Video & Transcript : 'removal standard' :

Page 7 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I've ordered IGT to remove those terminals. And to remove how many?
  • a notification to our team to take action and remove.
  • Yes, and in fact today we removed 42 of the 47 machines at their direction.
  • was removed, as well as the validated receipt that was provided through the terminal.
  • I know they're open, but if you remove the lottery operation...
Bills: SB28 , SB687 , SJR34 , SCR9 , SB523 , SB62 , SB847 , SB706 , SB869 , SB890 , SB992 , SB 28
Summary: The meeting was a crucial session for discussing several important bills including SB992, which aims to establish a clear time frame for the Attorney General's approval on outside legal counsel for state agencies. Senator Nichols presented the bill, emphasizing its necessity for timely responses to ensure efficient legal processing. Another notable discussion centered around SB523, which seeks to allow parole and probation officers to use a business address on their driver's licenses for safety and security purposes. This bill passed favorably out of the committee, with public testimony supporting the need for such provisions due to the risks these officers face.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Feb 3rd, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • It removes section two of the bill, as these are at the discretion of the court, and also removes the
  • amendment reinstates those standards.
  • Ours and theirs both removes the statute of limitations for victims of...
  • By using ambiguous standards, this proposal removes the free exercise of speech and association guaranteed
  • By using ambiguous standards, this proposal removes the free exercise of speech and association guaranteed
Bills: S0002 , S0002 , S0006 , S0018 , S0026 , S0028 , S0050 , S0178 , S0326 , S0538 , S0786 , S1004 , S1096 , S1178 , S1366 , S1632 , S1634
Committee: Senate Judiciary
Summary: The Judiciary Committee took up a long agenda of bills, including several claims bills and policy measures. It heard and approved, mostly unanimously, bills on curators of estates (SB 326, as amended), remedies under the Florida Civil Rights Act (SB 1096), a claim for Reginald Jackson against the City of Lakeland (SB 28), a DCF-related claim for L.E. (SB 6), trust administration reform (SB 786, as amended), a Broward County claim for the estate of a deceased minor (SB 18, as amended, 10-1), a DOT claim for the estate of Mark Legata (SB 26), veterans’ courts (CS/SB 50), extracurricular activities in public K-12 schools (CS/CS/SB 538, as amended), and pet sale protections for dogs and cats (SB 1004). The committee also considered the sovereign immunity claims bill (SB 1366), which was presented as a starting point for negotiations with the House and was reported favorably after testimony from local government, hospital, and school representatives who urged the Senate to hold to its current lower cap levels. The committee later approved a claims bill for the estate of Daniel Maudsley against DHSMV (SB 2). The meeting included repeated roll calls and favorable reports on each measure, with the only recorded no vote on SB 18 from Senator Osgood. Several bills drew testimony from supporters and, in some cases, objections. SB 50 on veterans’ courts received broad support from veterans’ groups, criminal justice organizations, and community advocates who said it would expand problem-solving court options for veterans dealing with service-related issues. SB 538 on extracurricular activities drew support and opposition, and was amended to address home education eligibility, a school activity fee issue, technical conforming changes, and compensation for extracurricular sponsors. SB 1004 was presented as consumer protection legislation aimed at retail pet dealers, requiring disclosure of animal health records and financing terms and creating a private right of action for violations. The committee also heard extensive testimony on SB 1178, which would create a foreign interference restriction and enforcement framework targeting foreign countries of concern and designated foreign terrorist organizations. Supporters described it as a national-security measure to limit foreign influence, protect critical infrastructure, and restrict gifts, contracts, and sister-city ties; the sponsor withdrew one amendment and the bill was reported favorably. Finally, SB 1632, dealing with ideologies inconsistent with American principles, prompted substantial questioning about due process, domestic terrorist organization designations, Sharia law references, student discipline, and notice procedures. The sponsor said the bill was intended to protect constitutional principles and target conduct rather than belief, but the transcript ends while public testimony on that bill is still underway.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/8/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so we need to rebuild the seawall, do some environmental remediation work to clean up the site, remove
  • Just last year, La Lake was removed from the state's impaired waters list, which is very important to
  • Just last year, Law Lake was<00:57:57.839><c> removed</c><00:57:58.079><c> from</c><00:57:58.240><c>
  • the</c><00:57:58.400><c> state's</c><00:57:58.720><c> impaired</c> was removed from the state's impaired
  • was removed from the state's impaired waters<00:57:59.440><c> list,</c><00:57:59.839><c> which</c><00
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/27/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • The gag rule offered plaintiffs some procedural protection by removing the question of seat belt use
  • So why have one law on the books criminalizing the non-use of seat belts and another that removes the
  • The gag rule offered plaintiffs some procedural protection by removing the question of seat belt use
  • The gag rule offered plaintiffs some procedural protection by removing the question of seat belt use
  • So why have one law on the books criminalizing the non-use of seat belts and another that removes the
Bills: HF1027 , HF2226 , HF1916 , HF1915 , HF1567 , HF1986
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • If you hit a teacher, you get removed from class. Now, where your removal can go, JJP, if it's a...
  • The student that was expelled or removed from the class...
  • A removal from a classroom does not constitute a removal from learning.
  • Removal of the student, I'm invoking Chapter 37.
  • At that point, just the way the removal process works.
Summary: The committee heard a series of school safety and discipline bills, beginning with SB 870, which would codify an attorney general opinion allowing local school boards to decide whether school marshals may openly carry, conceal carry, or store a firearm in a secure safe on campus. The bill was laid out with no public testimony and left pending. The chair then moved to a combined discussion of SB 1871, 1872, 1873, 1874, and 1924, all focused on school discipline, teacher authority, and student safety. Senators Perry and Creighton described the package as a response to rising classroom disruptions, assaults on teachers, and concerns that districts lack effective tools to maintain order. SB 1871 would expand teacher removal authority, require return-to-class plans before a student removed for certain conduct can return, make some serious offenses mandatory for placement in juvenile justice settings, and provide telehealth mental health services through a consortium. SB 1872 would require expulsion to a JJAEP for assaults on teachers or school volunteers and extend certain expulsion-eligible conduct to off-campus offenses. SB 1873 would restore the prior understanding that in-school suspension is not subject to a three-day limit. SB 1874 would grant teachers immunity from disciplinary action for reporting discipline violations or acting in compliance with Chapter 37. SB 1924 would restore authority for local police and school district police to issue Class C citations for school offenses and require criminal referrals for students posing an imminent threat or assaulting a teacher, with a substitute clarifying referral rules when a citation has already been issued. The committee adopted the substitutes for the bills and moved them forward. Invited witnesses from teacher and administrator groups largely supported the overall goal of stronger discipline and safer classrooms, while asking for refinements. The Texas Classroom Teachers Association testified that teachers need more autonomy to remove disruptive or violent students and that classroom removals should not mean removal from learning. Superintendents from San Angelo, Grandview, and Wiley ISDs supported the bills’ emphasis on safety, expanded ISS flexibility, mandatory placement for serious offenses, and telehealth mental health services, but asked for more local control, flexibility for Districts of Innovation, more than one campus behavior coordinator in large districts, clearer timelines for return-to-class plans, and more precise definitions for disruptive conduct. Several witnesses stressed that teacher retention and student learning are being harmed by current discipline problems, while some members raised concerns about vague standards and the risk of overuse or public humiliation through citations and removals.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 2123 removes the existing authorization from the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority to build a bridge
  • The word 'exception' has been removed, and 'suitable alternative' has replaced that word.
  • House Bill 3178 creates a standard depreciation table for county assessors to use when evaluating farm
  • But do you believe that this would hinder the ability for us to move forward on doing a standardization
  • Do you see any issue with the constitution, Article 1, where it talks about a standard assessment or
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Agriculture and Wildlife Feb 23rd, 2026 at 10:00 am

Agriculture and Wildlife

Transcript Highlights:
  • So with these out-of-state processors, would they be held to the same standards that we require here
  • And that aligns with the federal standards.
  • Reversing 75% of its loss and cutting costs, if we remove these invasive species, it costs $447 million
  • As this bill passes through, I think it kind of sets the standards.
  • We're in an upstream state has to meet our downstream state's water quality standards.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Mar 24th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • from the historical standard?
  • So, in your opinion, And by adopting standards, would that include rulemaking to get those standards?
  • This is not a typical drinking water standard or a typical wastewater standard.
  • Do in developing these standards?
  • There are going to be standards.
Bills: HB48 , HB49 , HB 1169 , HB1971 , HB2584 , HB2663 , HB2890 , HB48 , HB49
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Education 2ND REVISED Apr 21st, 2026 at 10:00 am

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • If they make the decision to permanently remove the book, is there a public process for appealing to
  • They can remove the book or they can deny the challenge.
  • So when you said permanently remove, you're referring to line three.
  • The community to define those standards.
  • And I don't know a single school yet that has removed that requirement.
Committee: Senate Education
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Standards or bureaucratic delay.
  • It removes outdated restrictions and clarifies the operation, training, and liability standards, which
  • That's reflected in the bill with the removal of one word.
  • The amendment would remove that.
  • And so removing the amendment is not doing anything.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, House Bill 1707 by Chairman Landgraf and House Bill 2100 by Vice Chair Flores have both been removed
  • of clearance rates deadlines, performance measures or standards of clearance rate requirements set by
  • statute, administrative rules or Performance measures or standards of clearance-rate requirements set
  • When you buy a carton of strawberries and one is bad, you remove it and the rest are still good.
  • One is bad, you remove it, and the rest are still good.
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence met to hear House Bill 1761, a broad judicial package focused on increasing judicial compensation and adding accountability and efficiency measures. The chair explained that HB 1707 and HB 2100 were withdrawn from the agenda, and that HB 1761 would be taken up first because many judges and stakeholders were present. The committee substitute for HB 1761 proposed a 30% increase in base judicial pay to $182,000, changes to judicial retirement linkage, stronger judicial conduct provisions, and efficiency measures such as targeted reporting for judges not meeting benchmarks, appellate in-person meeting encouragement, and time limits on certain motions. The chair and several supporters said judicial pay had reached “emergency status,” citing Texas’s low national ranking and difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified judges. Witnesses in support included presiding and district judges, the State Bar’s judicial section, business and trial lawyer groups, and prosecutors. They emphasized that many judges work long hours off the bench, handle warrants at night and on weekends, manage heavy dockets, and face recruitment problems in both urban and rural counties. Supporters also said higher pay would help attract experienced lawyers, retain judges, and improve court efficiency. Several witnesses and members discussed judicial accountability, including public reporting of court performance and the role of the Texas Supreme Court and presiding judges in setting benchmarks. Some members raised concerns that raw statistics can be misleading because judges also do substantial off-the-bench work and often help cover other courts’ dockets. There was also testimony and discussion about the bill’s conduct and discipline provisions. A representative of the Texas Civil Rights Project opposed parts of the bill that would tie pay raises to changes affecting judicial independence, warning about subjective bail-related discipline standards and possible chilling effects. The executive director of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct cautioned against civil penalties for complainants, saying it could discourage good-faith complaints and create litigation risks. Other witnesses supported accountability reforms but urged caution about unintended consequences, especially for family and emergency cases and for judges handling warrants and other time-sensitive matters. After testimony, the committee withdrew the committee substitute and left HB 1761 pending, then recessed the committee.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Rules Apr 23rd, 2026 at 08:30 am

Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • place, leaving TSET in place, basically leaving everything about TSET alone with the exception of removing
  • So, what this does is this puts to a state question to allow the voters to decide to remove a billion
  • So, is it accurate that once this $1 Billion is removed, it is permanently removed from the original
  • It will be reduced if we remove $1 billion from this If the taxpayers are the voters, removing $1 billion
  • It removes 1 billion from the foundation of that trust.
Committee: Senate Rules
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations REVISED Feb 18th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • We will see several requests by the chair to remove the appropriation, including the chair's own bills
  • Senate Bill 1338 Removes the provision for what you all probably have heard of as the Heroes Literacy
  • So it removes that pilot provision of this legislation and it allows that Heroes team that's been built
  • One of the reasons that we removed the appropriations because it's it's it's part of a bigger discussion
  • Chair, I move to amend Senate Bill 1341 as follows on page 2 Lines 7 through 11 by removing section two
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Alcohol, Tobacco and Controlled Substances REVISED: SB1501 - Added Apr 8th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Alcohol, Tobacco and Controlled Substances

Transcript Highlights:
  • You remove tetrahydrocannabinol (plural) from Schedule 3.
  • And I Thought that was a step too far, so I removed the liability from an employee, asking an employer
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Rules 2ND REVISED Mar 4th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • So years ago, before we got into this building, they lowered this from a certain standard down to that
  • Members, HJR 1024 modifies the judicial nominating committee to remove the restrictions on the members
  • This bill removes that requirement. Is that correct? Yes, that's correct. Follow up, Senator Hicks.
  • So, on removing the restrictions based on political party membership.
  • My concern would be to possibly deal with removing that part of it.
Committee: Senate Rules