Transcript Highlights:

• Yet CNA's members have long experienced challenges interfacing with Cal/OSHA to enforce health and safety

Summary: The hearing focused on a state audit of Cal/OSHA titled “The Division of Occupational Safety and Health: Process Deficiencies and Staffing Shortages Limit Its Ability to Protect Workers.” Committee leaders and the audit team described serious workplace tragedies, argued that California’s worker protections are not being adequately enforced, and said the audit was prompted by concerns that Cal/OSHA was too often relying on letters instead of inspections, delaying investigations, and closing cases without enough documentation. Members repeatedly emphasized that the issue was not just staffing, but also outdated policies, weak oversight, and inconsistent enforcement. State Auditor Grant Parks said the audit found a 32% vacancy rate in 2023-24, heavy reliance on hard-copy files, outdated or unclear policies, and inconsistent decision-making in complaints, accidents, citations, and fine reductions. He said Cal/OSHA conducted on-site inspections in only about 20% of complaints, used letter investigations more than 80% of the time, often lacked evidence that hazards were corrected, and sometimes failed to inspect serious injury cases on time. The audit also found weak documentation for fine calculations and settlement reductions, with some penalties reduced substantially without clear explanations. Parks said the agency had accepted the findings and would provide progress updates later in the year. Committee members pressed the auditor on vacancy rates, the use of letter investigations, the low rate of criminal referrals, and whether fines were being reduced too often. Cal/OSHA and DIR officials responded that the vacancy rate had fallen to 12% partly because 66 vacant positions were eliminated in a statewide budget reduction and partly because of hiring; they said 126 people had been hired in the first half of the year. They also said they had hired a policy writer, were updating several policies, were planning periodic internal audits, and were developing a new data management system expected to go live in late 2026 or early 2027. On fines, officials said Title 8 sets base penalties and allows adjustments based on factors like employer size, history, and good faith, with appeals and informal conferences also affecting final amounts. No votes or formal actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Number 10, dark pattern: A user interface designed or manipulated with the effect of substantially subverting

Bills: HB 14, HJR 31, HB 43, HB 18, HB 106, HB 36, HB 26, HB 149, HB 121, HB 206, HB 136, HB 3114, HB 2733, HB 1732, HB 3700, HB 467, HB 1130, HB 1846, HB 1442, HB 1147, HB 2176, HB 2701, HB 805, HB 2890, HB 1154, HB 1644, HB 2118, HB 1718, HB 2488, HB 2596, HB 1971, HB 2468, HB 484, HB 2578, HB 3204, HB 1041, HB 307, HB 685, HB 1710, HB 538, HB 2525, HB 3125, HB 2027, HB 2894, HB 3077, HB 3684, HJR 99, HB 1399, HJR 5, HB 1330, HB 2110, HJR 2, HJR 6, HB 1587, HB 14, HJR 31, HB 43, HB 18, HB 106, HB 36, HB 26, HB 149, HB 121, HB 206, HB 136, HB 3114, HB 2733, HB 1732, HB 3700, HB 467, HB 1130, HB 1846, HB 1442, HB 1147, HB 2176, HB 2701, HB 805, HB 2890, HB 1154, HB 1644, HB 2118, HB 1718, HB 2488, HB 2596, HB 1971, HB 2468, HB 484, HB 2578, HB 3204, HB 1041, HB 307, HB 685, HB 1710, HB 538, HB 2525, HB 3125, HB 2027, HB 2894, HB 3077, HB 3684

Keywords: nuclear energy, advanced reactors, energy security, grant programs, Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Office, farm products, tax exemption, ad valorem taxation, agriculture, Texas Constitution, livestock, producer, finance, young farmers, financial assistance, pest control, rural health, hospital funding, healthcare access, mental health services

Transcript Highlights:

• That as soon as you are confirmed, which I believe you will be, that you will address this suit, interface

Transcript Highlights:

• The concern that I have is especially, even though the areas I represent are not urban, when we take
• </c><00:22:31.360><c> then</c><00:22:31.600><c> 50</c> 25 acre you know anything urban then 50 25 acre
• you know anything urban then 50 acres<00:22:32.080><c> and</c><00:22:32.240><c> 100</c><00:22:32.480
• Right now, they're limited to just, you know, if they approved from urban agriculture to urban, if the
• environment so it's essentially urban environment so it's not<00:27:32.960><c> appropriate</c><00:27

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committees first took up SB 3322 relating to law enforcement. Chairs recommended adopting amendments from the Department of Law Enforcement that would exempt plainclothes officers from identification requirements, limit conspicuous agency markings to vehicles used in immigration enforcement operations, and allow a plainclothes officer to wear a mask when within eyesight of an unmasked officer from the same agency while performing official duties. Although there was an initial quorum issue, both committees ultimately voted to adopt the chair’s recommendation and advance the bill as amended. The next major item was SB 3333 relating to property tax treatment for certain housing. Testimony was strongly supportive, including from a Maui County real property tax board member and a representative of Nali Maui, who described homeowners in affordable housing being taxed at much higher rates when exemptions were missed or when resale restrictions kept values below market. The committees recommended passing the bill with amendments, including a deferred effective date of April 19, 2042, and the recommendation was adopted. The committees also heard SB 2422 on a pro housing score program for counties, SB 2981 on eliminating minimum off-street parking requirements in urban districts, SB 2007 on county land use boundary amendments, SB 3028 on restructuring the conveyance tax to a marginal rate system, SB 3033 on public petitions for review of beach structures, and SB 2434 on electric vehicle infrastructure. SB 2422 drew support with a request for flexibility and an appeals process for counties facing extraordinary circumstances; the chair’s recommendation was to pass it with amendments and note a $200,000 implementation study request, which was adopted. SB 2981 received strong support from housing and transportation advocates and was advanced unamended, while SB 2007 drew opposition from the Sierra Club and discussion about the Land Use Commission’s limited enforcement tools and the number of approved but unbuilt units. SB 3028 received mixed testimony, with support for the marginal-rate change but concerns about earmarking and blanks in the bill, and SB 3033 was supported as an early-warning mechanism for erosion-threatened coastal structures, though OPSD said it should not be the regulatory decision-maker. SB 2434 prompted concern about whether utility capacity can support EV infrastructure goals, with the chair citing a recent report suggesting transmission and distribution constraints.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, a debater, urban debate co-president, now a student at the University of Minnesota.
• Uh a debater,<00:04:55.600><c> urban</c><00:04:56.639><c> debate,</c><00:04:57.360><c> uh</c><00:04:58.080
• ><c> co-president,</c> debater, urban debate, uh co-president, debater, urban debate, uh co-president
• So I have noticed we have all noticed increasing flocks of turkeys in our urban core.
• area for um used um like in the urban area for um turkey<00:21:47.520><c> hunting</c><00:21:47.919><

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• As resources dwindle, you see migrations of our community members moving to urban areas, not because
• It is obviously not. not urban.
• So it's allowing the non-urban portions of urban counties to qualify for this.
• Counties like Sandoval have places like Jemez, which is also not urban.
• Of funding goes to one of these very urban-centered counties. Mr.

Transcript Highlights:

• The chair responded that the amendment shifts $75,000 per year from the Urban Egg appropriation within
• </c><00:24:18.400><c> egg</c><00:24:19.360><c> uh,</c> 75,000 from the urban egg uh, 75,000 from the
• urban egg uh, appropriation<00:24:20.159><c> within</c><00:24:20.720><c> agree</c><00:24:21.440><c> uh
• </c><00:24:34.880><c> So</c> for urban egg to a greet for marl.
• So for urban egg to a greet for marl. So okay,<00:24:37.200><c> thank</c><00:24:37.440><c> you.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The alternative urban areawide review process is a substitute kind of environmental review that’s designed
• </c><00:03:08.080><c> areawide</c> what it the alternative Urban areawide what it the alternative Urban
• </c> little bit so the alternative Urban little bit so the alternative Urban areawide<00:04:33.720><c
• Yes, it would be for the projects that were covered under the alternative urban areawide review, the
• </c> by Statute to provide a level of urban by Statute to provide a level of urban impact<00:14:05.240

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• good idea, and it strikes me as potentially a very good idea for many school districts and their interface
• good idea, and it strikes me as potentially a very good idea for many school districts and their interface
• good idea, and it strikes me as potentially a very good idea for many school districts and their interface

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, I'm trying to figure out in my head how this interfaces with the basic school funding formula in
• a state like Massachusetts that has a more generous formula. interfaces with the basic school funding
• interfaces with the basic school funding formula<03:27:33.040><c> in</c><03:27:33.520><c> a</c><03:27

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up SB 209, which would require schools seeking building aid for construction or reconstruction projects to use an owner’s project manager. The chair explained an amendment that would remove the bill’s requirement that the manager be engaged before application and instead revert to current law, while updating the project threshold from the older $1 million figure to a more current amount and clarifying that the manager’s role is to protect the project owner’s interests. Members asked about the cost of hiring a project manager over several years before a project is funded, the 1.5% fee in rule, and whether the rules already define the manager’s duties. The chair said the amendment addressed those concerns by leaving the timing to current law and relying on existing administrative rules for qualifications and responsibilities. The committee then voted 18-0 to adopt the amendment and 18-0 to recommend SB 209 OTPA, placing it on the consent calendar. The committee then moved to SB 99, which concerns allowing students enrolled in career and technical education programs at receiving comprehensive high schools to take additional academic courses there. The chair said the bill was intended to make it easier for students to access CTE without being blocked by scheduling conflicts in their sending schools, and to clarify how agreements between sending and receiving districts would work. He described concerns about the bill’s cost formula, transportation, part-time versus full-time status, and whether the proposal could unintentionally create open-enrollment or athletic-transfer issues. He said the amendment would mirror existing treatment for homeschool and charter school students, use a familiar funding model, and limit participation to students already enrolled in one or more CTE classes at the receiving school. The chair also emphasized that comprehensive high schools already have a statutory definition and that the bill would help more students participate in CTE, which he said currently reaches only a relatively small share of students statewide. He noted that transportation would be covered only when a CTE bus is available, otherwise students would be responsible for arranging travel as under current practice. After brief discussion, the committee voted 18-0 to adopt the amendment and 18-0 to recommend SB 99 OTPA, also placing it on the consent calendar.

Transcript Highlights:

• This sounds like that what the testimony that you’ve given is about the CTE and how they interface or
• This sounds like that what the testimony that you’ve given is about the CTE and how they interface or
• This sounds like that what the testimony that you’ve given is about the CTE and how they interface or

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee opened a hearing on Senate Bill 185, which would add timelines to Office of Professional Licensure and Certification (OPLC) investigations. Senator Howard Pearl said the bill was prompted by concerns from the New Hampshire Association of Realtors about delays at the Real Estate Commission, and he explained that the proposal would require OPLC staff to make an initial determination within 30 days and, if misconduct is found, complete an investigation within 60 days. He said the goal is to improve transparency and give consumers and licensees more timely information, while preserving the board’s adjudicatory role. He also noted that the bill had been amended to delay implementation to give OPLC time to work through its backlog. Committee members questioned how the bill would work when an investigation is incomplete and whether the board could send a case back to OPLC without a firm deadline. Pearl said the board would have discretion to continue the investigation or make a final determination, and that the bill was intended to streamline OPLC’s process rather than impose a hard cap on complex cases. OPLC Executive Director Deanna Durus and General Counsel Nicholas Fry then testified that the agency has already changed its procedures under prior legislation, including a facial review of complaints and monthly board review of dismissal memos. They said the bill would substantially alter the current structure, could conflict with existing limitation periods and board duties, and would be difficult to implement without additional staff and funding. Durus said the agency’s backlog is large, that new complaints are being triaged and prioritized, and that some urgent matters are moved ahead based on risk and statutory deadlines. She said OPLC had completed a review of about 500 backlog cases that would now be dismissed under current screening standards, and that those cases are being turned into memos for board review. Board of Medicine public member Nina Gardner testified in favor of the bill but said the backlog is significant and that the agency needs more resources to make the process work effectively. She said the board is seeing progress, but not fast enough, and suggested the bill may not go far enough without additional staffing and funding. No vote was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Collins, Special Commission to enable resilient urban coasts in the Commonwealth.
• through you to the members, I rise in support of Amendment 160, Special Commission to enable resilient urban
• Crichton, streamlining permitting for coastal resiliency projects in urban areas.
• I know that's a particular challenge in the urban environment, where oftentimes these projects take on
• permitting process that was included in this legislation for so-called gray infrastructure projects in urban

Summary: The Senate considered a broad environmental bond bill with amendments touching climate resilience, coastal infrastructure, housing, plastics, wildlife protection, and public health. Early in the debate, Senator Keenan withdrew an amendment to fund the Massachusetts Healthy Homes Program, explaining that the program had been enacted without funding and that he hoped to secure money through the budget process instead. The Senate then adopted his amendment banning hotels from providing plastic toiletry packaging. The chamber also debated and rejected a Republican amendment to remove the paper bag fee; supporters argued the 10-cent charge would burden working families, while opponents said it was a necessary environmental measure. The amendment failed on a standing vote, 5-10. Several environmental and coastal amendments were adopted, including measures on ocean acidification and nutrient pollution, a statewide carbon sequestration goal that includes salt marshes and seagrasses, a study of banning polystyrene, restrictions on rodenticides with local control and emergency-use exceptions, and indoor air quality improvements. Senators also approved amendments to create a Massachusetts Climate Bank, establish a trust fund and on-site housing for the Manuel F. Corrella State Forest on Martha’s Vineyard, increase the Douglas State Forest entry fee from $1 to $2, and clarify procedures and oversight for housing priority projects. Some proposals were withdrawn, including a special commission on resilient urban coasts and a conservation commission proposal, while others were rejected, including a local-priority housing confirmation amendment and a warrantless-entry amendment that raised Fourth Amendment concerns. The Senate also adopted a series of coastal resilience and permitting amendments, including streamlined permitting for urban coastal projects, a pilot for nature-based solutions, dredging and sand placement in general permits, and a Salisbury Beach trust fund clarification. A New Bedford state pier redevelopment amendment and a harbor protection amendment were adopted, as were amendments related to public and private water utility reporting and equitable representation. The session concluded with notice that only two amendments remained before a roll call, followed by an adjournment in memory of James A. Jim Sheets, former Quincy mayor and educator.

Transcript Highlights:

• Collins, Special Commission to enable resilient urban coasts in the Commonwealth.
• through you to the members, I rise in support of Amendment 160, Special Commission to enable resilient urban
• Crichton: streamlining permitting for coastal resiliency projects in urban areas.
• I know that's a particular challenge in the urban environment, where oftentimes these projects take on
• permitting process that was included in this legislation for so-called gray infrastructure projects in urban

Keywords: 1212, all

Transcript Highlights:

• As of early 2026, the crisis affects urban, rural, and tribal communities, with median rents increasing
• major transit areas, and it will spur mixed-use development by addressing housing shortages and spur urban
• revitalization with affordable, unique, aesthetic, and proximate housing to jobs in urban centers.
• What works for a large urban city?
• housing, Across the state in both our rural and urban jurisdictions, we lack enough safe, accessible

Bills: SB211, SB131, SB183, SB222, SB246, SB254

Keywords: appropriation, local government, Las Vegas, Rodriguez Park, public facilities, zoning reform, building regulations, residential apartments, commercial use, multigenerational housing, local government authority, healthcare, urgent care, emergency services, feasibility study, medical facilities, physician training, medical residency, New Mexico, massage therapy

Transcript Highlights:

• You know, in our state right now, there is underused land, underutilized property within the urban growth
• In commercial zones and in mixed-use zones, these are places that we're already planning for future urban
• And there are tens of thousands... ...planning for future urban development.
• You can build housing more densely within the urban areas, or you can expand the amount Housing more
• densely within the urban areas, or you can expand the amount of land that's available to build on.

Bills: SB5223, SB6071, SB5966, SB6061, SB5520, SB6016, SB5890, SB5973, SB5053, SB5249, SB5536, SB5879, SB5899, SB6190, SB6086, SB5574, SB5873, SB5924, SB6134, SB6263, SB6282, SB6302, SB5950, SB6074, SB6096, SB5970, SB5609, SB5827, SB5862, SB5880, SB5901, SB5943, SB5971, SB5975, SB5981, SB5988, SB6097, SJM8016, SB5496, SB5907, SB6031, SB6155, SB6158, SB6227, SB5947, SB6085, SB6234, SB6274, SB6194, SB5909, SB5868, SB6026, SB6044, SB6239, SB5923, SB6045, SB6106, SB6089, SB6170, SB5954, SB5968, SB5489, SB5762, SB5832, SB5847, SB5963, SB5969, SB6027, SB6032, SB6049, SB6066, SB6079, SB6082, SB6113, SB6114, SB6160, SB6162, SB6164, SB6176, SB6289, SB6309, SB6319, SB6347, SB6308, SB6200, SB6080, SB5911, SJM8014, SB6177, SB6052, SB6182, SB5828, SB6335, SB6017, SB6346, SB6262, SB5470, SB5990, SB6244, SB5961

Keywords: criminal offense, fingerprinting, law enforcement, state regulations, public safety, overpayment recovery, modernization, health care, legislation, healthcare, nutrition, medically tailored meals, dietary support, food security, chronic illness, tourism, self-supported assessment, funding, statewide promotion, economic development

Transcript Highlights:

• You know, in our state right now, there is underused land, underutilized property within the urban growth
• In commercial zones and in mixed-use zones, these are places that we're already planning for future urban
• Planning for future urban development.
• You can build housing more densely within the urban areas, or you can expand the amount... housing more
• densely within the urban areas, or you can expand the amount of land that's available to build on.

Bills: SB5223, SB6071, SB5966, SB6061, SB5520, SB6016, SB5890, SB5973, SB5053, SB5249, SB5536, SB5879, SB5899, SB6190, SB6086, SB5574, SB5873, SB5924, SB6134, SB6263, SB6282, SB6302, SB5950, SB6074, SB6096, SB5970, SB5609, SB5827, SB5862, SB5880, SB5901, SB5943, SB5971, SB5975, SB5981, SB5988, SB6097, SJM8016, SB5496, SB5907, SB6031, SB6155, SB6158, SB6227, SB5947, SB6085, SB6234, SB6274, SB6194, SB5909, SB5868, SB6026, SB6044, SB6239, SB5923, SB6045, SB6106, SB6089, SB6170, SB5954, SB5968, SB5489, SB5762, SB5832, SB5847, SB5963, SB5969, SB6027, SB6032, SB6049, SB6066, SB6079, SB6082, SB6113, SB6114, SB6160, SB6162, SB6164, SB6176, SB6289, SB6309, SB6319, SB6347, SB6308, SB6200, SB6080, SB5911, SJM8014, SB6177, SB6052, SB6182, SB5828, SB6335, SB6017, SB6346, SB6262, SB5470, SB5990, SB6244, SB5961

Keywords: criminal offense, fingerprinting, law enforcement, state regulations, public safety, overpayment recovery, modernization, health care, legislation, healthcare, nutrition, medically tailored meals, dietary support, food security, chronic illness, tourism, self-supported assessment, funding, statewide promotion, economic development

Summary: The Senate opened with the usual ceremonial items, approved the previous day’s journal, received House messages, and introduced several bills. It also adopted Senate Resolution 868 honoring April as National Donate Life Month. Senators Gaynor and Dozier spoke in support, sharing personal stories about organ donation and transplant recipients, and the resolution was adopted by voice vote. The chamber also recognized guests in the gallery connected to those stories. The Senate then confirmed several gubernatorial appointments, including Colin L. Bannister to the Workforce Education, Investment, Accountability, and Oversight Board, Amina Hussein to the Washington State University Board of Regents, and Ramatou-Libah to the Eastern Washington University Board of Trustees. Each confirmation passed with broad support after brief remarks from Senator Schoesler, and several senators were excused from voting. The Senate also acknowledged MLA Jody Tour of British Columbia and a personal privilege recognition for Senator Leis receiving Finland’s Order of the Lion. On legislation, the Senate passed Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 6026, dealing with residential development in commercial and mixed-use zones, after adopting and rejecting several amendments that narrowed or clarified exemptions and local-control provisions. Senators argued both for housing supply and for preserving local planning flexibility. The Senate also passed Senate Bill 6106 on layoff notifications and worker information protections, Senate Bill 5890 on speeding and reckless driving standards, Senate Bill 5536 on equitable distribution of real property in divorce, and Substitute Senate Bill 6097 allowing federally recognized tribes to participate in the Conservation Futures Program. Senate Bill 5988, authorizing fee authority for Department of Health accreditation services for opioid treatment programs, passed after a close vote with one nay. The meeting ended with the Senate standing at ease for caucus and lunch.

Transcript Highlights:

• said, and in the interest of time, right now I'd actually like, if anybody here represents a large urban
• area and Right now I'd actually like, if anybody here represents a large urban area or a large metropolitan
• I come from more of an urban area... Physically constrained counties.
• I come from more of an urban area.
• the fact of looking at something that's more approachable that'll fit a rural community as well as urban

Summary: The Select Committee on Property Taxes held its first meeting with opening remarks from the co-chairs and ranking member framing the committee’s task as developing property tax legislation for next session. Staff then gave a high-level overview of Florida property taxes, explaining how ad valorem taxes work, the roles of property appraisers, tax collectors, taxing authorities, value adjustment boards, and the Department of Revenue, and reviewing key concepts such as just value, assessed value, exemptions, taxable value, millage rates, homestead exemptions, Save Our Homes, and portability. The presentation also emphasized that property tax law is largely rooted in the Florida Constitution and that local governments choose millage rates, which affects collections. No public comment was taken. The committee then discussed five Speaker-proposed concepts. Proposal 1 would require cities, counties, and special districts to hold a referendum on eliminating property taxes on homestead properties; members raised concerns about local funding, public safety, special districts, renters, and the need for extensive voter education, with some suggesting countywide elections or town halls instead. Proposal 2 would create a new $500,000 homestead exemption for non-school taxes and a $1 million exemption for seniors 65+ or long-term homesteaders; members split between seeing it as meaningful relief for seniors and warning it could devastate local tax bases, especially in lower-value or rural counties, while also potentially trapping older homeowners in place. Proposal 3 would authorize the Legislature to raise homestead exemptions by general law; some liked the flexibility, but others worried about statewide one-size-fits-all impacts, political difficulty in reversing changes, and the need for local revenue replacement. Proposal 4 would change assessment caps for homestead and non-homestead property; several members said it would not provide enough relief and could shift burdens to rental properties and non-homestead owners. Proposal 5, eliminating foreclosure on homestead property for tax liens, drew the strongest opposition, with members saying it would undermine lien priority, mortgage and title systems, and incentives to pay taxes. Throughout the meeting, members repeatedly stressed the need to understand local fiscal impacts, including police, fire, infrastructure, and other services funded by property taxes, and to consider alternative revenue sources or offsets if taxes are reduced. The co-chairs said the committee is still in the information-gathering stage, that all ideas remain on the table, and that members should do “homework” by meeting with local taxing authorities and learning how property taxes are set and spent in their districts. The meeting ended with no votes on the proposals and adjournment after a motion to rise.

Transcript Highlights:

• Futurewise agreed that there could be some differences in rural and urban areas for how allowing sewer
• , extending sewer, or septic could have a different impact on sprawl in rural and urban areas.
• So over the summer, Representative Burnbaum did a lot of work... ...all in rural and urban areas.

Bills: HB1974, HB2118, HB2236, HB2269

Keywords: land bank, land banking authority, affordable housing, housing crisis, housing supply, public corporation, public housing authority, nonprofit housing, tax-foreclosed property, blight remediation, redevelopment, anti-displacement, equity, redlining, racial segregation, deed restriction, affordability covenant, property tax exemption, excise tax exemption, predevelopment

Transcript Highlights:

• WE ARE IN URBAN BUSINESS SETTINGS.
• AND ALSO DIFFERENT TYPES OF SYSTEMS AND DIFFERENT PRODUCTS AND IT DEPENDS UPON WHETHER IT IS AN URBAN
• THIS GOES TO ANOTHER MULTIMODAL OPTION FOR TRANSIT IN MORE URBAN ENVIRONMENTS.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then finally, on behalf of the Urban Counties of California, the California Association of Public
• on behalf of Alameda County, and we'd just like to align our comments with those submitted by the urban
• funding for the eligibility workers mirrors my comments, aligning my comments with those from the urban
• funding for the eligibility workers mirroring my comments with, aligning my comments with those from the urban

Keywords: 987, senate, all