Video & Transcript Research : 'judgment debtor'

Page 74 of 164
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Education Policy Committee Feb 5th, 2025

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Once again, to begin another session, we just pray that you grant us the judgment, the wisdom, and the
Keywords: 1136, house, all
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Regulated Industries Feb 4th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • SOMEONE DID SUE THE DEPARTMENT AND STATE IN COURT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTION ASKING THAT THEIR MACHINE
Keywords: 999, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - Part 2 - 03/27/26

Judiciary and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, I'd be much more comfortable leaving it to the discretion of law enforcement to make a judgment call
  • So, I'd be much more comfortable leaving it to the discretion of law enforcement to make a judgment call
  • But I'm going to reserve judgment on the total bill until we see what comes of those conversations with
  • But I'm going to reserve judgment on the total bill until we see what comes of those conversations with
  • But I'm going to reserve judgment on the total bill until we see what comes of those conversations with
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, December 2, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • My judgment, Mr.
  • Lyall can better serve my judgment, Mr.
  • In my judgment, Mr.
  • In my judgment,<02:21:33.280> Mr.
  • Lyall can better serve the judgment, Mr.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Finance (03/04/2025)

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • So I'm not here to pass judgment or comment on that.
  • So I'm not here to pass judgment or comment on that.
  • So I'm not here to pass judgment or comment on that.
  • So I'm not here to pass judgment or comment on that.
  • <02:10:16.639> pass are you um so I'm not here to pass are you um so I'm not here to pass judgment
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Session - 2026-05-28 - 9:30AM

Vermont House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • perform over 1,000 procedures as the primary surgeon during their residency, developing the hands-on judgment
  • their residency, developing<00:57:25.280> the<00:57:25.520> hands-on<00:57:26.000> judgment
  • , developing the hands-on judgment, developing the hands-on judgment, sterile<00:57:27.680> technique
  • That judgment develops only through supervised operative experience.
Keywords: 926, house, all
Summary: The House began with several announcements and recognitions, including a lengthy tribute to Representative Carolyn Brangan of Georgia on her retirement and years of service, followed by remarks from Brangan explaining that she is leaving to care for her husband during cancer treatment. Additional members offered brief reflections, including one on the end of the session and another welcoming students from Founders Memorial School to the gallery, and a member from Brattleboro highlighted a collaborative mural in the card room titled “These Green Hills, Vermont State Symbols and Personal Reflections.” The body then took up its calendar. It adopted Joint House Resolution 12, authorizing limited remote voting in joint committees through the remainder of the calendar year, with an ADA-related accommodation for members physically present but unable to access a meeting room. The House also suspended rules to take up and concur in the Senate amendment to House Bill 935 on emergency management. The committee report described grant programs for emergency response and technical rescue, new definitions and shelter-planning language centered on “whole community,” a wildland fire response task force, and an emergency rulemaking provision requested by the Agency of Natural Resources; the committee approved the Senate proposal on an 8-3 straw poll, and the House concurred. The House next adopted the conference committee report on House Bill 952, the capital construction and state bonding budget adjustment bill. The report explained changes made in conference, including shifting funds to cover a higher-than-expected bid for the St. Johnsbury facility, restoring some funding for maintenance at the women’s correctional facility in Chittenden County, and setting aside $750,000 toward planning for Wi-Fi installation in correctional facilities. It also noted a lease-related language change for a Vermont Huts project at Little River State Park, with notification to the institutions committee chairs. The House then took up Senate Bill 64 on optometrists’ scope of practice; the committee presentation supported allowing specially credentialed optometrists to perform certain minor surgical, laser, and injection procedures, citing improved access, safety, cost, and workforce development, and the bill was read for second reading with committee recommendations for concurrence.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

TRS Public Hearing 02-03-2026

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • At 0.05, drivers experience reduced coordination, slower reaction times, and impaired judgment.
  • Reaction time slows, judgment fails, vision narrows, coordination drops at 0.05 to 0.079.
  • Reaction<01:42:14.880> time<01:42:15.199> slow,<01:42:15.840> judgment<01:42:16.320
  • > fails, Reaction time slow, judgment fails, Reaction time slow, judgment fails, vision<01:42:
Summary: The committee opened by explaining hearing procedures, including a two-minute oral testimony limit and that decision-making would follow after testimony. It then took up SB 20008, which would set 55 mph as the maximum speed limit on all parts of the DKI/Saddle Road highway. The bill’s introducer described it as a response to safety concerns and noted prior public opposition when the speed limit was lowered from 60 mph; the Hawaii Police Department was listed in opposition, while DOT and several individuals testified in support. No vote was taken during the portion provided. The committee next heard SB 20009, requiring new plates/tags or emblems for used motor vehicles transferred between private individuals, and SB 2026, which would require drivers approaching stationary vehicles on the shoulder or roadside to slow down and, if necessary, change lanes. The Attorney General supported SB 2026 but recommended narrowing and clarifying the language by removing references to shoulder/roadside, collision or mechanical problem, and other limiting definitions so the duty would apply more broadly and be easier to enforce; AAA and OMA also supported the measure. Members discussed the practical need for a mandatory move-over rule, especially for roadside workers and tow operators, and the committee heard concerns about enforceability on two-lane roads and in accident scenes. SB 2053 was then heard, authorizing electronic signatures on supporting documents used to transfer ownership of total-loss vehicles to insurers without notarization and requiring insurers to indemnify the finance director for claims arising from those electronic title issuances. The Hawaii Insurers Council, Copart, the City and County of Honolulu, and others supported the bill, with Copart describing it as a modernization that would reduce delays for total-loss settlements; technical amendments were requested. The committee also heard SB 2172, which would allow all-terrain vehicles to operate at night if equipped with lights and a slow-moving vehicle emblem, adjust helmet requirements, define utility terrain vehicles, and include ATVs in motor vehicle insurance law. DOT said it could support the bill only if limited to low-speed areas, and the insurance industry warned it could create a new insurance scheme; the City and County of Honolulu opposed while the Hawaii Farm Bureau and an individual supported. Finally, SB 2253 was introduced to expand first-degree negligent injury to include injuries negligently inflicted by intoxicated drivers, with DOT, county prosecutors, and the Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office in support; Honolulu prosecutors said they would oppose a proposed amendment because they wanted the language to preserve the offense as a lesser included offense tied to negligent homicide.
AL
Transcript Highlights:
  • And that's an important program in my judgment.
  • And that's an important program in my judgment.
  • finance director at the time. that's an important program in my that's an important program in my judgment
  • . judgment. judgment.
Keywords: 924, joint, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Legislative Commission on Data Practices 1/22/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Regardless of what the Supreme Court decides, one thing it will not do is pass judgment on whether using
  • Um, so obviously the Supreme Court will render judgment on that.
  • 49.120> render the the Supreme Court will will render the the Supreme Court will will render judgment
  • 50.560> never<01:23:50.800> know<01:23:50.960> where<01:23:51.120> the judgment
  • I never know where the judgment on that.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee continued its hearing on enforcement and compliance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, first taking additional public testimony from Melissa Zimmerman and Matt Senot of the East Side Corridor residents in Owatonna. They described submitting roughly two dozen data requests across several government entities related to a proposed highway project, saying some agencies responded but others did not, and that even after they substantially prevailed in a data practices complaint and the court imposed a maximum civil penalty, they still did not receive meaningful access to the records. Zimmerman said the lack of access harmed their ability to comment on the project’s environmental review, and both witnesses argued that the law needs stronger enforcement, realistic timelines, better communication, and more accessible remedies for requesters who cannot afford repeated litigation. They also raised practical barriers such as inaccessible file formats, missing software on a county-provided laptop, and the need for electronic delivery options. The committee then heard from Eric Johnson of Anoka County, who testified about Chapter 13 issues involving third-party polygraph data used in probation monitoring. He argued that when the state relies on third-party-generated summaries, the responsible authority’s obligations for access, retention, and correction are unclear, and there is no effective remedy when the third party does not respond. Johnson said the county directed him to seek raw data from the third party, which had not responded, and he warned that short retention periods can make data subject rights unenforceable if the records are destroyed before a request is resolved. Members asked about statutory citations and retention schedules, and several commented that the issue may warrant review of data-retention rules. During member discussion, legislators broadly agreed that the Data Practices Act’s enforcement mechanisms are not working well enough and that many requesters cannot afford to pursue administrative or court remedies. Co-Chair Scott suggested staff compile the testimony into a report to identify possible legislative fixes, while Senator Lucero said there may be some “low-hanging fruit” that could be addressed quickly in the short session. The chair also floated the idea of involving the Office of Collaboration and Dispute Resolution in a mediation role to improve communication and reduce gridlock, though members noted that any process would still need to produce results consistent with the law. The committee then moved on to its next agenda item, a discussion of the BCA Fusion Center and its annual reporting requirements.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Task Force on Homeowners and Commercial Property Insurance 10/1/25

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • c> is<01:18:13.040> a<01:18:13.280> is<01:18:13.600> a<01:18:13.760> judgment
  • <01:18:14.080> in >> Nuclear verdict is a is a judgment in >> Nuclear verdict
  • is a is a judgment in excess<01:18:14.560> of<01:18:14.800> $10<01:18:14.960> million
  • <01:18:15.520> Thermon<01:18:15.920> nuclear Nuclear verdict is a judgment in excess
  • Thermonuclear verdict is a judgment in excess of $100 million. Are we seeing a lot of that?
Keywords: 1183, house
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Election Law (03/04/2025)

Election Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • In your judgment, do you think that replacing our current containers with the kinds of containers proposed
  • In your judgment, do you think that replacing our current containers with the kinds of containers proposed
  • make<00:51:19.640> a because the clerks have to make a because the clerks have to make a judgment
  • 22.240> what<00:51:22.839> constitute<00:51:23.319> a<00:51:23.480> vote judgment
  • on what what constitute a vote judgment on what what constitute a vote for<00:51:23.920> person
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Education Finance - 01/22/25

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • be clear at the outset that in my role as nonpartisan staff to this committee, I'm not making a judgment
  • be clear at the outset that in my role as nonpartisan staff to this committee, I'm not making a judgment
  • be clear at the outset that, in my role as nonpartisan staff to this committee, I'm not making a judgment
  • be clear at the outset that, in my role as nonpartisan staff to this committee, I'm not making a judgment
  • be clear at the outset that, in my role as nonpartisan staff to this committee, I'm not making a judgment
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
ND

North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session

Advanced Nuclear Energy Committee Mar 24th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Advanced Nuclear Energy Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the federal government has this thing called the judgment fund.
  • If the government gets sued, the money just comes out of the judgment fund.
  • Wouldn't it be great if we all had a judgment fund?
Keywords: 908, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Policy Committee 2/24/26

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • restores Removing the three-year limit restores the<00:10:34.720> professional<00:10:35.200> judgment
  • <00:10:35.600> to<00:10:35.839> MDE the professional judgment to MDE the professional
  • judgment to MDE investigators, investigators, investigators, allowing<00:10:38.320> them<00:10
Bills: HF3489, HF3550
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • A federal officer may choose to testify or not at their judgment.
  • Ulster County Clerk's Office in New York has plainly rejected any attempt by Texas to enforce the judgment
  • And listening is to gain insight rather than place judgment.
Summary: The Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting met virtually for its West Texas regional hearing, established a quorum, and explained that the hearing was part of a series of statewide information-gathering sessions before any map was filed. The chair outlined the Zoom procedures, the two-minute testimony limit, and the availability of written comments through the committee’s public portal. Senators also discussed the logistics and transparency of the process, including the expectation that any proposed map or amendment would be made public once filed and that additional hearings would follow. Senator Blanco, whose district includes West Texas and the border region, said the area’s communities of interest should be kept together and warned against repeating the loss of representation that followed the last redistricting cycle. Senators Alvarado, Hinojosa, Miles, and others debated the value of virtual hearings versus in-person hearings, the number of people who had testified, and whether the committee could subpoena witnesses after the regional hearings ended. The chair said he was awaiting legal guidance and would consider a subpoena motion at a formal meeting the next day. A lengthy exchange also occurred over the tone of public testimony and the chair’s view that some comments directed at Republicans and the president had been offensive or historically inaccurate. Invited witnesses and public commenters largely opposed mid-decade redistricting and argued that any new map should reflect population growth, especially among Latino and other minority communities, and comply with the Voting Rights Act. Nina Perales of MALDEF said the hearings were not meaningful without a draft map and testified that Texas has a long history of discriminatory redistricting; senators questioned her about litigation, DOJ’s July 7 letter, and the 2021 congressional map. Tania Chavez Camacho, Luis Figueroa, and several El Paso residents emphasized that maps should preserve communities of interest, avoid cracking and packing, and be transparent and participatory. A smaller number of witnesses supported redistricting, including one El Paso resident who said the current districting leaves the area underrepresented and another who argued that some communities want to return to a map closer to the earlier District 16 configuration. Several witnesses also criticized the DOJ letter as inconsistent with the state’s position that the 2021 maps were drawn race-blind, while others said the current process was too rushed and lacked sufficient public input.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • There are consequences when we don't exercise good judgment.
  • This is about meeting students where they are without judgment and with the full spectrum of care.
  • about requiring that your provider provide certain information that might be outside of clinical judgment
Summary: The committee hearing covered several higher education bills, with extensive testimony on student aid, affordability, and institutional debt. AB 587 would add veteran representation to the California Student Aid Commission; the author said the change would bring lived experience from the veteran community to student aid policy, and members raised a concern about keeping the commission’s membership odd-numbered, which the author said would be addressed by amendment. AB 791 would standardize cost-of-attendance housing calculations using objective data and improve notice of the adjustment process; supporters said current budgets often underestimate students’ real living costs, while UC, CSU, and independent colleges opposed or had concerns about the bill’s prescribed methodology, fiscal impact, and a 14-day turnaround for adjustments. AB 850 would create a one-term grace period for students with institutional debt to re-enroll while arranging repayment, bar reporting that debt to credit agencies, and require more transparency; proponents described students being blocked from continuing school over debts, while CSU, UC, and private-college representatives said they already use holds and payment plans and worried about added liabilities and budget pressures. AB 537 would extend the California College Promise Program to part-time community college students; supporters said most community college students attend part-time and should not be excluded from fee waivers, while the committee noted fiscal concerns but ultimately advanced the bill. AB 7 would allow universities to consider whether an applicant is a descendant of American chattel slavery in admissions as a reparative measure; supporters framed it as lineage-based reparative justice, while opponents argued it would function as a racial proxy and conflict with Proposition 209 and equal-protection principles. The committee took roll-call votes on the measures, advancing AB 587, AB 791, AB 850, and AB 537 to Appropriations, with AB 850 and AB 537 receiving fewer votes and the roll left open for additional members.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 15th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under the current law, bondsmen have two years after a final judgment is entered for a bond forfeiture
  • Oftentimes there's a rush to judgment to respond to a crime that horrifies the community, whether it's
  • Both of those clients were ultimately given new trials or judgment of acquittals after we discovered
Bills: HB200
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 15th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under the current law, bondsmen have two years after a final judgment is entered for bond forfeiture.
  • Oftentimes there's a rush to judgment to respond to a crime that occurs, whether it's someone who's been
  • Ultimately, they were given new trials or judgments of acquittal after we discovered that there was exculpatory
FL

Florida 2026 5th Special Session

Judiciary Apr 1st, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • The brain's judgment center matures in the 20s.
  • The Supreme Court has said that most children are unable to make sound judgments about their medical
  • care, and that, quote, parents can and must make those judgments, end quote.
Summary: The committee first took up SB 1272 on guardianship, which would limit a guardian’s ability to isolate an adult ward from family and require notice to family or other named persons about major events such as a ward’s death or medical relocation. Senator Jones said the bill was intended to curb abuse by bad actors while not affecting good-faith guardians. Fortuna Smuggler and Phyllis Smith spoke in support, describing the need for family notification and closure. The bill passed unanimously, 8-0, and was reported favorably. The committee then considered CS/SB 1284 on wrongful death for an unborn child. Senator Graal explained that the bill would expand Florida’s Wrongful Death Act to allow parents to recover economic and non-economic damages for the death of an unborn child. An amendment was adopted to define “unborn child” as a member of the species Homo sapiens carried in the womb and to state that the act does not authorize a wrongful death action against the mother or a health care provider acting within the applicable standard of care. The amendment drew questions about abortion, medical emergencies, and whether fathers could sue; the sponsor said the bill was not intended to create claims against mothers or lawful medical care. Public testimony was sharply divided, with supporters arguing it gives families parity and accountability, and opponents warning it could be used to target abortion care, increase malpractice pressure, and worsen physician shortages. The committee approved the bill as amended by a 6-4 vote. Finally, the committee heard a strike-all amendment to SB 1288 on parental rights. The amendment would strengthen parental consent requirements for minors’ medical care, with exceptions for emergencies, court orders, certain legal categories of minors, and other existing statutory exceptions. It also would require parental consent for treatment related to STD screening, give parents more control over school or health surveys, and address use of biofeedback devices. Supporters said the measure restores parents’ authority and protects children from inappropriate questioning or treatment, while opponents argued it could block needed care for minors in unsafe homes, reduce access to STI treatment and mental health services, and create unintended consequences. The amendment was adopted, and the committee continued hearing testimony on the bill.