Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Fisher has an idea on profits from the mill.
• North Dakota Mill is a great asset to North Dakota, its economy, and the citizens of our great state.
• So the mill is okay with it? I mean, they don't much. Well, it will come out of the mill.
• Then with the growing need and demand, I think the mill is the world's largest mill now.
• I just, you know, I think we just have to be aware of the debt that the mill carries, too.

Committee: House Appropriations - Government Operations Division

Keywords: 908, all

Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 2023 for the Racing Commission. Members confirmed the bill’s existing items, including the internships program and copier replacement, and then adopted an amendment based on the worksheet that moved those items to one-time funding. The committee then passed SB 2023 as amended, with the only noted differences from the Senate version being the one-time treatment of the $20,000 internship item and the copier replacement. Next, the committee considered House Bill 2011 for the Highway Patrol. Representative Pyle explained a series of verbal amendments that shifted several one-time and ongoing expenses from the general fund to the electronic permit fee fund, including body armor, preliminary breath test devices, handgun replacement, emergency vehicle operations course resurfacing, and related items, while also removing the shooting range ventilation project because it could be completed with existing funds. The committee also added a section allowing carryover authority for federal grant dollars tied to the in-car router system. After adopting the amendments, the committee passed HB 2011 as amended. The committee then discussed Senate Bill 2014 for the Industrial Commission, focusing on a proposed amendment by Representative Fisher that would direct additional percentages of North Dakota Mill net income to wheat breeding programs at NDSU’s main experiment station and branch research centers. Members asked about current funding, the size of the proposed transfers, and how the money would be used, with Fisher arguing the funds would support breeding, disease resistance, and related research. Several members said they wanted more information on existing funding and program costs before advancing the idea, so the committee held the amendment for further review and took no final action on the bill during this discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• Year three, I stay at seven mills.
• I levied zero mills that year. That was my decision. In my district, I levied zero mills that year.
• They levied the 2.5 mills from year 1 to year 10.
• So that same 2.5 mills that generally, So what happens is that same 2.5 mills that generated $50,000
• I mean, if you want to run 50 mills, I still don't disagree.

Bills: HB287 , HB340 , HB412 , HB440 , HB514 , HB515 , HB521 , HB543 , HB553 , HB570 , HB961

Committee: House Ways & Means

Keywords: HB 287, Louisiana Tax Commission, ad valorem, property tax, property assessment, assessment fees, fee extension, sunset extension, public service property, utility property, insurance company property, financial institution property, tax administration, R.S. 47:1838, Act 296, reappraisal, ad valorem tax, valuation, Louisiana tax law, homestead exemption

Transcript Highlights:

• And a lot<00:48:12.640><c> of</c><00:48:12.800><c> the</c><00:48:14.000><c> mills</c> lot of the mills
• ,</c> north than the Quebec and Ontario mills, north than the Quebec and Ontario mills, but<00:48:23.520
• The other thing I see is lumber being produced going into Canada to be finally milled or dried and milled
• </c> some mills in northern New Hampshire. some mills in northern New Hampshire.
• </c> over going over to a Quebec milling over going over to a Quebec milling location<01:03:13.920><c

Committee: House Public Works and Highways

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• You know, we have a mill tax, and the mill tax pays for the implementation of the regulatory aspects
• You know, we had a pretty good battle on the mill fee.
• You know, we had a pretty good battle on the mill fee.
• being the inflation factor added to the mill fee, which would have kept the mill fee then current.
• Added to the mill fee, which would have kept the mill fee then current.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Climate Crisis, Resources, Energy, and Transportation heard an informational hearing with Secretary Garcia and CalEPA-related departments on the administration’s budget proposals and related environmental programs. Secretary Garcia highlighted CalEPA’s work on methane reduction, community air protection, water infrastructure, Exide cleanup, safer pesticide alternatives, Prop 4 implementation, and Bay-Delta water quality, while emphasizing the impact of federal rollbacks and the need for flexible state response. Members raised broader policy concerns about the polluter-pays principle, special fund vacancies, and whether the state is maintaining sufficient staffing and enforcement capacity, especially after recent fee increases. A major portion of the hearing focused on landfill support, response, and enforcement, particularly subsurface elevated temperature events at Chiquita Canyon and El Sobrante. CalEPA requested $5.1 million and 12 positions to improve monitoring, technical response, coordination, and enforcement across CalRecycle, CARB, DTSC, the Water Board, and OEHHA. Assembly Member Schiavo described severe community impacts from Chiquita Canyon and pressed for stronger state action, more transparency, and accountability from landfill operators; Assembly Member Rogers emphasized that accountability must mean forcing operators to take preventive measures and bear the costs. Agency staff said the proposal would help augment current response efforts, support local enforcement agencies, and improve early detection, while acknowledging that the causes of set events are not fully understood and may involve factors such as lithium-ion batteries, oxygen intrusion, and gas extraction practices. The committee then heard an update on the Safe and Affordable Drinking Water program and the effects of the new cap-and-invest structure. State Water Board Chair Joaquin Esquivel reported that the program has reduced the number of Californians without safe drinking water from 1.6 million to about 600,000 since 2019, while also bringing 320 systems back into compliance and distributing $1.8 billion in drinking water grants. The Legislative Analyst’s Office explained that under SB 840, SAFER is now in a lower funding tier, which could reduce annual proceeds from the prior $130 million level to a projected $92 million in 2026-27 and delay funding until later in the year. Members expressed concern that this deprioritizes rural drinking water needs, while the board said it would continue using SAFER’s flexible funds for emergency water, technical assistance, and construction, and would keep pushing consolidations and other long-term solutions for the remaining failing systems.

Transcript Highlights:

• &gt;&gt; Senator<01:37:40.639><c> Mills.</c> &gt;&gt; Senator Mills. &gt;&gt; Senator Mills.
• Sand Meredith, &gt;&gt; Sand<04:42:22.638><c> Mills,</c> &gt;&gt; Sand Mills, &gt;&gt; Sand Mills, &gt
• Hi >> Senator Mills. Hi >> Senator Mills.
• Hi, &gt;&gt; Sander<04:55:06.798><c> Mills.</c> &gt;&gt; Sander Mills. &gt;&gt; Sander Mills.
• &gt;&gt; S Mills. Sand Neil, &gt;&gt; S Mills.

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And then a mill, or a mill rate, is the conversion factor that we get to obtain a rate.
• The school relief was a mill levy rate—a mill levy, a mill rate—that was bought down back in 2012.
• And whatever that is, if it was 40 mills or 30 mills in each school district, that mill rate is applied
• I can tell you that the mill rate from 2012 in McKenzie County is not the same mill rate for that amount
• So it is a number, a historical mill rate. Again, a mill rate is just a conversion factor.

Summary: The subcommittee of the Tax Reform and Relief Advisory Committee met to begin its study of whether the content of the real estate tax statement should be revised to improve transparency. Legislative Council staff reviewed the study directive from HB 1176 and the statutory requirements for tax statements, including required line items such as true and full value, mill levy, legislative tax relief, primary residence credit, legacy fund share, discounts for early payment, and special assessments. The Tax Department then explained how the current uniform statewide statement is prescribed and approved, and noted that changes are typically driven by statute and implemented collaboratively with counties and vendors. County officials from NDACO, including auditors from McKenzie and Richland counties, described the full annual property tax timeline from budgeting through mailing final statements. They explained how counties gather budgets, calculate levies, verify taxable values, handle centrally assessed property, and prepare required notices and statements. They also said public attendance at budget hearings is generally very low, though the notices and statements generate some calls, mostly about whether attendance is required or why taxes are changing. Several members questioned the usefulness of the legislative tax relief line and the complexity of the 5% discount calculation, and county officials said the current process can be confusing and depends on manual data entry and coordination among counties, vendors, and taxing districts. The committee also discussed assessment frequency, valuation equalization, the 3% cap, and whether more frequent reassessment would reduce large jumps in taxable value. County officials said they try to use rotating reassessments and sales-ratio reviews to keep values within statutory tolerance, but staffing, training, and local market changes make the work difficult. NDACO staff estimated, based on a small county survey, that tax statement preparation and mailing costs average about 74 cents per statement, with outsourcing generally cheaper than in-house printing, and said HB 1176 added some mailing and administrative costs even if the tax statement itself did not change dramatically. Software vendors from CPT and Tyler then began presentations showing how their systems handle budgeting, valuation notices, tax statement generation, primary residence credit processing, and levy worksheets, emphasizing that many of the required calculations and reports are still manually entered or verified by county staff.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair calls Brady Mills. And Mr.
• Chair calls Brady Mills. And Mr.
• Seeing none, the chair calls Brady Mills once again. And Mr.
• Mills, once again, and Mr.
• If there are none, the chair calls Brady Mills.

Committee: House Criminal Jurisprudence

Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence met with a quorum and heard a series of Senate bills, generally receiving sponsor explanations and, in most cases, no public testimony. SB 2595 would create a Class B misdemeanor for harassing, threatening, or intimidating someone while intentionally concealing identity with a mask, with broad affirmative defenses for legitimate mask use; SB 1980 would increase penalties for assaulting peace officers, parole officers, and community supervision officers and add related presumptions and interference protections; and SB 1896 would require magistrates to issue emergency protective orders in certain family violence, sexual assault, stalking, and aggravated cases, with law enforcement required to provide needed information. All three were left pending. The committee also heard SB 955, which increases trafficking of persons from a second-degree to a first-degree felony when the victim was recruited from a correctional facility, and SB 614, which would let the Texas Forensic Science Commission refer dismissed complaints to the Office of Capital and Forensic Writs when they reference a prior FSC report; both were left pending. Members then heard several forensic and criminal procedure bills. SB 1372 would resolve a discovery/access conflict involving the DPS crime lab portal by limiting portal access to defense attorneys rather than defendants directly, prompting questions from members about access for pro se defendants; DPS’s chief crime lab witness testified neutrally. SB 1936 would change the LSD “abuse unit” definition for unmarked/unperforated paper from a square-measurement method to a 10-milligram weight standard, and SB 1937 would require a subject matter expert from the testing lab to participate in pretrial meetings in capital cases involving biological evidence to help identify viable testing and conserve resources. SB 2580 would lower the population threshold for sheriff’s departments to independently use tracking equipment and access certain communications from 3.3 million to 500,000, expanding the authority beyond Harris County; it was described as a public safety and emergency response measure and left pending. The committee also considered SB 2798, which would extend the statute of limitations for certain financial crimes from three years to seven years, with testimony from a Montgomery County assistant district attorney supporting the change because fraud is often discovered late. SB 1099 would increase penalties for felony offenses committed by undocumented or unauthorized aliens, but drew strong opposition from the Texas Civil Rights Project, which argued immigration is a federal matter and that the bill would create difficult and potentially unfair status determinations for local courts; members raised concerns about the lack of an expert-testimony requirement. SB 1278 would create an affirmative defense to prostitution prosecution for trafficking victims compelled by their traffickers to commit the conduct, and testimony from advocates and a member’s personal account emphasized the coercive, traumatic nature of trafficking; members discussed whether the defense should be narrower or framed as mitigation, and the bill was left pending. Finally, SB 127 would extend the statute of limitations for failure to report or conceal child abuse, with members discussing mandatory reporting duties and the need to allow more time for delayed discovery of cover-ups; it too was left pending before the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• They got to do it, cut the four mills.
• And I guess my question is, I still the four mill conversation.
• It's not a you may move to 4% or to four mills.
• I understand four mill conversation.
• It's you move to 4% or to four mills.

Keywords: 916, all

Summary: The committee reconvened on House Bill 11, the capital construction bill, with a quorum present and focused on several remaining amendments. Members discussed projects including a building completion in Jackson, the NC Center at Gillette College, and a University of Wyoming parking lot green space item that had already been resolved. A major point of discussion was the Gillette College proposal, which was tied to a requirement that the college move to a four-mill levy and provide a one-to-one local match; supporters argued this would bring Gillette into the state system on equal footing and was a fair incentive, while opponents raised concerns about the mechanism and the impact on their own institutions. There was also clarification that major maintenance funding for state buildings remained in the bill, while the LCCC exterior renewal project and a separate inflation-related request were distinct items. The committee first considered a motion to cut the NZ stem research facility funding from $16 million to $8 million, but that motion failed. After a brief recess, members reached a compromise on the two contested projects: a motion passed to set the Gillette NC Center at $6 million and the Jackson project at $750,000, by a vote of 5-1. The committee then unanimously reinstated the stricken University of Wyoming language in section 3. The meeting concluded with expressions of appreciation for the compromise and the bill was adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• So if you look on there's a little table on the bottom there has the SFP 12 mills, the school 31 mills
• , the county 12 mills, and then all other mills.
• has the SFP 12 mills, the school 31<00:06:16.240><c> mills,</c><00:06:17.120><c> the</c><00:06:17.360
• ><c> then</c> 31 mills, the county 12 mills, and then 31 mills, the county 12 mills, and then all<00:
• </c> all other mills. So we break that out. all other mills.

Committee: Joint Revenue

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ,</c><00:32:18.640><c> what</c> the other districts, the mill, what the other districts, the mill, what
• Yeah, the mill only applies to &gt;&gt; Go ahead.
• It's going to be in terms of that mill, right?
• Uh, one of those being um over in mills.
• ,</c> landscape uh for these larger mills, landscape uh for these larger mills, saying,<00:51:11.680>

Bills: HB0078 , HB0087 , SF0070 , SF0068 , SF0017 , SF0043

Committee: House Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources

Keywords: forest health, grant program, state forester, wildfire prevention, environmental conservation, habitat improvement, water development, feasibility studies, appropriations, water management, rehabilitation, irrigation, public works, agricultural supply, municipal water, funding, maintenance projects, tax assessments, state law, forestry management

Transcript Highlights:

• We get mill levy and values all messed up. It's the budget.
• Even if the budget goes up, the mill levy rate will go down.
• So one of the things that House Bill 389 said is you don't use the previous year's mill levy.
• You use the current year's mill levy rate.
• And so what this bill does is it says you can go back to the previous year's mill levy rate.

Summary: The House Revenue and Taxation Committee heard House Bill 842, sponsored by Speaker Moyle, as a follow-up to House Bill 389 and its effects on property tax growth, foregone amounts, and new construction. Moyle said the bill is intended as a compromise to reduce shifting of tax burdens to existing homeowners while giving taxing districts more flexibility: it would raise the cap for smaller communities and certain fire/EMS districts to 15%, eliminate adding to foregone balances going forward while allowing districts to use existing foregone at a higher rate, revert to the previous year’s mill levy rate, and allow local voters to use the initiative process to lower city or county budgets/taxes. He argued the measure would help districts with growth and give taxpayers more direct control. Public testimony was split. The Idaho Association of Counties supported the mill levy change but opposed the initiative language, warning it could be challenged under existing case law and constitutional limits on initiatives for administrative acts. The Idaho Fire Chiefs Association supported the bill, saying fast-growing districts like Star Fire District have lost budget authority and cannot keep up with growth. The Association of Idaho Cities opposed the bill, saying the 15% cap would still leave many cities unable to fund new homes or commercial growth, that foregone is an important fiscal tool, and that the initiative provisions and reduced flexibility would create problems for local governments. The Idaho Farm Bureau supported the bill, especially the initiative provision, arguing voters should have a way to lower local taxes if they can vote to raise them. After testimony, the committee debated a motion to hold the bill for one day, but a substitute motion was offered to send it directly to the floor with a due pass recommendation. Members discussed the urgency of the bill, the recent death of Nampa’s mayor, and the initiative-process concerns. The substitute motion passed on an 8-6-1 roll call vote, and House Bill 842 was sent to the House floor with a due pass recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• And that's mill valuation. Mr.
• In a real simple example, if a house is worth $100,000 and the mill rate's 250 mills, and it goes to
• $200,000, but the mill rate is cut in half to 125 mills, the property tax obligation is exactly the same
• The local share for that $11,000 per kid is 60 mills.
• So they figured out what 60 mills is.

Committee: Joint Budget Section

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senator Mills. Senator Rawlings. Vice Chair Tichenor, present. Chair Nemes, present.
• Senator Mills?
• Senator Mills? Pass. Senator Rawlings? Yes. Senator Tishner? Chair Nemes? I pass.
• Senator Mills? Senator Rawlings? Senator Tishner? Chair Nemes?
• Senator Mills? Senator Rawlings? Senator Tishner? Chair Nemes?

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:25 Attendance Roll Call: 00:31 HJR 15 (Rep. Baker): 01:15 HB 462 (Sen. Nemes for Rep. Dietz): 09:01 HB 6 (Rep. Williams): 10:18 HB 73 (Rep. Johnson): 15:21 Adjournment: 18:48, 958, all

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on State and Local Government first considered HJR 15, a resolution to return a Ten Commandments monument to the new state Capitol grounds. Representative Shane Baker described the monument’s history, its removal to storage in the 1980s, and a prior 2000 effort that was blocked by the courts. He argued recent Supreme Court decisions, including Van Orden and Kennedy, support a history-and-tradition approach and said the resolution would direct the Historic Properties Advisory Commission to retrieve and reinstall the monument in Monument Park. Senator Herron raised concerns about religious neutrality and whether other faiths would also be represented at the Capitol. Baker and Chair Petrie responded that the resolution was limited to restoring a specific historical monument and did not bar future proposals for other displays. Senator Armstrong voted no, saying the legal landscape remained uncertain and the state could face costly litigation. The committee approved HJR 15 on an 8-1 vote. The committee then took up House Bill 6, which would limit administrative agencies from issuing regulations with an economic impact of more than $500,000 over two years, with exceptions for imminent public health or safety threats, protection of federal or state funds, and compliance with certain court orders. Representative Wade Williams said the bill would rein in costly agency rulemaking and cited LRC data showing only about a dozen regulations in 2024 would have met the threshold, with roughly six after closer review. Senator Chambers Armstrong expressed concern that the bill could tie the government’s hands in emergencies, but the bill passed 8-1. Finally, the committee considered House Bill 73, which had a committee substitute. Representatives Johnson and Tipton explained that one part would add We Lead CS to the list of educational service providers allowed to administer their own retirement program participation, and the other would require the Teachers’ Retirement System actuary to provide additional information on each employer’s share of unfunded liability. The committee approved HB 73 unanimously, 10-0, and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• You know, we have a mill tax, and the mill tax pays for the implementation of the regulatory aspects
• But suffice to say, in terms of the mill fee increase specifically, and the to say, in terms of the mill
• I appreciate the concerns on the mill fee.
• You know, we had a pretty good battle on the mill fee.
• as the inflation factor added to the mill fee, which would have kept the mill fee then current.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:05:18.400><c> Senator</c><00:05:18.880><c> Mills.</c> Senator McDaniel. Aye. Senator Mills.
• Senator<00:09:54.200><c> Mills.</c> Senator Mills. Senator Mills. Senator<00:09:56.000><c> Rawlings.
• Senator<00:13:14.960><c> Mills.</c> Senator Mills. Senator Mills. Senator<00:13:16.839><c> Rawlings.
• </c><00:18:49.120><c> Senator</c><00:18:49.560><c> Mills.</c> Senator McDaniel. I. Senator Mills.
• </c> Senator Mills. Senator Rawlings. Senator Mills. Senator Rawlings.

Committee: Senate State & Local Government

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:10 Attendance Roll Call: 00:15 SB 133 Discussion: 00:52 SB 133 Vote: 05:01 SB 226 Discussion: 06:10 SB 226 Vote: 09:36 SJR 62 Discussion: 10:22 SJR 62 Vote: 12:55 SB 261 Discussion: 13:42 SB 261 Vote: 18:19 SB 262 Discussion: 19:10 SB 262 Vote: 26:36 Adjournment: 28:02, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• &gt;&gt; Senator<00:01:15.760><c> Mills?</c> &gt;&gt; Senator Mills? &gt;&gt; Senator Mills?
• &gt;&gt; Senator<00:09:49.200><c> Mills.</c> &gt;&gt; Senator Mills. &gt;&gt; Senator Mills.
• &gt;&gt; Hi, &gt;&gt; Hi, &gt;&gt; Hi, &gt;&gt; Senator<00:14:17.680><c> Mills.
• </c> &gt;&gt; Senator Mills. &gt;&gt; Senator Mills.
• . >> Senator Mills. >> Senator Mills. >> Hi. >> Hi. >> Hi. >> Senator Rawlings. >> Senator Rawlings.

Committee: Senate State & Local Government

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:06 Attendance Roll Call: 00:11 SB 53 Discussion: 01:54 SB 53 Vote: 09:09 SB 192 Discussion: 10:15 SB 192 Vote: 13:42 HB 290 Discussion: 15:02 HB 290 Vote: 16:08 HB 314 Discussion: 16:45 HB 314 Vote: 19:38 Adjournment: 21:32, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank you to the members of the CNC committee for moving this bill along.
• By removing this mills from receipts, this bill will cut daily exposure to harmful chemicals to protect

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senator Mills, here. Senator Rawlings. Senator Tichenor. Vice Chair Elkins, present.
• Senator Mills, I'm glad you brought this, and you did the right thing.
• Senator Mills, I'm glad you brought this, and you did the right thing.
• Senator Mills, I'm glad you brought this, and you did the right thing.
• </c> bledo Senator McDaniel hi Senator Mills bledo Senator McDaniel hi Senator Mills hi<00:31:15.880>

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:11 Attendance Roll Call: 00:18 Senate Bill 10 (Sen. Mills): 01:47 Senate Bill 65 (Sen. West): 18:47 Senate Bill 104 (Sen. Madon): 25:41 Adjournment: 31:38, 958, all

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on State and Local Government heard testimony on Senate Bill 10, which would revise CERS retiree health subsidies for members who began participating on or before July 1, 2003. Senator Mills said the bill was developed with employee and employer groups to improve retiree health benefits while protecting the system’s financial footing, using a shared-cost structure. Testimony from sheriffs, police chiefs, firefighters, and the League of Cities strongly supported the bill, emphasizing recruitment and retention, affordability of retiree health coverage, and limited taxpayer risk. Members echoed those points, and the committee approved SB 10 with a 9-0 favorable recommendation. The committee then took up Senate Bill 65, sponsored by Senator West, which would codify the Administrative Regulations Committee’s annual practice of placing certain deficient regulations into statute so they cannot take effect. West explained that the committee’s role is limited to finding regulations deficient or asking for deferral, and that SB 65 is the fifth version of this measure. He described the specific regulation at issue as a Medicaid Services rule that would have required behavioral health associates to hold a master’s degree; providers testified that it would reduce the workforce and harm behavioral health services statewide. West said the committee had deferred the matter eight times before deciding to side with providers. The bill received favorable expression and was reported out. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 104, sponsored by Senator Madon, concerning Kentucky Deferred Comp for state employees. The bill would establish a codified fiduciary standard, authorize fiduciary liability insurance, add self-correcting mechanisms to keep the plan in compliance with federal law, and allow self-directed brokerage accounts. Personnel Cabinet representatives said the changes would align the plan with other public pension plans, reduce risk, and offer participants a useful investment option with strong account growth among users. SB 104 also received favorable expression and was reported to the floor. The committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have no idea what this carbon CO2 stuff they're getting off these paper mills, paper, uh, steel mills
• </c><00:08:59.519><c> We</c><00:08:59.839><c> is</c><00:09:00.000><c> very</c> mills, paper uh steel
• mills.
• We is very mills, paper uh steel mills.
• injecting oil well to get oil out mill injecting oil well to get oil out at<00:09:52.560><c> first.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ,</c> &gt;&gt; Senator Mills, &gt;&gt; Senator Mills, &gt;&gt; hi &gt;&gt; hi &gt;&gt; hi &gt;&gt; Senator
• &gt;&gt; Senator<00:13:44.639><c> Mills.</c><00:13:45.120><c> Hi.</c> &gt;&gt; Senator Mills. Hi.
• Senator Mills. Hi. Senator Rawlings. Senator Tishner. Chair Nemes. I.
• Senator Mills. Hi. Senator Rawlings. Senator Tishner. Hi. Chair Nemes. I.
• Senator Mills, &gt;&gt; Hi.

Committee: Senate State & Local Government

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:05 Attendance Roll Call: 00:09 HB 456 Discussion: 02:05 HB 456 Vote: 07:00 HB 136 Discussion: 07:54 HB 136 Vote: 09:36 HB 448 Discussion: 10:28 HB 448 Vote: 13:26 HB 220 Discussion: 14:12 HB 220 Vote: 17:14 HB 213 Discussion: 18:17 HB 213 Vote: 19:19 HB 518 Discussion: 20:23 HB 518 Vote: 23:03 HB 600 Discussion: 24:05 HB 600 Vote: 25:17 Adjournment: 26:32, 958, all