Video & Transcript Research : 'shared ride'
Page 67 of 500
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado Senate 2026 Legislative Day 115 May 8th, 2026
Colorado Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- subdivisions share personal Sorry. subdivisions share personal Sorry.
- Share<01:12:34.640>
persons' Share persons' Share persons' identifying<01:12:36.680>information - I share their goals from with this bill.
- Um, under those rules, you're not allowed to share legal fees with non-attorneys.
- those rules, you're not allowed to share those rules, you're not allowed to share legal<04:06:33.440
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/25
Transportation Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- c> a<00:15:34.880>
car <00:15:35.240>and <00:15:35.360>even learned that riding - in a car and even learned that riding in a car and even wearing<00:15:35.839>
sunglasses <00:15 - to share about the positive<00:21:04.840>
impact <00:21:05.280>of <00:21:05.480>this - Josh Canton Hubinger, and asked them to share their thoughts because they were just laying the spill
- <01:10:51.040>
with clarification if you could uh share with clarification if you could uh
Keywords:
accident reporting, law enforcement, data privacy, contracted service providers, public safety, HF639, Minnesota driver license, Department of Public Safety, driver medical review, loss of consciousness, voluntary control, seizure, nonepileptic seizure, epilepsy, antiseizure medication, physician statement, medical certification, commercial driver, CDL, medical examiner's certificate
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
CPN, CPN DEFER Public Hearings 01-31-2025
Transcript Highlights:
- practice in this committee to allow in-person and online live testifiers two minutes to clarify or share
- Your two minutes are your own to share, but if you'd like to stand on your comments then we'd be happy
- <00:01:22.960>
any <00:01:23.240>additional <00:01:23.680>thoughts clarify or share - any additional thoughts clarify or share any additional thoughts or<00:01:24.159>
feelings <00 - uh but if you'd like to stand on share uh but if you'd like to stand on your<00:01:54.200>
comments
Summary:
The committee opened by outlining hearing procedures, including a two-minute limit for live testimony, a request not to repeat written testimony, and a reminder about decorum. The first bill heard was SB 697, which would create a nonrefundable individual income tax credit for expenses to retrofit residences with wind-resistive devices. The Insurance Division said it supported the concept but noted it may need an appropriation or outside expertise to develop certification standards, while the Department of Taxation said the bill should retain a third-party certification requirement if the Insurance Division cannot administer the credit. The Hawaii Insurers Council supported the bill, and the Tax Foundation suggested a subsidy-style program would be more efficient than a tax credit and criticized the bill’s 100% credit structure. A testifier in support argued the measure would help homeowners fortify houses against hurricanes and reduce shelter demand; written testimony from several others, including HIEMA, was noted as supportive.
The committee then moved through SB 76, which would require the Hawaii Property Insurance Association to provide commercial property coverage after two private-market denials, and SB 83, which would require insurers to give advance written premium-change notices and explanations to common-interest community policyholders and the insurance commissioner, along with a report on premium increases. For SB 76, the State Insurance Division stood on its written comments, and testimony in support came from Michael Honda, the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, and Jessica Herzog. SB 83 drew more extensive discussion: the Insurance Division supported the need for better transparency, while the Hawaii Insurers Council opposed the bill, arguing that agents—not insurers—typically communicate with AOAO boards and that the measure could worsen an already difficult market. Insurance Division staff acknowledged widespread complaints from condo associations about lack of transparency and said the division had received many calls about premium increases and nonrenewals.
The discussion on SB 83 expanded into broader concerns about condo insurance, nonrenewals, surplus lines, and the difficulty of getting timely explanations for large premium increases. Committee members and testifiers described older buildings struggling to fund repairs and upgrades while facing steep insurance costs, and some urged the committee to craft baseline statutory protections for unit owners. The Insurance Division said surplus lines serve a critical gap-filling role and warned against regulating that market in a way that could slow access to coverage. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
AZ
Arizona 2026 Regular Session
02/10/2026 - Senate Appropriations, Transportation and Technology
Appropriations, Transportation and Technology
Transcript Highlights:
- In Illinois, police illegally share data with Texas on a woman seeking abortion care.
- It's an information-sharing system between law enforcement. It is a secure system.
- You get caught sharing information outside of that.
- We asked our providers for some information to share with you all today.
- It's not like they are getting a free ride on this as well. Mr.
Bills:
SB1072, SB1111, SB1114, SB1116, SB1122, SB1179, SB1250, SB1308, SB1455, SB1456, SB1457, SB1487, SB1547, SB1549, SB1551, SB1552
Keywords:
reimbursement rates, intellectual disabilities, community services, economic security, funding appropriations, automated license plate readers, law enforcement, privacy, data access, public records, behavioral health, patient brokering, appropriation, state funds, Maricopa County, claims review, medical necessity, American Indian health program, healthcare regulations, healthcare
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- It's never something that we want to continue to share and pour out of us. It's taxing.
- Thank you for being here to share your story with us. We know that this is not easy.
- Summer, thank you for sharing your story again with us.
- Currently, federal law bars individuals on the national sex offender registry from working as ride share
- Additionally, sex offenders who drive for ride share companies are not required to disclose their status
Bills:
HB47
Keywords:
HB 47, Texas Tax Code, ad valorem taxes, property tax, voter-approval tax rate, tax rate election, taxing unit, injunction, taxpayer rights, property owner, local government finance, tax refund, attorney's fees, court costs, voter-approved tax increase, tax reform, municipal taxes, county taxes, school district taxes, bond election
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on State Administration Mar 18th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- were going to do, it wouldn't be used in an incorrect way or that data wouldn't be inappropriately shared
- Especially given the new projects proposed, and generally we share the concern of the legislature around
- I know for a fact many fellows share similar lived experiences and motivations.
- My name is Jasmine Lopez and I'm happy to share my testimony on being and a College Corps alumni.
- I love sharing my story and hope that it inspires other students to become service members.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- for parking would increase or decrease in the future, especially as people rely on Lyft, Uber, and ride-sharing
- <04:33:38.959>
And <04:33:39.119>I <04:33:39.279>think and ride sharing services - And I think and ride sharing services?
- <04:39:00.240>
share autonomous vehicles or Ubers ride share autonomous vehicles or Ubers - ride share um<04:39:01.039>
other <04:39:01.279>things <04:39:01.520>like <04:39:
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
November 6, 2025 - 09:00 AM
Transcript Highlights:
- Ride a tour and answer any questions we may have.
Summary:
The State Administration Budget Subcommittee was called to order and a roll call established a quorum. Chair Lopez noted Vice Chair Mager was excused, and members present were recorded before the meeting proceeded.
The chair explained that, unlike the committee’s usual budget work, the subcommittee would conduct a site visit to the new State Emergency Operations Center. The purpose was to see how taxpayer funding is being used and to compare the current and new facilities. The chair said both the current and new EOC are managed by the Department of Management Services and are part of the Florida facilities pool.
The chair also summarized the funding history for the project, stating the Legislature appropriated $100 million for construction in fiscal year 2021-2022 and $80 million in fiscal year 2022-2023, with additional funding for technology infrastructure, bringing the total appropriated amount to just over $200 million. Members were instructed to begin the tour by visiting the current EOC, then travel to the new EOC for a tour and questions.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 4/8/26
Public Safety Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:48:25.440>
home partner and said, "On the bus ride home partner and said, "On the bus - Throughout that process, there was a shared understanding that the new funding structure could result
- Throughout that process there<01:32:56.240>
was <01:32:56.520>a <01:32:56.600>shared - there was a shared understanding that the<01:32:57.880>
new <01:32:58.044>[clears throat]< - > a<01:34:47.600>
more shared recognition that a more shared recognition that a more comprehensive
Keywords:
school safety, threat assessment, pilot project, education, real-time monitoring, public safety, HF4299, school safety specialists, Minnesota School Safety Center, appropriation, general fund, fiscal year 2026, school security, school violence prevention, student safety, Department of Public Safety, school resource support, education funding, peace officer, training reimbursement
DE
Transcript Highlights:
- As my colleagues have so powerfully shared, we are the mental health providers in our schools.
- We share the goal of ensuring safe and supportive, consistent environments for all students to achieve
- Just on behalf of CSOA, we shared gases, comments, and also on the request that was presented.
- I didn't share, I didn't circulate this one.
- I didn't share. I didn't circulate this one. Now, here's my only point. So I was focused on that.
Summary:
The Senate Education Committee met with enough members present to conduct business and approved the June 17 minutes. It first heard HB 459 with House Amendment 1, which would prohibit the sale of energy drinks on public middle and high school campuses during school hours or school events. The sponsor and Department of Education explained that the bill targets beverages containing caffeine and marketed as energy drinks, not ordinary soft drinks or coffee/tea products. Public testimony from the Medical Society supported the bill on health grounds, while the beverage industry said its companies already voluntarily limit school offerings and that the bill does not reflect current practice. No vote was taken in the transcript.
The committee then heard HB 461, a follow-up to prior legislation on New Castle County property reassessment and school tax rates. Senator Cruz said the bill would let New Castle County school districts adjust and reset tax rates to reflect reassessment changes without increasing projected operating revenue, and that it includes a sunset. DSEA supported the measure, saying fair property values are important to public education funding. The committee also heard HB 452, which would require additional background checks and training for DIAA sports officials and strengthen DIAA enforcement procedures. Members questioned how checks would be handled, who would see the results, and who would provide training; the DIAA compliance coordinator said the checks would be maintained through the state process and that associations would verify eligibility. The bill’s sponsor and DIAA said the goal was to align officials with existing child-safety standards.
Next, the committee considered HS1 for HB 425, which raises the salary supplement from 6% to 12% for nationally certified school counselors, nurses, and school social workers, and allows DOE to identify additional qualifying positions by regulation. Supporters, including school social workers, nurses, and DSEA, argued the change would improve retention and recognize advanced credentials. Senator Hansen raised concerns that school psychologists were not included; sponsors said a broader study and possible future legislation or budget language would address other nationally certified school-based professionals. The committee then heard HS1 for HB 358 on student elopement notifications, inspired by Ace’s Law, but administrators and the chair raised concerns that the bill may be too prescriptive and difficult to implement in practice, especially when schools may not immediately know a student has left campus. Finally, the committee discussed HB 379 on the comprehensive school discipline improvement program; DOE said the substitute was intended to consolidate prevention and intervention supports and avoid competition for funding, while DASA asked that the bill be paused or tabled. The meeting ended before action on the remaining bill, and HB 443 was deferred to a future executive meeting.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Let me share with you. This amazing love story and their legacy and life of service.
- amendment says if the people of Texas ever decide that these automated trades should pay their fair share
- Let's not give Wall Street's gamblers a free ride in our constitution.
- The bottom 20% of earners pay a greater share of their income in taxes than the top 1%.
- motor vehicles through peer-to-peer car sharing programs, and imposing a penalty, for the Committee
Keywords:
occupation tax, securities, financial regulation, tax exemption, legislative amendment, capital gains tax, realized gains, unrealized gains, investment income, asset sale, capital assets, wealth tax, estate tax, trust tax, tax limitation, constitutional amendment, Texas Constitution, Article VIII, property tax, sales tax
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Thursday, June 25, 2026)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Thank you to everyone who came out and to those who had a hand in sharing Curry Tuck Jack's courage to
- Last week, I had the opportunity to participate in a ride-along with the Firefighters from AFD Engine
- Puerto Rico shares your concern on behalf of the honest, hardworking majority of Puerto Ricans.
- The shared waterway includes tribal fishing grounds and shellfish beds, and this MOU will compensate
- Large share of Medicare spending on age 65. So this is... The distribution, just so you understand.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
- I want to share that with somebody.
- I want to share that with somebody else that had questions about Charlie Kirk and comments.
- money for Special Olympics, coordinate police and fire fundraisers, Jeanette Ballard: I've seen him ride
- advanced practice registered nurses who diagnose and treat patients, and all of that reporting must be shared
- Senator Calatayud: Must be shared with the registry. That is the bill, Madam Chair.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Now I'd like to share a little bit about what we do at the Texas Department of Insurance.
- Also when we respond to legislative inquiries, we share educational materials that can be put in into
- Member companies must share a portion of TWAIA's losses through assessments as prescribed by statute.
- must have been declined wind and hail coverage by at least one. a private market company actively riding
- As we mentioned, Tuya's share of the coastal market is, I would say, more significant.
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
Senate Chamber Feb 5th, 2026 at 11:33 am
New Mexico Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Senator Share votes yes. Senator Shendo votes no. Senator Solz votes no.
- So, Senator, share, to your point, we are debating the motion. So you're right.
- Senator, share that. ...on subjects referred to them.
- Senator Share that, I'm going to go to Senator Worth. Mr.
- Senator Share votes no. Senator Shendo votes yes. Senator Soles votes yes.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Cmte on Rules - Subcommittee on the Federal Impact on Minnesotans and Economic Stability - 01/15/26
Transcript Highlights:
- practice of the committee to not share practice of the committee to not share in<00:03:12.959>
<00:32:29.600>up-to-date we'll of course share up-to-date we'll of course share up-to-date - much for sharing that with us. much for sharing that with us.
- here and sharing that with us. here and sharing that with us.
- Zoom to share their direct experiences. Zoom to share their direct experiences.
Summary:
The Select Subcommittee first took up adoption of three previously prepared nonpartisan committee summary reports dated October 15, November 13, and November 21. Senator Rasmusson objected to the lack of advance notice about the day’s testifiers and criticized the practice of having nonpartisan staff summarize what he described as a partisan agenda. The chair responded that the committee’s purpose is to gather information, not hear bills, and that the summaries were intended as neutral resources for the Senate. Senator Coopek moved adoption, the motion was opposed by Rasmusson and another member, and the motion passed.
The committee then turned to the day’s hearing on federal impacts on Minnesota, with the chair focusing on federal funding threats and the effect of congressional budget actions on health care, especially in greater Minnesota. The first presentation came from the Minnesota Department of Health on the state’s rural health transformation work. Assistant Commissioner Carol Broom introduced the team and described the rural hospital transformation program as a major opportunity to invest in rural health, while acknowledging longstanding challenges such as demographics, transportation barriers, and the financing of care. Nitha Moibi outlined the state’s rural health chart book and data showing an aging population, workforce shortages, and many health professional shortage areas, and described proposed strategies including workforce pipelines, bridge payments for low-volume birth hospitals, telehealth access points, mental health urgent care, and chronic disease prevention.
Acting Assistant Commissioner Anna Ashby of the Minnesota Management and Budget office explained the state’s application to CMS for the Rural Health Transformation Program, which was created in federal law and awarded Minnesota just over $193 million for federal fiscal year 2026. She said the application was shaped by public comments, stakeholder meetings, and legislative outreach, and included initiatives on preventive care, workforce, care access, behavioral health, and provider financial stability. She also reviewed implementation constraints, including a January 30 revised budget deadline, limits on administrative spending, restrictions on using funds to offset Medicaid losses, and the need to show measurable progress to remain eligible for future funding. The presentation noted that most year-one funding would go to rural hospitals, with additional support for federally qualified health centers, community mental health centers, tribal partners, and technical assistance.
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
JHA Public Hearing - Tue Feb 10, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST
Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- They gave me a ride. My father gave me a place to sleep.
- They gave<00:58:05.839>
me <00:58:05.920>a <00:58:06.079>ride. - My father gave me a gave me a ride.
- Who did you share it with? What did you share? What was the circumstances behind that sharing?
- Who did you share it with? What did you share? What were the circumstances behind that sharing?
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on House Bill 1552, which would make the attorney general the interim chief election officer if that office becomes vacant until the Elections Commission appoints a replacement. The Department of the Attorney General opposed the bill, saying it could create a conflict of interest if the attorney general were both the state’s lawyer and the chief elections officer in any related litigation. The League of Women Voters supported having some interim backup for the office, but said it was not necessarily advocating that the attorney general fill the role. Several other testifiers, including the Hawaiian Islands Republican Women, opposed the bill, arguing the current law already provides for a prompt commission appointment and warning about partisan bias and concentration of power. Supporters, including Indivisible Hawaii, said an interim mechanism is needed to ensure election certification in a crisis. The chair also asked whether any statutory acting capacity already exists, and the attorney general said none was known.
The committee then took up House Bill 2125, which would bar corporations operating under state law from engaging in election activity. The attorney general opposed the bill, citing Citizens United and arguing that corporations have First Amendment-protected political speech rights and that the bill would likely be unconstitutional. Indivisible Hawaii supported the measure, saying it would keep elections focused on the will of the people rather than corporate influence. Libertarian Party testimony was mixed: one witness supported the goal of reducing corruption but warned the bill could suppress organized dissent and sweep too broadly by treating many associations as corporations. The bill’s introducer asked whether the legislature could still enact it as a policy matter, but the attorney general maintained federal constitutional law would control. No vote was taken on either bill during the portion of the hearing provided.
The committee also heard House Bill 2493 on wrongful imprisonment, which would set procedures and compensation for people whose convictions are reversed or vacated on grounds consistent with innocence and whose charges are dismissed. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation supported the bill’s intent but objected to language assigning it responsibility for helping released individuals secure housing, identification, health coverage, and other reentry needs, saying it no longer has jurisdiction after release and suggesting the courts or a community-based contractor handle that role. The Office of the Public Defender strongly supported the bill, emphasizing the harm of wrongful conviction and the need for compensation, case management, and medical coverage after release. No action or vote was reported on this measure in the excerpt.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- a little bit about how federal share a little bit about how federal funding<00:48:06.240>
cuts - <01:07:51.280>
listening they bonded through a shared listening they bonded through a shared - And so I'd like to share a couple of instances where we did get to see that.
- This is just adding a section that will make them build a park-and-ride facility at Leeward.
- <02:56:39.120>
facility them build a uh park and ride facility them build a uh park and ride
AR
MO
Missouri 2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement Apr 28th, 2026 at 08:30 am
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Transcript Highlights:
- Well, thank you both for the information you shared with us.
- So does the lion’s share of the responsibility fall on the investment advisor?”
- The 32% that rides up to an 80% funded ratio, is that correct?
- And I know we've talked probably about this, and I've shared my comments, but on the lawsuit that was
- I really appreciate the slides that you shared.
Summary:
The Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement held a hearing focused on the Missouri State Employees’ Retirement System (MOSERS) and its long-term financial condition. MOSERS staff and its investment consultant reviewed the system’s structure, membership, funding policy, and investment approach. They reported a June 30, 2025 funded ratio of 55.4%, with about $17.4 billion in liabilities and $9.6 billion in assets, and explained that the board certified a 32% employer contribution rate under its minimum contribution policy, up from 30.25%, which will increase state appropriations. They also described the system as mature, with more retirees and inactive members than active employees, and said declining payroll growth has made it harder to improve funding.
The presentation emphasized that recent board actions were intended to strengthen the plan over the long term, even though they increased near-term costs. Those changes included lowering the assumed investment return over time to 6.95%, updating mortality assumptions, moving from an open to a closed amortization schedule, and adopting a minimum employer contribution policy. The investment consultant said MOSERS historically used a more risk-balanced asset allocation than many peers, which helped explain weaker relative returns during a long period when public equities outperformed; the board has since shifted toward a more equity-oriented allocation. He said recent performance has improved, with the portfolio outperforming its policy index and ranking better against peers in the short term, though longer-term peer performance remains a concern.
Committee members questioned why the funded ratio had declined over roughly 20 years and whether past investment and actuarial assumptions were too optimistic or too conservative. MOSERS officials responded that the current board is trying to correct earlier decisions and that the present strategy is more in line with industry practice. Members also discussed a proposed MOSERS bill package that would automatically refund small balances to terminated non-vested members and increase deferred compensation auto-escalation, with officials saying the refund provision would improve efficiency and return small balances sooner. The committee also briefly discussed ongoing litigation involving Catalyst Capital; MOSERS said attorney fees have been about $20 million so far, the case remains on appeal, and the damages amount is sealed. No formal votes were taken, and the committee adjourned after questions and discussion.