Video & Transcript Research : 'vehicle code'

Page 60 of 500
DE

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Education Committee Meeting Jun 17th, 2026

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's an act to amend Title 14 of the Delaware Code related to child care. House Bill 447.
  • It's an act to amend Title 14 of the Delaware Code related to child care.
  • It's an act to amend title 14 of the dollar code related to child care.
  • It's an act to amend Title 14 of the Delaware Code relating to the establishment of a Title IX coordinator
Bills: SB293, SB279
Summary: The Senate Education Committee approved the June 10 minutes and then heard House Bill 447, which would create a framework for voluntary child care cost-sharing partnerships among the state, employers, community sponsors, and families. Supporters said the bill is meant to help make child care more affordable and support workforce participation by using the existing Interagency Resource Management Committee to coordinate planning and funding. Committee discussion focused on how the tri-share model would work, who would participate, and whether it would reach lower-income families; no public comment was offered on the bill. The committee then took up House Bill 300, as amended, which would establish a statewide Title IX coordinator within the Department of Education to provide training, technical assistance, data collection, and oversight for interscholastic athletics in grades 6 through 12. The bill’s sponsor and supporters said the position would help schools comply with Title IX, improve consistency, and make athletic participation and spending data more transparent; opponents or skeptics questioned whether a new DOE position was needed and whether districts were already meeting their obligations. The sponsor and witnesses responded that existing federal data are delayed and incomplete, that some Delaware schools have participation gaps, and that a state-level coordinator would provide needed support and accountability. Public comment on HB 300 included testimony from the Delaware State Education Association, the Delaware Association of School Administrators, the Delaware School Sports Network, and the Office of Women’s Advancement and Advocacy, all generally supporting the bill or its goals. DASA noted it remained neutral but appreciated changes made in House Amendment 1 to reduce reporting burden. After public comment, the chair asked members to sign the bill release forms for the two bills heard, and the committee adjourned.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 4/15/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • of vehicle moving forward. of vehicle moving forward.
  • <00:43:18.520> that<00:43:18.640> funds<00:43:18.920> the for a fair tax code
  • that funds the for a fair tax code that funds the public<00:43:19.280> services<00:43:19.760>
  • Most fans already pay sales tax on tickets and concessions, but our current tax code exempts purchases
  • IRS code.
Summary: The committee first adopted the April 14, 2026 minutes as amended, correcting a misspelling in the reference to Chair Davids. It then heard House File 4234, a tax-exempt bonding/affordable housing bill from Representative Rey Rower, and adopted a technical A1 amendment before laying the bill over for possible inclusion in the 2026 tax bill. The bill would conform Minnesota law to recent federal changes to low-income housing tax credit rules by lowering the amount of tax-exempt bonds needed for projects to qualify, with the stated goal of spreading bond allocations across more projects and increasing affordable housing production without additional state funds. Testimony in support came from the bill author, the Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, and Mary Tingerthal, who said the change would increase efficiency in the use of federal bond authority and could raise the number of funded housing projects from about 16 to 25 per year, bringing in roughly $120 million more annually for housing. Members discussed where the benefits would be felt statewide, including greater Minnesota and larger metro areas, and the author said the bill would help address shortages in affordable and senior housing. The committee took no final vote on the bill, instead laying it over. The committee next heard House File 3697 from Vice Chair Norris, which would change Minnesota’s tax refund claim timelines to better align with federal law and most other states. The author and a tax attorney testifier said the bill would reduce confusion and help taxpayers, especially vulnerable individuals who may overpay or be overassessed and then miss the current deadline to seek refunds. The Department of Revenue said it had no concerns with the language and did not oppose the bill, and the committee laid the bill over for possible inclusion in the 2026 tax bill. Finally, the committee began hearing House File 4738 from Representative Keeler, a Safe Harbor funding proposal for victims of sex trafficking and sexually exploited youth. The author described Safe Harbor as a statewide program serving youth across Minnesota and said the committee should consider creative funding options, but Chair Davids stated the proposed funding source would not work because it would take money from women’s sports scholarships. Testifiers from Lake House in Duluth and a former Safe Harbor youth described the program’s impact on homeless and trafficked youth, including shelter, mental health services, education, and transition to adulthood. The hearing continued with testimony, but no action was taken in the portion provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 8th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you don't, then under Section 21.047 of the Property Code, there was added a provision that says if
  • Section 402.031 in Chapter 21 of the Texas Property Code.
  • The contents of the Bill of Rights are prescribed by the Texas Legislature and Texas Government Code
  • Section 402.031 in Chapter 21 of the Texas Property Code.
  • “Section 111.019 of the Texas Natural Resources Code was enacted to deal with surveys.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Appropriations Apr 29th, 2025

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • A couple of years back we were running 15% of all commercial motor vehicle fatalities in the state of
  • , TURP is a dedicated account that is funded primarily from the increased or the, uh, I guess the vehicle
  • exploration for oil and gas industry, uh, and the miles they put in is such a tremendous. 1.8, 1.9 million vehicle
Bills: HB188, HB 265, HJR35
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

S/C on Property Tax Appraisals Mar 20th, 2025

S/C on Property Tax Appraisals

Transcript Highlights:
  • Back then, chapter 131, our ag code, the definition of an apiary was 6 hives, and that was the only real
  • It's based on income, and it's determined by zip code.
  • Is there one zip code and HUD figures that out.
  • The idea being that in a zip code, there is one zip code may be different from another in terms of what
  • Like you can really drill down into by zip code as well. OK. All right, that was our question.
Bills: HB148, HB203, HJR30
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 9th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • So residents in these areas that flood flooded, they had their vehicles flooded, their homes flooded,
  • They already apply to many districts, and there's many other exemptions in the water code that already
  • However, the Texas Water Code spends over 2000 pages regulating that right.
  • The water code mandates on the other hand, that districts shall recover legal fees.
  • The committee sub adds water code section 36.018 in subsection B2.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 9th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • They're in 35 separate chapters of the special district local laws code.
  • Its water code spends over 2,000 pages regulating that right.
  • This would give us a tool in the toolbox, a vehicle, a framework to be able to.
  • The committee sub adds water code section 36.01. 8 in subsection B-2.
  • The committee substitute properly amends section 16.062 of the Water Code.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 9th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill simply amends section 17.1 and add section 17.1215 to the water code.
  • Chairman members House bill 3663 amends chapter 15 of the Texas water development code by removing the
  • The bill accomplishes this by amending chapter 15 of the water code to expand the definition of flood
  • I'm just I was more concerned about the water resources than the building codes.
  • The bill that the, or the code. that would apply in the bill that's set out is a may, not a shall.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Second, the bill establishes a comprehensive AI code of ethics.
  • significant investments in data centers in our state because of reasonable business-friendly legal codes
  • SB 841 addresses an important clarification within Chapter 162. ...of the Texas Property Code, namely
  • The law seems to have been clear to you under the current code, but it's been interpreted in such a way
  • Some folks are using their electric vehicles (EVs).
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • government is one of the highest values we hold as Texans, reflected in Chapter 552 of the Government Code
  • the bill you referred to, maybe that was one in Chapter 16 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code
  • It creates a burdensome new framework under Chapter 604B of the Texas Business and Commerce Code, which
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce (Part I) Apr 3rd, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • government is one of the highest values we hold as Texans, reflected in Chapter 552 of the Government Code
  • government is one of the highest values we hold as Texans, reflected in Chapter 552 of the Government Code
  • government is one of the highest values we hold as Texans reflected in Chapter 552 of the Government Code
  • that the data compiled meets the requirements of Section 20.05 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code
  • that the data compiled meets the requirements of section 20.05 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code
Summary: The Senate Committee on Business and Commerce met with a quorum and first took up several pending and uncontested bills. It favorably reported SB 1405, SB 1762, SB 1977, SB 2077, SB 2148, and SB 1968, and also moved SB 2321 to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then heard SB 819, which would change how the Public Utility Commission reviews proposed utility-scale solar and related interconnection projects. The committee substitute would shift the default so interconnection is allowed unless the PUC affirmatively prohibits it within 180 days, limit denial to cases where harm substantially outweighs benefits, remove public meeting requirements, retain setback and financial assurance provisions, add optional application materials such as national security and environmental information, and restore local control over county tax abatements. The substitute was adopted and SB 819 was favorably reported to the full Senate on a 7-3 vote. The committee then took up SB 231, focused on CenterPoint’s use of large emergency generators after Hurricane Beryl. Senator King explained that the original bill was intended to prevent customers from being charged for non-mobile generators that were leased at great cost and did not match the bill’s emergency-response purpose. CenterPoint’s Jason Ryan apologized for the company’s communication failures and said the company would make customers whole through a combination of rate reductions, foregone storm-cost recovery, and a donation of the 15 large generators to ERCOT for about two years to address a San Antonio-area reliability issue, with the company absorbing the associated costs. PUC Executive Director Connie Corona said the commission could enforce the agreement through its contested-case process. Public testimony included consumer and reliability advocates, one of whom argued utility-scale microgrids should be preserved as a policy option. SB 231 was left pending. The committee also heard SB 986, which would create an alternative process for routine Public Information Act requests so local governments can make initial redactions without sending every routine exception to the Attorney General, while preserving an appeal path and training requirements. Supporters said it would reduce backlog and speed access to records; opponents argued it would shift the burden to requesters and encourage delay. The AG’s office testified that the process could improve efficiency and still fit within current timelines if used promptly. SB 986 was left pending. Finally, SB 584 was briefly laid out to require consumer reporting agencies that buy data from others to ensure the information complies with Texas law on excluded items such as bankruptcies, judgments, and tax liens, and SB 600 was heard on heir property. SB 600’s substitute would strengthen notice, require an attorney ad litem, add an heir’s bill of rights, allow settlement conferences, and require fair-market-value sales protections; supporters said it would curb predatory partition practices, while opponents warned some provisions could burden or diminish minority heirs’ property rights. SB 584 and SB 600 were left pending after testimony.