Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Bill HB390

Filed/Read First Time
7/5/26  
Introduced
2/5/26  
Introduced
12/31/69  
Refer
2/5/26  

Caption

Relating to workforce development, to extend the employer tax credit to include adult daycare.

Summary

HB390 expands Alabama’s existing employer tax credit for child care-related expenses to also cover adult day care services. Under current law, employers can receive a tax credit for certain costs tied to child care for employees’ children, such as facility construction, renovation, operation, payments for care, and reservations of child care services. This bill adds parallel definitions and eligible expenses for adult day care facilities and adult day care providers, allowing employers to claim credit for payments made to provide or reserve adult day care for dependent adults of employees. The bill defines key terms such as “adult day care facility,” “adult day care provider,” and “eligible adult,” and it amends the credit administration rules so the Department of Revenue would verify expenses supporting either child care or adult day care. The credit remains capped at 75 percent of eligible expenses for most employers and 100 percent for small businesses, with annual statewide credit limits already set in the existing statute. The bill applies to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, but it does not take effect until January 1, 2027, meaning the new adult day care provisions would be available only after that effective date. In practical terms, the bill would broaden the scope of Alabama’s employer tax incentive program and could encourage businesses to help employees with dependent adult care needs, not just child care. It would affect employers, adult day care facilities and providers, and the Department of Revenue, while leaving the underlying tax credit structure in place. The bill also references dependent adults who may need support because of age, disability, cognitive impairment, chronic health condition, or supervision needs. The general sentiment reflected in the bill’s caption and structure is supportive of workforce development and employee support, with the proposal framed as an extension of an existing tax credit rather than a new program. No committee transcript or vote record is provided, so there is no recorded debate or opposition in the supplied materials. The absence of voting history makes it difficult to assess broader legislative sentiment beyond the bill’s apparent policy goal of helping employers address caregiving needs. The main point of contention, based on the text itself, would likely be the cost and scope of expanding a tax credit that already has annual statewide caps. The bill also creates administrative requirements for employers to document eligible expenses, which could be a concern for compliance and verification. Another possible issue is whether the credit should be limited to child care or extended to adult day care, since the bill changes the program’s purpose from a child-focused benefit to one that also supports dependent adult care.

Impact

HB390 would amend Sections 40-18-541 and 40-18-542 of the Code of Alabama 1975 to include adult day care expenses within the existing employer tax credit framework. It would add new statutory definitions for adult day care facilities, adult day care providers, and eligible adults, and it would expand the list of eligible expenses to include payments for adult day care services and reservations for dependent adults of employees. The Department of Revenue would be required to accept and verify documentation for these new categories of expenses, while the existing credit percentages, employer eligibility rules, and annual aggregate caps would remain in place.

Sentiment

The bill appears generally favorable and policy-driven, with its caption and text presenting the measure as a workforce support expansion rather than a controversial tax overhaul. Because no committee transcripts or votes are included, there is no direct evidence of opposition or amendment debate in the provided record. Overall, the available context suggests a positive or at least pragmatic reception centered on helping employers support employees’ caregiving responsibilities.

Contention

The likely areas of contention are fiscal impact, administrative burden, and the proper scope of the tax credit. Expanding the credit to adult day care could reduce tax revenue or increase demand for the capped credit pool, which may concern budget-minded lawmakers. Employers may also face added documentation and verification requirements. If any opposition exists, it would most likely come from those who prefer the credit remain limited to child care or who are concerned about extending a business tax incentive to a broader caregiving category.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.