Transcript Highlights:

• Those recommendations can just be recommendations, or they can be formally offered as amendments.
• And when we make the recommendations, we're making recommendations as amendments, then somebody would
• so chairman cordelli has recommended so chairman cordelli has recommended that<01:51:48.880>
• No, you make the recommendation. I don't make the recommendation. Is there a second?
• We're going to act on this soon. recommendation I don't make the recommendation I don't make the recommendation

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee work session of the Education Policy and Administration Committee focused on House Bill 131 and House Bill 781, which were described as nearly identical bills addressing student cell phone use in schools. Members noted that HB 781 is an early bill and therefore needed committee action by Wednesday, while HB 131 did not face that deadline. The chair and members discussed the bills’ shared goal of requiring school boards to develop and adopt policies on student personal device use, with debate over whether the state should set minimum standards or leave more to local control. A major topic was funding. One member urged the committee to avoid creating an unfunded mandate and asked for some funding support, while others argued it was too early to commit money and that the committee should first establish the policy framework. The governor’s proposed funding was discussed, including a $1 million figure in the budget and a separate $250,000 amount referenced in the bill, but several members said the money would likely be insufficient to cover all students or pouch systems statewide. The committee also reviewed a handout reflecting proposed budget language that would require school boards to adopt policies on personal device use during the school day, with schoolwide implementation and exceptions for medical disability or language proficiency needs, and a DOE-administered grant program. Members spent considerable time on drafting details, especially deadlines and exceptions. They debated whether the bills should require school boards to “develop,” “adopt,” or also “implement” policies, and whether the effective date of the act should also serve as the deadline for school boards. They also discussed whether exceptions for classroom instructional use should be mandatory or merely encouraged, and whether the bills should explicitly include or exclude charter schools. Additional proposed exceptions included IEPs, 504 plans, English learners, and medical needs such as glucose sensors or insulin pumps, with some members suggesting medical issues be certified by a physician. No final vote or formal action was taken in the work session.

Transcript Highlights:

• every death, making recommendations for action, and acting on those recommendations, the work of the
• <00:42:28.720> for every death making recommendations for every death making recommendations
• <00:43:51.839> to committee makes recommendations to committee makes recommendations to improve
• Now, IM MOM has a number of recommendations.
• <00:47:20.880> also additional recommendations also additional recommendations also emphasize

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:14:57.040> would purpose so the recommendation would purpose so the recommendation would
• fy2 and then our uh final recommendation fy2 and then our uh final recommendation is<00:15:12.399
• operating funds this recommendation operating funds this recommendation would<00:15:18.279> allow
• budget recommendations.
• <01:25:54.400> budget governor's uh recommended budget governor's uh recommended budget recommendations

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The JAC adopted the governor's recommended recommendation and added footnote number one to authorize
• The JAC adopted the governor's<01:18:31.920> recommended governor's recommended governor's recommended
• increased the governor's recommendation increased the governor's recommendation of<02:08:26.000>
• That was their recommendation.
• That was their recommendation. recommendation. recommendation.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• house I mean the chair recommends house I mean the chair recommends passing<01:23:23.760> with
• Recommendation has been [snorts] Cherry. Recommendation has been adopted. adopted. adopted.
• chair recommendation has been adopted. chair recommendation has been adopted.
• <01:28:03.440> All recommendation has been adopted. All recommendation has been adopted.
• :40.560> has Seeing none, chair recommendation has Seeing none, chair recommendation has been<

Bills: HB1924, HB2121, HB1928, HB1979, HB1650, HB1543, HB1981, HB1982

Keywords: mattress recycling, waste management, producer responsibility, environmental health, steafardship program, electronic cigarettes, disposable devices, environmental protection, plastic pollution, lithium batteries, pollution control, public health, deposit beverage container, bottle bill, container deposit law, container redemption, recycling refund, extended producer responsibility, EPR, deposit return system

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures related to waste, recycling, and environmental review. On HB 1924, which would establish a mattress stewardship program, the Department of Health said it stood on written testimony and offered comments, while Hawaii Reef and Ocean Coalition and one individual supported the bill and the International Sleep Products Association opposed it. No questions were raised and the committee moved on. A large portion of the hearing focused on HB 2121, which would prohibit the sale of disposable vapes in Hawaii. The Department of Health supported the measure but suggested the bill may be better placed in a different part of state law because the cited waste-management section regulates products after consumption, while still praising the effort to remove disposable vapes from the market and environment. Testimony in strong support came from the Coalition for Tobacco Free Hawaii Youth Council, Hawaii Public Health Institute, Hawaii COPD Coalition, Hawaii Health and Harm Reduction Center, the City and County of Honolulu, and many individuals; supporters emphasized youth vaping, toxic waste, lithium battery fire risks, and environmental harm. There was at least one opposing individual and the International Sleep Products Association was listed in opposition. The committee noted there were many written testimonies and no immediate vote was taken. The committee also heard HB 1928 on the deposit beverage container recycling program. The Department of Health stood on written testimony. The Solid Waste Task Force of Hawaii Environmental Change Agents and Upstream supported the bill but urged amendments to better integrate reuse and reusables, strengthen enforcement, clarify definitions, and protect existing redemption centers. The Hawaii Food Industry Association supported the concept of a backdrop program but preferred strengthening the existing program and raised concerns about undefined fees, existing infrastructure, and future audit costs. The Chamber of Commerce Hawaii supported the bill, and the chair said the measure needs work and that decision-making would occur in a few days. Finally, the committee took up HB 979 on environmental review and HB 1650 on environmental assessments. For HB 979, OPSD offered amendments, HCDA supported the bill but suggested clarifying the affordable-housing definition, Kauai Island Utility Cooperative supported it, and Earthjustice was asked about the court process for environmental challenges; the chair asked about shortening the challenge period and the relationship between environmental court, the intermediate court of appeals, and the Supreme Court. For HB 1650, OPSD and the State Historic Preservation Division stood on written testimony, OHA asked to retain historic sites, and several groups and individuals testified in support or opposition. Opponents argued that removing Wiki special district and historic sites from Chapter 343 trigger language would weaken environmental review and risk impacts to iwi kūpuna and historic resources.

Transcript Highlights:

• okay with those uh recommendation okay with those uh recommendation members<01:25:21.960> is<
• Recommendations adopted. Thank you.
• Recommendations adopted. Thank you.
• Your recommendations are adopted.
• Recommendations adopted.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Actually, I recommend, well, Representative Meza asked excellent questions, because all that technology
• For example, recommending both for and against the same company on a director nomination, on a merger
• If proxy advisors are issuing recommendations based on non-financial...
• The required disclosures would also help prevent blind reliance on these recommendations by...
• told that the recommendation may not be in your shareholder client's financial interest.

Bills: HB2226, HB2269, HB2343, HB2760, HB3621, HB4079, HB4204, HB4518, HB4531, HB4555, HB4850, HB4876, HB4903, HB4996, HB5122

Keywords: construction trust funds, Property Code, Chapter 162, construction payments, mechanics lien, contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material suppliers, materialmen, real property improvement, assignment of payment rights, unpaid trust funds, trust fund beneficiaries, construction industry, payment protection, Texas construction law, property owners association, landscaping, grass maintenance

Transcript Highlights:

• Senator Kolkhorst moves that HCR64 be reported favorably to the full Senate with a recommendation that
• Senator Kolkhorst moves that HCR64 be recommended for the May 1st, 2025 local and uncontested calendar
• Senator Kolkhorst moves that SCR 3 be recommended for the local uncontested calendar on May 1st, 2025
• With the recommendation that it do pass and be printed, the clerk will call the roll. Senator Cook.
• I want SCR35 recommended for the local and uncontested calendar for this calendar.

Bills: SCR3, SCR30, SB2375, HCR35

Keywords: cowboy culture, Bandera, cultural heritage, historical significance, Texas identity, Birding Capital, Matagorda County, wildlife, conservation, Texas Legislature, statutory revision, code corrections, laws omitted, legislative updates, spaceports, tax-exempt bonds, aerospace investment, Texas space economy, Federal legislation, 1185

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair's recommendation for SB 1413 SD1 HD2 is to pass with amendments. Chair Chang, I.
• 05:00.000> 1413<00:05:01.000> SD1 Chair's recommendation for SB 1413 SD1 Chair's recommendation
• Recommendation has been adopted. We have a bill. Thank you, sir. I. I.
• <00:05:31.120> We<00:05:31.240> have Recommendation has been adopted.
• You might need to amend that recommendation. Do we need to take it to 10:31?

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• pass recommendation.
• In the Committee of the Whole, the report recommends HB 2072 as amended, a do-pass recommendation.
• The Committee of the Whole report recommends HB 2072 as amended, a do-pass recommendation.
• 2874 as amended be given a do pass recommendation.
• HB 2874 as amended be given a do-pass recommendation. Excellent.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'd like to recommend moving us forward. I'd like to recommend moving us forward.
• Okay, chair's recommendation for the Committee on Transportation, Culture and the Arts: Chair's recommendation
• uh with amendments uh just recommending uh with amendments uh just recommending that<00:36:26.680
• Transportation uh like to recommend Transportation uh like to recommend moving<00:38:31.760>
• > pass<00:39:43.000> HB 1156 chair's recommendation to pass HB 1156 chair's recommendation

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Committee on Transportation and Culture heard testimony on several transportation-related bills. HB 1422, which would exempt certain community-based organizations providing transportation services from motor carrier law, drew support from the Department of Transportation, PUC, DLNR, Kauaʻi County, the Hōnaunau Initiative, and others; members asked about narrowing amendments to prevent unintended use, and the bill later advanced with amendments, including a three-year sunset. HB 1162, requiring motorcycle instruction permit applicants to complete a DOT-approved basic rider course, received support from DOT and Honolulu Customer Services; it advanced with amendments to address city and county concerns and to allow more implementation time. HB 1259, which would remove the need for an engineering study when reducing speed limits by up to 10 mph, had mixed testimony and was deferred for further discussion. HB 1260, establishing summer streets pilot programs for counties other than Oʻahu, drew support from DOT, DOH, UH, Hawaiʻi Appleseed, bicycling and public health groups, and individuals; DOH and others asked that Oʻahu be included, but the measure was deferred for later decision-making. HB 177, making civil ID cards free, had opposition from DOT and Honolulu Customer Services and support from health advocates; DOT said the program costs about $1.3 million annually and would need replacement funding, and the bill was deferred. HB 862, authorizing motor coaches, small buses, and vans for school bus services under certain conditions, received broad support from disability advocates, DOE-related entities, neighborhood boards, and private providers, with testimony emphasizing flexibility and accessibility; it was deferred. HB 667, requiring microchip scanning and reporting when deceased cats or dogs are removed from roadways, was supported by DOT, the Hawaiian Humane Society, and many animal groups and individuals, and was passed unamended. HB 960, increasing the cap on certain DOT capital investment contracts, and HB 228, authorizing electronic license plates and banning plate-obscuring devices and flipping devices, were both heard and then deferred. HB 1156, increasing the amount of special facility revenue bonds available for harbor improvements, received support from DOT, the Island Chamber of Commerce, Alakaʻi Energy, and the Harbor Users Group, and was passed unamended to Ways and Means.

Transcript Highlights:

• On page 23 includes recommendations for On page 23 includes recommendations for enhanced<00:51:07.640
• uh recommendation to Additionally uh recommendation to include<00:52:44.480> the<00:52:44.560
• 53:14.000> uh Another recommendation was to uh Another recommendation was to uh uh<00:53:14.760
• So, direct funding recommendations.
• I will the first five recommendations I will the first five recommendations were<01:03:01.320>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The recommendation is adopted.
• <03:27:31.760> Sorry Uh that is the recommendation. Sorry Uh that is the recommendation.
• The recommendation is adopted. Perry. The recommendation is adopted.
• pass<03:33:21.760> with The recommendation is to pass with The recommendation is to pass
• recommendation? recommendation?

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard HB 2021, a transportation measure creating a framework for electric bicycle and micromobility regulation. The bill would define electric bicycle and electric micromobility device, set age and helmet rules, restrict class 3 e-bikes from sidewalks, allow limited sidewalk use for class 1 and 2 bikes, prohibit high-speed electric devices and certain nonconforming devices in specified locations, update county tax definitions, and change related terminology. Testimony was largely supportive from DOT, police, Honolulu officials, Hawaii Bicycling League, AAA Hawaii, the Hawaii State Teachers Association, and several individuals, while DCCA’s Insurance Division asked for clarity on whether insurance would be required. Committee discussion focused on safety, enforcement, and the fact that no insurance market currently exists for these e-bike classes; members also discussed the need to target bad actors rather than ordinary riders. The chair then proposed and the committee adopted amendments to HB 2021, including clarifying that road-legal, permitted, classified electric bicycles are not subject to insurance requirements at this time; allowing properly classified electric bicycles on sidewalks at 10 mph or less subject to county restrictions; barring high-speed electric devices and other nonconforming devices from public roadways; authorizing impoundment of non-road-legal or improperly registered devices; and requiring direct parental supervision for riders under 16 on class 2 or 3 e-bikes. The committee also made technical and effective-date changes. The recommendation to pass HB 2021 with amendments was adopted unanimously by the members present. The committee next took up HB 1641, a related transportation bill addressing high-speed electric devices. The chair explained that the measure would prohibit the sale, lease, rental, distribution, possession, or operation of high-speed electric devices and establish penalties, but the committee’s version would narrow the focus to devices covered by HB 2021. The amended bill would prohibit offering high-speed electric devices for lease or rent, require sellers to comply with the new regulatory framework, ban operation on bicycle lanes, highways, roadways, and streets, and set a civil penalty of $250 to $1,000 per violation. After no further questions, the committee voted to pass HB 1641 with amendments, and the recommendation was adopted. The meeting then moved to HB 1709, which would transfer regulation of the Hawaii Water Carrier Act from the Public Utilities Commission to the Department of Transportation and make conforming changes with an appropriation. DOT testified in support, while the PUC and DCCA’s Consumer Advocacy Division raised concerns about preserving consumer protections and the complexity of moving the regulatory framework. Young Brothers supported the bill and said the current system is outdated, but the discussion remained ongoing; the transcript cuts off before any final action on HB 1709 is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• So the bill passes as recommended by the conference committee report.
• Show the bill passes as recommended by the conference committee report.
• The bill passes as recommended by the Conference Committee report.
• Show the bill passes as recommended by the Conference Committee report.
• The bill passes as recommended by the conference committee report.

Summary: The Senate took up the conference report on House Bill 501E, the General Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2026-27, with Chair Hooper and the appropriations chairs walking through the $114.5 billion budget. Major highlights included pay increases for state law enforcement, firefighters, park rangers, and correctional officers; funding for teacher salary increases and K-12 enrollment stabilization; workforce and university funding in higher education; major Medicaid, nursing home, waiver, and opioid-related investments in health and human services; corrections and prison-capacity funding; transportation, housing, and emergency management spending; and large environmental appropriations for Florida Forever, Everglades restoration, and water quality projects. Members then asked detailed questions about specific items. Senators pressed on the Hamilton Center at UF, the difference between assistant state attorney and public defender pay, declining student enrollment funding, private school scholarship vouchers, mental health funding in schools, the lack of preeminence funding, APD’s iBudget waiver wait list and provider rates, ADAP premium assistance and the return of Biktarvy to the formulary, prison staffing and air conditioning, Florida Forever land-buying versus easements, SNAP and Sun Bucks funding, Hope Florida, election audit funding, and the IDD managed care program. Chairs generally explained the negotiated compromises, noted where funding was flat or omitted, and in several cases said items would be revisited next year or depended on agency implementation. Several senators used debate to praise the budget while also criticizing major policy choices. Leader Berman argued the state should have expanded Medicaid, invested more in public schools instead of vouchers, and accepted federal summer EBT funds. Other senators highlighted local wins such as Biscayne Bay restoration, Tri-Rail, housing assistance, ADAP funding, and declining enrollment support. The transcript ends with debate remarks thanking Chair Hooper for his work on the budget; no final vote is shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• The recommendations would also address implementation.
• Yeah, I would recommend increasing that to two. To two? Okay. Mr. Chairman?
• There's been no motion made to recommend us and I was just going to answer. Mr.
• Recommend, yeah, we're not passing. Or no motion at all.
• If there's no motion to recommend, then this just fails. It goes away.

Summary: The Child Custody Review Task Force met to approve prior minutes and then worked through draft legislation related to a possible family court study committee. The group discussed the proposed 15-member committee’s makeup in detail, including whether to add parent representation, judges, family law section members, child support, clerks of court, domestic violence advocates, and other stakeholders. The task force ultimately agreed to keep the committee at 15 members, reduce the legislative membership from eight to six, add two judges from different districts, add two family law section members with rural and urban representation, include one parent subject to a custody order, and replace the mental health professional with a clerk of court representative appointed through the trial court administrator’s office. The draft was also revised to keep domestic violence advocacy representation and to clarify that the study could consider juvenile court issues as part of the family court umbrella. The committee voted to approve the revised draft and recommend it to Legislative Management, with one recorded “no” vote from Judge Hovey after the meeting resumed. The task force then turned to a second draft dealing with requiring participation in a family transition program, which was renamed in discussion to a parenting education course. Members debated whether the bill should simply refer to an existing program like Parents Forever or instead specify broader education about the court process, parental rights, co-parenting, and related issues. Some members supported the requirement as a way to reduce conflict and improve understanding of the system, while others raised concerns about vague language, cost to parents, lack of exemptions, and whether the bill was too open-ended or potentially duplicative of other legislation. The discussion became lengthy and unresolved, with the drafter noting that more specific direction would be needed to revise the bill. The transcript cuts off before a final vote or action on this second draft is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• It reflects proposals recommended by the Commissioner of Financial Regulation.
• The bill was referred to the committee on agriculture, food resiliency and forestry, which recommends
• <00:30:59.520> the applications, and recommend the applications, and recommend the Secretary
• <00:31:02.080> Secretary Secretary and recommend to the Secretary Secretary and recommend
• If there is a recommendation, the secretary shall issue the award within 15 days of receipt of the recommendation

Keywords: 926, house, all

Summary: The House opened with devotional remarks from Representative Greer focused on perspective, kindness, and the idea that people “earn” respect and love through shared humanity. After that, the chamber suspended rules to introduce 17 House bills by number only, and adopted JRS 3 in concurrence, setting a joint assembly for Tuesday, January 20, 2026 at 1:00 p.m. to receive the governor’s budget message. Several announcements followed, including birthday wishes, a note about the new federal whole milk for schools law, guest introductions, and caucus notices. The House also approved committee transfers for H.393, an act relating to the prohibition of requiring face masks in schools, moving it from Education to Healthcare, and H.334, an act relating to limiting employer restrictions on individuals separating from employment, moving it from General and Housing to Commerce and Economic Development. The chamber then took up H.649 on captive insurance companies. The Commerce and Economic Development Committee explained that the bill, based on Department of Financial Regulation proposals, would prohibit risk retention groups from lending to or investing in members or affiliates, require annual and quarterly filings in NAIC form with a jurat page and actuarial certificate, and create new filing requirements for sponsored captive protected cells. The committee reported unanimous support, and the House amended the bill and ordered third reading. The House next considered S.60, establishing a Farm Security Special Fund. The Agriculture, Food Resiliency, and Forestry Committee and Appropriations described the bill as a response to repeated weather-related losses affecting farms and forestry operations, including flooding, freezes, drought, and other extreme events. The House version adds forestry and changes assistance from grants to payments to make aid faster and less cumbersome. The program would be administered by the Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets, with a review board and payments of up to 50% of uncovered losses, capped at 5% of annual appropriations and $150,000 per application. The committee testimony emphasized the need for a permanent, predictable state relief mechanism, and the bill was advanced with strong support.

Transcript Highlights:

• You talked about abiding by OA recommendations.
• You talked about abiding by OA recommendations.
• In the 2007 OA audit, a lot of recommendations were made to the legislature.
• You talked about abiding by OA recommendations.
• You talked about abiding by OA recommendations.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senator Parker moves that the Senate will be reported back to the full Senate with the recommendation
• Senator Parker moves that Senate Bill 2007 be recommended for the local and contested calendars.
• Senator Parker moves that Senate Bill 2926 be recommended for the local and contested calendar.
• Senator Parker moves that Senate Bill 2938 be recommended for the local and contested calendar.
• Senator Parker moves that Senate Bill 2938 be recommended for the local and contested calendar.

Summary: The Senate Veterans Affairs Committee met, established a quorum, and took up several pending bills. Senate Bill 2007, Senate Bill 2926, and Senate Bill 2938 were each moved out of committee with recommendations that they pass and be printed. All three received unanimous approval by roll call and were also recommended for the local and contested calendars. The committee then considered Senate Bill 2543. Senator Hancock moved adoption of a committee substitute, which was explained as clarifying references to veteran cemeteries and replacing a reference to the U.S. Department of Veteran Cemetery for clarity. The substitute was adopted without objection, and the bill as substituted was approved unanimously, 7-0, to be reported favorably to the full Senate. After the final vote, the committee also agreed to place SB 2543 on the local and non-contested calendar. With no further business, the Senate Committee on Veteran Affairs recessed subject to the call of the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• This task force must identify recommendations to strengthen and stabilize the homeowners and commercial
• adopted by the task force, recommendations relating to tort reform that could reduce insurance costs
• It will include a summary of the task force’s activities, findings, and recommendations adopted by the
• to address concerns with recommendations to address concerns with how<00:19:52.960> the<00:19
• other thing. um the the recommendations other thing. um the the recommendations that<00:51:02.480

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The task force held its first meeting on the insurance affordability crisis affecting single-family housing, common interest communities, and multifamily rental housing. Members and staff introduced themselves, including representatives from insurers, the Department of Commerce, housing advocates, affordable housing developers, and HOA/community association interests. Representative Steve Elkins was elected chair by roll call vote with 10 members in favor, after discussion that the Senate appointee’s formal appointment had not yet arrived; the group noted the intent to later move to co-chair leadership once that appointment is finalized. Staff reviewed the task force’s enabling statute and open meeting law requirements. The task force is charged with studying homeowners and commercial property insurance, property resilience and risk mitigation, liability laws and possible tort reform, notice and oversight issues, public reporting, and the state-supported insurance program, including possible expansion to a catastrophic reinsurance fund or self-insured pool. The final report is due February 15 and will go to the commissioners of commerce, housing finance, and employment and economic development, as well as relevant legislative committees. Members were also briefed on meeting logistics, a draft charter to be voted on at the second meeting, a resource page for shared materials, and the schedule of future meetings. The Department of Commerce then gave an overview of Minnesota’s property and casualty insurance market. Commerce described its regulatory role, the state’s competitiveness test, and how homeowners insurance is often filed under a “file and use” process rather than prior approval. The presentation emphasized that homeowners coverage has been under pressure for years: insurers have lost money in many recent years, premiums have risen, some consumers are taking on more risk through higher deductibles or reduced coverage, and some are moving into the surplus market. Commerce also highlighted the impact of severe weather losses, the growth in premiums since 2014, and gaps in oversight for homeowners associations and related policies. The meeting then shifted to brainstorming the problems the task force should address. Early discussion focused on climate and construction-related resilience, including hail and wind-driven rain damage, discontinued building materials, and whether stronger materials are reflected in insurance pricing. Members also raised the need to study programs like Alabama’s fortified roof model and Minnesota’s own Strengthen Minnesota Homes effort, along with questions about whether the construction industry is prepared to support broader resilience measures. No additional votes were taken during the discussion segment.

Transcript Highlights:

• to the Senate with the recommendation to the Senate with the recommendation that<00:08:07.120>
• <00:08:31.599> that the Senate with the recommendation that the Senate with the recommendation
• due pass recommendation. Voting I. due pass recommendation. Voting I.
• <01:16:24.960> that it, do so with a recommendation that it, do so with a recommendation that
• Signed, Senator Anderson, chairman. recommendation that it do pass as recommendation that it do pass

Keywords: 916, all