Video & Transcript Research : 'user fees'

Page 7 of 494
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Will they find a job with a single-user bathroom, or will they be... harassed, humiliated, or harmed
  • Because single-user restrooms are not mandatory, this bill would ban gender-diverse folks from these
  • This bill requires single-user restrooms, which would give fearful folks the autonomy to choose where
  • in public restrooms, it would be more... helpful to change building codes to require single-person user
Bills: SB7, SB14, SB 7, SB 14
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Day 56 (3-31-26)

Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting

NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Health and Public Affairs Feb 9th, 2026 at 02:06 pm

Senate Health & Public Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do think we need a separate, whole entire bill looking at impact fees, which have to do with the cost
  • point about working with the developments to get rid of the costs, if we could redo how we do impact fees
  • They don't have to focus on the subscription fee; instead, they can focus on really the life-saving operations
  • And what that means is we went from 10,000 users to 17,000 users, and we have 80% statewide coverage.
  • The other piece of this is that this saves the county millions of dollars in fees, where they can focus
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 2328 would establish a standardized $25 fee per entity for cases where electronic service
  • By streamlining the expunction notification process, standardizing service fees, and extending record
  • Currently, an expunction is filed by the petitioner and it's a $350 filing fee, and if they retain an
  • It's a $350 filing fee, and if they retain an attorney, they have to pay that attorney's fees, and then
  • The first is that the fee, there is a fee under this bill that is mandatory.
Bills: HB115
Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence reconvened with a quorum present and announced it would likely not vote that night because of confusion over the bill list; members were told a definitive list would be circulated the next morning and a formal meeting would be scheduled later. The chair then heard a series of bills, generally taking testimony and leaving each pending without action. House Bill 1847 would set maximum caseload standards for private attorneys handling indigent criminal appointments through the Texas Indigent Defense Commission; House Bill 2417 would expand compensation eligibility for some wrongfully imprisoned people; House Bill 2813 would require earlier and more specific victim notice of scheduled court proceedings; and House Bill 2309 would expand state and local authority in certain civil asset forfeiture cases involving human trafficking, health care fraud, and organized crime. Each bill was laid out by its author or a member, with no opposition witnesses registered, and each was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 4733, which would require sealing records for people acquitted of charges when they were not convicted on the related allegation; House Bill 2328, which would modernize expunction service by encouraging electronic notice, setting a standardized fee when electronic service is unavailable, extending clerk retention of expunction orders, and preserving certain mental health commitment orders; and House Bill 115, which would revise Texas’s “junk science” post-conviction writ law by providing counsel, changing the relief standard, requiring written decisions, and easing procedural barriers. Testimony on HB 2328 was mixed: county clerks supported the bill as a cost-saving modernization, while legal advocates warned that permanent retention of expunction orders could undermine true expunction and create privacy risks. HB 115 drew support from innocence and defense organizations, with some concern about a provision affecting subsequent writs. All were left pending after testimony. Later, the committee heard House Bill 2046, which would allow affirmative family-violence findings for any Penal Code offense rather than only Title V offenses; testimony from a Dallas County prosecutor and a committee member emphasized that family violence can involve arson, burglary, fraud, and other non-Title V conduct, and the bill was left pending. House Bill 1765 would tighten restrictions on no-knock warrants by requiring higher-level approval, judicial review, and identifiable officers; members discussed the dangers highlighted by the Harding Street raid and similar incidents, and the bill was also left pending. The meeting ended with the chair noting that some bills had been removed from the agenda at the author’s request and that members should be prepared to finalize the vote list the next day.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 15th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • And what this does is attorneys representing indigent clients are often paid flat fees, for example $150
  • free card because the state of Texas does not want that child to engage in sex with an adult for a fee
Bills: HB200
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 28 is creating a tax and fee structure that is similar to that for alcohol.
  • McQueeney has a question because you asked about the tax and the fee money.
  • The $5,000 annual license fee per store and $2,500 annual renewal fees are not safe... Measures.
  • These are not recreational users.
Bills: HB28, SB3, SB 3
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • HB 28 will hurt the small, clean business owners with excess fines and overpriced licensing fees, making
  • this progress would be an erasure of history and an attack on the health and safety of adult hemp users
  • For experienced users, 50 to 100.
  • don't know. ...that are using THC to the extreme addiction that it does compel a young 20-something user
  • So I employ. many users. If you know about autism, then you know that we love rules.
Bills: SB 3, HB28, SB3
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development Mar 19th, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • We reach about 400,000 unique users a month between our printed newspaper and our digital newspapers.
  • the existing bill language regarding early return of a rental to ensure there is no additional CDW fees
  • returned early or the damage waiver is canceled earlier than thought for our customer, no additional fees
  • register their age and to restrict what users under 18 see on the sites, including content regarding
  • And this is a challenge where TikTok encourages its users to hang themselves with ropes, purse strings
Bills: HB 186
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you reduce that impact fee, the impact fee should be at cost and therefore you would hurt the city's
  • those fees back.
  • We get very little from fees, from court fees.
  • that probably, first of all, the impact fees... ...fees probably are not a hundred thousand dollars
  • We also have a couple of things in particular; the City of Dallas has a user fee financed part of the
Bills: HB26, HB73, SB 14, HB46
AL
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 16th, 2026 at 11:18 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first item on the agenda is Senate Bill 38: fees on registered pet food. ...registered pet food.
  • food brand, and then that goes into the fee and is distributed.
  • So there's a fee on—pardon me, Madam Chair, Representative—there's a fee on registering the pet food.
  • Is there an actual tax on anything over this, or is it just the fee to register the food?
  • Madam Chair, Madam Chair, and Representative, yes, it's just the fee.
Bills: SB38, SB17, SB41, SB264
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It prohibits card networks from issuing a fee schedule that all the big banks used to price-fix.
  • your bill was that it... ...was a little bit of a disruptor in the testimony regarding the different fees
  • For the moving parts that we have with these swipe fees and different things, but this is almost... almost
  • So you pay, do you pay a building fee? Salaries of the professors? That's right. Okay. So, wow.
  • They do have to pay us a fee that is set by the FCC at the federal level, and we take the revenue that