Video & Transcript Research : 'removal grounds'

Page 6 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs May 7th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This reflects the realities on the ground.
  • The statute improves the bill by narrowing the statutory reference of Chapter 28 and removing article
  • However, we're deeply concerned that the proposed language would remove an important tool that is occasionally
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 7th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • introduces a pragmatic trade-off that streamlines implementation for the Department of Banking, but removes
  • So this bill amends Chapter 160 to remove some of the more problematic provisions that were causing issues
  • HB4243 aims to change that by allowing certain eviction records to be removed from credit reports under
  • Of getting something removed from their credit report just based on a letter from a landlord, is that
  • This is done by removing the word "cash" and clarifying. that a state trust company under supervision
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • If you hit a teacher, you get removed from a class.
  • A removal from a classroom does not constitute a removal from learning.
  • And the requirement for documentation has been removed.
  • And the requirement for documentation has been removed.
  • At that point, just the way the removal process works.
Summary: The committee heard a series of school safety and discipline bills, beginning with SB 870, which would codify an attorney general opinion allowing local school boards to decide whether school marshals may openly carry, conceal carry, or store a firearm in a secure safe on campus. The bill was laid out with no public testimony and left pending. The chair then moved to a combined discussion of SB 1871, 1872, 1873, 1874, and 1924, all focused on school discipline, teacher authority, and student safety. Senators Perry and Creighton described the package as a response to rising classroom disruptions, assaults on teachers, and concerns that districts lack effective tools to maintain order. SB 1871 would expand teacher removal authority, require return-to-class plans before a student removed for certain conduct can return, make some serious offenses mandatory for placement in juvenile justice settings, and provide telehealth mental health services through a consortium. SB 1872 would require expulsion to a JJAEP for assaults on teachers or school volunteers and extend certain expulsion-eligible conduct to off-campus offenses. SB 1873 would restore the prior understanding that in-school suspension is not subject to a three-day limit. SB 1874 would grant teachers immunity from disciplinary action for reporting discipline violations or acting in compliance with Chapter 37. SB 1924 would restore authority for local police and school district police to issue Class C citations for school offenses and require criminal referrals for students posing an imminent threat or assaulting a teacher, with a substitute clarifying referral rules when a citation has already been issued. The committee adopted the substitutes for the bills and moved them forward. Invited witnesses from teacher and administrator groups largely supported the overall goal of stronger discipline and safer classrooms, while asking for refinements. The Texas Classroom Teachers Association testified that teachers need more autonomy to remove disruptive or violent students and that classroom removals should not mean removal from learning. Superintendents from San Angelo, Grandview, and Wiley ISDs supported the bills’ emphasis on safety, expanded ISS flexibility, mandatory placement for serious offenses, and telehealth mental health services, but asked for more local control, flexibility for Districts of Innovation, more than one campus behavior coordinator in large districts, clearer timelines for return-to-class plans, and more precise definitions for disruptive conduct. Several witnesses stressed that teacher retention and student learning are being harmed by current discipline problems, while some members raised concerns about vague standards and the risk of overuse or public humiliation through citations and removals.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • You ask if a kid hits a teacher, they shouldn't be removed from the class.
  • If you hit a teacher, you get removed from a class.
  • The student that was expelled or removed from the class.
  • A removal from a classroom does not constitute a removal from learning.
  • The revised language in the current bill removes...
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • bill clarifies that a collector shall accept all forms of electronic payment listed in the bill, removes
  • Despite its complete removal from the tax roll in 2023, we have seen no evidence of reduced rents for
  • Senators, we urge you to remove the loopholes exploited by traveling HFCs while maintaining the ability
  • And we didn't recover that for over five years: $75 million in debris removal.
  • Yet, removing...
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Feb 3rd, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • It removes section 2 of the bill, as these are at the discretion of the court, and also removes the word
  • This amendment removes section 3 of the bill, which is no longer needed as the Medicaid claims have been
  • Ours and theirs both removes the statute of limitations for victims of...
  • Ours and theirs both removes the statute of limitations for victims of sexual abuse in schools.
  • It revises provisions governing Florida linkage institutes to remove the Florida-China Institute from
Summary: The committee heard a series of bills, most of them claims or civil-law measures, and reported each favorably. Among the bills approved were SB 326 on curators of estates, SB 1096 clarifying filing deadlines under the Florida Civil Rights Act, SB 28 and SB 26 on claims against the City of Lakeland and the estate of Mark Legata, SB 6 involving a DCF-related claim for Layla Estrada/Sapphire Williams, SB 786 creating a nonjudicial process for closing trusts, SB 18 and SB 2 on claims involving the estate of McKenzie Navarre and Daniel Mosley, and SB 50 expanding veterans’ courts statewide. The committee also approved SB 538 on extracurricular activities, SB 1004 on pet sales and financing disclosures, and SB 1366, the sovereign immunity bill, which was presented as a starting point for negotiations with the House over higher claims caps and related provisions. Most of these bills were explained by sponsors as clarifying existing law, modernizing procedures, or resolving uncontested claims, and several had support from affected organizations or individuals; some also drew opposition or concerns from speakers, especially on trust notice issues, sovereign immunity, and the scope of the extracurricular and pet-sale bills. Several bills were amended before passage. SB 326 was narrowed by removing a section and changing reporting language for curators. SB 786 received a technical clarification amendment, while SB 18 removed an unneeded Medicaid-related section. SB 50 on veterans’ courts drew broad support from veterans’ groups and criminal-justice organizations. SB 538 on extracurricular activities was amended multiple times to address home education eligibility, activity fees for homeschool participants, technical cross-references, and compensation for extracurricular sponsors. SB 1004 was supported by animal-welfare advocates and consumer-protection interests. SB 178 on athletics in public K-12 schools was amended to limit the bill to head coaches, require personal funds, and allow similar bylaws by other athletic associations; it passed after discussion of a Miami Northwestern coaching controversy. The committee also took up two major policy bills with substantial testimony and questions. SB 1178 on foreign influence would create a state framework for foreign-agent registration, restrict gifts and contracts tied to foreign countries of concern and designated foreign terrorist organizations, limit certain sister-city and university linkage activities, and increase penalties for crimes committed to benefit foreign governments or terrorist groups; supporters framed it as a national-security and transparency measure, while the sponsor withdrew one amendment before passage. SB 1632 on ideologies inconsistent with American principles generated the most extended questioning, especially about its domestic-terrorism designation process, references to Sharia law, notice and due-process protections, and potential effects on students and speech; supporters argued it targets conduct, not belief, while opponents warned it could chill protected activity and unfairly target Muslim communities. The committee heard many public speakers on both sides, but no floor debate followed before the bill was moved forward.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services May 6th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • of the six showed improvement in the percentage of children placed with kin within 60 days after removal
  • Despite being a low removal region, Region Six has a high population of children in care, plus or minus
  • Our kinship placements on the 60th day post-removal rose from 46% to 60%.
  • We have kept over 300 children with their families who are at imminent risk of removal.
  • When our kids are reunified back home, so they've already been removed, they're not in the home, and
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 9th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The small but meaningful change removes red tape for smaller, lower, lower impact projects, allowing
  • Um, it is my pleasure to be here today laying out HB 2715 relating to the suspension and removal from
  • The need for improvement of a defined suspension and removal process that prevents timely action and
  • Uh, so what, what officials could the governor temporarily remove under this bill?
  • So I assume under this bill, the governor could remove members of the legislature.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 9th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • passed to improve the statutory process allowing for the temporary suspension and removal of elected
  • The need for improvement of a defined suspension and removal process that prevents timely action and
  • So what officials could the governor... temporarily removed under this bill?
  • I assume under this bill the governor could remove members of the legislature.
  • Basically, a geothermal company can... drill a well in the ground, or a series of wells, or they can
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 2nd, 2025

State Affairs

TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 2nd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • vegetation that they felt needed to be removed because it was on private property.
  • Removed. Do you remember that? I do.
  • If they don't comply, these listings are supposed to be removed by the platforms.
  • Let's just say this bill really does help some new businesses get off the ground.
  • It removes unnecessary red tape and helps Texans stay prepared for outages.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Education May 14th, 2026

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'd like to remove this bill favorable. All right.
  • Yes, we are removing a paragraph that doesn't need to be there because the paragraph before it actually
  • When we remove barriers to care, we do more than improve health.
  • cannot be rectified, then we do want the principal to have the responsibility and the ability to remove
  • I think that the confusion has been that we want the providers removed, and we do not.
Summary: The Senate Education Committee met with four members present and took up a long agenda of education-related bills. Early items included SCR 65, which would create a K-12 student success task force to study statewide career and academic pathway advising; the committee adopted a substantive amendment adding designees and then reported the resolution favorably. The committee also reported favorably on SCR 119, honoring Coach D.D. Breaux, after brief remarks about her LSU gymnastics legacy and the request that LSU study naming its gymnastics training facility in her honor. Several bills affecting school operations and student support were heard and reported favorably, including HB 434 on probationary school bus driver employment and superintendent authority over dismissal; HB 484 expanding scholarship benefits for children and spouses of fallen or disabled firefighters and police officers; HB 749 and HB 1059 on savings accounts and TOPS math eligibility alignment; HB 218 adding food insecurity questions to student questionnaires, which was amended and reported favorably; HB 325 expanding TOPS Tech eligibility through dual enrollment and part-time use; HB 476 requiring Safe Haven law postings in middle and high school restrooms; HB 1249 clarifying access to school-based health centers, with an amendment adopted; HB 1242 allowing more than one early learning center license at the same location under certain circumstances; HB 632 improving data protections and functionality for LA First; and HB 352 on behavioral health services for public school students, which was amended to address IEP and dispute-process concerns before being reported favorably. Two bills drew extended debate over transparency, privacy, and school autonomy. HB 608 would create confidentiality for intercollegiate athletics revenue-sharing documents; LSU representatives argued the bill was needed to protect student-athletes and competitive information, while PAR and the Louisiana Press Association opposed it as an improper secrecy carve-out for state-generated revenue. Despite the opposition, the committee reported HB 608 favorably. HB 1112, which would exempt BESE-approved non-public pre-K programs from certain licensure and safety requirements and adjust related definitions, was amended and then heard with testimony from the Pelican Institute in support, arguing it corrects overreach from prior law and protects private school autonomy and parental choice.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is one of the only grounds, actually maybe the only ground, for termination of parental rights that
  • And that is what the O Grounds does.
  • HB116 will repeal the O ground of termination.
  • Why, then, is paragraph O the only ground before us?
  • He said, we just need to get rid of Ground O.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Investigations and removal proceedings.
  • First, the bill raises the evidentiary standard required for removal.
  • of that is to tighten multiple grounds where right now...
  • That one and the grounds for termination.
  • removed.