Video & Transcript Research : 'deferred disposition'

Page 77 of 310
HI
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

GVO Informational Briefing 12-16-2025

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:46:03.560> So huge deferred maintenance. So huge deferred maintenance.
  • Cuz what's deferred maintenance.
  • to do is move away from deferred to do is move away from deferred maintenance<00:56:03.720> to
  • to have deferred maintenance. to have deferred maintenance. >> Absolutely.
  • That instead of a deferred maintenance.
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The Senate Committee on Government Operations held an informational briefing with the State Procurement Office on its small business procurement program. SPO staff described the program’s purpose as expanding access to state contracting for small businesses, including veteran-, Native Hawaiian-, and women-owned firms, and said they are seeking to make the current five-year initiative permanent before it ends in June 2027. They reported outreach efforts, a new website and newsletter, statewide surveys, draft administrative rules, and a 38% increase in small business registrations in the HANS database. They also explained that the program is intended to support outreach, education, certification, compliance, and a statewide database to connect agencies with qualified small businesses. Committee members focused heavily on whether the program is producing measurable contract awards, not just registrations. The chair and senators questioned the definition of “small business,” noting that SPO currently relies on SBA standards in HANS and is considering a Hawaii-specific definition based on employees, revenue, and Hawaii residency. Members raised concerns that the data showed only a small number of registered businesses receiving awards and that the database does not yet track awards well enough to evaluate performance. SPO responded that the database has had funding gaps, that the position was only filled in February 2025, and that the agency is still building the system and rules needed to track outcomes accurately. A major theme was how to make the program more effective for very small or “micro” businesses and how to reduce the complexity of state procurement. Members discussed the difference between set-asides and bid preferences, with SPO explaining that set-asides are generally tied to RFPs and preferences to IFBs. The committee suggested that future rules should make participation easier, provide more training and hand-holding, and possibly create pathways for micro businesses or groups of small businesses to bid together. No votes or formal actions were taken; the briefing ended with the committee asking SPO to provide more performance data and clearer information on outreach results and database contents.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Deferred maintenance funds, $56.25 million allocated in FY25, and $101 million distributed this fiscal
  • allocations totaling $348 million in one-time dollars to address campus needs across the system, including deferred
  • We are so grateful to the legislature for the $157 million in deferred maintenance funding provided over
  • Institutions have identified more than $1.9 billion Dollars in deferred maintenance needs statewide and
  • Anticipated uses of these dollars include normal deferred maintenance, ADA compliance, critical infrastructure
Keywords: 914, all
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

2026 Legislative Session - Day Seventy One - Friday, May 15 - Afternoon Session

Missouri House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Speaker, your Committee on Fiscal Review reports its deferred conference committee report number two,
  • Speaker, your Committee on Fiscal Review reports its deferred Senate Substitute for Senate Bill 1553,
  • Speaker, your Committee on Fiscal Review reports its deferred Senate Substitute for Senate Bill 913,
  • Speaker, your Committee on Fiscal Review reports its deferred House... Mr.
  • Speaker, your Committee on Fiscal Review reports its deferred House Committee Substitute, Senate Bill
Summary: The House took up a series of conference committee reports and third-read Senate bills near the end of session, with several members also recognizing House drafters and research staff. The chamber first adopted and finally passed Senate Joint Resolution 87, which drew debate over whether the measure would remove the City of St. Louis sheriff as an elected office; supporters said the change also applied to other charter governments, while opponents argued it reduced local autonomy. The report and final passage both succeeded on 95-46 votes. Members then adopted and finally passed Senate Bill 973, a package combining a wholesaler/real estate transparency measure with a land bank provision. Senate Bill 1421, a broad public safety bill, was also advanced after a motion to exceed the conference differences; supporters highlighted provisions on clean slate, masked intimidation, prosecuting attorney salaries, fentanyl, gift card fraud, unmanned aircraft, and other public safety items. The conference report passed 116-18, the bill finally passed 110-25, and the emergency clause for the drone-related portion passed 136-5. The House also adopted and finally passed Senate Bills 835 and 1111, a combined conference report that included insurance consumer protections, court administration updates, treatment court and judgeship provisions, a St. Louis civil case surcharge, and the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act. Senate Bill 1408 was stripped back to a single issue authorizing MoDOT to consider raising rural interstate speed limits from 70 to 75 mph, and it passed 93-46. Senate Bill 913, extending several agriculture tax credits and adding a short line railroad credit, prompted extended debate over tax credits, budget pressures, and whether such incentives should be extended now or later; a proposed child tax credit amendment was withdrawn, and the bill ultimately passed 107-30. The House then began debate on Senate Bill 1553, a critical minerals and pharmaceutical manufacturing incentive bill, with supporters framing it as a jobs and supply-chain security measure and opponents raising questions about tax incentives and local impacts.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

House and Governmental Affairs Apr 29th, 2026

House and Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • You'd like to voluntarily defer? 4.25 and 4.25 and 4.7.
  • You'd like to voluntarily defer. 425 and 4279. Both be deferred.
  • I think under the testimony, I'll just voluntarily defer.
  • I'll make a motion that we defer Senate Bill 224. Is there any objection?
  • I'll make a motion that we defer Senate Bill 224. Is there any objection?
Summary: The House and Governmental Affairs Committee met on Senate Bill 123, a proposed constitutional amendment to create a legislative process for removing judges for cause. Senator Morris said the bill was needed because of uncertainty in the current Constitution about whether impeachment applies to judges, given the Judiciary Commission’s role in judicial discipline. He argued the measure would provide a clearer, higher-threshold accountability mechanism, and the committee adopted a technical amendment renumbering provisions and later clarified that the bill uses a majority vote in the House and two-thirds in the Senate, consistent with impeachment-style thresholds. Much of the hearing centered on testimony from Anna Carter and her family, who supported the bill after the murder of Jacob Carter in New Orleans. They described his death and other cases they said showed judges releasing dangerous offenders despite repeated violations, missed electronic-monitoring check-ins, and other warning signs. They argued the bill would create a last-resort accountability tool when judicial decisions or supervision failures lead to preventable harm. Several committee members expressed sympathy and said the testimony highlighted serious problems in the justice system, though some also suggested the bill should address district attorneys, electronic-monitoring oversight, or broader systemic issues. Opposition came from members who warned the proposal was overly broad, could become a political tool, and might conflict with existing constitutional provisions governing impeachment and judicial discipline. They argued the Judiciary Commission and Supreme Court already provide a disciplinary framework and that the bill could chill judicial independence or create due-process concerns. The ACLU’s Sarah Whittington also opposed the bill, noting technical inconsistencies in the draft, questioning why impeachment had not been tried first, and arguing the measure singled out judicial discretion while leaving other elected officials’ discretion untouched. The committee took no final vote on the bill during the hearing, but did adopt the technical amendment.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I would defer to the agency to clarify on if they are or not.
  • I would defer to the agency just to clarify on if they are or not.
  • **Julie.** I defer to the agency with that, yes, sir. Yes, sir.
  • **Senator Hinojosa.** I want to go to higher education fund recommendations for deferred maintenance.
  • However, their total expenditures on deferred maintenance are going up.
Bills: SB1, SB 1
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Insurance May 13th, 2026

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • And we are deferring House Bill 591.
  • So I’ll make a motion to defer them.
  • And if there’s any opposition, seeing none, those two bills are deferred.
  • So I'll make a motion to defer them.
  • And if there's any opposition, seeing none, those two bills are deferred.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • Forty years at 1.57 percent interest while also deferring principal payments for 20 years.
  • These flexibilities include below-market interest rates, deferred principal, extended terms, no need
  • I'd have to defer back to our State Primacy Agency and get that information, get it back to you.
  • systems across the country if the federal government ceases to partner in this effort. backlog of deferred
  • This idea of structured loans with deferred principal payments, this is something that they came up with
Summary: The meeting primarily focused on discussions surrounding the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and its implications for local water systems. Various witnesses highlighted the transformative impact of the bipartisan infrastructure law, which has provided an unprecedented amount of funding to help address long-standing issues in drinking water infrastructure, particularly concerning lead service line replacements and sustainability in water management. The discussions emphasized the urgent need for federal reauthorization to continue supporting these initiatives, as many rural and disadvantaged communities still face substantial barriers in upgrading their water systems. Additionally, cybersecurity risks were noted, raising concerns over the vulnerability of water systems across the nation.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • you this and if you feel it's deferable you this and if you feel it's deferable to<02:06:26.880>
  • future consideration, and I would defer future consideration, and I would defer that<03:18:33.120
  • So for that, I'm going to defer 2038. And it's for that.
  • So for that, I'm going to defer 2038. Members, HB 2030 relating to transportation affordability.
  • So for that, I'm going to defer 2038. Members, HB 2030 relating to transportation affordability.
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2021, a transportation measure creating a framework for electric bicycle and micromobility regulation. The bill would define electric bicycle and electric micromobility device, set age and helmet rules, restrict class 3 e-bikes from sidewalks, allow limited sidewalk use for class 1 and 2 bikes, prohibit high-speed electric devices and certain nonconforming devices in specified locations, update county tax definitions, and change related terminology. Testimony was largely supportive from DOT, police, Honolulu officials, Hawaii Bicycling League, AAA Hawaii, the Hawaii State Teachers Association, and several individuals, while DCCA’s Insurance Division asked for clarity on whether insurance would be required. Committee discussion focused on safety, enforcement, and the fact that no insurance market currently exists for these e-bike classes; members also discussed the need to target bad actors rather than ordinary riders. The chair then proposed and the committee adopted amendments to HB 2021, including clarifying that road-legal, permitted, classified electric bicycles are not subject to insurance requirements at this time; allowing properly classified electric bicycles on sidewalks at 10 mph or less subject to county restrictions; barring high-speed electric devices and other nonconforming devices from public roadways; authorizing impoundment of non-road-legal or improperly registered devices; and requiring direct parental supervision for riders under 16 on class 2 or 3 e-bikes. The committee also made technical and effective-date changes. The recommendation to pass HB 2021 with amendments was adopted unanimously by the members present. The committee next took up HB 1641, a related transportation bill addressing high-speed electric devices. The chair explained that the measure would prohibit the sale, lease, rental, distribution, possession, or operation of high-speed electric devices and establish penalties, but the committee’s version would narrow the focus to devices covered by HB 2021. The amended bill would prohibit offering high-speed electric devices for lease or rent, require sellers to comply with the new regulatory framework, ban operation on bicycle lanes, highways, roadways, and streets, and set a civil penalty of $250 to $1,000 per violation. After no further questions, the committee voted to pass HB 1641 with amendments, and the recommendation was adopted. The meeting then moved to HB 1709, which would transfer regulation of the Hawaii Water Carrier Act from the Public Utilities Commission to the Department of Transportation and make conforming changes with an appropriation. DOT testified in support, while the PUC and DCCA’s Consumer Advocacy Division raised concerns about preserving consumer protections and the complexity of moving the regulatory framework. Young Brothers supported the bill and said the current system is outdated, but the discussion remained ongoing; the transcript cuts off before any final action on HB 1709 is shown.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Room 224 Conference PM - 05-01-2026

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so, my recommendation at this point is to defer this measure and try again. >> Concur. >> Thank you
  • Recess. defer this measure and try again. defer this measure and try again. >> Concur.
  • I suggest we defer. >> Yeah, agreed. >> Okay, thank you.
  • I suggest<00:21:59.480> we<00:21:59.560> defer. suggest we defer. suggest we defer.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Room 224 Conference AM - 05-01-2026

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, can we defer it out?
  • So<00:27:33.360> Can<00:27:33.440> we<00:27:33.520> defer<00:27:33.840> it
  • So Can we defer it out? So Can we defer it out? Sounds<00:27:35.440> good.
  • Um<00:27:39.000> yeah,<00:27:39.160> we<00:27:39.280> can<00:27:39.360> defer
  • Um yeah, we can defer it. Um yeah, we can defer it. Okay. Okay. Okay.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

EEP Public Hearing - Thu Feb 13, 2025 @ 10:15 AM HST

Energy & Environmental Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • We deferred decision-making on this because we still had questions for DLNR at the time, who wasn't present
  • , and got those questions answered and determined we're going to defer this bill at this time, even though
  • we deferred decision making on this we deferred decision making on this because<01:29:08.560> we
  • /c><01:29:16.400> we're<01:29:16.560> going<01:29:16.679> to<01:29:16.800> defer
  • <01:29:17.159> this determined um we're going to defer this determined um we're going to defer
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The Energy and Environmental Protection Committee met on February 13, 2025, after a brief recess for a concurrent hearing. The committee heard testimony on several measures, including HB 332 on recycling and lithium-ion batteries, HB 256 on environmental protection and federal air standards, HB 348 on single-use plastics in lodging establishments, HB 810 on noise pollution and helicopter-related civil actions, HB 505 on Red Hill coordination, HB 975 on carbon sequestration incentives, and HB 974 on utility financing and step-in agreements. Testimony was generally supportive on HB 256, HB 348, HB 505, HB 975, and HB 974, while HB 332 drew both support and opposition, including concerns from the Consumer Technology Association about battery recycling policy. On HB 975, OPSD supported the program but urged language to prevent use for carbon offsets, and the committee discussed how the program would be monitored and reimbursed. On HB 974, the chair summarized extensive amendments addressing reserve fees, revenue definitions, trust funds, default procedures, and customer credits, while noting the Consumer Advocate’s changed view that a reserve fee may not be constitutionally required. In decision making, the committee adopted amendments and recommended passage for HB 332, converting it into a working group to study recycling of small- and medium-format lithium-ion batteries, with members from state agencies and industry and a note that an appropriation may be needed. HB 256 was passed with amendments to clarify compliance with federal law unless standards become more stringent. HB 348, HB 810, and HB 505 were each passed as is. HB 975 was passed with amendments, including language to prevent use of the program for carbon offsets and a note that dollar amounts would be blanked out and addressed in the committee report. HB 974 was also passed with amendments after the committee reviewed the proposed changes and discussed the reserve fee issue. The committee additionally noted that HB 1476 had previously been deferred and would remain deferred, and the meeting concluded with adjournment.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JDC DEFER Public Hearing 02-25-2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, I'm going to defer this one and at least let the other law act work for a couple years and see how
  • So,<00:03:52.159> I'm<00:03:52.400> going<00:03:52.480> to<00:03:52.640> defer
  • this<00:03:53.200> one<00:03:53.440> and<00:03:54.080> at So, I'm going to defer
  • this one and at So, I'm going to defer this one and at least<00:03:54.480> let<00:03:54.720><
Summary: The Judiciary Committee met on a decision-making agenda and considered four Senate bills. SB 2731 would cap misdemeanor jail terms at 364 days and allow people previously sentenced to one year to seek modification; the chair recommended passage with amendments limiting the change to nonviolent offenses, and the measure was adopted with one no vote. SB 2830 would extend the statute of limitations for misconduct-in-office offenses by public servants to allow prosecution during service and for 10 years afterward; members discussed tightening the definition of misconduct in office while leaving the public servant definition unchanged, and it was adopted with amendments. SB 2914, which would prohibit public disclosure of legislators’ personal contact information and certain voter and campaign records, was deferred because the chair believed existing law already covered much of the issue and wanted to see how that law works over time. SB 3072 would require a mandatory 12-month minimum sentence for first-degree theft involving property or services valued over $250,000; the committee recommended passage with amendments clarifying that the sentence could be imposed as a condition of probation or before parole, and it was adopted with the vice chair voting with reservation. The committee then adjourned.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

House Chamber - Wed Feb 4, 2026, 12:00PM HST - Day 9

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • . >> Madam Speaker, may this matter be deferred. So ordered.
  • be >> Madam Speaker, may this matter be >> Madam Speaker, may this matter be deferred
  • . deferred. deferred.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

House Chamber - Tue Apr 22, 2025, 11:30AM HST - Day 55

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Moriwaki, Madam Speaker, may this matter be deferred. So ordered.
  • may<00:13:28.320> this<00:13:28.480> matter<00:13:28.800> be<00:13:28.880> deferred
  • may this matter be deferred. So ordered. may this matter be deferred. So ordered.
Keywords: 910, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Capping Property Taxes to Increase Affordability – Senator Michael Kreun Mar 13th, 2026

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • We can also look at things like deferred property taxes for seniors so that they don't have to pay the
  • We can also look at things like deferred property taxes for seniors so that they don't have to pay the
  • We can also look at things<00:05:12.400> like<00:05:12.720> deferred<00:05:13.280> property
  • <00:05:13.680> taxes<00:05:14.080> for things like deferred property taxes for things
  • like deferred property taxes for seniors<00:05:14.880> so<00:05:15.120> that<00:05:15.840
Keywords: 918, senate, all
Summary: The discussion focused on Minnesota affordability pressures, especially rising property taxes, gas, and grocery costs. Senator Michael Kreun said property taxes rose by nearly $1 billion statewide in the last year, about 7%, and argued that many constituents are worried about being able to stay in their homes. He attributed much of the increase to unfunded state mandates on cities and counties and said mandate relief should be part of the solution. Kreun described a bill that would cap city and county property tax growth at the rate of inflation, with an additional allowance tied to population growth. Under his example, if inflation were 3% and a city grew, property taxes could rise 3.5%; anything above that would require voter approval through a referendum. He said the proposal would not apply to school districts, which already have a separate cap. He also mentioned other relief ideas, including increasing the disabled veterans property tax exemption and allowing seniors to defer property tax increases until they sell their homes. Kreun said the proposal has been mostly well received by constituents and homeowners, while local governments are concerned about losing revenue if state mandates continue. He said relief could begin as soon as the next property tax statement if the bill passes this year. He also noted broader affordability ideas in his caucus, including eliminating taxes on tips and overtime and reducing tab fees, but said he was not aware of current bipartisan efforts on property taxes specifically and remained open to working across the aisle on affordability measures.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services May 19th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • school district, and she said that occasionally when this happens, for example, they have major deferred
  • feedback that if you use the funds to pay back the bond, which is a worthy deal, you do have major deferred
  • districts to be a little bit less specific and more general just to be able to cover some of those deferred
  • Why would we allow them to roll in deferred maintenance on HVAC?
  • Some of that's evident with respect to technology and the purchase of buses, but also maybe... ...deferred
Bills: SB414, SB621, SB2395
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Standing Committee on Banking and Insurance. (3-3-26)

Banking & Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, Senate, we have Senate Bill 219, an act relating to deferred deposit transaction fees imposed by
  • <00:01:27.600> act<00:01:27.840> relating<00:01:28.240> to<00:01:28.479> deferred
  • <00:01:28.960> deposit an act relating to deferred deposit an act relating to deferred deposit
Summary: The committee met with a quorum and took up Senate Bill 219, a cleanup bill concerning deferred deposit transaction fees imposed by the commissioner. The sponsor and witness explained that the bill stems from earlier payday lending enforcement provisions and a real-time database funded by a fee. They said the 2024 law capped the fee at $3, but the department had to go through a lengthy regulatory process to set it, and this bill would remove the commissioner’s authority to set the fee separately so it remains a flat $3 maximum per transaction. Members discussed the bill briefly, including a clarification that the change on page 1, line 21 replaces “not to exceed” with “of.” Senator Douglas commented favorably on the bill’s simplicity. No opposition or substantive concerns were raised. A motion and second were made, the roll was called, and Senate Bill 219 passed the committee with favorable expression on a unanimous vote. The chair noted it was the only bill on the agenda and that House bills would be considered later.