Video & Transcript : 'section 7' :

Page 6 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education May 6th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill amends Section 1, Subchapter 1.
  • No, so there's obviously different sections.
  • That's the first section. Yes, in that first section, that's true. I'm sorry? In the first section.
  • I drove all the way from Collin County, and I've been here since 7. 30 a.m.
  • Currently, Section 25.08, Section 8.7 of the Education Code states that temporary student absences due
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development Mar 19th, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • went home and you were around your family or your friends now this follows these children online. 24-7-
  • And subject to action by the Consumer Protection Division of the AG's office under several sections here
  • Depending on which section that they enforce this under, it could be. them enforcing it on themselves
Bills: HB186 , HB517 , HB 1093 , HB 1268 , HB1395 , HB186
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Mar 5th, 2025

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senator Weaver… Albritton, we have 5 to 7 bills not given a favorable report. Mr.
  • It’s quite similar to the college 529 program; it's the same section of the IRS code.
  • The bill specifically affirms Section 17-75 in the first line, which prohibits...
  • Section 17-75 in the first line, which prohibits organizations from payroll deductions from political
  • Like he explained, it just defines financial instruments for the purposes of this section.
Bills: HB52 , HB89 , HB141 , HB52 , HB89 , HB141
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I don't have the exact section in front of me, but I guess it's the end section 14 or it's a 19, Section
  • 14 or it's a 19 uh the end section 14 or it's a 19 uh Section<00:53:35.440><c> 8</c><00:53:36.200><c
  • </c><01:21:26.760><c> of</c> previously there has been sections of previously there has been sections
  • </c> nonpartisan staff is there just sections nonpartisan staff is there just sections that<01:21:33.480
  • , section 12 on page 18, and in the embedding of OIG staff within state agencies.
Bills: HF1 , HF1384
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Children and Senior Advocacy Committee Feb 19th, 2025

Children and Senior Advocacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Section 12 in my bill has exactly what she discusses, which is that the Department of Education would
  • In fact, two sections ago, I had that exact same bill from Florida on social media... ...same bill from
  • Our section 12 allows... ...Our section 12 allows flexibility.
  • So, if you read section 12, it says they may create a curriculum.
  • Section 12 is something that we would support.
Bills: HB235 , HB276 , HB285
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 2/17/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • It just removes the section related to the extension of the dates between the RIT and the special election
  • She said the amendment maintains the provision requiring a longer filing period, but removes the section
  • raise up, and this I know particularly applies to my hometown because we are also a charter city, but section
  • raise up, and this I know particularly applies to my hometown because we are also a charter city, but section
  • raise up, and this I know particularly applies to my hometown because we are also a charter city, but section
Bills: HF72 , HF66 , HF69 , HF73
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a section... If we take out that section... Judges do need more money.
  • We were still on the job 24-7.
  • The acts of sexual misconduct that are very narrowly addressed here are in section, the proposed section
  • Section A-1, a person who is a professional is defined by that section 261.101-B, which teachers fit.
  • And that is because there is a section in 554A, we now say there are no exceptions, and in section B,
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The other part, we like having the accountability section regarding judges to make sure they're working
  • I've got you here on behalf of the State Bar of Texas Judicial Section, and you're testifying on the
  • Thank you very much for all that y'all have done on behalf of the judicial section.
  • That means in order to avoid a backlog, I had to close anywhere from 7 to 14 cases per day.
  • And what I wanted to speak to you about is the proposed bill, the change to Section 33.02-115 of the
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence met to hear House Bill 1761, a broad judicial package focused on increasing judicial compensation and adding accountability and efficiency measures. The chair explained that HB 1707 and HB 2100 were withdrawn from the agenda, and that HB 1761 would be taken up first because many judges and stakeholders were present. The committee substitute for HB 1761 proposed a 30% increase in base judicial pay to $182,000, changes to judicial retirement linkage, stronger judicial conduct provisions, and efficiency measures such as targeted reporting for judges not meeting benchmarks, appellate in-person meeting encouragement, and time limits on certain motions. The chair and several supporters said judicial pay had reached “emergency status,” citing Texas’s low national ranking and difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified judges. Witnesses in support included presiding and district judges, the State Bar’s judicial section, business and trial lawyer groups, and prosecutors. They emphasized that many judges work long hours off the bench, handle warrants at night and on weekends, manage heavy dockets, and face recruitment problems in both urban and rural counties. Supporters also said higher pay would help attract experienced lawyers, retain judges, and improve court efficiency. Several witnesses and members discussed judicial accountability, including public reporting of court performance and the role of the Texas Supreme Court and presiding judges in setting benchmarks. Some members raised concerns that raw statistics can be misleading because judges also do substantial off-the-bench work and often help cover other courts’ dockets. There was also testimony and discussion about the bill’s conduct and discipline provisions. A representative of the Texas Civil Rights Project opposed parts of the bill that would tie pay raises to changes affecting judicial independence, warning about subjective bail-related discipline standards and possible chilling effects. The executive director of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct cautioned against civil penalties for complainants, saying it could discourage good-faith complaints and create litigation risks. Other witnesses supported accountability reforms but urged caution about unintended consequences, especially for family and emergency cases and for judges handling warrants and other time-sensitive matters. After testimony, the committee withdrew the committee substitute and left HB 1761 pending, then recessed the committee.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 9th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • This section will expire. I'm happy to answer any questions you may have.
  • Section 52.062, that is the one that asks you to have numbering on the ballot.
  • You've added explicit prohibitions against waivers in at least four sections of the election code: Section
  • 127.306 for testing tabulating equipment, Section 129.003 for voting system standards, Section 129.054
  • for equipment testing requirements, and Section 276.019 for election procedures.
Committee: House Elections
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 3709, which would change the partial manual audit process so early voting could be audited by voting location rather than by randomly selected precincts. The author and several supporters said the current precinct-based process is antiquated, labor-intensive, and especially difficult in countywide voting systems and large counties. Opponents and some neutral witnesses raised concerns about whether the change would still allow an apples-to-apples audit against official precinct results, whether random selection procedures should be more clearly defined, and how ballot secrecy and mail ballots would be handled. The Secretary of State’s office said counties already use random selection methods and that the bill would largely standardize early voting audits with election-day procedures, while also noting ballot privacy issues can arise in public records requests. After testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee then took up House Bill 766, as substituted, which would require precinct chair applicants to provide an email address, phone number, or both, while making that contact information confidential. Supporters said the change would help parties and local officials contact applicants more efficiently. Opponents argued it could expose personal contact information to public records requests and harassment, and some suggested the information should instead be handled through party rules. The bill was left pending after the committee substitute was withdrawn. House Bill 3775 followed and would set clearer timelines for when early voting ballot boards may begin opening carrier envelopes, with different start times based on county size. Supporters said the bill would address counties opening ballots too early and improve ballot security, while opponents warned it could delay defect notices and cure opportunities for mail voters and create problems in large counties that process high volumes of ballots. Testimony also focused on whether the bill referred to carrier envelopes or secrecy envelopes and on how counties like Harris County currently image and secure ballot materials. The bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 4275, which would require countywide polling systems to have polling places in each election precinct, intended to address uneven distribution of polling locations across county commissioner precincts. Supporters said the bill would make polling place distribution fairer and more consistent, especially in Harris County, while opponents said it would undermine countywide voting, increase costs, require more equipment and staff, and reduce local flexibility. Several witnesses also raised concerns about ballot secrecy and the practical burden on large and rural counties. The bill remained under discussion as testimony continued.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • It's Title 70, Section 5 through 139.
  • in the ballot title, we repeal section two.
  • That section is deleted even if we're amending it right now. I think.
  • There are two sections to the gist.
  • One repeals sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Article 25A, and the other is an amendment to Article 25A, Section
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Civil Law and Procedure May 11th, 2026

Civil Law and Procedure

Transcript Highlights:
  • is a draft 6.8A report for Senate Bill 123 by Senator Morris, which proposes to amend Article 4, Section
  • SB 97 proposes to amend Article 1, Section 17A of the Constitution of Louisiana.
Bills: HB375 , HB986 , HB1098 , SCR35 , SB97 , SB123 , SB466
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs May 5th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • In 2021, Senate Bill 2185 established Section 49.2127 limiting the liability—excuse me, limiting the
Bills: HB2018 , HB1633 , HB1689 , SB612 , SB3058
Summary: The Senate Water, Agriculture, Rural Affairs Committee heard several bills focused on groundwater management, water infrastructure, and agricultural land conservation. SB 612 would limit certain water districts in Hidalgo, Cameron, and Willacy counties from charging developers pipeline construction fees above actual, documented costs; the committee substitute removed a developer challenge mechanism to preserve district discretion over construction standards. HB 1633 would require groundwater conservation districts to consider registered exempt wells when reviewing or amending permits, and testimony from landowners, district representatives, and advocacy groups largely supported the bill as a way to protect domestic and livestock wells from drawdown caused by large export projects. HB 1689 would clarify that export fee revenues may be used for well operability, alternative water supplies, and aquifer monitoring, including through interlocal cooperation, and HB 3058 would give the Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District authority to use export fees for county road improvements and environmental programs tied to well inspection and groundwater management. HB 2018 would clarify that the Texas Farm and Ranchland Conservation Program is intended to purchase conservation easements only on working agricultural lands, with support from cattle raisers and Farm Bureau representatives. The committee also considered HB 29, which would require large water systems to validate water loss audits and submit mitigation plans; a committee substitute removed the water-loss threshold and adjusted the timeline for more detailed validation. Public testimony on the bills was generally supportive, with several witnesses describing declining well levels, road damage from export projects, and the need to preserve agricultural land and local water supplies. The committee adopted committee substitutes and voted favorably on HB 29, HB 1689, HB 2018, SB 612, and SB 3058, recommending several of them for the local and uncontested calendar; HB 1633 was left pending awaiting a committee substitute.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Property Tax Appraisals May 1st, 2025

S/C on Property Tax Appraisals

Transcript Highlights:
  • address, or home telephone number of a child provided in an exemption application confidential under Section
  • The tax code section 6.412 addresses appraisal review board eligibility.
Bills: HB3557 , HB5578 , SB973 , SB974 , SB2068 , SB2073