Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal trigger'

Page 7 of 500
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Taxation and Revenue Feb 14th, 2026 at 10:35 am

House Taxation & Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • What triggers it? Because, I mean, it just changes so fast.
  • I really want to talk from a boots-on-the-ground perspective, especially from a fiscal perspective.
  • I'm looking at the fiscal impact report, Mr. Chairman.
  • I think what you're seeing is just a very conservative modeling by the district's fiscal team that put
  • So we are focused on being good fiscal servants. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for that.
Bills: HB248, HB309, HB332, SB48
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Taxation and Revenue Feb 13th, 2026 at 08:35 am

House Taxation & Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • I am in strong favor of House Bill 82, the Trigger Program.
  • I am in strong favor of House Bill 82, the Trigger Program.
  • The Trigger Program helps offset those costs. The Trigger Program helps offset those costs.
  • Programs like Trigger, and Trigger in particular, allow strong collaboration between the national labs
  • Of tabling bills that have a fiscal impact in this committee.
Bills: HB248, HB309, HB332, SB48
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Phoenix certainly hasn't been on a budget diet either; from fiscal year 23 to 26, Phoenix's total all-funds
  • They would also trigger, most likely, new members on their boards of supervisors.
  • So I'm, you know, deeply concerned about the cost of this, and I don't know if we've had a fiscal note
  • I don't know if there's been a fiscal note, but we deeply need to consider that issue.
  • This bill has not been thought out, and the JLBC fiscal analysis suggests property taxes would likely
Summary: The committee approved the February 4, 2026 minutes and held SB 1571 until the following week. It then heard and advanced several measures, beginning with SB 1745, which would cap transaction privilege/excise tax rates in the state’s largest cities at 2.5% per classification unless approved by voters, and would allow enforcement through the attorney general and state-shared revenue withholding. Supporters argued it would protect taxpayers and restrain municipal tax increases; the bill received a technical amendment and a due pass recommendation. The committee also advanced SB 1686, renaming Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza as the Wesley Bolin and Charlie Kirk Freedom Plaza and authorizing memorial placements for Don Bowles and Charlie Kirk, after brief supportive discussion and no substantive opposition testimony. The committee spent substantial time on SB 1567 and SB 1435, both aimed at restricting public entities, schools, and libraries from exposing minors to sexually explicit materials and from using public facilities for sexually explicit filming or access. Supporters framed the bills as child-protection measures and cited examples of explicit books and materials in libraries and schools; opponents, including the ACLU, warned the definitions were broad, could chill speech, and could criminalize librarians and educators for handling constitutionally protected literature or sex-education materials. Both bills were amended and passed on 4-3 votes, with supporters emphasizing existing obscenity standards and opponents stressing First Amendment concerns and implementation problems. The committee also advanced SB 1433 and SB 1434, which would redraw Maricopa County boundaries and, in the latter bill, create three new counties with a transition board and staggered elections. The sponsor argued Maricopa County had become too large and politically dominant, making government less representative and less responsive; opponents called the proposals expensive, disruptive, and politically motivated, citing concerns about debt division, duplicated county systems, and fiscal impacts. Both bills received due pass recommendations on 4-3 votes. Finally, the committee approved SCR 1024, requiring legislators to live in their district for one year before election, and SCR 1025, moving the legislative session start date from the second Monday to the fourth Monday in January; both resolutions passed unanimously or near-unanimously after sponsor testimony that they would modernize outdated rules and improve use of time.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Education Jan 28th, 2026 at 08:33 am

House Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • These payments would be equal to 2% of the benefit payment from the prior fiscal year.
  • These payments would be equal to 2% of the benefit payment from the prior fiscal year.
  • It's approximately a cost of about $32 million in fiscal year 27 and about $33.5 million in fiscal year
  • fiscal years.
  • I'm seeing that fiscal technical support, travel, and convening of the Executive Council.
Bills: HB40, HB100, HJR1, SB64, SB19, SB44, SB83
NV

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Assembly Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections May 29th, 2025 at 01:00 pm

Legislative Operations and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • My question is not fiscal, but I am going to use a fiscal note for clarification on the 3rd... ...not
  • fiscal, but I am going to use a fiscal note for clarification on the explanation of DMV's fiscal note
  • We're neutral on this bill, but we do have a fiscal note on it, as mentioned.
  • So that's primarily what our fiscal note is about.
  • We have a zero-impact fiscal note on the DMV. We are neutral on SB 74.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Apr 8th, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • year billion during fiscal year billion during fiscal year 2024.
  • flight school, and we're going civilian flight school, and we're going to make it flight schoolwide in fiscal
  • to make it flight schoolwide in fiscal to make it flight schoolwide in fiscal year 26. year 26. year
  • new and is projected to welcome 120 new and is projected to welcome 120 new warrants by the end of fiscal
  • year 25, a warrants by the end of fiscal year 25, a warrants by the end of fiscal year 25, a first since
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Taxes Committee 3/27/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • There are no costs for this proposal projected in fiscal 27 through fiscal 29.
  • uh for this proposal projected in fiscal uh for this proposal projected in fiscal 27<00:31:07.080
  • > through<00:31:07.279> fiscal 27 through fiscal 27 through fiscal 29<00:31:09.639>
  • We do not have an analysis on the fiscal impact of that.
  • We do not have an analysis on the fiscal impact of that.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/26

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm the fiscal analyst that staffs this committee and the children and families committee.
  • Families, and the Department of Health produce a report by November 30th that shows the grant base for fiscal
  • c><01:08:22.400> for 30th that shows the grant base for 30th that shows the grant base for fiscal
  • 08:24.799> in<01:08:25.040> all<01:08:25.279> cases<01:08:26.400> and fiscal
  • years 28 and 29 in all cases and fiscal years 28 and 29 in all cases and proposed<01:08:27.759> Ryder
NE

Nebraska 2025-2026 Regular Session

Legislative Morning Session Apr 10th, 2026

Nebraska Unicameral Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • It appropriates $1,137,300 from the motor fuel tax enforcement and collection cash fund for fiscal years
  • The reading continues with references to fiscal years 26 and 27.
  • The bill continues with appropriations from the 911 Service System Fund for fiscal years 2026-27 and
  • Legislative Council Program 1222, Legislature, general fund, fiscal 2026-27, $12 million.
  • year 2026-27, and similar amounts for fiscal year 2027-28 to the State Department of Education.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations May 11th, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • She was then asked whether she wanted the fiscal staff to come up and explain the fiscal note and how
  • I just have a question about the fiscal note, and I don't know if there's a person from the fiscal office
  • I know right now there is a fiscal note, but the amendment should clear that up and remove the fiscal
  • Where I think it should be, since there is no fiscal note on it now or potential fiscal note, and then
  • So on the fiscal note, explain to me what's going on with the fiscal note.
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 105, which would reinstate an existing TOPS Tech benefit for eligible veterans after a sunset expired. The author said the program had been underused because it was not well promoted, but that the new veterans workforce effort called “The Boot” would help connect veterans to the benefit. Members confirmed it would use existing TOPS funds and not require new money, and the bill was reported favorably without objection. House Resolution 3 asked the Louisiana Housing Corporation to study whether vacant state-owned property could be used for housing and rental assistance for cost-burdened state employees. The author described it as an exploratory study, while members raised concerns about the fiscal note and the scope of the study. Fiscal staff explained the agency had requested additional positions to do the work. The committee discussed narrowing the study to certain areas, but the resolution was ultimately reported favorably. House Bill 189 sought supplemental pay for fire protection officers at the Lakefront Management Authority’s airport. The author and airport representatives argued the firefighters perform hazardous, specialized ARFF duties at a busy public airport and should be treated like other supplemental-pay recipients. Some members questioned whether the airport and its employees qualified under existing law and whether the proposal would expand an already costly program. After debate, the committee rejected the bill on an 8-10 vote. The committee then reported Senate Bill 461 favorably, which would place certain small groups of active employees under the Office of Group Benefits to improve insurance rates without using general fund money. House Bill 623, creating a three-tier permitting system for vapor product producers, manufacturers, and wholesalers, was amended to clarify the direct-to-consumer shipment prohibition and then reported favorably. House Bill 1222, which would authorize LED to create a grocery initiative grant and assistance program to address food deserts, drew extended debate over whether it would amount to government-run grocery stores; supporters said it would only create incentives for private grocers and related assistance. It was amended and reported favorably by a 16-2 vote. Finally, House Resolution 80, as amended, would shift a proposed audit-related effort on higher education budget metrics away from the legislative auditor and toward university systems’ own boards; members questioned the need for a look-back report and the added workload, and the chair indicated he would move to recommit the resolution to the education committee.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Session Day 59 (4-14-26) - Part 1

Kentucky House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:57:20.079> year, Page six, lines 27, after fiscal year, Page six, lines 27, after fiscal
  • <00:57:29.920> Page three, delete fiscal bienium. Page three, delete fiscal bienium.
  • 100, line 22, delete in each fiscal 100, line 22, delete in each fiscal year.<01:01:47.040> Page
  • U so just want to make fiscal cliff.
  • full-time when he serves on their fiscal full-time when he serves on their fiscal court<02:22:02.880
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • It wasn't a requirement that it be 10%, just that that's sort of the trigger before we get suspicious
  • We passed a conditional trigger and said that if a municipality has such a low turnout— I think it was
  • Chair, members, Senate Bill 1654 appropriates $100,000 from the State General Fund in fiscal year 2027
  • And there was a fiscal note that was not prepared yet, and the counties are requesting $100,000 be dispersed
  • And there was a fiscal note that was not prepared yet, and the counties are requesting $100,000 be disbursed
Summary: The committee first heard a lengthy presentation and discussion focused on Arizona State University’s foreign research ties, especially collaborations and funding connected to China and Chinese military-affiliated institutions. The presenter argued that ASU and the Arizona Board of Regents had not been transparent about foreign gifts, contracts, and research partnerships, citing federal reporting forms, the Wolf Amendment, export-control concerns, and alleged links to dual-use technologies such as quantum systems, AI, robotics, microelectronics, and biosecurity. A witness from American Global Strategies testified in support, saying the bill would help protect U.S. research security and national security by imposing state-level guardrails on sensitive collaborations. After questions, the committee considered a strike-everything amendment to SB 1060 that would bar public universities from entering into or continuing certain loans, gifts, contracts, research partnerships, or sponsored projects involving the PRC, the CCP, and listed Chinese military-linked universities, require ABOR review and approval, and impose reporting and budget penalties. The amendment was withdrawn, and the committee instead took up SB 1327, which directs ABOR to require university research security policies and to report annually on those policies and on foreign contributions over $250,000; SB 1327 received a 4-2 do-pass recommendation, with Del Santos, Hernandez, and Márquez voting no and Kolodin, Powell, Keshel, and Gillette voting yes. The committee then heard SB 1803, a veterans bill regulating unrecognized persons who assist with VA disability claims. The sponsor and industry witnesses said the bill would protect veterans from bad actors by requiring disclosures, capping fees, banning certain practices, and filing service agreements with the Attorney General, while opponents argued it could restrict consumer choice, resemble a price ceiling, and still allow non-attorneys to engage in the unauthorized practice of law. After extensive debate over contingent fees, legal ethics, and whether the bill was too favorable to one company, the committee continued the hearing with additional testimony and questions.