Transcript Highlights:

• House File 3241 updates the language to read display of electronic content.
• There is much more video content and other types of interaction that aren't necessarily classified as
• There is much more video<00:05:16.240><c> content</c><00:05:16.800><c> and</c><00:05:17.600><c> other
• </c><00:05:17.919><c> types</c><00:05:18.160><c> of</c> video content and other types of video content
• taking place, but we're seeing significant increases in the amount of engagement with this virtual content

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill or that bill begins the process of aligning for principles, standards and content of Florida's
• This establishes the required content that all of our state approved teacher preparation programs must
• They should be learning those skills alongside with applying in learning the academic content as well
• What the certification essentially implies is that number one, you know, the content area that you are
• It's the content of understanding how to teach dues with disabilities.

Transcript Highlights:

• The coordinating organization and the needs assessment would need to include specified contents.
• Intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and trafficking are well-documented drivers of incarceration

Bills: HB1316 , HB2401 , HB2557 , HB2720 , HB1073 , HB2685 , HB2640 , HB2403

Committee: House Appropriations

Keywords: postsecondary education, homelessness, foster youth, education access, support programs, commission, gender equity, boys, men, advocacy, state policy, special education, parental rights, educational access, evaluation reports, disability services, behavioral health, emergency services, health insurance, provider access

Transcript Highlights:

• The coordinating organization and the needs assessment would need to include specified contents.
• Intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and trafficking are well-documented drivers of incarceration

Summary: The committee first heard Substitute House Bill 1128, which would create a Child Care Workforce Standards Board within the Department of Labor and Industries to study child care workforce conditions and make recommendations on employment standards. Staff explained that the proposed second substitute narrows the board’s role from setting enforceable standards to making recommendations, with estimated ongoing costs for L&I staffing and smaller costs for board member stipends and possible DCYF support. Supporters, including child care providers, SEIU 925, and labor representatives, said the bill would help address understaffing, low wages, and retention problems; opponents, including child care industry groups and private schools, argued it duplicates existing work, adds bureaucracy, and creates unfunded costs. No vote was taken in the hearing. The committee then heard Second Substitute House Bill 1634, which would direct OSPI and ESDs to develop a technical assistance and training framework to help schools coordinate student behavioral health supports. Staff said the bill aligns with the Washington Thriving Strategic Plan and could largely be implemented with existing work and limited additional costs, though DOH would need some support. Testifiers from behavioral health and school counseling fields described severe youth mental health needs and urged passage, and OSPI said the work is doable with current resources. The committee also heard Substitute House Bill 2636, which would create a public education review advisory council to recommend K-12 policies and funding provisions for JLARC review; staff described JLARC, OSPI, and State Board costs, and no public testimony was offered. The committee next heard House Bill 1316, which would expand the Supporting Students Experiencing Homelessness program so additional university campuses can access funding. The sponsor said the program has strong retention outcomes, and student advocates testified that campuses such as UW Bothell need access to already appropriated funds for emergency aid, food pantries, and case management. Staff then briefed Substitute House Bill 2474, which would allow the Student Achievement Council Tuition Recovery Trust Fund to be used for refunds tied to broader consumer protection violations, with no expected fiscal impact; there was no testimony. The committee also heard Substitute House Bill 2365 on digital equity, which would expand the Broadband Office’s role, revise the digital equity forum, and rename the grant program; supporters emphasized rural access, affordability, and the loss of federal digital equity funding, while staff estimated significant Commerce staffing costs and some additional agency impacts. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 2401, creating a Washington State Boys and Men Commission contingent on non-state funding, with staff outlining OFM startup and fundraising costs and an estimated operating budget if fully funded. Supporters said boys and men face mental health, education, and mentorship gaps and that the commission would improve coordination; the bill drew testimony from rural school leaders, nonprofit advocates, and community members. The committee then heard Substitute House Bill 2475 on language access, which would require the Office of Equity to develop uniform language-access guidelines and a report on interpreter and translator shortages; staff said the office could absorb the work but other agency and local government impacts were uncertain. Substitute House Bill 2517, on permitting for high-capacity transit, would let regional transit authorities apply for permits earlier and streamline land-use processes; Sound Transit and the sponsor said it would speed delivery of major projects, while staff estimated Commerce technical-assistance costs and possible local government impacts. The last bill heard was Substitute House Bill 2145 on the 340B drug pricing program, which would bar manufacturers from restricting contract-pharmacy access and require reporting to DOH; supporters said it protects safety-net providers and patient services, while opponents warned of higher costs for employers, state health plans, and litigation burdens. No final committee action or votes were recorded in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• there's no mechanism to require elections office explaining the irregularity of those. who are intimately
• an individual. voting in a county polling location runs the risk of having their ballot and its contents

Bills: SB16 , SB76 , SB310 , SB311 , SB396 , SB505 , SB827 , SB964 , SB1209 , SB1210 , SB1386 , SB1470 , SB2035 , SJR37 , SB 16

Committee: Senate State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• We've reviewed House Bill 2153, and most of the contents of this measure seem to be the policy.
• And most of the contents of this measure seem to be the policy content, and so therefore we didn't find

Summary: The Committee on Rules met briefly and noted the absence of Representative Hendrix due to a family medical situation. The only item on the agenda was House Bill 2153. A motion was made to recommend the bill as constitutional and in proper form, and the Rules Attorney, Tim Fleming, testified that the bill was largely policy content and raised no legal or constitutional concerns. After no questions from members, the committee proceeded to a roll call vote. The motion passed with five ayes, zero nays, and three members absent, giving House Bill 2153 a recommendation that it is constitutional and in proper form. The committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• We've reviewed House Bill 2153, and most of the contents of this measure seem to be the policy.
• And most of the contents of this measure seem to be the policy content, and so therefore we didn't find

Committee: House Rules

Transcript Highlights:

• Students Program by helping different districts write grants for this program and supporting their content
• Students Program by helping different districts write grants for this program and supporting their content
• Students are going through the curriculum, the gen ed curriculum, as well as preparation in both content
• , the curriculum, the gen ed curriculum, as well as preparation in both content, but also in pedagogy
• So you might have a content degree, let's say in history, come back to us for a year or so, get the pedagogy

Committee: House Education

Transcript Highlights:

• this has really helped us to expand and do greater outreach because from that we're able to create content
• Um we have many companies who content.
• And so providing more content for them, for anybody who's not physically on campus, has been a priority
• And so providing<01:00:01.319><c> more</c> providing more providing more content<01:00:04.240><c> for
• for them for anybody who's not content for them for anybody who's not physically<01:00:07.599><c> on

Summary: The Committee on Culture and the Arts held an informational briefing with representatives from ʻIolani Palace and Bishop Museum to discuss how the Legislature can better support state-funded cultural institutions during the interim and into the next session. Chair Capella said the goal was to understand current needs, preserve Hawaiian culture and history, and expand educational access. No votes or formal actions were taken during the briefing. ʻIolani Palace’s representative described the Friends of ʻIolani Palace’s role as the nonprofit supporting repair, restoration, maintenance, and public education for the state monument. She said state operational funding and ARPA funds were critical to keeping the palace open, maintaining HVAC and other systems, and funding repairs that would otherwise fall to DLNR. She highlighted ongoing and planned projects including a fire suppression system, HVAC improvements, basement exhibit work, plumbing repairs, elevator replacement, etched glass restoration, and school-tour access. She also noted that a prior $150,000 CIP for windows and doors had not yet been released, and said the organization is exploring ways to bring more neighbor island students to the palace through transportation support, airline partnerships, and digital outreach. Bishop Museum’s representatives outlined the museum’s history, its role as the state museum of natural and cultural history, and its extensive collections in archives, archaeology, botany, entomology, zoology, and cryopreservation. They emphasized the museum’s work in preservation, research, environmental stewardship, and public education, including free access through Museums for All, daily programming, and cultural festivals and community events. They said state funding has been essential for staffing, IT security, fire suppression, and infrastructure needs, and that digitization of the museum’s 25 million objects is a major ongoing initiative to preserve and share Hawaiʻi’s history and knowledge.

Transcript Highlights:

• The report documented early-morning police raids targeting individuals suspected of posting content that
• The report documented early-morning police raids targeting individuals suspected of posting content that
• The report documented early-morning police raids targeting individuals suspected of posting content that
• The report documented early-morning police raids targeting individuals suspected of posting content that
• that would incite hatred posting content that would incite hatred including<00:35:30.480><c> insults

Summary: House File 768, sponsored by Vice Chair Hudson, was heard with an author’s amendment (A4) adopted to remove a technical section and put the bill in the intended form. Hudson described the bill as a response to concerns about government monitoring of protected speech, saying it would bar the Minnesota Department of Human Rights from creating or maintaining a database of constitutionally protected speech while preserving the department’s ability to investigate actual discrimination, harassment, threats, or illegal conduct. He emphasized First Amendment protections and argued the state should not track speech simply because it is controversial or unpopular. The main testimony in support came from Ran Lee of Americans for Prosperity, who echoed the free-speech concerns and said databases of bias incidents can capture lawful speech and create a chilling effect. Representative Rest said she generally supported the free-speech goal but wanted to preserve the Department of Human Rights’ ability to produce biennial reports and analyze de-identified trend data on civil rights incidents, including emerging threats or hateful rhetoric, so lawmakers can respond to patterns without recording individuals’ protected speech. Representative Curran raised concerns that speech trends can relate to public safety and argued that attacks on human rights often begin as speech. Hudson responded that the Department of Human Rights is not a law enforcement agency and that the bill would not impede criminal investigations. He argued that trying to monitor “trends in thought” would be constitutionally problematic and produce unreliable data, and he distinguished protected speech from criminal conduct. Representative Feist said the department’s existing report already uses aggregate, non-investigative data and suggested there may be room to refine the bill’s language. The bill was laid over for further consideration, with Hudson indicating he was open to continued discussion and possible language changes.

Transcript Highlights:

• We will be leaving the flexibility of what the actual content looks like for the institutions and their
• Can you clarify who is providing the content for each of these modules for...
• Can you clarify who is providing the content for each of these modules for...
• I'm unclear on which entity is creating and providing the content.
• I think I'm trying to figure out where is our responsibility in developing the content for each of these

Summary: The task force met with a quorum to continue work on Caleb Wilson hazing-prevention recommendations, with the Wilson family present and repeatedly acknowledged. Members discussed Southern University’s expulsion of Omega Psi Phi and the family pressed for clarity on whether the fraternity could return; counsel said the expulsion appears permanent on its face but there is legal ambiguity, prompting legislators to say a statutory fix is needed to define suspension versus expulsion more clearly. The group also reviewed data on hazing-related suspensions since 2018 and hearing-panel practices across the public postsecondary systems, including panel composition, annual training, and appeals processes. The task force adopted several recommendations focused on prevention and accountability. These included annual hazing-prevention training for students, advisors, and faculty/staff; a state-provided training framework with campus-specific flexibility; stronger attention to mandatory reporting; an amnesty policy to encourage reporting and help-seeking; reverting hazing proceedings back to a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard; adding hazing to the annual power-based violence report; tying noncompliance penalties to loss of State Bond Commission borrowing authority; and identifying sustainable funding for training and reporting. Members debated scope and implementation, especially whether training should cover all employees or only those who interact with students, whether external advisors and graduate advisors should be included, and how to avoid unintended consequences for advisor recruitment. Several amendments were made, including narrowing one recommendation from “all” to “appropriate,” and the amnesty discussion was clarified to avoid creating a loophole for misconduct. The task force also discussed K-12 considerations, including applying bullying and hazing materials to nonpublic schools, updating prevention materials, and improving data collection. In closing remarks, student members and family representatives emphasized that hazing is about power, not tradition, and called for culture change, accountability, and earlier education. University leaders from the University of Louisiana System, Southern University System, and LSU said they support the effort and will implement the recommendations if enacted, while also urging stronger individual and organizational accountability beyond training alone. A public commenter from Nicholls State’s SGA praised the task force’s work before the meeting moved into public comment.

Transcript Highlights:

• that they can choose to populate or not and choose to use that data to help recommend services and content
• So that personalized and content-driven functionality is really So that personalized and content-driven
• There's also potential for bias or discriminatory content created unbeknownst to the user.
• We make sure policy includes AI-generated content will be reviewed and validated, verified by a human
• We make sure policy includes AI-generated content will be reviewed and validated, verified by a human

Committee: House Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans

Summary: The committee held a work session focused on technology use in government, AI policy and oversight, and federal broadband funding. The first panel featured Seattle CTO Rob Lloyd, who described the city’s AI approach as centered on public trust, responsible use, privacy, security, and community partnership. He said Seattle is using small pilots and a data strategy to test AI for tasks such as public records processing, infrastructure inspection, and housing/permitting improvements, while keeping human decision-makers responsible. Members asked about permit review, training on best practices, labor engagement, and public records risks; Lloyd emphasized that AI should assist rather than replace human judgment and that the city is still testing solutions for records redaction and search. Washington Technology Solutions CTO Nick Stow and Deputy Director Mark Quimby then outlined the state’s AI policy work, noting that the state’s guidance now covers more than generative AI and is built into existing privacy and security review processes. They described a statewide AI community of practice, a sandbox used by more than 15 agencies, and use cases including a resident portal with opt-in consent features, cybersecurity screening, and wildfire detection. Committee members raised questions about labor, data privacy, and the status and effectiveness of wildfire detection tools. The AI Task Force update from the Attorney General’s office reported progress through eight subcommittees on topics including governance, consumer protection, labor, health care, public safety, education, government efficiency, and climate/energy, with an interim report due December 1 and a final report due July 1, 2026. The presenter also warned that a pending federal budget reconciliation provision could bar state AI regulation for 10 years, and a member noted ongoing work on prior AI bills for the 2026 session. The broadband portion of the meeting began with Commerce’s Dave Pringle, who said the BEAD broadband program is being reshaped by new NTIA guidance issued June 6. He explained that Washington’s original multi-round application process has been compressed into an expedited roughly 30-day application window, with a September 4 state submission deadline, and that earlier rounds are effectively being replaced under the new federal rules. He noted that no projects have been built yet, that four counties did not receive round-two applications, and that the state is working with applicants, the Governor’s Office, and the Attorney General’s Office while also managing a leadership transition in the broadband office. The Office of Equity then reported on the Digital Equity Forum’s growth, membership expansion, outreach, and draft recommendations, including better interagency coordination, improved data for underserved communities, and elevating digital equity as a statewide priority; members discussed the loss of federal digital equity operating funds and the forum’s transition back to Commerce. The final presenter, Lumen’s Rob Thoms, discussed private-sector broadband deployment, saying the company continues investing in fiber overbuilds and working with local governments, but faces permitting, regulatory, and geography challenges. He said Washington has strong backbone fiber and is well positioned for enterprise and AI-related demand, but that rural and legacy telecom transitions remain difficult and that satellite and wireless options may play a larger role over time.

Transcript Highlights:

• HB 3133 adds explicit deep fake material to the list of content for which social media platforms must
• The bill requires social media platforms to do the following: remove content reported as explicit deep
• President Trump, criminalizes non-consensual deep fake pornography and requires platforms to remove such content
• fake material on a social media platform shall conduct an investigation to determine whether the content

Bills: HB668 , HB677 , HB766 , HB3133 , SB3070

Committee: Senate State Affairs

Keywords: HB 668, Texas, handgun license, license to carry, LTC, concealed carry, open carry, firearm permit, gun license renewal, public safety, Department of Public Safety, DPS, Government Code Section 411.185, renewal fee, handgun permit, Second Amendment, carry permit, firearms regulation, HB 677, Texas Election Code

Summary: The committee met to hear several bills, beginning with House Bill 766, which would require precinct chair applicants to provide an email address, phone number, or both on their applications while keeping that contact information confidential. No one testified for or against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 677, a companion to a previously approved Senate bill, would bar county election administrators from simultaneously holding another office or position appointed by an elected official; it also drew no public testimony and was left pending. Members then heard House Bill 3133, which would add explicit deepfake material to the list of content social media platforms must handle through complaint systems, including prompt acknowledgment, investigation, and status updates. Senators discussed concerns about how platforms would verify whether reported content was actually a deepfake, and the sponsor indicated the bill may be held pending while federal law on the subject is reviewed. House Bill 668 would create a one-year grace period for renewing an expired Texas handgun license to carry, codifying an existing DPS practice; it also received no testimony and was left pending. The committee spent the most time on Senate Bill 3070, a major overhaul of the Texas Lottery system. The bill would move oversight from the Lottery Commission to TDLR, dissolve the commission, impose new restrictions on ticket sales and internet play, create a lottery advisory committee, increase transparency and audit requirements, and include a sunset review that could lead to abolishing the lottery if not continued by 2027. The author described the bill as a response to alleged misconduct and illegal practices by the commission, while a witness from the Christian Life Commission testified in favor, supporting changes to prize anonymity and other lottery restrictions. After testimony, the bill was left pending, and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• with the Department of Mental Health about the full-blown website and how it will house a lot of content
• This includes the things I just mentioned, but also video content as well.
• Are they downloading content? Are they engaging with our content?

Transcript Highlights:

• funds also pay for our international and group sales, trade shows, product development, asset and content
• <00:07:21.400><c> and</c> shows product development asset and shows product development asset and content
• <00:07:22.080><c> creation</c><00:07:22.960><c> research</c><00:07:23.680><c> and</c> content creation
• research and content creation research and fulfillment<00:07:25.039><c> it</c><00:07:25.240><c> also

Summary: The committee met for the second Budget Review on Economic Development, Public Protection, Tourism, and Energy and approved the minutes from the previous meeting. After a quorum was confirmed, members heard a presentation from Melissa Brewer of the Tourism, Arts, and Heritage Cabinet, along with Olivia Atkins of Kentucky State Parks and Commissioner Mike Manet of the Kentucky Department of Tourism. The presentation focused on the state’s 1% tourism meeting and convention marketing fund and the broader role of tourism in Kentucky’s economy. Brewer explained that the fund is used only for marketing and promoting tourism-related activities, cannot be used for capital or construction projects, and must be reported annually to the governor and LRC. She said the Governor’s budget and enacted budget increased appropriations in response to growing transient room tax receipts, adding $3 million in FY 2025 and $7 million in FY 2026, and noted legislative support for the Kentucky Mountain Regional Recreation Authority, the National Quilt Museum, and the Southern Kentucky Tourism Initiative. Manet emphasized that tourism marketing drives overnight visitation, local spending, jobs, and economic development, and described the 1% fund as the source for marketing, advertising, website development, public relations, international and group sales, trade shows, research, and regional matching funds. He highlighted efforts to secure media coverage and said the matching funds program distributed $2 million last year to 87 local tourism commissions across the state. No votes or other committee actions were taken beyond approving the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• These materials include pornographic or age-inappropriate content.
• So the difference between Ginsburg and Miller is one is adult content, one is minor content, and this
• Representative Nixon, can we keep the question to the content of the amendment, please?
• When we move that safeguard, we're not just regulating content.
• Our job as adults is not to accelerate their exposure to inappropriate content.

Summary: The House convened with prayer, a moment of silence for former member Terry Fields and the Parkland victims, the Pledge of Allegiance, and routine organizational actions including approval of the journal and adoption of a special order report. The chamber then took up House Bill 1119, relating to materials harmful to minors, which the sponsor described as a measure to clarify and strengthen standards for removing obscene or pornographic content from public school classrooms and libraries while preserving educational uses and not targeting classical literature, LGBTQ content, or other protected viewpoints. Members questioned the bill’s use of terms such as “predominantly,” its relationship to existing local review processes, the impact on AP/IB and college-level materials, the applicability to voucher-funded schools, and the risk of additional First Amendment litigation and costs. The sponsor responded that the bill was needed because current standards were being bypassed and that the legislation was aimed at material harmful to minors, not general literary value. The House considered numerous amendments, most of which were defeated. Amendments offered by Representatives Gant, Aristide, Bartleman, Eskamani, Nixon, Rainer, Woodson, and Harris sought, among other things, to preserve parental choice during review periods, restore a whole-work constitutional standard, limit repeated objections, protect educational and abuse-prevention materials, prevent LGBTQ-inclusive books from being labeled harmful solely on that basis, shield school districts from funding penalties, and delay enforcement in districts already under litigation. Supporters of the amendments argued that the bill would encourage censorship, remove books with clear literary or educational value, burden districts with costs and lawsuits, and harm students who rely on school libraries for access to reading material and representation. Opponents of the amendments argued the bill was necessary to protect minors from explicit content and that the proposed changes would weaken that protection. All of the amendments described in the transcript failed. After the amendment process, the House waived rules, read HB 1119 a third time by title, and entered structured debate on final passage. In closing debate, opponents repeated concerns about constitutional vulnerability, overbroad book removals, and the educational harm of limiting access to literature, while supporters framed the bill as a child-protection measure and a clarification of existing law. The transcript ends during the structured debate on final passage, before the final vote on the bill is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• The quality of the video — what you're looking at, not the content.
• What is the content? Who makes this content? Whose ultrasound video?
• </c> the content. the content.
• What is the content? animation. Yeah. What is the content?
• </c><00:47:24.319><c> And</c> content. It's just kind of random. And content.

Committee: Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:

• Disclosures should be clear and conspicuous in the same medium as the content generated to help consumers
• As AI becomes more sophisticated, it will be impossible to verify the author of material and content
• Additionally, the questionable veracity of some AI content has the potential to spread false information
• three seconds of your recorded voice can have you make a full speech you never made, or generated content
• Advertisers can use as much legal AI content as they want with reasonable and sensible guidelines.

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, guest recognitions, and a quorum call before moving into committee reports and floor action. Committees reported a number of bills and resolutions, including measures from Local Government, Energy, Health, Judiciary, Appropriations, Rules, and Finance. The chamber also announced caucus and committee meetings, then recessed and later reconvened for final consideration of legislation. Several bills passed the House finally, including House Bill 2299 on body cameras for county probation officers, House Bill 167 designating a scenic byway along Allegheny River Boulevard, House Bill 95 requiring disclosure when content or advertising is generated or substantially modified by artificial intelligence, House Bill 1944 expanding medical amnesty and Good Samaritan protections on campuses, House Bill 2443 creating a child victim recovery fund, House Bill 246 updating references from the Public Welfare Code to the Human Services Code, and House Bill 2586 establishing title protection for music therapists. The House also adopted House Resolution 463 recognizing Korean-American Citizenship Day, House Resolution 499 recognizing Juneteenth Independence Day, and House Resolution 547 directing a study of electronic monitoring as an alternative to incarceration. The House spent significant time on amendments to House Bill 133, which concerns reinstatement of parental rights, and House Bill 138, which addresses parental incarceration and termination of parental rights. Both bills received bipartisan amendments adding guardrails and exceptions, and the amendments were adopted unanimously. The chamber also debated House Bill 2224, the Fair Act, with multiple amendments on utility rates, return on equity, and scope; some amendments were adopted, several tied votes failed, and the bill was left amended for reprinting. House Bill 2544, dealing with school administrators’ rights and negotiations, saw an amendment to allow individual bargaining, but that amendment failed and the bill was agreed to. The session ended with a correction to the record on House Bill 1944, a motion to recommit several bills to Appropriations, and adjournment until June 22, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• So our goal for today is to finalize the content of the report—not necessarily the report itself, but
• over to the right as you can see the red dotted line and so our goal for today is to finalize the content
• I also reviewed it just by other content and other things.
• You know, there will be a lot of content and narrative around these lists.
• But all of the content related to the recommendations is the same as the document that you were sent

Summary: The committee met for its final session before the report is delivered to the governor and legislature, with introductions and reminders that the meeting was public and recorded. Facilitators explained that the group was reviewing the final draft of the committee’s strategic priorities and recommendations for a five-year behavioral health plan focused on prevention, early intervention, and community-based services. They also noted that the recommendations were drawn from subcommittee work, a survey, and prior committee discussion, and that similar work is occurring in other groups such as Washington Thriving and the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Work Group. Most of the discussion centered on the first two overarching priorities and how to frame them. Members raised concerns that the draft did not sufficiently center people with lived experience, families, and communities, and suggested revising the vision language to reflect that. Several participants also emphasized the need for an executive-level role to coordinate behavioral health across state agencies and improve accountability. The group discussed the timing of related planning efforts, including Washington Thriving and the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Work Group, and agreed the report should acknowledge those efforts without duplicating them. The committee then turned to the high-priority recommendations and the structure of the report. Members asked for more specific action steps under the broader recommendations, rather than leaving them as aspirational statements, and suggested moving some of the lower-priority recommendations into the main sections as examples or sub-actions. There was also substantial discussion about terminology: participants recommended using language such as evidence-informed, promising practices, best practices, and practice-based evidence, especially to better reflect tribal and community-based approaches. Other edits included clarifying early intervention language, adding flexibility, addressing credentialing and carrier/MCO requirements in phases, and considering mentorship as a workforce retention strategy. The committee also discussed accountability and public engagement, with members suggesting the report include stronger references to community voice and oversight. Facilitators said they would revise the draft, circulate it by May 22, and seek comments by May 27 so the report can be finalized and submitted by the June 1 deadline. Several members offered to help with the final drafting and reorganization of the report.

Transcript Highlights:

• Next up, we will take CS for HB 391 face content in Batterers Intervention Program by Representative
• Thank you for the opportunity to present HB 391 faith-based content in Battered intervention program
• It allows but does not require better intervention programs to offer they face content.
• Tell me how this bill impact optometrists because that is always been a contention and all of the bills
• >> Representative Rizzo while that is not in representative steals content.