Transcript Highlights:

• and student-to-student misconduct, including consideration of Namely, the bill requires the review to
• and student-to-student misconduct, including consideration of crime prevention through environmental
• NDAs add nothing to student safety.
• Protecting students must remain our top priority.
• It allows parents of exceptional student education students to request in writing to the school's principal

Summary: The committee first heard SJR 1104, a proposed constitutional amendment on voluntary religious expression in public schools. Senator Massullo said the measure would protect students and school personnel from discrimination for lawful religious expression, while not requiring prayer or religious activity. Questions focused on whether the proposal would change existing law, whether it could be used to protect coercive conduct by school officials, and whether the staff summary accurately reflected the bill. Public testimony included support from religious-freedom advocates and opposition from American Atheists and some senators who said the measure could make minority-faith students uncomfortable. The committee voted to report SJR 1104 favorably. The committee then took up SB 1738 on educational facilities, which directs state education offices to review facility requirements and recommend design and construction practices to improve safety and accountability. Senator Yarborough offered and the committee adopted an amendment removing crime-prevention-through-environmental-design language and adjusting the bill to preserve safe spaces during emergencies. The bill was reported favorably after brief discussion about balancing transparency, access control, and emergency safety. The committee also adopted a delete-all amendment to SB 824 on charter schools, replacing it with a transparency measure requiring districts to submit annual reports on unimproved land holdings to the Department of Education, which would publish a statewide report; the amended bill was then reported favorably. The committee next approved confirmation recommendations for appointees on tabs 7 and 8, then took up SPB 7036, a committee bill sponsored by Chair Simon. The package included school turnaround and early literacy changes, updates to school safety and health policies, early learning revisions, instructional changes, and educator pipeline provisions. The most contentious part was a proposal to let the state develop instructional materials; several senators questioned costs, guardrails, and whether the state should enter the textbook business. Simon said that portion was still being considered and that the bill would need safeguards if it moved forward. The committee adopted a motion to submit the bill as a committee bill and reported it favorably. Finally, the committee heard SB 1620 on public education, described by Senator Leak as a “school board members’ bill of rights.” The bill would give individual board members direct access to district documents and staff, limit district attorneys’ ability to represent both the board and administration, strengthen nepotism rules, and prohibit nondisclosure agreements for employees. Testimony from Volusia County board members, educators, and advocates was sharply divided: supporters argued the bill would improve transparency and protect minority board members, while opponents warned it could undermine superintendent authority, expose confidential student or personnel information, and create confusion in district operations. After debate, the committee voted to report SB 1620 favorably. The committee then heard SB 1170 on cameras in self-contained special education classrooms, with an amendment changing the proposal from a statewide mandate to a district policy allowing parents of students with disabilities to request cameras. Testimony was overwhelmingly supportive, centered on protecting non-speaking and vulnerable students and documenting abuse; one witness opposed the bill as an unfunded mandate. The committee was still in debate on the bill when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• underrepresented student teacher grants and<00:05:53.120> student<00:05:53.440> loan<00
• :05:53.680> debt<00:05:54.000> counseling and student loan debt counseling and student
• assistance for post-secondary students assistance for post-secondary students grants<00:09:15.360
• For dependent students to 100% of the parental contribution, setting the student aid index, parental
• And this loses state student aid.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• more costly than that of a student more costly than that of a student that's<00:36:55.319> uh
• per student.
• eligible, around 1,500 students.
• preschool students out of state students preschool students out of state students and<03:45:57.040
• students being enrolled are the students students being enrolled are the students who<04:01:25.720

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee met in executive session on HB 563, which revises the adequacy education grant formula, including differentiated aid for free and reduced-price meals, English language learners, and special education, and also restores fiscal capacity disparity aid. Members explained that for FY 26 the formula largely stays the same with the usual 2% increases, while FY 27 would raise the base cost and several aid categories, including a substantial increase in special education differentiated aid. Supporters said the bill recognizes higher special education costs and separates fiscal capacity disparity from the extraordinary needs grant, which they argued better targets property-poor communities. A major point of discussion was the fiscal capacity disparity aid component. Some members asked for more detail on how the formula affected individual towns and how much money was being allocated. The sponsors said the spreadsheet showed the impacts and estimated the fiscal capacity disparity portion at about $13.3 million, benefiting roughly 40 communities, with Manchester the only municipality expected to receive less under the new approach. They also said the change partially rebalances money that had shifted heavily toward larger cities under the extraordinary needs grant and that the special education increase is new money, not taken from the hold harmless or extraordinary needs funds. Several members supported the amendment as a good-faith step and a bipartisan compromise, while others expressed frustration that they did not have enough time or information to review the spreadsheets in detail before voting. After extended debate, the committee recessed for lunch to allow the spreadsheet to be distributed and reviewed, with the understanding that the bill would continue later in the day and then move on to the other bills on the docket.

Transcript Highlights:

• When the bell rang, I asked an admin to escort student A to class while I escorted student B.
• expelled student. expelled student.
• those students who need good teachers. those students who need good teachers.
• students would be expelled for a year? students would be expelled for a year?
• IEPs and students who have students with IEPs and students who have done<00:27:23.679> this<00

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Senate convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, roll call, and a declared quorum. The chamber excused an absent senator, approved the prior journal, received House communication that the House had passed HB 168, 185, 249, and 455 and requested concurrence, and heard committee reports advancing SB 37 and SB 214 from Agriculture, SB 157 and SB 189 with a committee substitute from Banking and Insurance, and SJR 54 with a committee substitute from Families and Children. The Senate also introduced SB 226 on pre-need burial contracts and SR 113 honoring Robert Connley Young. The main floor debate centered on SB 101, an act relating to children, which would require a mandatory 12-month expulsion for students in grades 6-12 who assault a school employee, with exceptions for certain students with disabilities under an IEP and for incidents involving provocation by a school employee. The bill also creates a mandatory reporting requirement for assaults and penalties for intentionally failing to report them. The sponsor argued the measure responds to widespread, underreported assaults on teachers, citing 25,000 reported incidents since 2021 and sharing testimony from a teacher whose career ended after repeated assaults. Supporters said the bill would improve school safety, accountability, and classroom control, while opponents argued it is too harsh for children, could permanently remove students from school, and should leave more discretion to principals and districts. After debate, the Senate adopted Senate Committee Substitute 1 for SB 101 and then proceeded to final passage. Several senators spoke for and against the bill during roll-call explanation, with supporters emphasizing teacher safety, parental responsibility, and consequences for repeat offenders, and opponents warning about lost educational opportunities and the need for second chances. The transcript cuts off during the roll call, but the chamber had already adopted the committee substitute and moved to vote on SB 101 as amended.

Transcript Highlights:

• Charter school students, students that go to charter school, they're left out of safe school aid.
• It's the students.
• Our students that happen to be students in charter schools, they should have a safe place to study.
• > to<00:05:08.160> be<00:05:08.320> students students that that happen to be students
• students that that happen to be students in<00:05:08.720> charter<00:05:09.120> schools,

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• I'll have to get back with those students. And do we have students taking those blocks?
• Do we have students taking those blocks, and are they successful?
• I think that what we do need to work on is communication out to students and students at community colleges
• I assume that those students are in community colleges.
• That way the student doesn't... Can ask them, but they have to do it for free.

Summary: The Senate Committee on Education K-16 heard two bills. SB 2847, by Senator Hagenbuch, would give Texas public four-year universities the same option community colleges already have to seek approval from the Higher Education Coordinating Board for core curricula of fewer than 42 semester credit hours. Hagenbuch said the bill is intended to add flexibility, support career-focused programs, and help students finish degrees faster. There was no public testimony, and the bill was left pending. The committee then heard SB 3039, by Senator West, which addresses transferability and credit loss for students moving from community colleges to four-year institutions. West said the bill responds to ongoing problems with rejected transfer credits and seeks better data, study, and recommendations from the Coordinating Board. Deputy Commissioner Sarah Keaton testified that transfer remains a major policy issue, that reporting requirements from SB 25 have improved data collection, and that the main reasons credits do not transfer are grades and degree applicability. She also described the Texas Direct degree program and field-of-study curricula designed to transfer as blocks. Members discussed the cost of lost credits, the need for better communication to students, and concerns that some institutions still reject credits or require duplicate coursework. No public witnesses signed up on SB 3039, and it was left pending subject to the call of the chair. A quorum was later established, the agenda was completed, and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• , how to deal with motivating students, how to deal with handling<00:25:01.760> student<00:25:
• Student, that's fine, but it might be very appropriate for another student.
• were losing students previously.
• enrollment and student needs.
• on student enrollment and student needs. on student enrollment and student needs.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• technically when you have the students technically when you have the students that<02:08:18.639>
• <02:12:35.840> And number of students in the state. And number of students in the state.
• preparation pilot program for students preparation pilot program for students with<03:36:16.800>
• The students are there.
• helped the students in New Hampshire. helped the students in New Hampshire.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We need to protect student identity.
• We we have a number of initiatives related to college career advising, student success, getting students
• What we have to do is we have to have better student services to make sure the students we have get the
• I believe that... student services at the schools for every student that we have becomes critical.
• . students everything that they lost.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Students work to get by, to be able to survive in Los Angeles.
• Most students now are working over. They're working over.
• So like we said, we had an over-representation of UCLA students. majority of LSRP students go to UCLA
• Students aren't just balanced.
• So really allowing students to work less.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• STUDENTS ENROLLED IN THIS PROGRAM VARY FROM TRADITIONAL UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS TO WORKING PROFESSIONALS
• THE STUDENTS FOR THE NEXT SET OF JOBS THAT WE WANT OUR STUDENTS TO FACE AS THEY MOVE FURTHER.
• STUDENTS BE?
• BECAUSE NOT ALL STUDENTS OF COURSE BUT SOME STUDENTS ARE NOT PRODUCING CRITICAL THINKING NOW.
• STUDENTS WILL USE THAT.

Transcript Highlights:

• The money goes where the students go.
• Students, not the school.
• Listen, student life has become... ...and letting the free market and the students choose.
• It's about supporting students, our most vulnerable students.
• It's about supporting students, our most vulnerable students.

Keywords: 974, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The money goes where the students go.
• Students, not the school.
• Listen, student life has become... ...and letting the free market and the students choose.
• Student life is becoming very important.
• It's about supporting students, our most vulnerable students.

Summary: The Senate Education Committee met to hear several education-related measures. It reported favorably, without objection, on House Bill 1215, which would transfer certain removed historical statues and monuments to the Office of State Parks, prohibit re-erection in the parish where they were removed, and require interpretive signage. The committee also advanced House Bill 682, which creates a school guardian program for honorably discharged veterans employed or contracted by local school systems or charter schools; testimony emphasized that guardians would be unarmed, trained, and used for mentoring and school safety. House Bill 1079, giving enrollment preferences in charter schools to children in early childhood programs, military families, foster children, and children in custody disputes, was also reported favorably, as was House Concurrent Resolution 81, directing the Department of Education to study options for districts facing declining enrollment. The committee then took up House Bill 1084, which would allow public postsecondary institutions to raise tuition and mandatory fees by up to 15 percent annually, with higher increases requiring Board of Supervisors approval. The bill drew extended debate over affordability, TOPS, student retention, and whether universities should have more autonomy to set prices. Members raised concerns about fee burdens on families and whether the state should first study the issue; supporters argued the bill would increase transparency and let institutions respond to funding needs and market conditions. Senator Mazzell offered an amendment lowering the cap from 15 percent to 10 percent, and the committee adopted the amendment before reporting the bill favorably as amended. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 342, which would shift the burden of proof in special education due process hearings from parents to local education agencies. The author and parents testified that the current system places an unfair burden on families of children with disabilities, who often lack access to records and legal resources, and that schools already control the documentation and should have to show compliance with IEP obligations. Jefferson Parish school officials opposed the bill, arguing it would increase legal costs, require more staff and attorney time, and potentially lead to more hearings; they also questioned the fiscal note. The Legislative Fiscal Office said the fiscal impact was indeterminable, and the committee continued hearing testimony from parents and school representatives as the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• students in her special education class. students in her special education class.
• Uh she also has worked with students Uh she also has worked with students that<00:30:41.120>
• the students are benefiting from that. the students are benefiting from that.
• So, this allows homeschool students to participate if there is room, and the homeschool student would
• , a regular student even the the student, a regular student would<00:54:23.280> have<00:54:23.440

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Many, many students.
• <00:05:17.639> I<00:05:17.720> think students many many students and I think students
• I just want to say that it's very, very successful because those students, they're wonderful students
• student, whatever it is, okay.
• We want students to have access.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So the students who attended intersession… So the students who attended intersession three times during
• the students who attend intersession less.
• In those early grades in particular, the average student scored lower than the other students but made
• higher gains than the students who weren't attending.
• Um, but we every take those to students.

Bills: HB447, HB447

Keywords: HB447, school buses, student transportation, public schools, local boards of education, dual enrollment, career technical education, CTE, community college, trade school, technical college, offsite educational venues, student access, transportation policy, school bus law, Alabama education law, Montgomery County, probate court, judge of probate, will registration

Transcript Highlights:

• > Link,<00:21:24.160> Atlas We have students Nikki Link, Atlas We have students Nikki Link
• These students have represent many facets of our community, including student leadership, and I would
• students from Ka'ala Elementary School. students from Ka'ala Elementary School.
• > many These students have represent many These students have represent many facets<00:22:46.240
• , build relationships with students, build relationships with students, family,<00:33:17.880>

Bills: HR204, SB2925, SB2798, SB2320, SB2800, SB1230, SB2706, SB3233, SB2405, SB3320, SB2543, SB3097, SB3096, SB3140, SB2593, SB2567, SB2466, SB2140, SB2088, SB3090, SB608, SB2795, SB3294, SB3263, SB3001, SB2907, SB3251, SB2074, SB2360, SB2354, SB2908, SB2353, SB3045, SB2047, SB3254, SB3246, SB3133, SB2425, SB2671, SB3229, SB2969, SB1166, SB896, SB2391, SB2125, SB3118, SB3325, SB2613, SB2614, SB494, SB2376, SB3326, SB2001, SB2599, SB3048, SB3169, SB2002, SB3247, SB3253, SB2155, SB2192, SB3187, SB2190, SB2398, SB2424, SB3028, SB2338, SB3219, SB2981, HCR14

Keywords: H.R. 204, House Resolution, Hawaii LifeSmarts, LifeSmarts State Competition, student competition, academic recognition, congratulatory resolution, Iolani School, Kalani High School, Waipahu High School, personal finance, consumer rights, health and safety, technology education, environmental education, National Consumers League, Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Hawaii Credit Union League, youth achievement, high school teams

Transcript Highlights:

• How many students are served in a school?
• And the school finance system is essentially designed, predominantly, to fund, based upon students. student
• The special education student population is 14%.
• Yeah, generally MNO follows the student, INS doesn't, but MNO follows the student.
• Survives when there are no students are the students that are left behind that that smaller number are

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• WE HAVE MANY STUDENTS WHO NEED A LEG UP.
• STUDENTS ARE HOME EDUCATION STUDENTS THAT PARTICIPATE IN DUAL ENROLLMENT.
• SYSTEM AVERAGE STUDENT.
• STUDENT.
• SO WE DON'T ALWAYS KNOW WHY A STUDENT IS IN BIOLOGY BUT THERE ARE MANY STUDENTS IN BIOLOGY.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• When special education is well resourced, it's transformational for students.
• Educators are proud to serve students with disabilities from birth to age 21.
• When special education is well resourced, it's transformational for students.
• In life success for all of our students.
• And Texas students, families, and educators deserve better.

Keywords: special education, funding, equity, advocacy, Texas Legislature, SB568, HB2, disabilities

Summary: This was a press conference calling on the Texas Legislature to increase and reform funding for special education, with speakers arguing that the current system leaves a roughly $1.7 billion gap and forces districts to stretch general education dollars to cover mandated services. Sabrina Gonzalez Ocedo of The Arc of Texas opened by framing the issue as one of equity and self-determination for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and noted support for legislative efforts including Senate Bill 568 and House Bill 2. She also thanked a coalition of advocacy groups and legislators involved in special education funding work. Representative Steve Toth spoke in favor of investing surplus dollars in special education, citing high rates of functional illiteracy and dyslexia among prison populations and saying earlier intervention could change life outcomes. Amy Litzinger described how accommodations and assistive technology helped her succeed in school and urged continued investment so other students can access similar supports. Sarah Harden, a parent and disability advocate, shared her daughter’s positive experience in a well-supported district but warned that many Texas districts cannot provide comparable services because of funding shortages and that families are increasingly worried about cuts. Rachel Hull, a special education director, said well-resourced special education is transformational and outlined the need for individualized services, therapies, vocational training, and college readiness supports. Jean Mayer, a school trustee, said districts are struggling to meet state and federal requirements because funding does not match actual costs, pointing to staffing shortages and the need for parent engagement and professional development. The speakers repeatedly urged lawmakers to fully fund Senate Bill 568 and broader special education reforms this session; no votes were taken, as this was an advocacy event rather than a committee hearing.