Transcript Highlights:

• assessments, or the risk-informed, performance-based methodology.
• ...in the safety basis, because now we're using a risk-informed approach.
• And it's a decision based on risk and cost.
• side being those that are most critical as far as supply risk.
• Intrinsically, I grew up in an environmentally sensitive place.

Committee: Joint Advanced Nuclear Energy Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• Insurance rates from increased risk of accidents will affect the whole state.
• Office of Environmental Analysis.
• Caltrans District 4 is an environmental scientist in the Office of Environmental Analysis.
• Office of Environmental Analysis.
• TransDistrict 4 is an environmental scientist in the office of environmental analysis.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 heard updates from the Secretary of State, EDD, the State Controller’s Office, CalHR, and DGS on a range of budget proposals and federal policy impacts. Secretary of State Shirley Weber opened with remarks about California’s election system, emphasizing its safety, transparency, high voter registration and vote-by-mail participation, and the office’s response to bomb threats and other election threats. Her staff then presented funding requests for the Cal-Access Replacement System (CARS) and Help America Vote Act/VoteCal activities, describing them as needed to modernize campaign finance and lobbying disclosure systems and maintain election security and voter services. A major portion of the hearing focused on federal election policy, especially the potential effects of a presidential executive order and the SAVE Act. Secretary of State staff said California would face significant, potentially unquantifiable costs if forced to comply, including new burdens on county recorders, county election offices, and the Secretary of State’s office, and warned of voter disenfranchisement, especially for students, seniors, disabled voters, military and overseas voters, rural residents, and people with limited transportation. Members and public commenters strongly opposed the federal proposals and argued California’s current system is functioning well. The committee also heard that federal HAVA funds were not expected to be at risk because the state draws them down into an interest-bearing account. EDD reported on paid family leave, explaining that recent delays were tied to a system transition and increased claim volume, and said it was simplifying applications and adding staff and automation. Public testimony supported expanding paid family leave to chosen family. EDD also said it is prepared for possible unemployment spikes, citing a recession plan, a command center, and recent hiring. The State Controller’s Office requested funding to continue the Fiscal migration project, which would move the state’s accounting book of record to the new system by July 1, 2026; Finance and LAO had no objections, and the committee expressed support for the project’s progress. CalHR presented a proposal for a statewide recruitment, outreach, and education paid media campaign under AB 1511, saying its current advertising budget is too small to reach diverse communities effectively. The final item addressed Governor Newsom’s executive order requiring a return to office on a four-day schedule. CalHR and DGS said they were working department-by-department to assess space, parking, transit, and other logistics, but had not completed a statewide cost analysis. Members and many public commenters criticized the order, arguing it was rushed, costly, harmful to telework benefits, and potentially disruptive to workers, especially those with disabilities, caregiving responsibilities, or long commutes. No votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Budget Subcommittee Number 2 on Resources, Environmental Protection and Energy will come to order
• We also have GGRF, Prop. 68, Prop. 4, and then the license, environmental license plate.
• The fuel break work this center has historically provided is essential to reducing wildfire risk in one
• And in particular, on the reducing wildfire risk from electricity transmission, And in particular on
• our state and reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires.

Transcript Highlights:

• assessments or the risk-informed, performance-based methodology.
• Where are the gaps, where are the risks?
• And it's a decision based on risk and cost.
• Use the risk of commercial failures.
• Use the risk of commercial failures.

Summary: The meeting opened with remarks about the value of public engagement and the quality of questions from the group, followed by a series of technical presentations from Idaho National Laboratory staff. Joe Renovitz described recent nuclear regulatory changes tied to presidential executive orders, including NRC Part 53 for advanced reactors, the forthcoming Part 57 for very small reactors, and DOE updates to reactor authorization standards. He emphasized efforts to align DOE and NRC processes, use risk-informed and performance-based licensing, support reactor deployment for AI/data centers and national security, and use AI to speed communications and crosswalks between DOE and NRC requirements. In response to questions, he said there was no plan to merge agencies, but rather to improve coordination and public outreach through groups like GAIN and NEI. David Tolman then discussed the nuclear fuel cycle, including uranium mining, conversion, enrichment, fuel fabrication, spent fuel storage, transportation, disposal, and reprocessing. He explained high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU), why it is needed for advanced reactors, and DOE’s HALEU Availability Program and related investments in enrichment, transportation, deconversion, and supply chain development. He also covered spent fuel management, the possibility of centralized storage or a fuel-cycle campus, the Center for Used Fuel Research, and ongoing work on high-burnup cask testing and reprocessing technologies. Tolman described aqueous, pyrochemical, and fluoride-volatility reprocessing approaches, noting the advantages and waste characteristics of each, and said several companies are working with INL on these technologies. Ashley Shields presented INL’s AI and nuclear work, focusing on the Genesis initiative and the Prometheus effort to use AI to design, license, build, and operate reactors with far less human intervention. She described INL’s broad use of generative AI tools, the need to manage large volumes of legacy technical data, and applications in reactor design, materials discovery, autonomous laboratories, and digital twins. Shields said AI is being used to reduce the enormous documentation burden in nuclear licensing and to support autonomous or remotely operated reactor demonstrations, while stressing that humans remain in supervisory roles. In discussion, she addressed data security, model access, and the continued need for software engineers. The session then recessed briefly and resumed with Mitch Kerman beginning a presentation on critical minerals and materials.

Transcript Highlights:

• Policy act has required Environmental Policy act has required environmental<01:30:25.880><c> impact<
• </c> social economic and environmental social economic and environmental conditions<01:30:41.679><c>
• </c> Hampshire pass a similar environmental Hampshire pass a similar environmental statute<01:31:39.199
• </c><03:17:46.560><c> yeah</c> far as ignoring the health risk yeah far as ignoring the health risk yeah
• </c> the lack of vaccination increases risk the lack of vaccination increases risk to<03:30:06.960><c

Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 153, which would require two or more law enforcement officers in each county to receive animal cruelty training through the police standards system. Representative Barbara Coma, the sponsor, said the bill was prompted by problems in animal cruelty cases, especially in rural areas without animal control officers, and she described it as a limited training measure. She said an amendment was forthcoming that would add an eight-hour approved course and a two-hour refresher every three years, and she emphasized that the trained officers would serve as resources rather than being required to take action themselves. Members asked about cost, due process, overlap with animal control officers, how trained officers would be identified and notified, and whether veterinarians could fill the role. Coma responded that the bill would not be a heavy financial lift, would not interfere with animal control officers, would apply to livestock as well as companion animals, and would still require law enforcement involvement because veterinarians cannot lawfully remove animals from property. She also said the training could improve due process by helping officers better understand when animal removal is appropriate and how cases should proceed. Sheriff William Wright, speaking for the New Hampshire Sheriffs Association, testified in opposition. He said training itself was acceptable, but the bill went beyond training by creating an obligation for sheriffs and state police to respond to and potentially investigate animal cruelty cases, which he argued would be ambiguous, unfunded, and burdensome for staffing and resources. He said some sheriff’s offices do not have investigative deputies and that the bill could create liability and uncertainty about who would lead investigations. In response to questions, he said the association would likely have no objection if the bill were limited to training, but it opposed the assistance/investigation mandate as written.

Transcript Highlights:

• My name is Michael Colvin with Environmental Defense Fund.
• Michael Colvin with Environmental Defense Fund in support.
• Leaping these proceedings risks years of expert input and analysis.
• And then I just heard the opponent say that there's a risk of under-procurement as a risk to cost.
• The risk is not just over-procurement or under-procurement.

Summary: The committee heard several energy-related bills, with AB 1715 drawing the most discussion. That bill would require the CPUC to create a searchable database of utility advice letters, protests, responses, and resolutions going back to 2020, and to require utilities to report state, federal, and other public financing so ratepayer savings from loans, grants, and similar funding can be tracked and passed through. The author and TURN said the bill is aimed at transparency, affordability, and preventing double recovery; committee amendments removed some language, and labor said the amendments would remove its opposition. Senators pressed on how “financial benefits” would be defined and whether the bill would require refunds to ratepayers, and the author said the CPUC would determine the details. The bill was later moved out of committee on a do-pass-as-amended vote to Appropriations. AB 1301, a CPUC/Public Utilities Code cleanup bill, was presented as a housekeeping measure to remove obsolete references, align deadlines, eliminate duplicative requirements, and extend the Energy Conservation Assistance Act sunset. The Public Advocates Office and Golden State Power Cooperatives supported it, and the committee advanced it do-pass as amended to Appropriations. AB 2463, which would require the CPUC to disclose the models and analysis used to set utility authorized return on equity, was described as a transparency measure for a process that is currently a “black box.” EDF and the Utility Wildfire Survivor Coalition supported the bill, while members noted the importance of understanding how utility profits are set; it also passed to Appropriations. AB 1813, on community solar and storage, generated substantial debate. The author said the bill is intended to fix a CPUC program that he argued is unworkable and inconsistent with the Legislature’s earlier direction, while supporters including San Diego Community Power, TURN, and many clean energy, labor, and local-government groups said it would make community solar viable for renters and others who cannot install rooftop solar. Opponents, including the Public Advocates Office, Southern California Edison, SDG&E, and PG&E, argued it would raise rates, create cost shifts to non-participating customers, and conflict with a recently adopted CPUC decision. The bill was moved out on a do-pass-as-amended vote to Appropriations, with some senators indicating support but also concern about affordability and pending amendments. AB 2111, which would require the CPUC to plan transmission using multiple demand and resource scenarios instead of a single forecast, was supported as a way to reduce bottlenecks, improve reliability, and avoid costly under-planning as electrification grows. Supporters said better scenario planning would help avoid transmission constraints that block new generation, while the committee raised questions about cost impacts and the role of current CPUC planning processes. The bill passed to Appropriations. The committee also took up AB 2266, which would consolidate related CPUC compliance reporting, require consistent reliability valuation across programs, and direct an evaluation if CAISO uses backstop procurement; supporters said it would reduce confusion and improve consistency, while opponents warned against forcing one valuation method across different resource types. AB 2266 was also moved to Appropriations. Finally, AB 2175 was taken up on consent and advanced without discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• two of the compacts have been revised to align with more recent agreements, thereby mitigating the risk
• And if we fail to bargain in good faith, the state exposed itself to the risk of potential litigation
• terms that Chicken Ranch specifically said we can't bargain for in a compact, things like onerous environmental
• So we have updated those terms by deleting the compact's environmental review provisions, deleting the
• mentioned to Pinoleville, and that the core Chicken Ranch topics, those four topics I mentioned, environmental

Committee: House Governmental Organization

Summary: The Assembly Governmental Organization Committee held an informational hearing on four Tribal-State Gaming Compacts and amendments, with Chair Blanca Rubio noting that no formal vote would be taken because the Legislature cannot amend the compacts. The hearing was framed as a briefing on AB 1527 and SB 864, the ratification bills for the agreements, and committee members were told the compacts reflect negotiations under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and recent Ninth Circuit guidance in Chicken Rancheria v. State of California. Governor’s Office Senior Advisor Matthew Lee explained the first compact, with the Sherwood Valley Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria, as a 25-year agreement consistent with recent compacts: up to 1,200 gaming devices at three facilities, worker protections through a tribal labor relations ordinance, minimum wage and anti-harassment/retaliation provisions, state regulatory cost recovery, and revenue-sharing tied to operations above 350 devices. He said the second item, a fourth amendment with the Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians, would extend the existing compact to preserve the status quo while the parties continue litigating in federal court, and would add the state’s standard off-track wagering appendix. Lee then described the first amendment with the Pinoleville Pomo Nation as an update to an older compact to align it with current law and recent agreements, including removal of environmental review and family law provisions, narrowing of tort requirements, revised revenue-sharing, and updated financial disclosure rules. For the first amendment with the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, Lee said the parties used a collaborative dispute-resolution process to remove Chicken Ranch-related provisions, narrow tort and facility definitions, extend the compact through 2016, and add a commitment to bargain in good faith over any future legalization of new class III gaming forms. Sycuan Chairman Cody Martinez testified in support, thanking the Governor’s Office and noting the tribe employs more than 3,000 people, most of whom are non-Indian, and that the tribe has operated Indian gaming since 1983. No opposition was recorded, and the committee adjourned after the presentations.

Transcript Highlights:

• What I’m saying is you are putting at risk—” “What I’m saying is you are putting at risk.
• We did restructure the office recently, but again, further risk of reduction puts us at risk of being
• But the risk is, and again, it's a real risk, as I've looked at the numbers.
• But the risk is, and again, it's a real risk, as I've looked at the numbers.
• And again, that's a risk I don't think I want to take.

Summary: The committee first received updates from LSO on the latest green sheet, including the revenue impact of House Bill 559, recent cash transfers, and the Idaho Budget Rescissions Act for FY 2026. Members then moved through a series of FY 2027 maintenance budgets, beginning with the legislative branch. The committee discussed the statewide 2% reduction layered on top of the governor’s recommendation, benefit-cost adjustments, and how those decisions were being built into the maintenance budgets. The legislative branch budget passed, followed by unanimous-consent adoption of related language. The committee next considered public safety, natural resources, health and human services, economic development, judicial branch, constitutional officers, and general government budgets. In each case, analysts explained how rescissions, ongoing base reductions, and statewide adjustments were incorporated. Several members objected to the across-the-board cuts, arguing they would reduce staffing or services in corrections, juvenile corrections, environmental quality, health and welfare, public defender services, crime victims compensation, tax administration, and treatment courts, while supporters said the committee needed a target and would revisit details in enhancement work groups. Most budget motions passed on divided votes and were forwarded with do-pass recommendations. The committee also adopted multiple sections of standard and nonstandard language, including cash transfers, reporting requirements, and agency-specific provisions. In Health and Human Services, members debated language requiring reporting on large acquisitions and transfers, and in Economic Development and General Government they adopted language affecting the State Public Defender, the Department of Insurance, and group insurance premiums. The meeting ended while the committee was still working through a disputed general government language item about funding employee health insurance premiums from reserve accounts, with members debating whether the language should reference specific reserve funds or broader reserve funding and whether the proposal was properly within JFAC’s scope.

Transcript Highlights:

• That it might put at risk our state program?
• The agency and its member districts are environmentally focused.
• But it's the perpetrators, too, who are also at risk.
• They are at risk of alcohol and drug dependency.
• Like victims, they have an increased risk of depression and suicidal ideation.

Committee: House Education

Transcript Highlights:

• and risk need to be a greater part of this transmission discussion.
• First, more transmission lines will mean a greater risk of utility caused wildfires.
• And fire liability and risk needs to be a greater part of this transmission discussion.
• However, any exemptions from our environmental review are not acceptable.
• With UW in particular, the risk would create for a public employer of about 55,000 people.”

Bills: HB1069 , HB2091 , SB6355 , HB2104 , SB6003 , HB2441 , HB2124 , HB2610 , HB2338

Committee: Senate Ways & Means

Keywords: collective bargaining, retirement benefits, employee rights, public sector, supplemental benefits, public employers, employee information, bargaining representatives, labor relations, union representation, electric transmission, energy policies, infrastructure, regulatory framework, transmission systems, aviation, wildland fires, funding, disaster relief, emergency response

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:16:49.040><c> um</c><00:16:49.279><c> New</c> environmental community. um New environmental community
• </c><04:22:12.720><c> for</c> development and increasing risks for development and increasing risks for
• </c> protect human health and environmental protect human health and environmental sustainability<04:
• </c> risk of finding alternative bottling. risk of finding alternative bottling.
• </c><04:40:26.638><c> impact</c> if you look at the environmental impact if you look at the environmental

Committee: House Resources, Recreation and Development

Summary: The committee first took up HB 163FN, dealing with requiring current, verifiable evidence of a species’ presence before land-use restrictions are imposed for habitat protection. Members discussed an amendment that had been worked on with agencies and stakeholder groups. Fish and Game testified that, while the amendment improved the bill, the agency still opposed it because of concerns about citizen science, how the proposal would apply to public versus private property, and how the transition to DES would work. Representative Darby argued the amendment was ambiguous, lacked a full hearing, and did not clearly address record verification or private-property access issues. The amendment passed 8-7, and the committee then voted OTPA 8-7, with a minority report noted. The committee then moved to HB 1752FN, which would create a chain of custody for timber and carbon credits. Representative Davis presented an amendment saying it would help law enforcement investigate timber theft and add transparency to New Hampshire’s carbon registry by identifying buyers of carbon credits. Supporters said the change would impose little burden and align with practices in other states. Opponents, including Representative Darby, Representative Vale, and the state forester from DNCR, said the carbon market is complex, the amendment was not fully vetted, and a hearing with all stakeholders was needed; they also raised fiscal-note concerns. The amendment passed 8-7, and the committee then voted OTPA 8-7, again with a minority report. Finally, the committee opened a hearing on HB 1019, which would add an active water treatment professional to the state water well board. Representative Peter Petrino and Representative Wendy Thomas said the board should include expertise on contamination risks and treatment technologies, citing concerns about arsenic, radon, and PFAS in private wells. The chairman of the Water Well Board testified in opposition to the bill as drafted, saying the board supports the general idea of licensing water filtration work but does not currently have authority or rules to oversee that field and believes the proposal would put “the cart before the horse.” Members questioned whether the board’s current mandate even covers filtration systems, and the discussion ended with those concerns unresolved.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, I have both our mayor health risk.
• </c> of our mo most at risk neighborhoods. of our mo most at risk neighborhoods. 337<00:51:00.480><c>
• She said, 'Muchas gracias.' crumbling and with their environmental crumbling and with their environmental
• </c> environmental considerations are being environmental considerations are being incorporated<01:50
• If the modern environmental standards?

Bills: HF2080 , HF356 , HF1968 , HF228 , HF569 , HF603 , HF692 , HF1455 , HF2224 , HF1361

Committee: House Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:

• far outside the norm and greatly increase the risk to human health.
• We think about mental illness risk factors, but heat is a risk factor that we have to take seriously
• , and how to make healthy lifestyle choices to lower risk.
• It is one tiny bullet in there under risk factors.
• However, they are not doing so on a risk basis.

Committee: House Legislative Health & Human Services Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• James Semerad, Director from the Division of Air Quality, Department of Environmental Quality, to kind
• So basically Environmental Quality, man...
• We've also been supplied some negative environmental information that hasn't matched with what we've
• So, summary from a DEQ environmental quality standpoint...
• Charles Gorecki, the CEO of the Energy and Environmental Research Center.

Committee: Joint Energy Development and Transmission Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative, before you begin, I left out the fifth one, which is environmental and natural resources
• or health-based guidance as health risk or health-based guidance as well<00:42:21.839><c> as</c><00:
• 42:22.000><c> health</c><00:42:22.240><c> risk</c><00:42:22.520><c> limits</c><00:42:22.839><c> on</c
• ><00:42:22.960><c> a</c><00:42:23.040><c> few</c> well as health risk limits on a few well as health
• </c> borne the brunt of environmental borne the brunt of environmental pollution<01:15:28.719><c> more

Committee: House Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• , medium-risk, and low-risk areas.
• , the medium-risk, and the low-risk areas, and also OHA and IBC's will be consulting parties.
• </c><01:22:56.000><c> areas</c> the project proponent and low-risk areas the project proponent and low-risk
• </c> environmental action levels essentially. environmental action levels essentially.
• </c> below again below those environmental below again below those environmental action<02:05:59.440>

Committee: House Water & Land

Summary: The committee heard several bills on water, land, housing, permitting, and historic preservation. For SB 746/SD2/HD1 on invasive species, DLNR and the Department of Agriculture supported the intent but warned that a bounty approach for coconut rhinoceros beetle could have unintended consequences, divert resources from biocontrol research, and be vulnerable to abuse; Hawaii Farm Bureau supported the measure. The committee also heard SB 1541 on the WoE water system, with testimony from ADC, Kunia Village Title Holding Company, and Farm Bureau in support, emphasizing the importance of the system for agriculture and the high cost of water on lands already dedicated to farming. The most extensive discussion was on SB 66, relating to building permit review and county permitting authority. DPP opposed the bill, saying the problem is not just agency review time but the broader permitting process, including applicant corrections, outside-agency review, staffing shortages, and low pay that make it hard to fill vacancies. DPP said it already meets or beats existing review deadlines for residential permits and is using tools like electronic plans and AI to help applicants submit better plans. Several supporters, including Iron Workers Local 625, an individual witness, and Hawaii Food Industry Association, backed the bill but urged a pilot program or other safeguards; some also asked for broader permit coverage beyond single-family homes. Committee members questioned DPP about whether applicant correction time should count against the clock, whether self-certification could be used, and whether the state should fund any new mandate. The committee then took up SB 26 on affordable housing, with HHFDC, OPSD, and HCDA in support and no opposition noted. Finally, on SB 1263 relating to historic preservation, HHFDC and DLNR supported the bill, while OHA offered comments and requested amendments, especially on the new risk-based review process for high-, medium-, and low-risk areas. OHA said the new procedure should be implemented carefully and allowed more time, describing it as a pilot that should be done well to be useful while still protecting cultural and historic resources. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• manner that subordinates the economic interest of the plan's participants and beneficiaries to any environmental
• , social, policy, governance, or ideological goal, or that promotes any environmental, social, policy
• Finally, proxy advisory firms have a clear history of supporting environmental and social shareholder
• There was a notion of a lot of litigation risks here.
• The litigation risks, can you talk to me a little more about what the litigation risks are for the funds

Bills: SB1090 , SB1293 , SB1414 , SB1429 , SB1503 , SB1536 , SB1633 , SB1724 , SB1764

Committees: Senate Finance , Senate Senate Finance Committee of Reference

Keywords: savings and loan, technical correction, Arizona Revised Statutes, financial institutions, prohibitions, GPLET, abatement, tax incentives, local government, property improvement, central business district, insurance, settlement demands, time limits, third-party claims, regulatory compliance, initiative, referendum, ballot measures, petition circulators

Transcript Highlights:

• Permission must not be required by the city, but by the environmental factors of where that might go
• Robinson: Madam Chair and members, there's always a risk, more with the adulticides or fogging.
• A lot has been discussed as far as the public health risk.
• It's certainly partly environmental.
• Property owners are left bearing the health and environmental risks while having no real recourse or

Committee: House Local Government

Transcript Highlights:

• We are, by definition, a high-risk environment, not a low-risk patient population.
• We are, by definition, a high-risk environment, not a low-risk patient population.
• That puts them at risk of infection and other health complications.
• That puts them at risk of infection and other health complications.
• That puts them at risk of infection and other health complications.

Committee: House Health

Transcript Highlights:

• We know that we have the highest environmental standards.
• “Could you rank, could you put in some kind of priority order what you see as risk?
• “I'm proud of our environmental standards, because it is something that I think sets us apart.
• —40% of its permitting and environmental protection mission.
• So that feels like... ...of its permitting and environmental protection mission.

Summary: The meeting began with a lengthy opening discussion with Secretary Karen Ross of the Department of Food and Agriculture, who reviewed the department’s proposed budget, emphasized California agriculture’s record output, and highlighted major priorities including climate-smart agriculture, groundwater management, local food systems, farm-to-school, food hubs, invasive pest prevention, bird flu response, and food safety. She also warned about federal budget cuts, especially at USDA and FDA, and discussed market access challenges abroad, rising input costs, labor shortages, and the need for automation and workforce training. Members raised questions about the future of Farm to School, the California Nutrition Incentive Program/Market Match, local food procurement, and how to better connect farmers to schools, food banks, and food hubs; Ross said the department had strong evidence the program benefits small farms and Title I schools and noted continued interest in building out local food infrastructure. The committee then took up item one on eliminating vacant positions at the Departments of Fish and Wildlife, Parks and Recreation, and Food and Agriculture. The Legislative Analyst’s Office explained that the Governor proposed eliminating 6,000 vacant positions statewide, with the Joint Legislative Budget Committee previously rejecting 650 of them, including 174 in these three departments. LAO and Finance said the vacancies represented a source of budget flexibility, but warned that eliminating them could create program impacts; LAO recommended retaining the special-funded positions at Fish and Wildlife and Food and Agriculture, while weighing the General Fund positions against other priorities. Finance argued the reductions were part of a broader budget-resiliency exercise and that departments could reclassify or shift vacancies to higher priorities. Members focused heavily on the practical impacts of the cuts. Assemblymember Petrie-Norris argued that Fish and Wildlife staffing shortages were already slowing permits needed for housing, clean energy, water, and transportation projects, and questioned the value of saving relatively small amounts of money. Fish and Wildlife officials said the department had prioritized mission-critical work and could still meet permitting obligations, but acknowledged limited-term staffing constraints. State Parks said the proposed ranger and maintenance cuts would not have immediate effects but could slow maintenance and eventually worsen deferred maintenance. Food and Agriculture said some of the eliminated positions supported early pest detection and eradication, but that the department believed it could still meet its mandate and reclassify positions if needed. The chair and several members signaled concern about the Fish and Wildlife and Parks cuts, while also noting the broader need for budget reductions. The committee then moved to item six, hearing an overview from the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation. Staff described the office’s role in CEQA implementation and said the budget requests were baseline funding to maintain existing functions, including IT services and administrative/legislative support, rather than new programs. The chair asked the presenters to move quickly through background material so the committee could get to questions, and the item began with no votes taken during the meeting.