Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial experience'

Page 6 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections May 5th, 2025

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Moreover, the current law creates confusion about judicial responsibilities.
  • If they do those four things, they have judicial immunity. ...is intact.
  • I have the letter in front of me from the Judicial Advisory Council.
  • So how does someone get on the Judicial Advisory Council?
  • So, a lot of the major cities are not represented on the Judicial Advisory Council.
Bills: SB663, SB958
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that's what the judicial discretion is there for. Again, you know, just practicing.
  • I think really, you know, the... think really, you know, the judicial discretion really does clear up
Bills: HB265, HB146, SB254, HB202, HB3, HB42, SB18
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Rules Feb 2nd, 2026 at 09:12 am

Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • Teresa is a senior human resource leader with over 30... years of progressive HR experience, including
  • Edessa, as she mentioned, had over 23 years of state government experience. with 22 of them being at
  • So looking through your resume you only have 40 years of experience, not that much. Pretty bad.
  • I, you know, can always ask the governor to find someone with more experience, but you know, we're going
  • As Senator Brock said, you don't have much experience, but you probably have enough to get by.
Bills: SM13, SM14
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 30th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman, for a criminal subcommittee based on your years of criminal experience. Correct, Mr. Fer?
  • You got to love the last judicial hearing. I said motion. Yeah.
  • this... there's certainly aspects of this that I do appreciate in the bill, and you have a lot of experience
  • So I've had experience with all of those. I've served on five-member boards.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • I am also a grandmother who has raised five grandchildren, so I am a lived experience in this matter.
  • So that was my first experience.
  • The second experience I had is a little bit different than child support, but I think it's very important
  • and allow denied or delayed payments to be appealed to the presiding judge of the administrative judicial
Summary: The Senate Committee on Jurisprudence heard several family-law and probate bills. Senate Bill 2052 would codify a rebuttable presumption that a parent acts in the best interest of a child and require clear and convincing evidence to overcome that presumption in disputes involving non-parents; the author and several witnesses supported the bill as a clarification of existing case law, while one witness suggested refining the modification language. Public testimony was closed and the bill was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1923, which would allow child support to follow a child placed temporarily with kin or fictive kin under a parental child safety placement or authorization agreement; the bill’s author and a grandparent caregiver testified in support, while one witness suggested the Attorney General could handle the change administratively. That bill was also left pending. Senate Bill 1838 would standardize fee schedules and compensation rules for attorneys ad litem and related court-appointed counsel in DFPS child-protection cases. The author said the bill would clarify unclear current law, and witnesses from the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and family-defense bar supported it, though one asked that expert-witness expenses be expressly included. Senate Bill 387 would raise the bond requirement for county judges handling guardianship proceedings to at least $500,000; the author described it as a refiling of a prior bill that passed unanimously but was vetoed, and a statutory probate judge testified in support. Senate Bill 1839 would require original or paper wills to be delivered to the transferee court when probate proceedings are transferred; the committee substitute broadened the delivery methods, and the district clerk witness supported the change. All three bills were left pending. The committee also took up Senate Bill 1536, which had previously been voted out with the wrong committee substitute; members reconsidered the vote, adopted the corrected substitute, and then voted 3-0 to report the bill favorably to the full Senate, with local and contested calendar certification. Finally, Senate Bill 1940 would create a transfer-on-death mechanism for manufactured homes classified as personal property, similar to existing tools for real property and vehicles; the author and an estate-planning attorney testified that it would streamline transfers and reduce probate costs. A non-substantive committee substitute was still being prepared, and the bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Health Mar 17th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I have personal experiences with this as, as a high school student.
  • Um, have other states passed legislation like this, and what have their experiences been like?
  • And the reason I ask is because I had a brief experience when I was in college.
  • Is there, is there any protections in your experience and in doing this?
  • So I have brought them here so they have lived experiences.
Bills: HB163, HB 296
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because of this, I repressed the experience until it resurfaced recently in therapy.
  • But let me be clear, this wasn't a fun experience.
  • They go through their own painful personal experiences.
  • Just. ...personal experiences.
  • Thanks for sharing your experience. Ms. Cohen, welcome.
Bills: SB6, SB7, SB8, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB15, SB17
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 8, the Texas Women's Privacy Act, and heard extensive public testimony both for and against the measure. Supporters, including representatives of Texas Values and Texas Values Action, argued the bill was needed to protect women’s privacy and safety in restrooms, locker rooms, showers, prisons, domestic violence shelters, and other government-controlled spaces, and said it would provide clear, sex-based rules. Opponents, including many transgender Texans, civil rights advocates, clergy, business and public safety voices, and others, argued the bill would invite harassment, gender policing, lawsuits, and invasive inspections, while harming trans, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people as well as cisgender women who do not fit stereotypes. Several witnesses said the bill would conflict with federal law or prison standards, worsen safety in shelters and prisons, and hurt Texas’s reputation and economy. The chair repeatedly noted the compressed special-session schedule and said flood relief remained the session’s top priority. Public testimony on SB 8 was eventually closed, and the bill was left pending. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 6, dealing with consumable hemp product restrictions. Testimony on SB 6 focused on whether the bill went too far in restricting hemp-derived THC products. Opponents argued hemp and THC have medical and economic value, that the bill would criminalize conduct and burden courts, and that regulation—not prohibition—was the better approach. Some witnesses supported tighter rules such as testing, child-resistant packaging, and limits on marketing to children, but still opposed the bill’s broad THC ban, higher fees, and age restrictions. Several speakers emphasized benefits for veterans, chronic pain patients, and small businesses, and warned that prohibition would push consumers toward the illicit market. The committee heard the testimony and then continued with additional witnesses, with no final vote or disposition reported in the excerpt.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Committee, February 13, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • to the judicial branch.
  • gives that independence to the judicial gives that independence to the judicial branch<00:10:40.240><
  • retaliatory effort against the judicial retaliatory effort against the judicial system<00:15:06.000
  • <01:19:43.280> with initially my my own experience with initially my my own experience with
  • experience during the interim time. experience during the interim time.
Bills: HB0066, HJ0005, HB0010
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • grandparents raising grandchildren I am also grandmother has raised five grandchildren so I am a lived experience
  • So that was my the first experience. The second experience I had...
  • and allow denied or delayed payments to be appealed to the presiding judge of the Administrative Judicial
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • defense exceptions to the Penal Code for harmful material and sexual performance of a child are judicial
  • with Clarifying that it is a defense to prosecution if at the time of the offense the actor was judicial
  • So, that's why we appreciate that he left those two in there, judicial and the law enforcement.
  • I am a pediatric nurse with 10 years of experience in caring for the safety, health, and well-being of
  • That experience made one thing clear.
Bills: SB20, SB1621, SB412, SB441, SB442
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2026-04-09

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:58:42.760> review presented, includes judicial review presented, includes judicial review
  • Uh, I think two the judicial branch.
  • family medical leave where the judicial family medical leave where the judicial branch<01:18:21.320
  • we got a breakdown from the judicial we got a breakdown from the judicial branch,<01:19:29.520><
  • <01:31:27.160> branch Lee Bling, just the judicial branch Lee Bling, just the judicial branch
Summary: The Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee approved the minutes from March 25 and March 26, then took up House File 4077, a bipartisan bill authored by Representatives Greenman and Roach. The bill would prohibit municipalities from entering into non-disclosure agreements with private entities that restrict disclosure about land development, economic development, or publicly funded projects, while preserving existing Chapter 13 data practices rules and trade secret protections. The authors argued the bill is needed to prevent secret agreements and backroom decision-making that undermine public transparency, and they moved that the bill be re-referred to the general register. Several local officials and residents testified in support, including a St. Louis County commissioner, the mayor of Lonsdale, and residents from Farmington and Hermantown. Supporters said NDAs had been used in connection with data center and other development projects to keep elected officials and the public in the dark, eroding trust and limiting community input. They described the bill as a common-sense transparency measure and said existing law already protects legitimate trade secrets. Opposition came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Business Partnership, which argued that NDAs are often necessary in early-stage economic development discussions to protect sensitive business information and remain competitive with other states. They warned the bill could discourage investment, jobs, and tax growth, and said it would impose a one-size-fits-all state mandate that limits local discretion. Committee members then debated whether the bill was too broad and whether it should be narrowed to data centers; supporters responded that the issue extends beyond data centers to other forms of economic development. A roll call vote was requested on the motion to re-refer the bill to the general register, but the final vote result was not stated in the transcript excerpt.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Apr 8th, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • state of regulate professions in the state of regulate professions in the state of Alabama accept experience
  • , training, and Alabama accept experience, training, and Alabama accept experience, training, and education
  • bill is the process or the original bill is the process or the original bill is the process or the judicial
  • part of of the process of how judicial part of of the process of how judicial part of of the process
  • in small unit hands-on experiences in small unit hands-on experiences in small unit tactics, mission
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 8th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I pray they accept Him as their Savior today and come to experience the powerful reality that when the
  • There's no better way to experience the forests of East Texas than on one of our historic locomotives
  • the deference given to the interim. interpretation of laws and rules by state agencies in certain judicial
  • This is not a radical idea without judicial deference as a safeguard a true independent panel is our
  • Yet without judicial deference as a safeguard, a truly independent panel is our next best defense.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Transportation Apr 29th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • costs, over $200,000 in wages and benefit costs, and the prevention of automation of key customer experience
  • This bill proposes to address judicial security concerns for state and federal judges in Texas related
  • to the required public display of their judicial status on specialty license plates. 3946 would amend
  • Customer experience, especially for Texans in large urban areas where commuting to a tax office can be
  • Visiting your local county tax office to receive the new plate is viewed as a very negative experience