Video & Transcript Research : 'Penal Code Section 49.04'

Page 70 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, Senate Bill 2320 amends the penal code to enhance the penalties for all DWI offenses, including
  • Senate Bill 1379 amends section 32.21 of the Texas Penal Code by increasing the penalty for forgery from
  • Senate Bill 1451 amends section 32.24 of the Penal Code by increasing the criminal penalty for stealing
  • The purpose of this bill is, will repeal Section 1B of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
  • Section 1B refers to the section of the penal code that states that a person who murders a child who
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate Chamber Feb 19th, 2026 at 08:53 am

New Mexico Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • As used in this section, 'school athletic activity' means a sport or activity organized by a school.
  • Section 2 of this bill has some definitions, some new definitions.
  • So I'm just trying to understand the tax code.
  • There are other parts of the tax code that deal with other sources of electricity and other utilities
  • There are other parts of the tax code that deal with the valuation. of utilities. Okay, so Mr.
Bills: SB273, SB37, SB100
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 6th, 2026 at 04:24 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Unfortunately, you know, our neighboring state, Texas, has a whole section, which includes, you know,
  • Section, which includes, you know, what rights providers have as they go through that review process,
  • Chavez, on behalf of the Law Office of the Public Defender, we do oppose the penalty increase to this section
  • Are they going to have to report under this section or not?
Bills: HB99, HB49, HB164, SB30, SB43, SB50, SB136
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Education Jan 28th, 2026 at 09:05 am

Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • be gifted pursuant to our statute and standards adopted by the department in accordance with that section
  • Nothing in this section precludes a school district or charter school from offering additional gifted
  • By embedding this in the state code as a core responsibility, the state's not just individual schools
  • Gifted education is Section 504, [and] will remain in course of instruction, the school program section
  • I think New Mexico... ...course of instruction, the school program section of the state law.
Bills: SB64, SB19, SB44, SB83
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Appropriations and Finance Jan 27th, 2026 at 04:11 pm

House Appropriations & Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Moving on from the numbers, On page 15, this begins your detail of the section four language differences
  • This is appropriations language that's going to be found in section four of the bill.
  • As far as the difference in the language for Section 4, for the teacher prep affordability fund, Connor
  • If we can, go ahead and go back on to the back page and look at the at-a-glance section.
  • Like, we can't penalize a school that has high-demand jobs, children, students that are on rigorous courses
Bills: SB37, SB29
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Jan 27th, 2026 at 09:18 am

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • They also provide technical assistance with billing, coding, and stocking support for providers across
  • They also provide technical assistance with billing, coding, and stocking support for providers across
Bills: SB37, SB29
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Delivery of Government Efficiency Apr 23rd, 2025

Delivery of Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, under the government code, if state agencies or local governments have a digital.
  • Every incentive is aligned to grow the regulatory code.
  • about how to define a rule in the Texas Administrative Code? Yes, sir, that's correct.
  • So there's another part of the section that you're adjusting; it's actually you're adjusting exactly
  • this section, correct?
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry Committee Apr 9th, 2025

Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry

Transcript Highlights:
  • everybody knows whether you're fishing or not, you have a favorite rod, a favorite reel; it might be a Z Code
  • The bill defines off-road vehicles as those specified under section 38-3282. those specified under section
  • 38-3282 of the Code of Alabama.
  • Off-road vehicles must be registered under Article 5, Chapter 12, Code of Alabama, and a special tag
  • And there's also the use of off-road vehicle section there.
Bills: HB352, HB366, SB272, SB296
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Agriculture & Livestock Mar 18th, 2025

Agriculture & Livestock

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's a section that would give us a rule-making authority to TDA. to be able to update rules once
  • I'd like to know what part, what section of the...
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Ways & Means Mar 10th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • what it could look like to the taxpayer when the following sentence is added to the school district section
  • we're upholding the principles of property rights and fairness, ensuring that landowners are not penalized
  • Bill 247 ensures that landowners who allow border security infrastructure on their property are not penalized
  • Um, we're just making sure that people aren't penalized for participating and responding favorably to
  • HB 255 clarifies the definition of farm products under the tax code to ensure fair and consistent treatment
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs May 19th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • They're being penalized, but they're not the ones labeling it.
  • They're being penalized, but they're not the ones labeling it.
  • This arguably penalizes the very people the 1D1 Ag valuation was supposed to support.
  • This arguably penalizes the very people the 1D1 Ag valuation was supposed to support.
  • It amends Section 251.055 of the Agricultural Code to prohibit a city from requiring the owner or lessee
Summary: The Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs met with only four members initially present, so quorum was not established until later in the hearing. The committee heard several agriculture-, wildlife-, and food-labeling-related bills, including HB 3479 on expanding the Rio Grande vegetative management program beyond carrizo cane to other noxious vegetation, SB 823 on shrimp origin labeling and restrictions on misrepresenting imported shrimp as Texas or Gulf shrimp, HB 3088 on giving Texas Parks and Wildlife more flexibility to procure resale goods for park gift shops, HB 1275 on permits for non-bovine dairy farms in certain TB-affected areas, HB 519 on honey production and packaging rules, HB 609 on cleaning oyster cages in-bay with bay water only, HB 1592 on a voluntary AgriLife pest and disease alert system, HB 2842 on targeted urban deer depredation permits, and HB 4163 on limiting city requirements that agricultural operators maintain roadside rights-of-way. Testimony generally came from industry groups, agency resource witnesses, and affected producers, with most witnesses supporting the bills and several bills drawing questions about enforcement, labeling responsibility, and the scope of local authority. The most extensive discussion centered on SB 823, where Vice Chair Hancock and others questioned why wholesalers would be covered if they cannot relabel products. The bill author and restaurant association witness said the measure was intended to improve transparency and allow enforcement against intentional mislabeling, while preserving a good-faith defense and clarifying that the bill does not create a private cause of action. HB 519 also drew supportive testimony from beekeepers and a family farm, who argued that current rules treat honey extraction and bottling too much like food manufacturing and burden small operations. HB 609 was presented as a way to save time and resources for cultivated oyster mariculture by allowing cage cleaning in the bay without soaps or chemicals, and HB 1592 was described as a voluntary opt-in alert system for pests and diseases coordinated through AgriLife and other state agencies. HB 43 generated the most detailed policy debate. The bill would restructure and expand the Texas Agricultural Finance Authority, update grant and loan programs, and create a pest and disease control depredation program. The committee substitute reduced some funding caps, changed references from predators to depredating animals, and made the financial provisions contingent on appropriations. Supporters from Texas Farm Bureau, cotton growers, grain and feed interests, and young farmers described severe drought, inflation, land loss, rising input costs, and shrinking infrastructure as major threats to agriculture, while one witness urged preserving priority for young farmers. After testimony, the committee adopted the committee substitute and reported HB 43 favorably. The committee also voted HB 519, HB 609, HB 1275, HB 1592, HB 3088, HB 3479, HB 2842, and HB 4163 favorably, with several recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. SB 823 was reported from committee on a 6-2 vote after adoption of the committee substitute. The meeting ended with notice that the committee would tentatively reconvene Friday morning and then recessed subject to the chair's call.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • One of those policies is the Code of Ethics, that's probably the code of That's probably the biggest,
  • . through the Code of Ethics.
  • library but placed in the general or adult section so minors can browse the children's section. safely
  • It's very subjective, and I know that you're pulling from the... parts of the penal code, but the very
  • besides kids sections.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • under the current code section over the past decade so that the legislature can determine its ongoing
  • under the current code section over the past decade so that the legislature can determine its ongoing
  • under the current code section over the past decade so that the legislature can determine its ongoing
  • being recommended to the model penal being recommended to the model penal code<00:36:36.480>
  • elevated offenses throughout the penal elevated offenses throughout the penal code<01:34:39.199>
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 2246, which would expand public financial disclosure requirements. The State Ethics Commission strongly supported the bill, saying broader disclosure could help restore public trust and potentially deter corruption, and it offered a clarifying amendment to make clear the requirement applies to board and commission members rather than all employees of listed agencies. Several organizations and individuals also testified in support. A committee member asked about the amendment, and the commission explained it was intended as a clarification rather than a substantive change. The committee then took up Senate Bill 2250, which would add homeless facilities to the locations covered by the drug-free-zone offense for promoting controlled substances. The Public Defender opposed the measure, arguing that many homeless facilities are unmarked and not easily identifiable, creating notice, fairness, and due process concerns and risking arbitrary enforcement. The Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office and Honolulu Police Department supported the bill, saying it targets distributors rather than users, that notice can be proven through evidence, and that the law is aimed at protecting vulnerable people in shelters and similar facilities. In questioning, senators asked how homeless facilities would be identified and whether the bill would cover all shelter models; the prosecutor said the definition is cross-referenced in statute and must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii and other groups testified in opposition, while several service and advocacy groups testified in support. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 2325, which would allow courts to review and potentially reduce sentences for certain juvenile offenders after 15 years if the person is not a danger to the community. Judiciary staff said the court supports the bill’s intent but noted Hawaii’s indeterminate sentencing structure leaves no alternative sentence for a court to reduce to, suggesting the measure may need structural sentencing changes or could instead be directed to the Hawaii Paroling Authority. Public defender representatives and youth-justice advocates supported the bill, emphasizing rehabilitation, adolescent brain development, trauma, and the need for a meaningful opportunity for release. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the portion of the hearing provided.