Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal notes'

Page 7 of 500
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Taxation and Revenue Feb 14th, 2026 at 10:35 am

House Taxation & Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do want to note, Mr.
  • I really want to talk from a boots-on-the-ground perspective, especially from a fiscal perspective.
  • I'm looking at the fiscal impact report, Mr. Chairman.
  • I think what you're seeing is just a very conservative modeling by the district's fiscal team that put
  • So we are focused on being good fiscal servants. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for that.
Bills: HB248, HB309, HB332, SB48
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Taxation and Revenue Feb 13th, 2026 at 08:35 am

House Taxation & Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • year, so it doesn't The increase in the credits an additional year, so it doesn't impact the next fiscal
  • The policy in this committee is that when a bill has a fiscal impact, even if it's outward-looking a
  • Chair, Madam Vice Chair, let me find my notes. Mr. Chair, Madam Vice Chair, let me find my notes.
  • And to clarify this bill, we will vote on it because it doesn't have a fiscal impact.
  • Of tabling bills that have a fiscal impact in this committee.
Bills: HB248, HB309, HB332, SB48
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Phoenix certainly hasn't been on a budget diet either; from fiscal year 23 to 26, Phoenix's total all-funds
  • So I'm, you know, deeply concerned about the cost of this, and I don't know if we've had a fiscal note
  • I don't know if there's been a fiscal note, but we deeply need And that's what the county is estimated
  • I don't know if there's been a fiscal note, but we deeply need to consider that issue.
  • This bill has not been thought out, and the JLBC fiscal analysis suggests property taxes would likely
Summary: The committee approved the February 4, 2026 minutes and held SB 1571 until the following week. It then heard and advanced several measures, beginning with SB 1745, which would cap transaction privilege/excise tax rates in the state’s largest cities at 2.5% per classification unless approved by voters, and would allow enforcement through the attorney general and state-shared revenue withholding. Supporters argued it would protect taxpayers and restrain municipal tax increases; the bill received a technical amendment and a due pass recommendation. The committee also advanced SB 1686, renaming Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza as the Wesley Bolin and Charlie Kirk Freedom Plaza and authorizing memorial placements for Don Bowles and Charlie Kirk, after brief supportive discussion and no substantive opposition testimony. The committee spent substantial time on SB 1567 and SB 1435, both aimed at restricting public entities, schools, and libraries from exposing minors to sexually explicit materials and from using public facilities for sexually explicit filming or access. Supporters framed the bills as child-protection measures and cited examples of explicit books and materials in libraries and schools; opponents, including the ACLU, warned the definitions were broad, could chill speech, and could criminalize librarians and educators for handling constitutionally protected literature or sex-education materials. Both bills were amended and passed on 4-3 votes, with supporters emphasizing existing obscenity standards and opponents stressing First Amendment concerns and implementation problems. The committee also advanced SB 1433 and SB 1434, which would redraw Maricopa County boundaries and, in the latter bill, create three new counties with a transition board and staggered elections. The sponsor argued Maricopa County had become too large and politically dominant, making government less representative and less responsive; opponents called the proposals expensive, disruptive, and politically motivated, citing concerns about debt division, duplicated county systems, and fiscal impacts. Both bills received due pass recommendations on 4-3 votes. Finally, the committee approved SCR 1024, requiring legislators to live in their district for one year before election, and SCR 1025, moving the legislative session start date from the second Monday to the fourth Monday in January; both resolutions passed unanimously or near-unanimously after sponsor testimony that they would modernize outdated rules and improve use of time.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Education Jan 28th, 2026 at 08:33 am

House Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • These payments would be equal to 2% of the benefit payment from the prior fiscal year.
  • These payments would be equal to 2% of the benefit payment from the prior fiscal year.
  • It's approximately a cost of about $32 million in fiscal year 27 and about $33.5 million in fiscal year
  • fiscal years.
  • I'm seeing that fiscal technical support, travel, and convening of the Executive Council.
Bills: HB40, HB100, HJR1, SB64, SB19, SB44, SB83
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Apr 8th, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • year billion during fiscal year billion during fiscal year 2024.
  • Quick note on mentioned. Quick note on mentioned. Quick note on infrastructure.
  • to make it flight schoolwide in fiscal to make it flight schoolwide in fiscal year 26. year 26. year
  • And on that note, I ask for the BR. And on that note, I ask for the BR.
  • And on that note, I ask for the BR.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Taxes Committee 3/27/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • He also noted that the fiscal note indicates there is a negligible impact.
  • note that the<00:13:39.360> uh<00:13:39.519> fiscal<00:13:39.920> note<00:13:40.560
  • > indicates<00:13:41.560> uh<00:13:41.720> that the uh fiscal note indicates uh
  • that the uh fiscal note indicates uh that there<00:13:41.959> is<00:13:42.079> a<00:13:
  • > through<00:31:07.279> fiscal 27 through fiscal 27 through fiscal 29<00:31:09.639>
AL
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/26

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please note that assisted living facilities are an outlier.
  • Please note that assisted living facilities are an outlier.
  • Please note that assisted living facilities are an outlier.
  • And I'll note that there are six overall proposals that are included in this packet.
  • I'm the fiscal analyst that staffs this committee and the children and families committee.
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • I would like to note that with these amendments, NDE would be able to remove their fiscal note entirely
  • No fiscal note is always a good thing.
  • DCFS fiscal note, that liability has been increasing.
  • bill, has removed its fiscal note.
  • Regarding the fiscal impact, there was a fiscal note from the Division of Public and Behavioral Health
NE

Nebraska 2025-2026 Regular Session

Legislative Morning Session Apr 10th, 2026

Nebraska Unicameral Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Like a Beach Boys song, it's not possible to do those note for note.
  • Well, Mike, you are definitely an original song that I don't think anybody could replicate note for note
  • The reading continues with references to fiscal years 26 and 27.
  • Your staff wanted me to share a couple notes with you.
  • Senator Dungan, I have M.O. 567 with a note that you withdraw. So ordered.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Session Day 59 (4-14-26) - Part 1

Kentucky House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:57:20.079> year, Page six, lines 27, after fiscal year, Page six, lines 27, after fiscal
  • <00:57:29.920> Page three, delete fiscal bienium. Page three, delete fiscal bienium.
  • 100, line 22, delete in each fiscal 100, line 22, delete in each fiscal year.<01:01:47.040> Page
  • U so just want to make fiscal cliff.
  • full-time when he serves on their fiscal full-time when he serves on their fiscal court<02:22:02.880
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm going to be a note here.
  • Madam Vice Chair, please note the roll. Mr.
  • Madam Vice Chair, please note the roll. Mr.
  • And there was a fiscal note that was not prepared yet, and the counties are requesting $100,000 be dispersed
  • And there was a fiscal note that was not prepared yet, and the counties are requesting $100,000 be disbursed
Summary: The committee first heard a lengthy presentation and discussion focused on Arizona State University’s foreign research ties, especially collaborations and funding connected to China and Chinese military-affiliated institutions. The presenter argued that ASU and the Arizona Board of Regents had not been transparent about foreign gifts, contracts, and research partnerships, citing federal reporting forms, the Wolf Amendment, export-control concerns, and alleged links to dual-use technologies such as quantum systems, AI, robotics, microelectronics, and biosecurity. A witness from American Global Strategies testified in support, saying the bill would help protect U.S. research security and national security by imposing state-level guardrails on sensitive collaborations. After questions, the committee considered a strike-everything amendment to SB 1060 that would bar public universities from entering into or continuing certain loans, gifts, contracts, research partnerships, or sponsored projects involving the PRC, the CCP, and listed Chinese military-linked universities, require ABOR review and approval, and impose reporting and budget penalties. The amendment was withdrawn, and the committee instead took up SB 1327, which directs ABOR to require university research security policies and to report annually on those policies and on foreign contributions over $250,000; SB 1327 received a 4-2 do-pass recommendation, with Del Santos, Hernandez, and Márquez voting no and Kolodin, Powell, Keshel, and Gillette voting yes. The committee then heard SB 1803, a veterans bill regulating unrecognized persons who assist with VA disability claims. The sponsor and industry witnesses said the bill would protect veterans from bad actors by requiring disclosures, capping fees, banning certain practices, and filing service agreements with the Attorney General, while opponents argued it could restrict consumer choice, resemble a price ceiling, and still allow non-attorneys to engage in the unauthorized practice of law. After extensive debate over contingent fees, legal ethics, and whether the bill was too favorable to one company, the committee continued the hearing with additional testimony and questions.