Video & Transcript Research : 'Tenth Amendment'

Page 8 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now, the First Amendment of the U.S.
  • I'm open to amendment. Representative Dyson. I was going to say I'm not open to that amendment.
  • I mean, our Second Amendment rights would be infringed.
  • If there was an amendment or if we need to look at a committee sub, either one, probably an amendment
  • And the Texas Constitution also protect the First Amendment.
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 4961, which would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision. The author said the bill is intended to create incentives to maintain insurance and to address what he described as an unfair system for insured drivers. Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Eagle Forum testified in support, while the Texas Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, warning the bill could also affect pedestrians, passengers, children, and others who did not choose whether a vehicle was insured. The bill author clarified that passengers would be included in the bill’s coverage. No vote was taken and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5570 would extend a legislative attorney CLE exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate to boards or commissions. The author said the measure is meant to ease time burdens and encourage service, and a witness supported it as a modest incentive for public service. A committee member noted a discrepancy in the number of affected attorneys, and the author agreed to verify the correct figure. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 2969, which would restrict the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech based on sincerely held beliefs. The author and several witnesses from Texas Values, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Cecilia Wood argued the bill protects lawyers of faith from an ABA model rule they described as a speech code. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 4260, which would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction, drew opposition from the County Judges and Commissioners Association, which argued existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would burden rural officials. The author said the bill was prompted by concerns about judges using their office to pressure others. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5134 would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect actual damages and would allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill is aimed at preventing harassment and fishing expeditions, especially in family-law disputes. Questions focused on how the standard would work and how it differs from current law; the author said the main change is fee-shifting and a clearer legislative directive. The bill was left pending. House Bill 3095, a committee substitute version of a similar uninsured-motorist bill, would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages and limit economic recovery, with several exceptions. Trial lawyers argued it was unconstitutional because it capped economic damages and could unfairly affect innocent drivers, pedestrians, and older people who no longer drive. The author acknowledged constitutional concerns and said the bill would need further work; the committee withdrew the substitute and left the bill pending. Finally, House Bill 4388 would require all judges, including county judges who perform administrative duties, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Supporters said some elected judges avoid accountability by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents argued the bill is too rigid and unnecessary because existing remedies already exist. House Bill 3964 would limit public nuisance claims to their historical role and bar such claims against lawful conduct, conduct already covered by other remedies, and products. The author and supporters said the bill is meant to prevent courts from using public nuisance to make policy, while opponents argued it would eliminate useful remedies and could affect local actions against environmental or product-related harms. The author said the bill would not affect statutory nuisance claims, private nuisance claims, or other causes of action, and would be amended to clarify some provisions. The bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now, the First Amendment, the U.S.
  • I'm open to amendment. Representative Dyson. I was going to say I'm not open to that amendment.
  • I mean, our Second Amendment rights would be infringed.
  • If there was an amendment or if we need to look at a committee sub, either one, probably an amendment
  • And the Texas Constitution also protects the First Amendment.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current law, when a person files a constitutional amendment election contest, no official result
  • It amends several different codes to address some of the issues that have arisen since the passage of
  • I'm here actually just to register my opposition to the amendments to subsection F.
  • And subsection F was passed in 1989 as an amendment to the turnover statute.
  • An amendment basically says you can't use disbursements either.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Commerce and Small Business Committee Apr 23rd, 2025

Commerce and Small Business

Transcript Highlights:
  • If there are any questions, I think we should consider an amendment. Yes sir.
  • Manufacturers like AT&T, I guess, was this amendment kind of a compromise?
  • I mean, so right now with this amendment, they don't have any opposition.
  • We amended the bill in the Senate.
  • Okay, so anyway, the amendment, what... Okay.
Bills: SB186, SB212, HB566, SB186, SB212
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Madam Chair, we can do that in a floor amendment. Sure.
  • Senate Bill 2774 will remedy that by amending the tax code definition of retail trade to add trade activities
  • HJR4 proposes a constitutional amendment that prohibits the legislature from imposing new taxes on the
  • By adopting this amendment, we provide certainty for investors, including retirees, about their ability
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Education Policy Committee Apr 1st, 2026

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • . >> Is this a constitutional amendment?
  • >> It is a constitutional amendment to allow them to start thinking about it and working it out. >> Okay
Bills: HB8, HB380, HB8, HB380
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Rules Jan 30th, 2026 at 09:10 am

Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • Do we need to have a constitutional amendment?
  • Do we need to have a constitutional amendment?
  • Senator Solz's constitutional amendment.
  • So I don't think we would need to do it in the actual constitutional amendment.
  • I have a... ...to do it in the actual constitutional amendment.
Bills: SB104, SJR3, SM3
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 25th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair moves that Senate Bill 1062 without amendments be reported favorably the full House recommendation
  • With that context, are you aware of concerns that referencing or amending the 1925 ban in new legislation
  • OK, so, um, shifting gears in 2003 when the wrongful death statute was amended to allow lawsuits related
  • Um, there was a wrongful death statute in 2003, and it was amended to allow lawsuits related to pregnancy
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee substitute to Senate Bill 5 is contingent upon the constitutional amendment being approved
  • In 2019, Texas voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment to continue this work.
Bills: SB5, SJR3, SB 5, SJR 3
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 18th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now, in our current state code, it amends the electronic registration information center, which is a
  • I guess, is this an amendment to our constitution in terms of navigable ways? No, no, no.
Bills: SB5, SB142, SB158, SB171, SB5
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 4/3/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • additional amendment?
  • AO to amend it.
  • yesterday and um and this amendment yesterday and um and this amendment doesn't<01:09:03.440>
  • chair um I'll note that this amendment chair um I'll note that this amendment was<01:09:37.920><
  • The Chair put the A3 amendment to a vote, and it was adopted. The bill was amended.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Mar 12th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hearing none, amendment is adopted. Following amendment, will the secretary read the amendment?
  • Following amendment, will the secretary read the amendment?
  • Hearing none, the amendment is adopted. The following amendment. Secretary, read the amendment.
  • Secretary, read the amendment. Amendment number two by Schwartner.
  • The following amendment... Secretary, read the amendment. Or amendment number two by my...