Video & Transcript : 'patent settlement' :

Page 6 of 181
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Created by settlements and judgements resulting from both uninsured and underinsured causes of action
  • And finally, there's our $4 billion settlement related to the AB-218 claims, brought under a law that
  • The tentative four-billion-dollar settlement under AB 218, this settlement is unprecedented and by far
  • Davenport, in your settlement you comprehensively addressed all the cases that you knew about.
  • We are still working on settlement of additional claims.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Apr 27th, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, House Bill 763 provides for a public settlement agreement information database to contain certain
  • information regarding settlements entered into by state agencies.
  • This database will include the date of the settlement, the description of the claims, the total settlement
  • It will also include the settlement document itself, unless the agreement...
  • If they already maintain a database that has substantially similar information about their settlement
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/31/2026 - Senate Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • And even after a settlement agreement was reached, DCS failed to comply, so that agreement has now been
  • And even after a settlement agreement was reached, DCS failed to comply, so that agreement has now been
  • then there's been legal issues about union busting, and Lucid workers... ...workers actually won a settlement
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • And then finally, there's our $4 billion settlement.
  • This settlement is unprecedented and by far the costliest in the county's history.
  • And then finally, there's our $4 billion settlement.
  • This settlement is unprecedented and by far the costliest in the county's history.
  • We are still working on settlement of additional claims.
Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Accountability and Transparency held a hearing focused on three issues: federal funding cuts and delays, possible state revenue impacts from reduced IRS enforcement, and the fiscal effects of AB 218 on local governments. The Franchise Tax Board described how state and federal tax systems are closely linked, how most returns are filed electronically through software, and how FTB relies on IRS information sharing for compliance, fraud prevention, offsets, and nonfiler work. Members raised concerns that federal staffing cuts at the IRS could weaken audits of large corporations and reduce California revenue, and asked about VITA and ITIN filers; FTB said it was not aware of VITA reductions, noted ITIN returns are processed the same as other returns, and said ITIN filing appeared slightly down this year. The Department of Finance said it is monitoring federal developments, summarized the continuing resolution and reconciliation process, and noted that California lost nearly $940 million in earmarked federal projects under the CR, while major federal budget decisions remain uncertain until the President’s budget and later congressional action. The University of California reported substantial federal pressure on research, student aid, and health care. UC said hundreds of millions of dollars in federal awards have already been canceled, with additional threats to NIH and DOE facilities-and-administration rates, graduate fellowships, student loan repayment plans, international student visas, Pell Grants, and Medicaid/Medi-Cal funding. Committee members pressed UC on the effects of DEIA-related federal restrictions, the loss of clinical trials and research staff, and the impact on low-income students and patients. UC said it is pursuing litigation with the Attorney General and other institutions, but emphasized that court action is only a temporary solution and that sustained state and private support may be needed. The second panel addressed the fiscal consequences of AB 218, which extended the statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse claims against public agencies. FCMAT presented a report with 22 recommendations, including better statewide data collection, financing mechanisms, a possible victims compensation fund, and prevention measures. Los Angeles County described a tentative $4 billion settlement tied to AB 218 claims, saying it will require reserves, borrowing, and long-term annual payments through 2050, while also forcing curtailments and cuts to vacant positions to preserve services. Members discussed insurance pools, retroactive premiums, unidentified future claims, and the need for a compensation fund or other financing tools. No formal votes were taken; the hearing concluded with public comment, including testimony from local health officials about nearly $400 million in terminated federal public health grants and the resulting layoffs and service impacts.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 2/19/26

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have issued over 3,000 settlement.
  • But some, as I mentioned, the 3M settlement and the east metro is the most prominent example of cleanup
  • and the east metro the the 3M settlement and the east metro is<00:10:33.360><c> the</c><00:10:33.680
  • Uh $850 million uh settlement efforts.
  • Uh $850 million uh settlement with<00:10:39.279><c> with</c><00:10:39.680><c> 3M</c><00:10:40.079><c>
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

WAM-HRE Informational Briefing 01-17-2025

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • We are currently trying to figure out the settlement of the NCAA house settlement.
  • The house settlement also allows us to do something that we call revenue sharing, so revenue sharing
  • July 1st is when, if the judge approves the settlement in April, July 1st would be the enactment date
  • These funds have been declining since the master settlement was established.
  • Is this not a patent window glazing matter at the... No, that is a construction...
FL

Florida 2026 5th Special Session

FL House Floor Session - 2026-02-11 (4:00PM Session)

Florida House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • together as a whole, it predominantly appeals to prurient, shameful, or morbid interest, and is patently
  • was mentioned, there is a small group of people who have made a lot of objections and there were settlements
  • And under a settlement, 24 titles, 24 books were removed and were supposed to be returned to student
  • And that doesn't include the state legal defense costs or settlement risk, which historically rise when
  • including material that appeals to prurient, shameful, or even morbid interest, and material that is patently
Summary: The House convened with prayer, a moment of silence for former member Terry Fields and the Parkland victims, the Pledge of Allegiance, and routine organizational actions including approval of the journal and adoption of a special order report. The chamber then took up House Bill 1119, relating to materials harmful to minors, which the sponsor described as a measure to clarify and strengthen standards for removing obscene or pornographic content from public school classrooms and libraries while preserving educational uses and not targeting classical literature, LGBTQ content, or other protected viewpoints. Members questioned the bill’s use of terms such as “predominantly,” its relationship to existing local review processes, the impact on AP/IB and college-level materials, the applicability to voucher-funded schools, and the risk of additional First Amendment litigation and costs. The sponsor responded that the bill was needed because current standards were being bypassed and that the legislation was aimed at material harmful to minors, not general literary value. The House considered numerous amendments, most of which were defeated. Amendments offered by Representatives Gant, Aristide, Bartleman, Eskamani, Nixon, Rainer, Woodson, and Harris sought, among other things, to preserve parental choice during review periods, restore a whole-work constitutional standard, limit repeated objections, protect educational and abuse-prevention materials, prevent LGBTQ-inclusive books from being labeled harmful solely on that basis, shield school districts from funding penalties, and delay enforcement in districts already under litigation. Supporters of the amendments argued that the bill would encourage censorship, remove books with clear literary or educational value, burden districts with costs and lawsuits, and harm students who rely on school libraries for access to reading material and representation. Opponents of the amendments argued the bill was necessary to protect minors from explicit content and that the proposed changes would weaken that protection. All of the amendments described in the transcript failed. After the amendment process, the House waived rules, read HB 1119 a third time by title, and entered structured debate on final passage. In closing debate, opponents repeated concerns about constitutional vulnerability, overbroad book removals, and the educational harm of limiting access to literature, while supporters framed the bill as a child-protection measure and a clarification of existing law. The transcript ends during the structured debate on final passage, before the final vote on the bill is shown.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

FL House Floor Session - 2026-02-11 (4:00PM Session)

Florida House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • It predominantly appeals to prurient, shameful, or morbid interest, and is patently offensive to prevailing
  • community standards, they depict or describe specifically defined sexual conduct in a way that is patently
  • was mentioned, there is a small group of people who have made a lot of objections, and there were settlements
  • And under a settlement, 24 titles, 24 books were removed and were supposed to be returned to student
  • And that doesn't include the state legal defense costs or settlement risk, which historically rise when
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, December 15, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • At Interior, she championed the negotiation of water settlements to protect the water rights of 15 tribal
  • to protect the water rights settlements to protect the water rights of<00:13:09.760><c> 15</c><00:13
  • As a result, ANCSA settlement for Cape Fox remains unresolved.
  • 42.240><c> Cape</c><04:40:42.638><c> Fox</c> result, ANA settlement for Cape Fox result, ANA settlement
  • </c> Alaskan Native Claims Settlement Act. Alaskan Native Claims Settlement Act.
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Emerging Issues Feb 16th, 2026

Emerging Issues

Transcript Highlights:
  • So this is not anything new, and the monies we're trying to pull out would come from the opiate settlement
  • So this is not anything new, and the monies we're trying to pull out would come from the opiate settlement
  • So this is not anything new, and the monies we're trying to pull out would come from the opiate settlement
  • companies aren't interested, I actually think it's just because it's an actual product, so you can't patent
  • So you would, as soon as you get approval, you know, So you can't patent it.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Civil Rights & Judiciary Jan 21st, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • money to a party, or to a person, to pursue a lawsuit in return for a share of any damages award or settlement
  • clients and prohibits funders from controlling litigation strategy, as you heard from Matt, or settlement
  • When undisclosed investors influence litigation strategy or settlement dynamics, cases can be prolonged
  • decisions, ensuring that Thank you. strategy, as you heard from Matt, or settlement decisions, ensuring
  • When undisclosed investors influence litigation strategy or settlement dynamics, cases can be prolonged
Summary: The committee held public hearings on House Bill 2255, House Bill 2548, and House Bill 2320. HB 2255 would regulate third-party litigation funding by requiring disclosure of funders and agreements, prohibiting funder control over litigation, capping funder recovery at 25%, and creating enforcement remedies. Supporters, including the sponsor, insurance groups, and liability reform advocates, described it as a transparency and consumer-protection measure that could improve court efficiency and reduce costs. Opponents, including the Washington State Association for Justice and the commercial litigation funding industry, argued it would burden plaintiffs, reveal protected work product, chill access to justice, and create satellite litigation. No vote was taken; the chair closed the hearing and asked testifiers to submit written comments. HB 2548 would expand state oversight of health care market transactions by broadening the types of mergers, acquisitions, asset sales, and ownership/control changes that trigger notice to the Attorney General, pausing transactions until information requests are substantially complied with, expanding interagency data sharing, and revoking nonprofit status in certain transactions. Supporters, including patient advocates, nurses, the Office of the Insurance Commissioner, the Attorney General’s office, physicians, and individual health care workers, said private equity and consolidation are driving higher costs, reduced access, and lower quality. Opponents from the Washington State Hospital Association and MultiCare said the bill is unclear, may contain drafting errors, does not adequately target private equity structures, and could create problems around nonprofit status and charitable assets. The hearing ended with the committee moving on to the next bill. HB 2320 would update Washington’s ghost gun laws to address 3D-printed firearms, CNC manufacturing, digital firearm manufacturing code, and the sale of machines marketed for firearm production, and would make certain violations per se Consumer Protection Act violations. The sponsor and supporters, including school officials, gun violence prevention advocates, a trauma survivor, a 3D-printing industry representative, and others, said the bill closes a public safety loophole and responds to the growing availability of untraceable weapons. Opponents, including the NRA, makerspace representatives, and some industry witnesses, argued the bill is overbroad, may sweep in lawful 3D-printing and CNC activity, raises First, Second, and Fifth Amendment concerns, and could create uncertainty through rebuttable presumptions and the CPA provisions. The transcript ends during the HB 2320 hearing, with additional testimony panels still to come and no final committee action recorded.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Apr 17th, 2025

Alabama Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • agents and and to prohibit settlement agents and and to prohibit settlement agents and loan closing
  • It also has to hold the patents for each device it the patents for each device it the patents for each
  • and each device and get down to patents and each device and get down to patents and each device and
  • Holds the patents for each a device. Holds the patents for each a device.
  • device its manufacturers or holds the patents for the operating system on a patents for the operating
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Civil Rights & Judiciary Jan 21st, 2026 at 08:00 am

Civil Rights & Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • providing money to a party or person to pursue a lawsuit in return for a share of any damages award or settlement
  • clients and prohibits funders from controlling litigation strategy, as you heard from Matt, or settlement
  • decisions, ensuring that Thank you. ...strategy, as you heard from Matt, or settlement decisions, ensuring
  • When undisclosed investors influence litigation strategy or settlement dynamics, cases can be prolonged
  • Undisclosed financial interests can complicate settlement discussions, prolong litigation, and make cases
Bills: HB2255 , HB2320 , HB2548
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Legislative Audit Committee Mar 24th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • In addition, employee retaliation whistleblower concerns, a settlement involving a former communications
  • Objective five has us quantify the litigation costs and the settlement costs associated with the board's
  • This is patently and constitutionally false.
  • This is patently and constitutionally false.
Summary: The committee met as a subcommittee for much of the hearing because it initially lacked a quorum, then later established one and began taking votes. The state auditor gave a status update on ongoing audits, including several JALAC-requested audits in progress, other statutory audits, staffing growth in his office, and the number of new JALAC audits his office could start in the coming months. The committee also heard that one audit request on Prop. 28 was held, and another PUC-related request was moved off consent and heard on the regular calendar. Members then heard and discussed several audit requests. Senator Cervantes presented a request to audit California fusion centers, with witnesses from the FBI and ACLU supporting the need for transparency and oversight; opponents argued the request was politically motivated and could interfere with counterterrorism work. Senator Allen presented a request on CPUC enforcement of Rule 21 interconnection timelines for solar and storage projects, supported by industry and school representatives who described long delays and financial harm, while CPUC staff said the issue was being addressed through workshops and a formal proceeding. Senator Perez presented a request to audit Caltrans’ administration of the former SR 710 extension properties and affordable sales program, citing tenant complaints about maintenance, pricing, and transparency; Caltrans said it was working to complete sales and improve administration. Senator Umberg presented a request to audit the Orange County Board of Education over transparency, contracting, litigation spending, charter oversight, and whistleblower issues, while board representatives said there was no factual basis for an audit and that existing legal remedies had not been invoked. After quorum was established, the committee approved the consent-calendar DMV license revocation audit and then approved the PUC utility timeliness audit and the Caltrans SR 710 audit. The fusion center audit was left on call after a split vote, and the Orange County Board of Education audit continued with testimony from the board’s representatives after the committee had already moved on to other business.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Then you file your Hawaiian legal paperwork, your royal patent, LCA with the Bureau of Conveyance.
  • Then you file your Hawaiian legal paperwork, your royal patent, LCA with the Bureau of Conveyance.
  • Then you file your Hawaiian legal paperwork, your royal patent, LCA with the Bureau of Conveyance.
  • Then you file your Hawaiian legal paperwork, your royal patent, LCA with the Bureau of Conveyance.
  • Then you file your Hawaiian legal paperwork, your royal patent, LCA with the Bureau of Conveyance.
Committee: House Housing
Summary: The committee first took up HB 2611, which would prohibit algorithmic price-setting in Hawaii’s rental market, require public education by the Attorney General, and establish fines and penalties. The Department of the Attorney General opposed the bill, saying its language was too unclear and could expose landlords and agents to criminal and civil liability for ordinary rent-setting practices based on public information or assistance from property professionals. Members asked about antitrust standards, tacit agreement, and whether using county-published affordable-rent schedules would be unlawful; the AG said that would not be unlawful if based on public information and without collusion. Testimony was mixed, with the chair noting support from the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, Hawaii Realtors with comments, 50501 Hawaii and General Strike Hawaii, Haloha Project, 13 individuals, and one opponent. The committee then heard HB 2102, which clarifies that residential projects involving ground disturbance in high-risk areas remain subject to state historic preservation review and removes an exemption for lands presumed nominally sensitive. The Office of Planning and Sustainable Development and the Department of Planning and Permitting supported the measure, saying it would improve clarity and ensure review focuses on projects most likely to affect historic properties or iwi kupuna, while also urging language refinements to better define sensitive sandy-soil areas and balance preservation with housing timelines. NAP Hawaii opposed the bill, arguing it would undo progress made last session and that the current process already includes protections for inadvertent discoveries and efficiency for lower-risk areas. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs strongly supported HB 2102, explaining it was responding to beneficiary complaints about late-added language in last year’s law and saying the nominally sensitive-area language should be removed because it was adopted without sufficient stakeholder input and could be harmful to iwi kupuna protections. Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation and several individuals also supported the bill. Committee discussion focused on how “nominally sensitive” areas are determined, whether project proponents could self-certify areas as exempt, and how high-density residential projects should be treated; SHPD said it uses survey and monitoring data to map sensitivity, that highly sensitive areas like Kīauea are not nominally sensitive, and that some high-density projects should remain exempt if they do not involve new ground disturbance. The hearing included no final vote in the portion provided, but the chair noted 48 individuals in support and continued questioning on the bill’s definitions and implementation.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • That is factually incorrect. 25% of the settlement money goes to the Ag's office already.
  • We're not changing that. 37.5% of the T-Set settlement money will go to the state health department to
  • Well, I think we have disagreement on what the settlement intended that the people at the time had A
  • Take tobacco settlement dollars and preserve them as a permanent fund, ensuring the principal would be
  • There's a reason why Oklahoma's tea set are settlement endowment fund is one of the best in the nation