Video & Transcript Research : 'contested case hearing'

Page 79 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement - 04/14/26

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • contest PERA's determination. contest PERA's determination.
  • Um, I think we could do a better job, and I appreciate you hearing this hearing.
  • don't have to have a hearing for that. don't have to have a hearing for that.
  • Thank you, get to hear it.
  • I heard the uh hear what that was.
Keywords: 918, senate, all
Summary: The Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement met on April 14, 2026, adopted the April 7 minutes, and then took up Senate File 4464, which the chair said would be laid over after hearing testimony. The bill would restore continued health insurance coverage for police officers and firefighters in the PERA Police and Fire Fund who suffer documented physical duty-related injuries, addressing the current 5-year cap and the loss of coverage at normal retirement eligibility. Senator Hal Hoffman and Senator Hoffman’s testimony emphasized that the bill is a narrow fix for injured public safety workers and not a broader restructuring of retirement benefits. Supporters, including Mike Ladue of Law Enforcement Labor Services, several injured officers, Sheriff Ryan Kruger, and Amber Waldner, described the personal and family impacts of severe line-of-duty injuries and argued that coverage should continue to age 65 so families are not left with uncertainty if injuries worsen or force medical retirement. They said the bill would honor the promise made to public safety workers and provide stability for long-term care needs. One witness, Officer Albert, said the 2025 changes significantly reduced the protection he believed he and his family would have if his injury forced retirement. Anne Finn of the League of Minnesota Cities opposed the bill as drafted, warning that restoring coverage to age 65 for all physical injuries would be fiscally unsustainable without additional state funding. She said the 2025 pension changes were part of a negotiated package, noted that duty disability retirements are common, and argued the employer cost could reach about $500,000 per employee and create significant property tax pressure, especially for smaller communities. She urged the committee to work on a broader solution and said revisiting only one part of the 2025 law would create imbalance.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • We have other hearings going on. So thank you for being here.
  • I'd also like to address the health of the force in this hearing.
  • I have scheduled a hearing in front of this body as I retire later this summer.
  • That is really terrific to hear.
  • I'm hearing it already. Yes, sir. Oh, yeah.
Summary: The committee meeting focused on pressing issues related to the U.S. military's recruitment and personnel strategies, especially in light of the upcoming NDAA for fiscal year 2026. Chairperson expressed appreciation for the service of witnesses including senior military leaders from different branches, emphasizing the importance of personnel as the backbone of national defense. Discussions revealed concerns regarding the recent lowering of recruitment standards across military branches, which could potentially affect the quality of service members and long-term military readiness. Witnesses were asked to address the implications of these changes on military health and efficiency.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House DFL Press Conference 1/17/25

Transcript Highlights:
  • Why don't we let you hear from the chief author of this year's bill, Lee Finy?
  • from the chief why don't we let you hear from the chief author<00:10:38.959> of<00:10:39.079>
  • We don't need to be in a committee to hear it.
  • police Chiefs and our Mayors and hearing police Chiefs and our Mayors and hearing what's<00:18:56.640
  • <00:30:30.679> I house floor in an election contest I house floor in an election contest I
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: House DFL leaders held a press event outlining their priorities and criticizing Republicans for what they described as illegitimate or sham proceedings in the Minnesota House. Speakers said Democrats would focus on affordability, workers, families, and protecting prior DFL accomplishments, while opposing efforts they said would roll back paid family and medical leave, clean energy, Dreamer access to higher education, reproductive rights, consumer protections, and universal school meals. Individual members highlighted issue areas for the coming session: Children and Families Chair Kaohly Her emphasized child care, food security, and support for parents and caregivers; Health Finance and Policy Chair Robert Bierman said Democrats would expand access to dental, maternal, and mental health care, lower prescription drug costs, and address hospital service cuts; Commerce co-chair K.H. Her focused on consumer protections and maintaining out-of-pocket caps on drugs like insulin, inhalers, and EpiPens; Housing co-chair Mike Howard discussed the housing shortage, rising rents, and corporate ownership of homes; and Rep. Emma Greenman framed the agenda as a push to curb corporate power and monopolies. A substantial portion of the event and Q&A centered on the House power-sharing dispute and the effort to deny quorum after the controversy over Rep. Brad Tabke. Leaders said Republicans had rejected co-chairs, equal committee membership, and co-speaker arrangements, and they argued the GOP was trying to use its temporary advantage to control the chamber and potentially force special elections. They also discussed the legal status of the House after adjournment, the lack of a legal hopper for bill filing, and the possibility of court review of whether the House is duly organized. In response to questions, DFL leaders said they were still open to negotiation and expected eventual collaboration, but maintained that Republicans had broken the power-sharing agreement. They said the February budget forecast and the governor’s budget would shape the session’s formal work, and one speaker noted that the ERA remains a caucus priority and that the DFL would continue pursuing it when the opportunity arises.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Committee on Elections - 03/04/25

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • campaign finance limits look like in other states, including whether states distinguish between highly contested
  • campaign finance limits look like in other states, including whether states distinguish between highly contested
  • campaign finance limits look like in other states, including whether states distinguish between highly contested
  • campaign finance limits look like in other states, including whether states distinguish between highly contested
  • campaign finance limits look like in other states, including whether states distinguish between highly contested
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

RM 325 Conference PM - Wed Apr 22, 2026

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Welcome to the conference committee hearing today, our conference committee meeting.
  • limits and available public funds to either primary or general because sometimes they don't have a contest
  • limits and available public funds to either primary or general because sometimes they don't have a contest
  • limits and available public funds to either primary or general because sometimes they don't have a contest
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee, February 18, 2026

Minerals, Business & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • >> Hearing none.
  • Can you hear<00:31:19.360> me?<00:31:19.520> Okay. hear me? Okay. hear me? Okay.
  • Hearing none. Thank you. questions? Hearing none. Thank you.
  • <00:54:39.520> You<00:54:39.680> have<00:54:39.760> a contested case proceeding
  • You have a contested case proceeding.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Capitol Interpretive Exhibits and Wayfinding Subcommittee, May 7, 2026

Capitol Interpretive Exhibits and Wayfinding Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Can everyone hear me? All right. Can everyone hear me? All right.
  • being able to hear in these spaces. being able to hear in these spaces.
  • Looks I'm hearing that Jake is now >> Okay.
  • I hear they're pieces in that category. I hear they're quite<01:51:07.760> tremendous.
  • Uh they have a contest out right name.
Keywords: 916, all
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Mahalo for joining today's AEN-WLA and EIG triple joint hearing.
  • And I just for hearing this proposal.
  • contest and my students<01:14:46.560> won.
  • Hearing none, members, any questions? Hearing none, members, any questions?
  • Hearing none, chair will vote aye. Hearing none, chair will vote aye.
Bills: SB2706, SB2320
Summary: The committees first heard SB 2371, which would prioritize lease offers on agrivoltaics parcels for beginning farmers, require annual compliance reports to DAB, authorize penalties for noncompliance, and allow solar facilities on certain agricultural lands. DAB, the State Energy Office, PUC, and Hawaii Farm Bureau generally supported the intent, while OPPSD recommended amendments to preserve agricultural lease affordability and strengthen food-production language. Members questioned whether the bill would meaningfully encourage solar on ag lands, whether beginning farmers would have enough information to use such parcels, and how the bill would interact with Land Use Commission review. The Farm Bureau said agrivoltaics remains challenging and largely in pilot form, and noted the Mililani project as a promising example of dual use. The committees voted to pass SB 2371 with amendments, with one member expressing a preference that it be opened to all farmers rather than only beginning farmers. The next measure, SB 2800, appropriates funds to DAB, DLNR, and ADC for acquisition, repair, and maintenance of irrigation systems. All testifying agencies and the Farm Bureau supported the bill, and members pressed them for estimates of needed funding and the condition of existing systems. DAB cited major repair needs, including Waimea, Molokai, Kahuku, and Kawailoa, and said its backlog could total roughly $65 million; ADC estimated about $35 million for several systems; and DLNR said its current needs for three systems were about $35 million, with the largest cost tied to piping in Kekaha. The committees amended the bill to defer its effective date to July 1, 2050 and to blank out the appropriation amounts in the bill text, with the agencies’ requested amounts to be included in the committee report for consideration. SB 2800 then passed in AEN, Water and Land, and EIG. The final measure discussed was SB 2718, a food hub pilot program beginning in 2028 that would require state departments and UH to source 30% of certain food purchases from local agricultural products, create a nutrition- and ʻāina-based school program, and have DAT partner with a regional aggregator for Native Hawaiian staple crops. DAT, DOH, the Farm Bureau, Food Plus Policy Group, HAPA, and others supported the bill’s intent, while the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation opposed it, saying it is already struggling to meet the current local procurement percentage and faces procurement and quantity barriers, especially for staple items used daily. The testimony focused on whether agencies could realistically meet the higher local purchasing target and whether smaller farms could supply the needed volumes.
HI
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • And then he won the overall statewide contest as well.
  • Who'll hear this, he'll hear this.
  • I never thought I'd build a friendship with, err, Hilbert his dad, in case y'all don't know him.
  • And so a lot of times, our primaries are much more contested than people on your side of the aisle.
  • The Senate obviously did not do that in this case, even though they failed.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • General Kane, we will now hear your testimony. You're recognized.
  • Once the Secretary in some cases, or the President probably in most cases, has made the decision, then
  • of whether or not they want to hear it.
  • Testimony that we've had at numerous hearings is it's inadequate.
  • Well thank you Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Reed for holding this hearing.
Summary: The meeting centered on the nomination of retired Lieutenant General Dan Kane for Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, delving into various security concerns and the strategic environment facing the U.S. today. Testimonies highlighted the growing threats from adversaries such as China and Russia, with discussions around the necessity of maintaining and modernizing military capabilities to address these challenges. The need for agility in military operations and enhancing collaboration among various defense agencies was underscored. Further, concerns were raised regarding the defense budget and the importance of a strong national defense strategy were prevalent throughout the discussions. The committee members collectively emphasized the need for superior readiness and modernization to keep pace with global threats.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Opening Ceremonies of the 89th Legislature Jan 14th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The chair hears none, and the motion is adopted. Thank you.
  • Hearing none, nominations are closed.
  • But that is clearly not the case. And you all know it.
  • Those Texans deserve the truth about this contest, so I'm here.
  • Chair hears none. Tom Craddick: The chair hears none and the motion is adopted.
Keywords: 1184, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session Mar 27th, 2025

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hearing no objections, the journal is approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
  • Pursuant to the agreement for House at February 5th, 2025, Rule 9.1 relating to election contests, the
  • Hearing no objection, the reports are adopted. Second reading of House Files.
  • This is what we wanted to hear about programs like this. We need to keep going.
  • Hearing no objection, the motions prevail.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Opening Ceremonies of the 89th Legislature Jan 14th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The chair hears none and the motion is adopted. Thank you.
  • Representative Hunter, I think that I'm hearing you saying that.
  • Hearing none, nominations are closed now.
  • Burrows, but that is clearly not the case. And you all know it.
  • Chair hears none, and the motion is adopted.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • I've been hearing about it in my home state of Washington.
  • And when you guys don't want to hear it.
  • It's important to stay – hear publicly how significant it is.
  • Is that still the case? Yes.
  • We now conclude the hearing. Thank you.
Summary: The meeting centered around an in-depth discussion of the PRO Act, with representatives expressing passionate opinions both for and against the legislation. Representative Chavez de Rimmer emphasized the importance of worker freedom, arguing that the PRO Act would infringe upon individual rights by coercing unionization. This perspective was strongly received by members from right-to-work states, who articulated their concerns about the potential erosion of workers' choices and protections. Speaker after speaker conveyed conflicting views on labor laws, indicating a deeply polarized environment surrounding labor issues at the moment.
WV
Transcript Highlights:
  • Those are for contested cases. That’s correct.
  • That is the article in the Administrative Procedure Act for contested cases.
  • So what if there’s a case?”
  • I think that, well, I mean, you can bring a contested case and then reach a settlement.
  • A hearing is held.
Keywords: 994, senate, all
Summary: The committee first approved the previous meeting’s minutes, then took up House Bill 4198, which would require all employers to use E-Verify to confirm new hires’ work authorization. Counsel explained that the bill would add enforcement by the Division of Labor, create tiered penalties including warnings, fines, debarment from state contracts, and possible business license revocation, while also removing criminal penalties tied to hiring unauthorized workers in light of federal law. Members raised extensive concerns about drafting problems, including circular and conflicting language, unclear references to existing verification and recordkeeping provisions, the meaning of terms like “seeks to employ,” and whether the bill could unintentionally apply to babysitters, lawn care, and other casual or household arrangements. Questions also focused on whether the bill would apply to public versus private employers, how compliance would be shown, and how penalties would work for small businesses or employers who never actually hire the person in question. The bill sponsor defended the measure as a straightforward extension of the federally required I-9 process, saying E-Verify is a quick, free online check that helps employers verify work authorization and protects them from liability for unknowingly hiring unauthorized workers. He said the bill was intended to be mandatory, not permissive, and argued that it would help law-abiding employers compete fairly. After the questioning, the committee rejected a motion to table the bill and instead sent House Bill 4198 to a seven-member subcommittee to clean up the drafting, resolve inconsistencies, and review the penalties and scope of the measure. The subcommittee was directed to meet the next morning and report back quickly. The committee then moved to House Bill 4710, with an amendment that would require a person to be registered with a political party or as an independent 210 days before filing a certificate of candidacy. Counsel explained that the bill is aimed at preventing candidates from switching parties after losing a primary and then running as independents in the general election. Members discussed how the 210-day requirement would interact with both primary and general election filing deadlines, and the Secretary of State’s office clarified that the measure would affect candidates who change affiliation shortly before filing. The discussion continued with testimony from the Secretary of State’s general counsel about how the bill would operate in practice, but no final action on the bill was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.