Video & Transcript Research : 'civil commitment'

Page 8 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence will come to order.
  • I don't know if you're familiar with that civil statute and that civil law remedy.
  • And one frivolous civil lawsuit could very easily put one out of business.
  • liability, to provide civil liability, and this necessary and powerful solution.
  • And on March 5, we got a call that he had committed suicide.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence will come to order.
  • The committee substitute for House Bill 5624 adds Chapter 75E to the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies
  • House Bill 4202 corrects this inconsistency by changing the Civil Practices and Remedies Code to allow
  • The underlying statute, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section... 1.02 was enacted in 1979.
  • I've had to remove one full-time clerk from working civil. cases just to deal with receiverships.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Technology and Telecommunications REVISED Feb 19th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Technology and Telecommunications

Transcript Highlights:
  • patterns in there if there were not reasonable standards that were kept up then the Ag could bring civil
  • saying if you comply with reporting to the Ag so that we have full investigations and that right to civil
  • They will impose a civil fine.
  • And if it's beyond a reasonable standard, then at that point, civil right to action, private right to
  • interactions, and she defined those broadly in the interview to include racism, sexism, references to commit
Bills: SB1670, SB1716, SB1521
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Also, the breadth of the term legal actions could be interpreted broadly to include representation in civil
  • I'll be available for questions. ...representation in civil litigation or other proceedings beyond TTRO
  • The ask is essentially to convert these to exempt positions, with 30% being converted to civil service
  • identified in this bill and amend language on page 20, lines 17 to 19, to clarify the transition to civil
  • other stakeholders to continue to work on this measure to make sure that it is fully incorporated into civil
Bills: SB3082, SB3110, SB3251
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Commerce Committee Meeting - 2026-04-07

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, it's really a civil procedure question, right? Which I love as a lawyer.
  • Um, it's really a civil procedure question, right? Which I love as a lawyer.
  • <00:23:23.240> Which<00:23:23.400> I civil procedure question, right?
  • Which I civil procedure question, right?
  • Judiciary Finance and Civil Law. Judiciary Finance and Civil Law.
Bills: HF4456, HF4544, HF3698
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Policy Committee 2/18/26

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • hear, and understand today’s proceedings, we ask for your cooperation in maintaining decorum and civility
  • So the A1 amendment takes out the civil remedies portion of the bill.
  • I grew up during a civil war. I have firsthand understanding of what I am doing.
  • They came here from Somalia after suffering through a civil war, my mom being separated from her family
  • They came here from Somalia after suffering through a civil war, my mom being separated from her family
Bills: HF3435, HF3409
TX
Summary: The committee considered several House bills dealing with family law and civil procedure. House Bill 1916, concerning a court’s jurisdiction in suits to divide property not divided on dissolution of marriage, was reported favorably on a 4-0 vote and recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 1973, addressing proof of the identity of a child’s parents in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, was also adopted with a committee substitute, reported favorably 4-0, and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 2524, on recovery of fees, court costs, and expenses in family law proceedings, and House Bill 2530, on special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship, each received favorable 4-0 votes and were likewise recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then took up House Bill 3180, which was reported favorably 4-0 and recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The most detailed discussion centered on House Bill 40, relating to updates to business courts. Senator Hughes explained a committee amendment that made conforming changes requested by the Finance Committee and removed language creating two new judgeships, replacing it with a different judge allocation. The amendment was adopted, the amended committee substitute was adopted, and the bill was reported favorably on a 4-0 vote and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. At the end of the meeting, members briefly clarified procedural details about the House Bill 40 amendment and then closed out the agenda. The committee also noted a correction to an earlier reference to Bartleby the Scrivener, and the Chair recessed the Committee on Jurisprudence subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence (Part I) May 21st, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • They don't put them in jail when they commit crimes and kill people, so they don't have room in jail
  • We're changing the word settlement to statement in the context of discovery under the Texas Rules of Civil
  • The issue under 15-0-11 of our civil practice remedy code for 150 years is that a land suit should be
  • The issue under 15-0-11 of our civil practice remedy code for 150 years is a land suit should be brought
  • Thank you for your time and your commitment to supporting and protecting future generations of Texans
Summary: The committee heard several House bills, most of them relating to family law and court procedure, and left each bill pending after testimony. House Bill 1916 would clarify that the court that issued a final divorce decree retains exclusive jurisdiction over later actions involving undivided property. House Bill 1973 would require a certified birth certificate, if reasonably available, to be filed with a SAPCR petition or allow alternative proof of parentage while keeping the information confidential. House Bill 2530 would add qualifications and procedural safeguards for appointing amicus attorneys in SAPCR cases, including notice and hearing requirements, minimum qualifications, conflict rules, and limits on what amicus attorneys may do. House Bill 2524 would make Family Code references to attorney’s fees consistent by using “reasonable and necessary” language. House Bill 3180 would correct a scrivener’s error in the civil discovery rules by changing “settlement” to “statement.” The committee also heard House Bill 4213, which would change the interest rate on overdue child support from the current 6 percent simple interest to a fixed 5 percent and require the Attorney General to report on the impact of the change. Testimony was sharply divided: supporters argued lower interest could improve collections and help low-income obligors catch up, citing research and the size of child-support arrearages; opponents said lowering the rate would reduce incentives to pay and harm custodial parents and children. The Attorney General’s office raised implementation concerns about a House version that would have created a variable rate, while the committee substitute was described as restoring a simple fixed rate. After testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee also discussed House Bill 40, updating business court provisions and supplemental jurisdiction; House Bill 3421, streamlining probate procedures for original wills and copies; and House Bill 417, clarifying venue for lawsuits involving private transfer fees on real property. Each drew limited testimony and was left pending. Finally, House Bill 3783 drew extensive testimony on court-ordered counseling and reunification therapy in family cases. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would protect children and abuse victims from coercive, unregulated reunification practices, while opponents argued it was too broad, could interfere with legitimate therapy and judicial discretion, and might affect military families and other high-conflict cases. The committee heard testimony from judges, therapists, parents, survivors, and advocates, but took no final action and left the bill pending.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • So that's a big concern if 90 employees are exempt from civil service.
  • stuff like that, but it's something that's very much needed to be done. employees are exempt from civil
  • service. employees are exempt from civil service.
  • They're not civil service. They don't have a property right to their position.
  • sorry we also have um committed sorry we also have um committed testimony<01:05:08.079> from<
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 25th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill authorizes the Office of the Attorney General to seek a $25,000 civil penalty for the first
  • violation and a $50,000 civil penalty for each subsequent violation.
  • This bill in no way targets any woman who has an abortion, either civil or criminal penalties.
  • What this bill does is it essentially gives the state of Texas long arm, civil long arm jurisdiction
  • This bill is intended to provide the tools and the civil resources to address a case where a woman is
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 25th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • And we see that this allows for two different types of civil liability: two new types of civil liability
  • This bill also has a civil penalty in there.
  • Who's going to bring that civil penalty and what court would that be filed in?
  • That is a committed former member on a Friday who's watching the state affairs.
  • That is a committed member. We miss him. I know I miss him. I do too.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Sep 2nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is civil liability.
  • You're a civil lawyer, and I don't want to castigate you.
  • Which are civil service cities, and they already use this exact policy.
  • A civil service city in the state of Texas, any civil service city under Local Government Code 143 already
  • It's a commitment to the public, and it's transparency.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 17, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • standard even in the civil law. standard even in the civil law.
  • committed was only $5,000. committed was only $5,000.
  • bad actor just in any other civil case. bad actor just in any other civil case.
  • So they're not a party to this civil action. Remember, it's a civil action.
  • So they're not a party to this civil action. Remember, it's a civil action.
Bills: SF0087, SF0088, SF0092
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EIG DEFER, EIG-PSM, EIG Public Hearings 02-10-2026

Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I’m Mandy Fernandez on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union of Hawaii.
  • It also limits state and local involvement expressly in federal civil immigration enforcement, including
  • opposes Senate Bill 3322 relating to law enforcement, facial coverings, visible identification, and civil
  • coverings, visible facial coverings, visible identification,<00:35:50.320> and<00:35:50.480> civil
  • identification, and civil immigration. identification, and civil immigration.
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 2033 on renewable energy, focused on rooftop solar and grid-ready homes. Members discussed amendments intended to clarify retrofit provisions for new homes, cost-sharing requirements for interconnecting customers, compliance with relevant safety standards or certifications, and a date change. The chair recommended passage with amendments, and the committee adopted the recommendation unanimously. The joint committees then heard Senate Bill 2363 on county authority over access to encumbered properties such as streams. The City and County of Honolulu, along with the Department of Transportation and the Department of the Prosecuting Attorney, testified in support, saying the bill would help protect public safety, reduce flood risk, and prevent illicit activity. A Libertarian Party representative opposed the measure, arguing the problem stemmed from mismanagement and that the bill granted overly broad new powers. No action was taken during the hearing. The committees also heard Senate Bill 2054 and Senate Bill 2057, both relating to public safety and immigration-related state authority. Testimony on SB 2054 largely supported limiting state resources for federal or out-of-state deployments when the governor objects, with the Hawaii National Guard raising concerns about unclear obligations for service members and the distinction between Title 10 and Title 32 authority. On SB 2057, supporters including ACLU of Hawaii, the Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights, and the Legal Clinic said the bill would curb cooperation with ICE, protect constitutional rights, and preserve trust in immigrant communities; one witness also noted the rapid growth of 287(g) agreements nationwide. The committee then moved on to SB 2377 on property damage to critical infrastructure, where Charter Communications and Hawaiian Telecom supported the bill and asked for clarification to include broadband and telecommunications, while the Public Defender questioned whether the higher penalty was justified. Finally, the committee began SB 3322 on law enforcement, with testimony emphasizing clearer separation between local police and federal agents, limits on immigration enforcement cooperation, and protections for community trust; the hearing continued with additional testimony and questions.