Video & Transcript Research : 'resident preference'

Page 6 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

State Committee Meeting - 2025-03-27

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Cities are going to be putting more taxes onto our residents.
  • We would prefer it be laid over. Thank you, Coach Nash.
  • Medicaid provider fraud and the abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation of vulnerable adults who reside
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/27/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Counties and cities are going to be putting more taxes on our residents.
  • on putting more taxes on putting more taxes on to<00:18:49.240> our<00:18:49.360> residents
  • I think we have to to our residents.
  • Medicaid provider fraud and the abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation of vulnerable adults who reside
  • Medicaid provider fraud and the abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation of vulnerable adults who reside
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Thu Apr 9, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:19:42.240> to kind of give first preference to kind of give first preference to owner-occupants
  • or preference or preference just<00:24:37.320> to<00:24:37.440> kind<00:24:37.640>
  • For local residents only. Yeah, yeah, for local residents only.
  • , not investment properties for residents.
  • :18.040> with<01:53:18.160> the would have preferred going with the would have preferred
Summary: The committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce met on April 9, 2026, and heard testimony on several measures. SB 3302 SD1 HD1, dealing with homemade food products, would require the Department of Health to adopt rules for farm kitchens producing homemade food products that are no more stringent than rules for home kitchens. The Department of Health said it supported the bill with technical amendments, and the Hawaii Food Industry Association and Grassroot Institute of Hawaii also supported it. No opposition was heard. A lengthy discussion focused on SB 2061 SD2 HD1, which concerns a 99-year leasehold residential condominium project and HCDA’s rules for sales, income restrictions, and buyback pricing. HCDA supported the bill and said the House draft clarified unclear provisions and would help move the project to pre-sales. Testimony and committee questions centered on whether the project should remain owner-occupied in perpetuity or allow investor purchases after an initial sales period. HCDA explained that the bill was revised to make the project feasible in the market, that 60% of units would be income-restricted for buyers at or below 140% of area median income, and that the remaining units could be sold without owner-occupancy restrictions. Some members and testifiers expressed concern that the bill had shifted away from the original owner-occupancy vision and could become an investment property model, while others argued the changes were necessary for the project to pencil out and compete with fee-simple developments. No vote was taken during the discussion shown. The committee also heard SB 2050 SD1 HD1, which would allow chiropractic students in accredited programs to engage in clinical practice beginning July 1, 2028. The Hawaii Board of Chiropractic and the Hawaii State Chiropractic Association supported the measure, and one testifier described personal experience with student chiropractic care in California. Members questioned why the board requested delaying implementation until 2030, and the board said it needed more time to develop rules because it meets only a few times a year and rulemaking is lengthy. Finally, SB 2102 SD2 HD1, on industrial hemp in commercial feed, was introduced; the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity offered comments, the Department of Health raised concerns about regulating pet food and possible jurisdictional conflict, and a farmer testifying in support suggested narrowing the bill to federally approved livestock feed rather than pet food.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee Apr 16th, 2025

Ways and Means Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current law, the existing credit is available to licensed resident physicians who practice and
  • reside in a small or rural Alabama community, which is currently undefined as having less than 25,000
  • residents, with admission privileges to a smaller rural hospital having an emergency department.
  • setting up a bill that would allow for someone who works 30 days or less in the state, who is a non-resident
  • ... veterans that may meet certain residency and disability requirements.
Bills: HB46, HB379, SB22, HB487, HB273, HB525
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Mar 24th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Most of our residents are teachers; they're retired clerks.
  • We have over 800 residents, and we have a waiting list of 150.
  • All of our residents are senior citizens.
  • This is their only residence, their claim. ...claiming it as their homestead.
  • We are adjacent and actually reside in part of the city limits.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/13/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I think I prefer that being clarified, so making sure that there's consistency between the systems.
  • c><00:09:15.120> I nor oh thank you Mr chair I think I nor oh thank you Mr chair I think I prefer
  • > being<00:09:16.279> clarified<00:09:16.880> so<00:09:17.680> making prefer
  • that being clarified so making prefer that being clarified so making sure<00:09:18.200> that<
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Education Feb 10th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • It updates Oklahoma's higher education residency tuition law, which they've already been practicing for
  • are some bordering counties from other states that we allow those students to come as an in-state resident
  • It's the literacy instructional team that resides at the state department of Education.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 2/17/25

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm not here representing an agency, just as a civil engineer resident in Minnesota. Mr.
  • I was a former MnDOT resident engineer, so I was responsible for all the road construction projects out
  • I was a former MnDOT resident engineer, so I was responsible for all the road construction projects out
  • 02:15.960> uh the uh you know I was a former mad uh the uh you know I was a former mad uh resident
  • engineer so I was responsible resident engineer so I was responsible for<01:02:18.079> all<01
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, I would prefer to keep it in, make it clearer that there is a deadline for SHPD's review. Okay.
  • So, So, So, um I<00:27:59.840> would<00:27:59.960> prefer<00:28:00.200> to<00:28
  • prefer to keep it in make<00:28:01.800> it<00:28:01.880> clearer<00:28:02.280> that
  • to have that animal residents to have that animal companionship<00:29:29.560> in<00:29:29.679
  • So we'll prefer that we use that language. Members, any questions, comments, or concerns? Sure.
Summary: The House Housing Committee opened its Friday morning hearing by noting potentially catastrophic flooding on the island and acknowledging that some members were absent helping their communities, so quorum for voting was uncertain. The committee then heard testimony on several housing-related measures, with most bills drawing support from housing agencies and community organizations and little or no opposition in the room. On SB 2069 SD2, SB 2177 SD2, and SB 2342 SD2, witnesses largely supported the measures. HHFDC supported SB 2069 and SB 2177, and HPHA supported SB 2342. For SB 2342, HHFDC raised concerns that the bill would alter the Qualified Allocation Plan outside the normal open, public process required by federal law and could exclude stakeholders; Kathy Charities echoed those concerns and also objected to changing point allocations in ways that could raise rents and weaken long-term affordability. Members questioned HHFDC about how the QAP is normally updated, the meaning of the point system, and whether a legislative working group could mandate changes; HHFDC said recommendations would still need public hearing and board approval. The committee also heard SB 2060 SD2, which would create a mixed-income subaccount in the rental housing revolving fund. HHFDC said the subaccount would likely use tier-two funds, estimated at about $100 million total, to support mixed-income projects above 60% AMI, citing Front Street Apartments as a possible example. Members asked about project selection and funding needs. On SB 2544 SD2, OHA opposed the bill’s Chapter 6E-related exemptions and mandatory review timelines, arguing that burial review protections should not be weakened and that the SPEED Task Force process was a better venue for streamlining. The sponsor later clarified that the bill was not meant to eliminate the 60-day review process but to make the deadline clearer. For SB 3011 SD1, which concerns public housing and pet ownership, HPHA and several humane organizations supported the measure, saying it would help low-income residents and seniors keep pets and benefit from animal companionship. HPHA explained its existing pet policy, including deposits, monthly fees, and restrictions, and said the requested funding would support ADA-accessible pet areas and related administration. Finally, on SB 2061 SD2, HCDA supported the bill while OHA opposed it unless protections for Hawaiian Crown and Government lands were strengthened. Committee members questioned the project’s 60/40 split between income-restricted and market-rate units, the 10-year owner-occupancy restriction, and the procurement exemption; the sponsor said the exemption was tied to a real estate transaction and that the project would still use 103D-like solicitation procedures. No votes were taken during the hearing, and several items were left for later action because quorum was uncertain.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • An example I know of is let's say the CLI residence project where there are one-bedroom units were sold
  • An example I know of is let's say the CLI residence project where there are one-bedroom units were sold
  • An example I know of is let's say the CLI residence project where there are one-bedroom units were sold
  • project where where there CLI residence project where where there are<02:04:40.320> one<02:04
  • <02:07:00.239> here<02:07:00.719> where<02:07:00.960> theoretically resident here
Summary: The committee first took up HB 2611, which would prohibit algorithmic price-setting in Hawaii’s rental market, require public education by the Attorney General, and establish fines and penalties. The Department of the Attorney General opposed the bill, saying its language was too unclear and could expose landlords and agents to criminal and civil liability for ordinary rent-setting practices based on public information or assistance from property professionals. Members asked about antitrust standards, tacit agreement, and whether using county-published affordable-rent schedules would be unlawful; the AG said that would not be unlawful if based on public information and without collusion. Testimony was mixed, with the chair noting support from the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, Hawaii Realtors with comments, 50501 Hawaii and General Strike Hawaii, Haloha Project, 13 individuals, and one opponent. The committee then heard HB 2102, which clarifies that residential projects involving ground disturbance in high-risk areas remain subject to state historic preservation review and removes an exemption for lands presumed nominally sensitive. The Office of Planning and Sustainable Development and the Department of Planning and Permitting supported the measure, saying it would improve clarity and ensure review focuses on projects most likely to affect historic properties or iwi kupuna, while also urging language refinements to better define sensitive sandy-soil areas and balance preservation with housing timelines. NAP Hawaii opposed the bill, arguing it would undo progress made last session and that the current process already includes protections for inadvertent discoveries and efficiency for lower-risk areas. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs strongly supported HB 2102, explaining it was responding to beneficiary complaints about late-added language in last year’s law and saying the nominally sensitive-area language should be removed because it was adopted without sufficient stakeholder input and could be harmful to iwi kupuna protections. Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation and several individuals also supported the bill. Committee discussion focused on how “nominally sensitive” areas are determined, whether project proponents could self-certify areas as exempt, and how high-density residential projects should be treated; SHPD said it uses survey and monitoring data to map sensitivity, that highly sensitive areas like Kīauea are not nominally sensitive, and that some high-density projects should remain exempt if they do not involve new ground disturbance. The hearing included no final vote in the portion provided, but the chair noted 48 individuals in support and continued questioning on the bill’s definitions and implementation.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Health and Human Services May 20th, 2025

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • finish residency.
  • They have to go through that residency again.
  • The first is about bedfast residents.
  • It is correct that an assisted living community cannot admit a resident who is bedfast, but a resident
  • It is correct that an assisted living community cannot admit a resident who is Bedfast, but a resident
Summary: The committee met without a quorum at first, then established a quorum with five members present. Members heard and left pending several House bills, including HB 4743 on allowing hospitals to license mobile stroke units under a hospital license, HB 4129 on earlier DFPS enforcement tools for single-source continuum contractors in community-based foster care, HB 4903 creating a Quad Agency Child Care Initiative to coordinate child care regulations across state agencies, HB 3812 revising the gold card/prior authorization process for physicians, HB 4535 requiring written informed consent before COVID-19 vaccination and a standardized state information sheet, and HB 4666 reducing the frequency of some HHSC reports to the legislature. The chair also noted HB 35 would be voted on later after a subcommittee back was received, and that a large number of bills would be heard the next day. Most of the testimony focused on HB 4535 and HB 4730. On HB 4535, supporters argued the bill would strengthen informed consent for COVID vaccination by requiring written consent and clearer state-level information about risks, manufacturer liability protections, and adverse-event reporting; opponents, including a pediatrician and medical groups, said existing federal and state informed-consent materials already cover these topics and warned the bill could create duplicative paperwork and penalties. On HB 3812, the Texas Medical Association supported changes that would extend the gold-card evaluation period to one year, raise transparency, and make prior authorization exemptions easier to administer, while health plans said they were neutral and viewed the bill as a balance between reducing burden and preventing fraud or unsafe care. HB 4730 drew extensive testimony from adoption professionals, birth mothers, adoptive parents, and child welfare advocates. The bill would require DFPS to create a relinquishment form, train child-placing agency staff, and extend the minimum waiting period for voluntary relinquishment from 48 hours to seven days. Supporters of the current law argued the 48-hour period aligns with hospital discharge, allows informed decisions, and helps birth parents and adoptive families begin healing and bonding without pushing children into foster care or creating legal and Medicaid complications. The author said the bill would be revised and that the seven-day provision was a work in progress. No votes were taken on the bills during the meeting; each bill was left pending after public testimony closed.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • You go on there, you put in your county size, and it'll tell you how many residents. residential beds
  • People prefer Fertile X, you know, there's nothing wrong with it. J.C., do y'all have roosters?
  • It's more some people prefer them and so they'll ask us simply do you have roosters and we'll say yes
  • So they want to, some people prefer them, some people don't. But there's really no difference.
  • with group homes that operate without oversight while exploiting some of Texans most vulnerable. residents