Video & Transcript Research : 'Penal Code Section 49.04'

Page 63 of 500
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

House of Representatives Mar 31st, 2026

Louisiana House Floor Meeting

Bills: HR84, HR85, HR86, HR87, HR88, HR89, HR90, HCR42, HCR43, HB1087, HB1088, HB1089, HB1090, HB1091, HB1092, HB1093, HB1094, HB1095, HB1096, HB1097, HB1098, HB1099, HB1100, HB1101, HB1102, HB1103, HB1104, HB1105, HB1106, HB1107, HB1108, HB1109, HB1110, HB1111, HB1112, HB1113, HB1114, HB1115, HB1116, HB1117, HB1118, HB1119, HB1120, HB1121, HB1122, HB1123, HB1124, HB1125, HB1126, HB1127, HB1128, HB1129, HB1130, HB1131, HB1132, HB1133, HB1134, HB1135, HB1136, HB1137, HB1138, HB1139, HB1140, HB1141, HB1142, HB1143, HB1144, HB1145, HB1146, HB1147, HB1148, HB1149, HB1150, HB1151, HB1153, HB1154, HB1155, HB1156, HB1157, HB1158, HB1159, HB1160, HB1161, HB1162, HB1163, HB1164, HB1165, HB1166, HB1167, HB1169, HB1170, HB1171, HB1172, HB1173, HB1174, HB1175, HB1176, HB1177, HB1178, HB1179, HB1180, HB1181, HB1182, HB1183, HB1184, HB1185, HB1186, HB1187, HB1188, HB1189, HB1190, HB1192, HB1193, HB1194, HB1195, HB1196, HB1197, HB1198, HB1199, HB1200, HB1201, HB1202, HB1203, HB1204, HB1205, HB1206, HB1207, HB1208, HB1209, HB1210, HB1211, HB1212, HB1213, HB1214, HB1215, HB1216, HB1217, HB1218, HB1219, HB1220, HB1221, HB1222, HB1223, HB1224, HB1225, HB1226, HB1227, HB1228, HB1229, HB1230, HB1231, HR73, HR74, HR75, HR77, HR78, HR79, HR80, HR81, HR83, HCR36, HCR37, HCR38, HCR39, HCR40, HCR41, HB368, HB433, HB1017, HB1018, HB1019, HB1020, HB1021, HB1022, HB1023, HB1024, HB1025, HB1026, HB1027, HB1028, HB1029, HB1030, HB1031, HB1032, HB1033, HB1034, HB1035, HB1036, HB1037, HB1038, HB1039, HB1040, HB1041, HB1042, HB1043, HB1044, HB1045, HB1046, HB1047, HB1048, HB1049, HB1050, HB1051, HB1052, HB1053, HB1054, HB1055, HB1056, HB1057, HB1058, HB1059, HB1060, HB1061, HB1062, HB1063, HB1064, HB1065, HB1066, HB1067, HB1068, HB1069, HB1070, HB1071, HB1072, HB1073, HB1074, HB1075, HB1076, HB1077, HB1078, HB1079, HB1080, HB1081, HB1082, HB1083, HB1084, SB111, SB122, SB195, SB221, SB404, HR1, HCR6, HCR19, HB27, HB81, HB134, HB154, HB163, HB170, HB194, HB214, HB217, HB220, HB254, HB259, HB290, HB308, HB311, HB360, HB382, HB401, HB410, HB417, HB463, HB514, HB575, HB592, HB718, HB723, HB750, HB755, HB776, HB812, HB830, HB838, HB844, HB882, HB885, HB888, HB950, HB961, HB966, HB980, HR15, HR20, HCR14, HB58, HB69, HB93, HB166, HB199, HB201, HB202, HB218, HB223, HB224, HB231, HB235, HB246, HB338, HB349, HB352, HB379, HB405, HB429, HB535, HB547, HB577, HB588, HB626, HB636, HB652, HB653, HB669, HB688, HB691, HB721, HB738, HB806, HB851, HB857, HB861, HB889, HB904, HB907, HB908, HB929, HB1009, HB13, HB23, HB25, HB32, HB41, HB90, HB120, HB121, HB122, HB127, HB138, HB139, HB141, HB179, HB187, HB213, HB247, HB286, HB332, HB344, HB357
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • That way we still have access to our penal code chapter 12 enhancements, and I'm happy to answer any
  • Despite the success, we are continuously hamstrung by the lack of anything in the penal code to address
  • Again, none of these crimes are addressed in the penal code, and the use or possession of these devices
  • Pursuant to Texas Penal Code Section 6.03, a person is criminally negligent when he ought to be aware
  • You know, desire is to ensure that if there are, to the extent there are gaps in the penal code with
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Instead of making that offense a second-degree felony, it cuts off our access to our Penal Code Chapter
  • We still have access to our Penal Code Chapter 12 enhancements, and I'm happy to answer any questions
  • Despite the success, we're... ...continuously hamstrung by the lack of anything in the penal code to
  • Again, none of these crimes are addressed in the penal code, and the use or possession of these devices
  • Code section 6.03.
Keywords: 1184, house, all
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Public Safety Committee Mar 11th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • Code Section 29810.
  • AB 383 would address this gap by amending Penal Code Section 29810 to include juvenile adjudications,
  • Code Section 29820.
  • To clarify, certain provisions would dictate that, for a simple possession, I think under Penal Code
  • Code 4019.3. ...per eight-hour shift that is currently in state law via Penal Code 4019.3, allowing
Summary: The committee heard several public safety-related bills. AB 383 by Assembly Member Davies would expand and clarify firearm restrictions tied to juvenile adjudications, allow certain minor firearm possession for hunting or training with guardian approval, and authorize warrants in some domestic violence-related firearm surrender situations. Supporters, including a district attorney representative, argued it would close gaps in existing law and improve public safety; opponents said it would over-criminalize youth and disproportionately affect marginalized communities. The bill passed as amended to Appropriations. AB 400 by Assembly Member Pacheco would require law enforcement K-9 units to meet statewide POST standards covering training, use of force, and handler skills. Supporters said the bill would create consistency, accountability, and safer deployments; opponents argued the standards were inadequate and would legitimize harmful canine practices. After debate over whether the bill expanded canine use or simply standardized it, the committee approved AB 400 and sent it to Appropriations. AB 380 by Assembly Member Gonzalez would extend price-gouging protections during emergencies, including for hotels, food, essential goods and services, and commercial property, and would remove the 12-month lease limit loophole for rent gouging. Supporters said the bill responds to wildfire-related exploitation and provides clarity for disaster victims; business and landlord groups warned it could amount to commercial rent control and create uncertainty for future emergencies. The author said he would continue working on amendments, and the bill passed as amended to Appropriations. AB 358 by Assembly Member Alvarez would create a narrow exception to Cal-ECPA so law enforcement could inspect tracking or surveillance devices found in a person’s home, vehicle, or property with the finder’s consent. Supporters said the change would help stalking and domestic violence victims preserve evidence quickly; privacy advocates argued warrants and existing emergency exceptions already cover these situations. The chair proposed narrowing the language to “tracking or surveillance device,” and the bill was held on call after an initial roll with only three votes in favor. The transcript also began AB 247, which would raise pay for incarcerated hand crew firefighters, with testimony from formerly incarcerated firefighters in support, but the discussion was not completed in the excerpt.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Public Safety REVISED Apr 14th, 2026 at 08:30 am

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so, I understand that under section B2, it provides a process for people who've been convicted of
  • And so, looking at Section A, line 20, it talks about people. Convicted of felonies.
  • Looking at page two, Section B, line 5, it talks about people being convicted of felonies.
  • And so, I'm looking at Section A, and it covers people.
  • I'm looking at Section B on page two. It talks about people convicted of a felony.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 2nd, 2026 at 03:25 pm

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're looking at agency code 790.
  • It's a different program code within DPS, but they're both healthy.
  • How could they be a different code when they're both healthy insurance premiums?
  • We'll be reviewing Agency Code 770.
Bills: SB48, SB64, SB100
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 2nd, 2026 at 09:02 am

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair, and Senator, I notice in the bill it says it amends a section of law. 635 1, section 1 through
  • Chairman, Senator Woods, Section 1 of the Act makes a technical fix since the bill adds a new section
  • The title reads Sections 1-12, and I suspect it's going to add now a Section 13 with this addition.
  • and it says Sections 1-12 of this Act, and that's gone. through.
  • So we've added on page eight, it's in section B.
Bills: SB48, SB64, SB100
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Also, I sent you some Texas Occupation Code.
  • Based on the Texas Occupations Code. Thank you.
  • The nurses use those codes. Nurses use those codes all the time.
  • In the practice section of the bill, Section 301, 357, I think this is important because you all will
  • Take care of an emergent case that required a C-section.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This legislation is vital in ensuring that individuals are not penalized or subjected to policies that
  • Section one of the bill amends Chapter 57 of the Occupations Code to add two new sections. 57.003 prohibits
  • This section also exempts certain conditions.
  • I just want to note that the definition of imminent serious bodily injury is derived from the Penal Code
  • According to a government code section 62, a person is disqualified from jury duty if he or she has served
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) May 1st, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This legislation is vital in ensuring that individuals are not penalized or subjected to policies that
  • Section 1 of the bill amends Chapter 57 of the Occupations Code to add two new subsections. 57.003 prohibits
  • and I just want to note that the definition of imminent serious bodily injury is derived from the penal
  • code, um, on, in, uh, chapter 22 on assault, and imminence comes from, uh, various interpretive opinions
  • According to a government code section 62, 10 or 1027, a person is disqualified from jury duty if he
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee Feb 26th, 2025

Public Safety and Homeland Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • It simply says if a person violates this code section, they are subject to a 24-hour temporary hold..
  • The substitute just changes a section of the title code.
  • House Bill 15 is simply a technical change to section… It's simply a technical change to section 12-1256
  • of the Code of Alabama.
  • 12-1256 that, at that time, it penalizes or opens… At that time, it penalizes or opens the door for
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 5, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:52:48.400> 106 recognition um for their section 106 recognition um for their section 106
  • <00:53:37.520> 106 then they also do the section 106 then they also do the section 106 historic
  • Shoreline is already defined in section. Never mind.
  • Shoreline is already defined in section. Shoreline is already defined in section.
  • And I'm going to take out the section And I'm going to take out the section where<02:15:31.360><
Summary: The committee first heard HB 1527 relating to gambling. The chair outlined hearing rules, including a two-minute limit and a warning that bills not heard would die. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support from a prosecutor, Honolulu Police Department, and Stop Predatory Gambling, all arguing that casinos and sports betting increase crime, sex trafficking, harassment of athletes, and broader social harm. No opposition testimony was presented, and the committee moved on without questions or action taken on the bill. The committee then heard HB 1823 relating to coastal zone management and HB 2490 relating to coastal resilience. For HB 1823, DLNR, the Office of Planning, and Maui County testified, with Maui County supporting the measure and its proposed amendments. For HB 2490, DLNR expressed concern about exempting a proposed Mokuji Bay pilot project from permits and regulation before a long-term plan is finalized, while the County of Maui, the Mokuji Soto Zen Mission, and the Office of Planning supported the bill as a coastal resilience pilot. The mission described severe erosion, sea-level rise impacts, and years of unsuccessful efforts to stabilize the shoreline; its consultant said the study is leaning toward nature-based and hybrid solutions. In questioning, members and DLNR discussed whether the bill should say the project “shall” or “may” be exempt, and the chair indicated the language would be adjusted to preserve DLNR discretion and to change the lead agency reference to OPSD. No vote was taken in the transcript. Finally, the committee took up HB 2223 relating to historic preservation reviews. SHPD said it stood on its written comments, while OPSD and DHHL supported the bill. DHHL argued the measure would streamline reviews, improve transparency, and help address long wait times for its projects, saying it could alleviate burden on SHPD and better serve beneficiaries. Representative Shimizu questioned whether the bill would create redundancy and expand government rather than strengthen SHPD, noting a separate staffing bill already exists. SHPD responded that DHHL is uniquely subject to 6E review and that the bill would not waive federal or state historic review requirements; the discussion also touched on possible federal-style grant support and the existing memorandum of agreement between SHPD and DHHL. The transcript ends during questioning, with no final committee action shown.