Video & Transcript Research : 'testing window'

Page 8 of 456
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Veterans and Military Affairs Division 4/15/26

Veterans and Military Affairs Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • We know how to test them, make sure that they're able to be ingested.
  • We<01:13:07.120> know<01:13:07.199> how<01:13:07.280> to<01:13:07.440> test
  • We know how to test them, make safely.
  • We know how to test them, make sure<01:13:08.159> that<01:13:08.320> they're<01:13:08.800
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Mar 5th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do know for a fact when we stopped testing things, the priority for those things to be taught is Lessened
  • That's one thing I recognize in public schools is like, test it all or don't test it. I'm with you.
  • And now we're throwing that Basically out the window.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 8th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's like asking students to grade their own test.
  • We'll strengthen those requirements by refining the procedures for public testing, standardizing testing
  • Meaningful testing.
  • True security would require comprehensive penetration testing by cybersecurity experts, testing for false
  • the ability of poll watchers to witness the hash test.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 22nd, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • So today when They get results from a paternity test, which indicates whether this is the father or not
  • Currently, when we receive a paternity test result, it has a wide range of information on it.
  • really don't need to know the particular genetic layout; we just need the result of the paternity test
  • We don't have any material at the department, of course, because we are not conducting that blood test
  • The court has ordered a paternity test, right?
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Why not make more funding to make sure rape kits are tested? Why aren't we making sure police...
  • Why not make more funding to make sure rape kits are tested? Why we're not making sure police?
  • is one of the reasons for this bill is, you know, they don't like that the stuff isn't labeled and tested
  • It's all tested. They have lab tests. They can't sell that without showing that to us already.
  • Got whatever tests that could help. But they can't do that because you won't let them.
Bills: SB6, SB7, SB8, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB15, SB17
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 8, the Texas Women's Privacy Act, and heard extensive public testimony both for and against the measure. Supporters, including representatives of Texas Values and Texas Values Action, argued the bill was needed to protect women’s privacy and safety in restrooms, locker rooms, showers, prisons, domestic violence shelters, and other government-controlled spaces, and said it would provide clear, sex-based rules. Opponents, including many transgender Texans, civil rights advocates, clergy, business and public safety voices, and others, argued the bill would invite harassment, gender policing, lawsuits, and invasive inspections, while harming trans, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people as well as cisgender women who do not fit stereotypes. Several witnesses said the bill would conflict with federal law or prison standards, worsen safety in shelters and prisons, and hurt Texas’s reputation and economy. The chair repeatedly noted the compressed special-session schedule and said flood relief remained the session’s top priority. Public testimony on SB 8 was eventually closed, and the bill was left pending. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 6, dealing with consumable hemp product restrictions. Testimony on SB 6 focused on whether the bill went too far in restricting hemp-derived THC products. Opponents argued hemp and THC have medical and economic value, that the bill would criminalize conduct and burden courts, and that regulation—not prohibition—was the better approach. Some witnesses supported tighter rules such as testing, child-resistant packaging, and limits on marketing to children, but still opposed the bill’s broad THC ban, higher fees, and age restrictions. Several speakers emphasized benefits for veterans, chronic pain patients, and small businesses, and warned that prohibition would push consumers toward the illicit market. The committee heard the testimony and then continued with additional witnesses, with no final vote or disposition reported in the excerpt.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • My hope is that they test at the beginning of the three-week window to allow time at the end.
  • windows.
  • or the majority of the testing.
  • And I think about my wife, who's now retired, but when she Looked at that testing window for her, the
  • I think we absolutely should do that, and I think we can do that even before the testing window.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • of deadline week, and so I was trying to look for a scripture. to talk about this and talk about testing
  • through 5: 'Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds, for you know that the testing
  • was also aligned with a 30-day window of a plan.
  • But the reason third grade retention is the number is because when you're talking about formative tests
  • So, the earliest age you can really have formative tests that I think are of any value and that the data
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Education K-16 (Part II) May 8th, 2025

Education K-16

AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

04/28/2026 - Joint Appropriations

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Finally, the bills continue the requirement that recipients of TANF cash benefits pass a drug test to
  • Finally, the bills continue the requirement that recipients of TANF cash benefits pass a drug test to
  • Finally, the bills continue the requirement that recipients of TANF cash benefits pass a drug test to
Summary: The committee met in a special joint appropriations session to review the FY 2027 budget package, including House Bill 4138 and Senate Bill 1831, the general appropriations or “feed” bills. Staff described the budget as including a one-time transfer of state funds, a 5% lump-sum reduction to most agencies’ discretionary general-fund budgets, continued funding for the state health insurance plan and school facilities, and various one-time restorations or reversions of prior appropriations. Members spent much of the meeting clarifying how the 5% reductions would work, noting that formula and mandatory funding such as K-12 basic aid are excluded, while the governor’s executive branch would decide how to implement the cuts within agencies. The chair repeatedly emphasized that the committee was not specifying line-item cuts and that agencies would have discretion over implementation. A large portion of the discussion focused on the practical effects of the budget on universities, public safety, health care, rural programs, and fund sweeps. Arizona Board of Regents and university representatives said the proposed reductions would amount to more than $85 million statewide and could affect programs such as the Arizona Promise Program, Teachers Academy, and tuition freezes, though no specific program cuts were written into the bill. Other testimony raised concerns about fund sweeps from encumbered balances, including university research funds, housing trust funds, utility regulation funds, and ADOT-related accounts, with some members warning about possible impacts on rural infrastructure and federal matching dollars. The committee also discussed the state employee health plan, including a $228 million general-fund infusion and proposed employee premium increases over three years, as well as questions about corrections, forestry and fire management, and rural critical access hospitals. Public testimony was largely opposed to the budget. Speakers from Opportunity Arizona, the Arizona Board of Regents, health care, and local government argued that the package would reduce support for education, housing, SNAP, health care access, and rural communities while preserving tax benefits for data centers and wealthy taxpayers. A mayor from Globe described severe flood damage and asked for state help for a flood relief fund, while a motorcycle safety advocate questioned a proposed transfer from the motorcycle safety fund. Committee members debated whether the budget’s effects should be described as speculative or as likely consequences of the broad cuts, and several exchanges became contentious over comparisons to the Great Recession and references to federal tax policy. The meeting ended with continued public testimony and no final vote taken in the portion provided, though leadership had earlier said the committee planned a mass roll-call vote on all the bills at the end.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • within 48 hours of the testing window and raw results within 48 hours of test administration.
  • They're a MAP test, they're an iReady test, they're Star Renaissance testing, or for local control, as
  • Which test? Test number one, test number two, or test number three?
  • It allows for flexibility in the beginning of the year and middle of the year testing windows to accommodate
  • Of the test.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • After a negative pregnancy test and weeks of unexplained bleeding, I took another test.
  • We test for 7-OH, we test for mitragynine, pseudoindoxyl, and we test for all of these adulterants that
  • Marking ballots used in the test as test ballots will also be included.
  • Testing is done.
  • The public test occurs.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • you know, obviously it's unique to each of each of us, but within hours an individual's DNA can be tested
  • Second, I would expand the definition of genetic test and genetic care.
  • And third, I would expand the definition of genetic test and genetic care characteristic to cover DNA
  • Shortly after birth, most babies in the United States are tested for a variety of genetic. disorders
  • But then my mama asked people to get tested. to see if I could get better blood, and guess what?
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • So yeah, the paying for the test would be on the family, the student. What have you?
  • They would be integrated into the regular AP testing schedule.
  • What we're what it's attempting to do is increase testing in pediatrics for type one diabetes.
  • This would now they are selling this hemp now because it doesn't have to be tested for pesticides.
  • It doesn't have to be tested for mold, doesn't have to be tested for potency, and has no age restriction
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • A bill 1456 by Kendris of the House and Bergstrom of the Senate, an act relating to the Board of Tests
  • This is simply an extension of the Board of Tests for Alcohol. And drug influence.
  • And Berkstrom of the Senate, an act relating to the Board of Tests for Alcohol and Drug Influence.