Transcript Highlights:

• We want to be able to evaluate.
• To really evaluate and test and make sure that we don't lose anything.
• And then we need To be able to evaluate that investment over the year.
• And so building in some, I think, some areas where we can look at a grant application and evaluate it
• But let's build in ways that we can evaluate the success or lack thereof, eliminate the things that don't

Summary: The commission met with a quorum and introduced Brett Farley, who was discussed as a possible partner to help strengthen the nonprofit side of the commission’s work. Members also welcomed a new participant, Naomi Janes of Owasso Public Schools, who described her role in instructional technology and AI integration. The group spent much of the meeting on planning for the upcoming AI symposium, including venue logistics, room and meal costs, audio-visual expenses, fundraising progress, keynote and vendor participation, and ideas for breakout sessions and after-hours demonstrations. Members discussed keeping attendee contact information private unless permission is obtained, and they also considered future regional meetings and year-round follow-up to sustain momentum beyond the symposium. A major portion of the meeting focused on legislation and grant strategy. Michael provided an update on House Bill 1782, saying floor amendments had been filed and that the bill now includes authority for agencies to pursue gifts and donations, an expanded advisory council, broader research purposes, and a fund structure that can support multi-year projects without fiscal-year pressure. He also reviewed Senate Bill 1734, which would require parental disclosure, allow opt-outs, and require reporting on data minimization and privacy compliance for AI tools used in schools. Members discussed how the commission could help schools, families, and the public understand AI policy and how the new law might shape future recommendations. The group also reviewed several grant efforts. Anna reported on the NSF TechABLE/AI HubZone proposal, a three-year, $1 million-per-year opportunity with a June 15 letter-of-intent deadline and July 15 full proposal deadline, and noted plans to include staff positions to support the project. She also updated the group on a rural health care transformation proposal of roughly $700,000 and asked for follow-up on its status. In addition, Anna outlined a broader K-20 pipeline concept centered on a shared learner record and microcredential system that would connect K-12, CareerTech, higher education, libraries, and workforce systems, with tools such as Career Coach and Skill of Eye to link credentials to jobs. Members generally supported the idea, noting benefits for transcript portability, special populations, teacher certification, and workforce alignment. The commission agreed to meet again on June 14 at 1:00 p.m., and the meeting adjourned after a brief announcement of an informal AI book club for the summer.

Transcript Highlights:

• academic performance and they make it harder for residency programs, employers, and the public to evaluate
• The bill also helps to preserve the integrity of the on transparency in how medical schools evaluate
• boards, and the public... the public can understand how future physicians are being trained and evaluated
• my attention not necessarily by the medical board and there's a kind of a national trend of not evaluating
• Now it is more subjective evaluations and word of mouth and faculty talking to faculty. as opposed to

Bills: HB232

Keywords: disaster recovery, natural disaster, weather disaster, emergency relief, flood relief, hurricane relief, storm damage, wildfire, tornado, hail, windstorm, extreme heat, ice storm, snowstorm, property damage, personal injury, temporary housing, relocation assistance, lost wages, state emergency management

Transcript Highlights:

• How those scores are used and how students are evaluated throughout the course of their education, including
• academic performance, and they make it harder for residency programs, employers, and the public to evaluate
• It puts in place a concrete framework for evaluating, reporting and correcting deviations from merit-based
• Evaluating students, medical schools basically become pass fail, believe it or not.
• standards by which to assess how these students are performing and so now it is more subjective evaluations

Bills: HB232

Keywords: disaster recovery, natural disaster, weather disaster, emergency relief, flood relief, hurricane relief, storm damage, wildfire, tornado, hail, windstorm, extreme heat, ice storm, snowstorm, property damage, personal injury, temporary housing, relocation assistance, lost wages, state emergency management

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill also helps to preserve the integrity of the on transparency in how medical schools evaluate
• medical boards, and the public the public can understand how future physicians are being trained and evaluated
• It puts in place a concrete framework. for evaluating, reporting, and correcting deviations for merit-based
• my attention not necessarily by the medical board and there's a kind of a national trend of not evaluating
• Now it is more subjective evaluations and word of mouth and faculty talking to faculty. as opposed to

Bills: HB1784, HB2088, HB3062, HB3475, HB3741, HB4279, HB4763, HB5154, HB5294, HB5508, SB1401, HB232, HB232

Keywords: students, homeless, foster care, higher education, liaison officer, housing assistance, transition support, law school, Rio Grande Valley, legal education, public university, accreditation, fentanyl prevention, drug poisoning awareness, mental health resources, substance abuse education, El Paso, university system, funding, public education

Transcript Highlights:

• The report evaluated the projected... write a return on various transportation investments to determine
• All of that has to be evaluated and assessed through the environmental impact statement.
• If they're working for us, either our own or private sector, they're evaluated.
• I think you all need to re-evaluate that. And so I think the question Mr.
• Through our consultants, we do evaluate our consultants at the end of every work authorization. to ensure

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• You have to go through a process of ensuring your teacher evaluation and appraisal system is fair, and
• If they cut muster with our evaluation process, processes, then we make a recommendation to the state
• At the top, if you are an A or B approved charter, If you're an A or B evaluated operator under our A
• Evaluated. Evaluated. Thank you. I'm not a teacher. I'm a nurse. evaluated, and that's costs.
• unrelated to the existence of an ESA, anyone who goes. to private school is entitled to get an evaluation

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, and one last component is evaluation.
• And so, we need a hypothesis, a baseline, and a rigorous evaluation, process measures, outcome measures
• Um, and one last component is evaluation.
• Um, and one last component is evaluation.
• There's some you know evaluation There's some you know evaluation components<00:45:42.200> and

Bills: HB2246, HB2119, HB1929, HB1953, HB1572, HB2549, HB2594, HB2551, HB2595, HB2548, HB2459, HB1931, HB1604, HB1616, HB1736, HB2233, HB2241, HB1891, HB1803, HB2567, HB2534, HB2399, HB2172, HB1595, HB1811, HB2168, HB1780, HB1781, HB1785, HB2122, HB2012, HB2398, HB1779, HB2296, HB1894, HB1925, HB2019, HB1896, HB2294, HB2298, HB2300, HB2344, HB2345, HB2391, HB2037, HB2201, HB1941, HB1635, HB1943, HB2325, HB1926, HB2490, HB1710, HB2545, HB1976, HB2173, HB1804, HB1563, HB2015, HB1619, HB2475, HB1889, HB2367, HB2187, HB1765, HB1452, HB2231, HB1700, HB1705, HB1626, HB1897, HB1642, HB1523, HB2593, HB815, HB1655, HB1596, HB1732, HB1842, HB2476, HB2478, HB2022, HB1588, HB2575, HB1163, HB2153, HB772, HB1519, HB2050, HB2309, HB2147, HB2329, HB2274, HB2280, HB2547, HB2275, HB2452, HB2306, HB2148, HB2088, HB1764, HB2438, HB2117, HB1860, HB2604, HB2118, HB2017, HB2155, HB1832, HB2216, HB1601, HB1934, HB2297, HB2397, HB1893, HB2533, HB1890, HB2454, HB2004, HB2427, HB2207, HB1810, HB1840, HB1644, HB1645, HB1946, HB1648, HB2324, HB2323, HB1509, HB1514, HB1515, HB2164, HB2165, HB2283, HB1691, HB2386, HB2423, HB2121, HB1984, HB1593, HB1671, HB2619, HB1481, HB2314, HB2319, HB1643, HB2558, HB1864, HB1898, HB2214, HB2167, HB2488, HB2009, HB2007, HB322, HB1964, HB2218, HB2616, HB1535, HB1574, HB1977, HB2054, HB2046, HB146, HB2094, HB2181, HB2250, HB2515, HB2444, HB2385, HB1740, HB1724, HB1733, HB1799, HB1725, HB2049, HB2161, HB1970, HB2519, HB1790, HB2416, HB1873, HB2001, HB2151, HB1603, HB1880, HB1753, HB2198, HB1511, HB1991, HB2546, HB1615, HB1939, HB2140, HB2429, HB1870, HB1850, HB1782, HB2137

Keywords: agriculture, federal grants, Hawaii, grant administration, revolving fund, department of agriculture and biosecurity, grant compliance, financial support, coffee, pest control, subsidy program, coffee berry borer, coffee leaf rust, economy, biosecurity, invasive species, Molokai, advisory board, quarantine, environmental protection

Bills: HB2246, HB2119, HB1929, HB1953, HB1572, HB2549, HB2594, HB2551, HB2595, HB2548, HB2459, HB1931, HB1604, HB1616, HB1736, HB2233, HB2241, HB1891, HB1803, HB2567, HB2534, HB2399, HB2172, HB1595, HB1811, HB2168, HB1780, HB1781, HB1785, HB2122, HB2012, HB2398, HB1779, HB2296, HB1894, HB1925, HB2019, HB1896, HB2294, HB2298, HB2300, HB2344, HB2345, HB2391, HB2037, HB2201, HB1941, HB1635, HB1943, HB2325, HB1926, HB2490, HB1710, HB2545, HB1976, HB2173, HB1804, HB1563, HB2015, HB1619, HB2475, HB1889, HB2367, HB2187, HB1765, HB1452, HB2231, HB1700, HB1705, HB1626, HB1897, HB1642, HB1523, HB2593, HB815, HB1655, HB1596, HB1732, HB1842, HB2476, HB2478, HB2022, HB1588, HB2575, HB1163, HB2153, HB772, HB1519, HB2050, HB2309, HB2147, HB2329, HB2274, HB2280, HB2547, HB2275, HB2452, HB2306, HB2148, HB2088, HB1764, HB2438, HB2117, HB1860, HB2604, HB2118, HB2017, HB2155, HB1832, HB2216, HB1601, HB1934, HB2297, HB2397, HB1893, HB2533, HB1890, HB2454, HB2004, HB2427, HB2207, HB1810, HB1840, HB1644, HB1645, HB1946, HB1648, HB2324, HB2323, HB1509, HB1514, HB1515, HB2164, HB2165, HB2283, HB1691, HB2386, HB2423, HB2121, HB1984, HB1593, HB1671, HB2619, HB1481, HB2314, HB2319, HB1643, HB2558, HB1864, HB1898, HB2214, HB2167, HB2488, HB2009, HB2007, HB322, HB1964, HB2218, HB2616, HB1535, HB1574, HB1977, HB2054, HB2046, HB146, HB2094, HB2181, HB2250, HB2515, HB2444, HB2385, HB1740, HB1724, HB1733, HB1799, HB1725, HB2049, HB2161, HB1970, HB2519, HB1790, HB2416, HB1873, HB2001, HB2151, HB1603, HB1880, HB1753, HB2198, HB1511, HB1991, HB2546, HB1615, HB1939, HB2140, HB2429, HB1870, HB1850, HB1782, HB2137

Keywords: agriculture, federal grants, Hawaii, grant administration, revolving fund, department of agriculture and biosecurity, grant compliance, financial support, coffee, pest control, subsidy program, coffee berry borer, coffee leaf rust, economy, biosecurity, invasive species, Molokai, advisory board, quarantine, environmental protection

Transcript Highlights:

• It clarifies agency roles in site evaluation proceedings and expands the site evaluation committee fund
• c> proceedings<02:31:57.680> and in site evaluation proceedings and in site evaluation proceedings
• :59.680> committee expands the site evaluation committee expands the site evaluation committee
• responsibilities for the site evaluation responsibilities for the site evaluation committee<02:37
• The Site Evaluation Committee has got to be done in 100 days.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We have successfully transitioned from initial planning into active operational evaluation.
• We have about $4.71 million remaining to complete this evaluation process through next summer.
• So the big part of this current addition of staff are policy analysts and program evaluators.
• So the big part of this current addition of staff are policy analysts and program evaluators.
• There might be directives to do an evaluation of a particular program.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Our federal partners at CMS require an independent evaluation of community supports...
• Our federal partners at CMS require an independent evaluation of community supports.
• The final evaluation report is due December 31, 2028.
• An interim evaluation report will be available by 2026.
• I think the evaluation that you were talking about, the joint evaluation of the ECMs, to analyze health

Summary: The committee heard a budget oversight hearing on the Department of Health Care Services, focusing first on the overall Medi-Cal budget and a March General Fund loan to cover a current-year shortfall. DHCS said the 2025-26 budget proposal totals $193.4 billion, with Medi-Cal projected at $188.1 billion total funds and $42.1 billion General Fund, driven by higher enrollment, pharmacy costs, managed care growth, and costs tied to eligibility expansions and the COVID-era redetermination unwinding. The department said the $3.44 billion loan was needed to manage cash flow and ensure timely payments to providers and plans, while the LAO noted Medi-Cal’s cash-basis budgeting creates volatility and that more detailed estimates would come with the May Revision. Members discussed federal Medicaid threats, the need for transparency on cost drivers, and the impact of pharmacy spending, long-term care, and immigration-related coverage expansions. The second major topic was family health programs, including California Children’s Services, the continuous coverage unwinding, and opioid settlement fund spending. DHCS described CCS funding methodology changes, ongoing county stakeholder work, and a delayed rollout of CCS monitoring and oversight until July 1, 2025, while county representatives and advocates argued the program is underfunded and asked for more technical assistance and a delay in implementation. On the unwinding, the department explained that federal redetermination flexibilities helped maintain coverage after the pandemic, but the Governor’s budget proposes ending them at the end of June 2025; advocates urged making the flexibilities permanent to avoid coverage losses. For opioid settlement funds, DHCS and Finance said the budget increases funding for naloxone distribution while reducing other harm-reduction spending based on updated settlement revenues, prompting criticism from members and public commenters who argued the change would weaken effective harm-reduction programs. The hearing also included an update on Proposition 35 implementation. DHCS said the voter-approved measure continuously appropriates MCO tax revenues beginning in 2025, with up to $4.6 billion annually available for specified Medi-Cal and provider investments in 2025 and 2026, but implementation depends on consultation with the required stakeholder advisory committee. The department and LAO noted uncertainty about future federal rules affecting the MCO tax after 2026. Public testimony largely supported maintaining Medi-Cal expansions, protecting immigrant coverage, preserving harm-reduction funding, and increasing support for community health workers, pediatric dental care, and CCS county administration. No votes were taken during the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, we ask for those clear standards to be part of the bill for threat evaluation, prioritization, or
• , the bill for threat evaluation, the bill for threat evaluation, prioritization,<00:24:56.559>
• That has been able to inform improvements that they've needed as well as evaluation of how it's going
• of the true effectiveness of evaluation of the true effectiveness of this<00:46:46.319> model
• evaluating the effectiveness. evaluating the effectiveness.

Bills: HF751, HF3550, HF3764, HF1490

Keywords: parental notification, school safety, bullying, harassment, violence, prohibited conduct, student discipline, charter school, school district, data practices, student privacy, parent rights, guardian notification, school incident reporting, cyberbullying, restraint, reasonable force, anti-bullying policy, school administration, student conduct

Transcript Highlights:

• directly with three major hyperscale companies and have built deep experience in planning for, evaluating
• built deep experience in planning have built deep experience in planning for,<00:10:08.400> evaluating
• /c><00:10:09.000> and<00:10:09.080> strategizing<00:10:09.720> around for, evaluating
• , and strategizing around for, evaluating, and strategizing around development.<00:10:11.200> While
• Those are the things that we evaluate.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:13:38.079> went<00:13:38.240> through third party evaluation went through third
• Let's evaluate. Do you have other options?
• <00:15:43.199> And evaluate. Do you have other options? And evaluate.
• <00:30:20.480> the exception to the cabinet to evaluate the exception to the cabinet to evaluate
• enablers because we try to evaluate enablers because we try to evaluate everything<00:53:06.400>

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee received an update from Secretary Jeff Noel of the Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development, joined by Matt Wingate and Terry Bradshaw of the Kentucky Association of Economic Developers, on the Kentucky Product Development Initiative (KPDI) and the closing fund. The presentation focused on how KPDI helps communities develop shovel-ready industrial sites by funding infrastructure, engineering, geotechnical work, and other site-preparation costs. Noel emphasized that the program is designed to reduce uncertainty for companies, improve speed to market, and support statewide job creation and investment, especially in rural and eastern Kentucky where development costs are often higher. Testimony highlighted the complexity and expense of preparing sites, with examples of road, water, power, and rock-removal costs, and the importance of third-party evaluation in scoring applications. Noel said the program has 116 total projects statewide, with 20 active projects stemming from pilot efforts and 35 projects already resulting in about 6,381 jobs and $4.4 billion in investment. He cited examples including Crown Holdings, Flash Metals, Phoenix Paper, Pratt Paper, AESC, Sound Elements, Kitchen Foods, Latte, Krueger, Biomass, and Anna Munsman. Bradshaw added that even communities that have not yet landed a project have benefited by building spec buildings or improving access to industrial property. The speakers said the last KPDI round drew $81 million in requests but only $35 million in available funding, and they urged lawmakers to consider whether additional funding or program adjustments are needed. Suggested changes included modestly increasing eligibility or funding flexibility for rural and eastern Kentucky, while maintaining third-party performance metrics, and continuing to prioritize finishing existing parks and creating strong regional sites. No votes or formal committee actions were taken during the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• It has two reports, and the second one evaluating the elimination of Northstar was about three or four
• <00:09:38.120> the the second one evaluating the the second one evaluating the elimination
• <00:20:35.840> for the Northstar was to be evaluated for the Northstar was to be evaluated
• <00:27:23.200> and uh the idea of carefully evaluating and uh the idea of carefully evaluating
• When was that last evaluated for its cost, the worth of the land? Mr.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 269 and House File 749 together, both aimed at ending Northstar Commuter Rail service. The bill author described HF 269 as directing the Metropolitan Council and MnDOT to request a federal waiver and discontinue Northstar operations, with HF 749 setting performance requirements that would trigger a similar termination request. Supporters argued Northstar has low ridership, high operating subsidies, and large maintenance costs, and said the agencies now agree with the intent to terminate the line and possibly replace it with bus rapid transit. The chair moved HF 269 to the general register while also laying HF 749 over in committee, and testimony was heard on both bills at once. Testimony split sharply. Supporters of termination, including the bill author and Annette Meeks, said Northstar has consistently underperformed ridership projections, has required large taxpayer subsidies, and should be ended rather than extended. Opponents, including Jesse Cook, Darwin Scherlan, Joel Mueller, Katie Nicholson, and Annie Buckle, argued the line still serves riders, workers, and communities, that low frequency and underinvestment are the real problems, and that the state should improve service rather than shut it down. Several opponents emphasized Northstar’s role for commuters, special events, and future growth, especially the St. Cloud corridor. Met Council Chair Charlie Zelle and MnDOT Commissioner Danenberger said they support carefully evaluating alternatives to commuter rail and acknowledged the subsidy is not acceptable, but they also said the agencies are working with the federal government and BNSF on possible next steps. Zelle said the agencies believe bus service could provide more frequent and direct service, and when asked directly, he confirmed they are in favor of terminating Northstar and replacing it with bus service if feasible. No final disposition beyond the motion on HF 269 and the laying over of HF 749 was recorded in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• We've extended our evaluation of ICCard transactions and have seen a 65% reduction in sole source purchases
• Committed to running as lean as we can, so we'll continue to evaluate our headcount and make sure we're
• We also will continue to evaluate because there may be other vacancies we really don't need to fill.
• other pockets and openings within the state, and it wouldn't necessarily displace Oklahomans as we evaluate
• We have some agencies that are already outsourcing that function, and we're evaluating all or leverage

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So it's human input, it's an AI-generated output, and then human evaluation.
• It offers practical tips for educators, parents, and students on evaluating AI technologies and fostering
• And so we feel like now we understand how we could evaluate the tools to choose which one would be the
• We feel like now we understand how we could evaluate the tools to choose which one would be the best
• I'm showing them how to responsibly and ethically use AI in a manner that is a way that they can evaluate

Summary: The committee met to hear an overview of Washington’s alternative learning experience (ALE) programs and then an update on artificial intelligence in schools. OSPI’s Anissa Sherritt explained that ALE is a course-level funding designation for instruction that occurs partly or wholly away from the traditional seat-time model, with online, site-based, and remote course types. She emphasized that ALE is still basic education, subject to the same public school requirements, and that OSPI provides technical assistance, annual reporting review, and program reviews. Representatives from several programs described different models: Washington Virtual Academy (a large online ALE operated through Omak School District and partnered with for-profit Stride), Columbia Virtual Academy in Valley School District (a district-run, nonprofit online/remote program), Pearl in Quilcene (a K-8 remote parent partnership program), and River Home Link in Battleground (a site-based hybrid program). They discussed student supports, special education, enrichment, family choice, transportation, and how they measure outcomes. Members asked for follow-up information on funding, demographics, racial and ethnic data, multilingual learners, and post-graduation outcomes, and OSPI agreed to provide additional data where available. The committee then heard from OSPI and several districts about AI guidance and implementation. OSPI’s Holly Ryan Calloway described the agency’s human-centered AI framework, three guidance documents for schools, statewide professional learning, an AI innovation summit, and new AI literacy and informatics course frameworks and CIP codes. Quincy School District described a multi-year effort to integrate AI by centering student needs, creating district policy and classroom guidance, and training teachers to use AI responsibly while building an AI readiness plan from elementary through high school. Peninsula School District described its AI action research team, teacher professional learning, and classroom uses of generative AI to support science instruction, communication, and prompt engineering, while stressing that AI should enhance rather than replace learning. Members raised questions about privacy, energy and water use, prompt engineering, workforce and university connections, and the need for clear standards and ongoing educator training. No votes were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• It requires a manual process to go in and really hit our KPIs and any kind of other eventual evaluations
• Evaluating our activities is very difficult. So that is, you know, what we found from our last one.
• The next is on how we evaluate applications on page five. We included certain criteria for the...
• And we've outlined there on page five how that will work: be evaluated, the need and the capability of
• So how we're gonna evaluate these projects for eligibility and prioritization, we will be consulting

Transcript Highlights:

• /c><00:08:40.560> with will continue as well along with will continue as well along with evaluation
• > processes<00:08:42.159> and<00:08:42.399> practices<00:08:42.880> to evaluation
• of processes and practices to evaluation of processes and practices to determine<00:08:44.240> um
• <01:51:06.560> and<01:51:06.800> make<01:51:07.040> budgetary to evaluate and
• make budgetary to evaluate and make budgetary allocations<01:51:09.040> which<01:51:09.199>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Evaluation of MCO provider networks.
• For incumbent MCOs, that data readily exists to complete this evaluation.
• Specifically, we were looking for how did they evaluate quality?
• We also wanted to know... how they were evaluating cost efficiencies.
• The state currently goes through an evaluation process.

Bills: HB149, HB252, HB643, HB1442, HB1500, HB1672, HB1851, HB1893, HB2028, HB2768, HB2818, HB149, HB252

Keywords: artificial intelligence, regulation, biometric data, ethical AI, consumer protection, AI governance, employment compensation, state agencies, salary payments, general appropriations, government efficiency, public works, contractors, payment bonds, government contracts, construction law, transparency, open meetings, government accountability, public access