Video & Transcript : 'voluntary registry' :

Page 8 of 261
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • registry. ...also a form for people who are in the registry, meet the age of majority, and wish to be
  • removed from the registry.
  • Judge Schwartz: It's a voluntary program. It's at no cost to the state agencies.
  • It's purely voluntary. If either side doesn't want to do it, it doesn't happen.
  • Representative Connerley: In that case, wouldn't mediation be a better solution if it's voluntary?
Summary: The Joint Administrative Procedures Committee heard a presentation from Representative Esposito on a proposal to strengthen oversight of agency rulemaking under Chapter 120. The bill would require cost-benefit analysis at the front end and after implementation, create an eight-year sunset and review process for rules, and require express legislative authority for agency rulemaking. Members questioned the lack of concrete examples of burdensome rules, the effect on already slow rulemaking, the choice of an eight-year sunset, and the bill’s origin; Esposito said she was working with stakeholders and cited her chamber-of-commerce background and research with the Cicero Institute. No vote was taken on the bill itself. Staff then reported on legislatively mandated rulemaking from 2023 and 2024, noting that most required rules had been adopted, proposed, noticed, or scheduled, with a few agencies still outstanding. The Department of Financial Services explained a delayed notice of rule development for the MySafe Florida Home condominium pilot program as an oversight that has since been corrected, and the Department of Education said it did not proceed with rulemaking for the Fostering Prosperity grants because the program received no funding in the 2025 budget. The Department of Health described delayed rulemaking for the sickle cell disease and trait registry, saying the registry and opt-out forms were being implemented and that notices of rule development had now been filed. Members pressed the department on why rules took so long and discussed the need for statutory deadlines. The Department of Children and Families reported on two 2023 human-trafficking-related rules: signage requirements for residential treatment facilities and children’s safe homes, and a new certification process for adult safe homes. DCF said the signage rule is now moving forward and the adult safe home certification rule has been submitted for final review after workshops and stakeholder feedback. Senators questioned the lengthy timeline and the lack of oversight during the interim, while the chair emphasized the need for time-certain deadlines in legislation and for JAPAC oversight hearings. The committee also considered staff-proposed amendments to Chapter 120 addressing emergency rules pending legislative ratification and the process for initiating ratification, including a one-year limit and notice to JAPAC. After discussion, the committee voted to forward the proposed amendments to the Senate President and House Speaker. Finally, members discussed a proposed amendment to the administrative law judge appointment and retention process under Section 120.65. DOAH’s interim director opposed the change, saying ALJs and workers’ compensation judges have different functions and warning against shifting appointment power to cabinet officers whose agencies appear before DOAH. Members raised concerns about timeliness, consistency, and accountability in DOAH decisions. The committee voted to forward this proposal as well, with Senator Smith voting no on that motion.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Disease Prevention & Women's & Children's Health Apr 3rd, 2025

S/C on Disease Prevention & Women's & Children's Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill also creates a kidney health clinic and a kidney health clinical trials registry to keep patients
  • The power of those two accessing this would be a registry, a place where clinical trials could be placed
Bills: HB514 , HB1652 , HB2117 , HB2298 , HB3269 , HB46 , HB46
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • AND WE I'M GONNA PUBLISHED THE NOTICE AS WELL IN THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE REGISTRY.
  • MEET THE AGE OF MAJORITY THAT SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE REGISTRY.
  • YOU PUT TOGETHER A REGISTRY.
  • >> IT IS A VOLUNTARY PROGRAM AT NO COST TO THE STATE AGENCIES.
  • IS VOLUNTARY IF EITHER SIDE DOES NOT WANT TO DO IT. >> Rep. Overdorf: FOLLOW-UP?
WA
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Energy and Natural Resources (05/06/2025)

Energy and Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> registry was a tremendous step forward. registry was a tremendous step forward.
  • or the California Air Resources Board registry, or some other registry.
  • :54.760><c> DR</c><01:19:55.800><c> DNCR's</c> the registry that's on DR DNCR's the registry that's on
  • And I did do some registry today.
  • </c><02:55:50.399><c> market,</c> the 40-year voluntary carbon market, the 40-year voluntary carbon market
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Public Safety Committee Apr 7th, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill creates a registry similar in concept to our sex offender registry that is narrowly focused
  • We've seen this with other registries.
  • We've seen this with other registries.
  • Domestic violence registries prevent or reduce violence.
  • The comment that domestic violence registries don't work: we don't have a domestic violence registry,
Committee: House Public Safety
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Public Safety Committee Apr 7th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • So it's completely voluntary if they want to do it or not.
  • And first of all, diversion almost universally is voluntary.
  • This bill creates a registry similar in concept to our sex offender registry that is narrowly focused
  • A registry would be duplicative and by no means comprehensive.
  • The comment that domestic violence registries don't work: we don't have a domestic violence registry,
Summary: The committee heard a large public safety agenda and began by announcing several bills off calendar and limiting testimony to two witnesses per side. The first major item was AB 2698, which would authorize local governments to create youth court diversion programs for first-time juvenile offenders. The author and supporters, including Bakersfield Police Department representatives and a student participant, described the program as restorative, record-clearing, and successful in Bakersfield. Opponents argued it was not true diversion because it occurs after adjudication, could widen system involvement, and should instead be replaced by pre-arrest community-based diversion. The bill was moved on a due pass motion to Appropriations, but remained on call with some members not voting. The committee also adopted a consent calendar of ten bills without opposition. The committee then heard AB 1959, which would create a narrow exception allowing resentencing in adult court for certain violent juvenile offenders in a case arising from the Santana High School shooting. The author, San Diego County District Attorney Summer Stephan, and a survivor/city councilmember argued the bill would close a loophole that could lead to resentencing and early release despite parole denials. Several organizations registered opposition or opposed unless amended, but many noted they were reviewing the amended version. The bill was moved due pass as amended to Appropriations and remained on call. AB 1628, extending California’s safe surrender window for newborns from 72 hours to 30 days, drew broad support from the author, firefighters, medical and child welfare groups, and no opposition; it was moved due pass to Human Services and remained on call. The committee also approved AB 1974, which authorizes law enforcement agencies to create voluntary temporary firearm storage programs. The author and supporters from San Francisco law enforcement, Giffords, and gun safety groups said the bill would expand safe storage options during crises and in custody disputes; there was no opposition, and it passed due pass as amended. AB 2297, requiring restitution in diversion cases, drew support from the author, district attorneys, and victims’ advocates, while opponents argued it was duplicative, could burden low-income participants, and might undermine diversion success. After discussion about restitution law and ability to pay, the bill passed due pass. Finally, AB 2438, which would require people sentenced to more than six years to serve in state prison rather than county jail, drew support from the author and Riverside County Sheriff Bianco, who said realignment had overcrowded county jails and strained resources. Opponents warned it could worsen state prison overcrowding and conflict with realignment’s purpose. The chair recommended no, and the bill was moved due pass and re-refer to Appropriations, remaining on call.
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

2026 Legislative Session - Day Fifty Five - Tuesday, April 21

Missouri House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • In 2018, there was an overhaul of the Missouri Sex Offender Registry.
  • under federal law, you could not get off of the registry here.
  • Buying food is not voluntary. Paying rent is not voluntary. Paying rent is not voluntary.
  • Buying food is not voluntary. Paying rent is not voluntary.
  • Paying for health care and child care are not voluntary.
Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, approval of the House Journal by roll call vote (117-5), and a long series of special guest introductions, including YouthBuild students, school groups, family members, former legislators, and a Delta Sigma Theta Sorority Day recognition. The chamber then moved to third-reading business and reconsideration motions on House Committee Substitute for House Bills 3283 and 3306. Members explained the bills needed to be sent back to Legislative Review to address possible conflicts with current case law and to tighten the language, especially around arbitration and municipal/court jurisdiction issues. The reconsideration motions and the motion to commit the bills to Legislative Review all passed by roll call votes in the 98-43 range. The House then took up House Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 982, which would revise Missouri’s sex offender registry system. The sponsor said the bill responds to concerns from an advocacy group and registry administrators, converting Missouri from a hybrid offense-based system to a true tier-based system aligned with federal SORNA standards, clarifying who must register, reducing litigation exposure, and adding related language on civil commitment housing, name changes, and carnival employees. Members asked about whether offenders could eventually petition off the registry; the sponsor said the bill would streamline removal where allowed under the tier system. House Amendment 1, correcting a typo, was adopted, the committee substitute was adopted, and the bill was third read and passed 141-4. The House also debated House Joint Resolutions 173 and 174, a proposal to amend the constitution to phase out the state income tax and shift more of the tax burden toward sales and use taxes over time. Supporters argued the current income tax hurts the middle class, discourages growth, and places Missouri at a disadvantage compared with no-income-tax states like Tennessee; they said the measure would let voters decide and could improve economic development, population growth, and fairness by making taxes more visible and consumption-based. Opponents argued the plan would raise taxes on most Missourians, especially low- and middle-income families, seniors on fixed incomes, and people who spend more of their income on necessities, and that it would shift costs onto consumers while weakening funding for schools, health care, and other services. The debate was extensive and included questions about constitutional tax limits, revenue neutrality, and comparisons to Tennessee and Washington, but no final vote on the resolutions was shown in the transcript.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Labor, Health & Social Services, February 13, 2026

Labor, Health & Social Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Completely voluntary on the part of the independent contractor.
  • And it's voluntary on the part of the business as well.
  • Completely voluntary on the part next.
  • And it's voluntary on the for it or not.
  • Um we went with I forms of a registry.
Bills: HB0028 , HB0080
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> statement made in custody is voluntary statement made in custody is voluntary or<00:30:24.200><c
  • statement</c> voluntary waiver or voluntary statement voluntary waiver or voluntary statement made<00
  • waiver and a they made a voluntary waiver and a voluntary<00:46:40.680><c> statement,</c><00:46:41.240
  • ,</c> this issue comes down to voluntariness, this issue comes down to voluntariness, and<00:51:00.200
  • I'd also like to talk about the word voluntary and how we, like, is this just a voluntary statement?
Summary: The Juvenile Justice Oversight Council met with a quorum, approved the October 8, 2025 minutes, and welcomed guests including Marshall County Attorney Jason Darnall. The main topic was juvenile interrogation, with a presentation from Kentucky Youth Advocates by Courtney Downs and Shannon Moody. They said their organization is supporting a 2026 Blueprint priority requiring children to consult with an attorney before waiving Miranda rights, and they emphasized research on adolescent brain development, susceptibility to peer pressure and impulsive decision-making, and the risk of false confessions. They cited National Registry of Exonerations data showing high rates of false confessions among exonerated youth, especially younger children, and described approaches in other states such as Maryland’s Child Interrogation Protection Act, Indiana’s statute allowing certain adults to waive rights in some circumstances, and laws in other states requiring recording of interrogations or limiting deceptive tactics. Members asked about trauma and adverse childhood experiences, whether the proposal would require attorney consultation in every juvenile interview, whether parents could instead be the ones consulted, and how such a rule would affect law enforcement investigations and juvenile accountability. Senator Carroll and others raised concerns about feasibility, delays, and whether juveniles might avoid accountability if attorneys are required before questioning. The presenters responded that they were focused on ensuring children understand their legal rights, that some states use age- or offense-based limits, and that parent consultation is another model used elsewhere, though they said a lawyer is best suited to explain legal rights and process. Members also discussed the role of the Department of Public Advocacy and whether legislative action or court decisions should address the issue. The council did not take final action on the policy, but requested additional materials, including the text of laws from Maryland, Indiana, and North Carolina, for further review.