the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• pretty consistent um on the legislative pretty consistent um on the legislative side<01:09:47.440
• But it does allow us to notify or to notice those and get it to the auditors, our internal auditors quickly
• to the auditors, our our internal<02:42:41.680> auditors<02:42:42.399> quickly<02:42:43.040
• That's where that would be legislation.
• <02:57:42.000> or without any unknown legislation or without any unknown legislation or regulation

Keywords: 924, joint, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Legislators will be taken out of turn.
• This legislation is not a mandate.
• At its heart, this legislation is about trust, participation, and voice.
• At its heart, this legislation is about trust, participation, and voice.
• You'd be well suited for the legislation. Yeah, exactly. Okay.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Election Laws held a public hearing focused primarily on ranked choice voting (RCV) legislation and several local home rule petitions, along with one petition to authorize remote participation in Concord town meetings. Chairs Keenan and Hunt outlined hearing procedures and noted the committee would hear both in-person and virtual testimony. The committee also took testimony on Concord’s request for remote participation in open and special town meetings, with supporters arguing it would make town meeting more accessible to residents with childcare, mobility, work, or disability barriers while preserving direct democracy. A large portion of the hearing centered on RCV local-option bills and municipal petitions from communities including Concord, East Hampton, Salem, Chelsea, Arlington, Revere, Amherst, and others. Supporters—among them local officials, legislators, election advocates, educators, veterans, and nonprofit leaders—said RCV would reduce vote-splitting, encourage more candidates, promote more positive campaigning, improve representation, and increase turnout. East Hampton officials described their existing use of RCV, saying it produced record turnout, was easy for voters to understand with education, and could be expanded to multi-winner races without major added cost. Concord and Amherst witnesses said their voters had already approved local steps toward RCV and urged the committee to let municipalities implement the system without further delay. Testimony in favor of the local-option RCV bill emphasized home rule and local control, with several witnesses arguing the state should not block communities that have already voted to adopt RCV. Speakers from MassVOTE, the AFT Massachusetts, Voter Choice Massachusetts, Progressive Massachusetts, the Boston Teachers Union, and Veterans for All Voters said the reform would strengthen democracy, broaden participation, and save money by avoiding low-turnout preliminary elections. Some witnesses also referenced examples from Cambridge, Maine, and Utah to argue that RCV is workable, nonpartisan, and familiar to voters. The hearing ended with no votes or final committee action taken in the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• She's our tribal auditor. Tami Archuleta, they even sat in order too, I didn't ask them to do that.
• Our auditor, Natalia, reviews invoices from some of the groups listed here, whether it's the New Mexico
• We are really working, of course, with legislators because we know there's so much to be done.
• We hope to be taking action, but it's not a legislative issue, though.
• If things don't go well, we may have a legislative issue in the future, but for now, it's not.

Transcript Highlights:

• So this legislation is attempting to put those guidelines in place.
• So my legislative, my legislative... scoring and how that's going to be administered.
• So my legislative, my legislative Through the Chair, Senator, well, they're not doing it on their own
• Good morning, Daniel Scherl, legislative advocate with SEIU Local 1000, in support.
• other related pieces of legislation, one of them from you.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In the 88th legislative session, the legislature passed HB 3059 by Representative Tracy King and sponsored
• This legislation was a crucial step... in supporting the science and monitoring needed to assess the
• I ask the auditor to explain the difference between the bills filed and the subbed.
• Chairman and members, I carried the legislation to create the Post Oak Savannah Groundwater District.
• My name is Charlie Leal, and I serve as State Legislative Director for Texas Farm Bureau.

Bills: HB2018, HB1633, HB1689, SB612, SB3058

Keywords: agricultural conservation, land preservation, environmental protection, wildlife habitat, Texas Farm and Ranch, groundwater conservation district, Texas Water Code, water permit, permit amendment, groundwater permit, water rights, aquifer, well registration, exempt wells, beneficial use, water conservation, groundwater quality, well plugging, Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area, surface water resources

Transcript Highlights:

• auditor, to a member of the legislature, or to a constitutional officer.
• enforcement official to the legislative enforcement official to the legislative auditor<00:03:05.040
• <00:03:07.200> or auditor to a member of the legislator or auditor to a member of the legislator
• auditor, legislators, or constitutional officers, or their supervisors, is quite broad and I think encompasses
• We really appreciate this legislation. We think that it will democratize the public workplace.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So this really covers a gap with very much needed legislation.
• This legislation does not promote or prefer any particular test.
• Senator Parker, thank you for carrying this legislation.
• Senator Parker, thank you for carrying this legislation.
• This ensures that spaceport testing facilities are also coming under this legislation.

Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum, received the House message that HB 35 had passed, and heard a gubernatorial message submitting Trinity River Authority board appointments for Senate confirmation. The chamber also adopted a slate of Senate resolutions by voice vote and later postponed reading and referral of bills and resolutions until the end of the calendar. Several members introduced bills with brief explanations before the Senate took them up under suspension of the regular order. The body then considered and passed a series of measures, often by wide margins, including SB 2846 on wildlife disease control and quarantine authority; CS SB 1224 requiring school superintendents or directors to report certain employee misconduct to local law enforcement; CS SB 2310 on transparency for degree and transfer requirements at public colleges; SB 1502 limiting school districts’ ability to exceed voter-approval tax rates after a failed TRE; CS SB 1141 on notice requirements before full adversary hearings in child-protection cases; CS SB 2568 exempting certain flood-control reservoirs from TCEQ permitting; SB 1524 on confidentiality of information about weapons in foster homes; CS SB 2925 creating a task force on modernizing manufacturing; CS SB 2269 on dispute resolution and enforcement for long-term care facilities; CS SB 1266 on Medicaid provider enrollment and disenrollment notices; SB 243 on migrant labor housing standards; SB 2200 on overweight vehicles transporting hazardous materials; CS SB 2480 on the Texas Physician Health Program; CS SB 1585 restricting government contracts with companies tied to foreign adversaries; CS SB 2357 establishing maternal health training; and SB 1551 requiring accessible AED placement in public schools. The Senate also debated more contested bills. CS SB 2019, which would extend vaccine exemption rules to medical and veterinary students, advanced only partway after a divided vote. CS SB 1442, directing a study on veterinary telemedicine relationships, and CS SB 1241, which would allow the Higher Education Coordinating Board to study alternative college entrance exams, prompted extended questioning about agency authority and whether changes should return to the legislature before taking effect. CS SB 2753, which would integrate early voting and election day voting into a single in-person voting period, was amended and passed to engrossment despite opposition. CS SB 2201, dealing with gang and foreign terrorist organization intelligence databases, and CS SB 2514, creating a DPS hostile foreign adversaries unit, drew detailed debate over civil liberties and national security. CS SB 2422, aimed at limiting Texas Medical Board discipline related to COVID-19 treatments and practices, also advanced after lengthy discussion and a close vote.