Video & Transcript : 'treatment services' :

Page 60 of 500
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Boards, Agencies and Commissions Committee Feb 5th, 2025

Boards, Agencies and Commissions

Transcript Highlights:
  • Basically, technology is expensive for these services.
  • So, what if two districts could work together to provide 911 services to the same people?
  • This allows them to combine services while still remaining separate and distinct.
  • We appreciate your service. Representative Simpson, you're up presenting House Bill 117.
  • The other was the expression of a contract for administrative services, which they did not renew and
Bills: HB25 , HB108 , HB109 , HB111 , HB112 , HB113 , HB117 , HB118 , HB119 , HB120 , HB121 , HB122 , HB124 , HB126 , HB127 , HB128 , HB129 , HB130 , HB131 , HB25
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Feb 24th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so my Concern is number one for the services.
  • And I would also say I do worry about services. That is one thing of all people.
  • I have been very concerned about services.
  • that needs treatment?
  • Tomorrow morning at 7:30, there will be a devotional service in the Senate lounge.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Finance May 11th, 2026

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • We simply ask that our essential services no longer be deferred. ...the committee to be more fiscally
  • We simply ask that our essential services no longer be deferred.
  • As seniors, we're talking about allowing a member with 35 or more years of service credit to select a
  • I'm sure it's along with the help of the Department of Family and Children Services.
  • Department of Family and Children's Services.
Bills: SB25 , SB250 , HB22 , HB27 , HB33 , HB47 , HB233 , HB290 , HB308 , HB324 , HB382 , HB533 , HB559 , HB575 , HB980 , HB1157 , HB1207 , HB1236 , HCR45
Committee: Senate Finance
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Public Safety REVISED Feb 10th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Persons providing medical treatment to crime victims are often some of the first witnesses to the crime
  • I think so, as far as any treatment that the judge may mandate at that Point after the first-time DUI
  • That have treatment required in them.
  • How would this affect Service members on duty outside of the United States. So, there is a.
  • And so, can people who are charged with misdemeanors not receive treatment? They can.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education May 20th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Third, but certainly not least, we encourage our regional education service centers to collaborate with
  • of how important it is to expand this Holocaust education week, to work closely with the regional service
  • told how their children were asked about their personal feelings, given intrusive, privacy-invading services
  • I started looking at other services to be involved in. Also, therapy-type exercises were used.
  • These organizations promote... ...accessible, confidential, and affordable sexual health services.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 28th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Legal services in immigration cases deliver measurable taxpayer savings. As Ms.
  • Third, these legal services directly support our Texas business community.
  • Legal services don't... encourage illegal immigration.
  • People who provide immigration legal services are in small businesses like mine.
  • , as well as offer income tax services.
Committee: House State Affairs
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 28th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I also saw financial services and I imagine that I mean the intent is probably bank mergers, but what
  • Industries like construction. in food services and domestic work, specifically.
  • As undocumented folks are not eligible for unemployment benefits and services that so many of us are.
  • Through mentorship, discussions about integrity, discipline, leadership, and service. Thank you.
  • Diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility isn't about giving preferential treatment to certain
Committee: House State Affairs
OR
Transcript Highlights:
  • So treatment is health care services that may or may not include residential care.
  • So BRS services are not a mental health treatment.
  • They're not a mental health service, but they are certainly a treatment-like service that's covered by
  • that they warrant psychiatric residential treatment services or other substance use disorder treatment
  • And that subacute PRTS or psychiatric residential treatment services and then secure inpatient services
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Financial Services Jun 21st, 2026 at 10:30 am

Joint Committee on Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • H. 1319 would require the full spectrum of addiction treatment services to be covered by insurance plans
  • to be covered, alongside acute treatment services and clinical stabilization services.
  • Assertive community treatment is holistic in that, in addition to clinical services, it also includes
  • vocational services and housing-related services.
  • The services are based on National Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services The services are based
Summary: The committee held a hearing on a large group of behavioral health and insurance-related bills. Topics included expanding access to mental health services by allowing physician assistants to authorize Section 12 emergency holds and be recognized as licensed mental health professionals (H. 1131/S. 773); improving coverage for community behavioral health centers so commercial insurance matches MassHealth’s bundled outpatient and crisis services (H. 1276/S. 703); eliminating cost sharing for certain behavioral health services (S. 718); extending detox and clinical stabilization coverage from 14 to 30 days and adding transitional support services (H. 1319/S. 772); requiring coverage for dual-diagnosis treatment in psychiatric facilities (H. 1277/S. 771); and preserving access to treatment for serious mental illness through coverage of coordinated specialty care and assertive community treatment (H. 1135/S. 709). The committee also heard bills on preventive behavioral health services for children (H. 1228/S. 802) and post-pregnancy mental health care, including postpartum depression and pregnancy loss-related care (H. 1314/S. 823).
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • They're also concerned about treatment services within the counties, as well as supervision for some
  • the treatment option right away.
  • , the same treatment needs arise.
  • . treatment, and supportive services, and not in ways that are going to further mass incarceration, which
  • services and housing.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, diving into the treatment-mandated felony aspect of the law, Prop 36 created a treatment-mandated
  • They're also concerned about treatment services within the counties, as well as supervision for some
  • get people the treatment.
  • Services.
  • , services, and housing.
Summary: The committee heard extensive testimony on Proposition 36 and its implementation, with judicial and budget officials describing it as a major shift from misdemeanor to felony processing for repeat drug possession and certain theft offenses. Witnesses explained that the law creates a treatment-mandated felony process that can lead to dismissal if a defendant completes treatment, but also requires evaluations, court monitoring, and potentially long, open-ended supervision. Judicial representatives said the new law is already generating large numbers of filings, creating workload, staffing, courtroom, and facility pressures, and that access to treatment beds, housing, and evaluation capacity is limiting participation. Several speakers emphasized that collaborative courts are effective but are not a perfect fit for Prop. 36 because those programs are typically probation-based and serve different risk/need populations. Court officials from San Bernardino and Orange counties said the impacts vary by county but are severe, with some counties seeing hundreds or more filings in a short period and others moving more slowly to build treatment infrastructure first. They argued that Prop. 36 is effectively an unfunded mandate unless the state provides more resources for judges, staff, facilities, treatment, housing, and supervision. The Legislative Analyst’s Office noted that Prop. 36 will reduce the Proposition 47 savings that fund mental health and substance use treatment grants, but said the near-term reduction is relatively modest and that the full effect will take time to appear because of the way those savings are calculated. Members of the committee repeatedly raised concerns that the state is underfunding the courts and counties needed to carry out the new law. The committee also reviewed the Governor’s proposed trial court operations budget, including a partial restoration of a prior $97 million cut and additional ongoing funding. Judicial branch officials said the restoration helped avoid furloughs, hiring freezes, and service reductions, and supported cybersecurity, technology, staffing, and records management. The LAO recommended that the Legislature seek more detail on how midyear restorations are handled and consider clarifying language for transferring unspent trial court trust fund monies to the General Fund. Finance said the flexibility in the ongoing funding was intentional and would be taken back for consideration. In a separate item, the committee heard testimony on a $6.3 million increase for Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal appointed counsel programs. Judicial officials and appellate project representatives said the system is facing a crisis because indigent appeals have risen sharply while the number of panel attorneys has fallen, leaving many cases waiting months for counsel. They argued the proposed increase would help but is still below what is needed to recruit and retain attorneys and prevent delays that affect criminal, juvenile, and child welfare cases. The committee also discussed the Tracy courthouse project in San Joaquin County, where local officials said reopening a courthouse closed since 2011 is necessary to serve a growing population and relieve overcrowding elsewhere. The LAO and Finance both noted the project is next in line under the facilities plan, though LAO suggested the Legislature could consider whether other facility priorities should come first.
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Task Force Jun 25th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Task Force

Transcript Highlights:
  • But I'm here to talk about recovery support services because treatment isn't enough.
  • Treatment and recovery support services are different, but... Enough.
  • That is where recovery support services make the difference. Recovery happens after treatment.
  • Treatment helps people get sober. Recovery support services help people I'll see.
  • Overdose prevention and substance use treatment referral services.
MO
Transcript Highlights:
  • But I'm here to talk about recovery support services because treatment isn't enough.
  • Treatment and recovery support services are different, but...
  • Treatment and recovery support services are different, but equally important purposes, and we would do
  • That is where recovery support services make the difference. Recovery happens after treatment.
  • Treatment helps people get sober. Recovery support services help people stay sober.
Summary: The task force heard extensive testimony on recovery support, harm reduction, and community-based care. Dan Haniken of Into Action described his own recovery from addiction and incarceration and argued that treatment alone is not enough; he said recovery housing, peer support, employment, accountability, and stable housing are what help people stay sober and avoid relapse. Members asked about funding, housing shortages, transportation, treatment courts, and support for medication-assisted treatment (MAT). Haniken said Into Action relies on a braided mix of federal, state, county, city, foundation, and private funding, and that recovery housing needs longer-term support than many current funding streams provide. He also said Missouri should expand recovery housing, peer recovery support, and recovery community centers, and improve awareness and access to MAT in recovery settings and after incarceration. Matt Cushman, a community paramedic with Raytown Fire Protection District, urged Missouri to expand harm reduction, including syringe service programs and broader access to clean needles and drug-checking tools. He argued that stigma and abstinence-only approaches keep many people from seeking help, and said harm reduction reduces disease transmission, overdose deaths, hospitalizations, and other harms while creating pathways to recovery. He cited naloxone distribution as a successful example and said similar strategies should be decriminalized and expanded. Members asked about naloxone access, community paramedicine funding, and whether safe consumption sites should be considered; Cushman said syringe exchange should be a near-term priority, while safe consumption sites are a longer-term policy question. Representatives from Ozarks Medical Center/COMC and Four Rivers Community Health Center focused on the need to reimburse peer support specialists and community health workers, especially in rural and underserved areas. COMC’s Monet Lehman shared her trauma and recovery story and described her jail reentry work, helping incarcerated people with housing, benefits, IDs, employment, MAT, and community supports before release. Four Rivers said its care coordinators and CHWs provide wraparound services such as transportation, housing help, Medicaid enrollment, clothing, and same-day MAT access. Members and staff discussed confusion over reimbursement rules, noting that CCBHCs can bill for peer services through Medicaid while FQHCs generally cannot, and that CHWs are often funded through grants rather than reimbursement. No votes were taken; the meeting consisted of testimony and member questions, with several requests for follow-up information on funding, transportation, and reimbursement rules.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • They add treatment service coordination requirements and modify the county board screening duties.
  • </c><00:11:31.480><c> Service</c><00:11:31.800><c> Coordination</c> add um treatment Service Coordination
  • and allow therapy services to include previous time in another similar treatment program.
  • Article Six is the assertive community treatment and intensive residential treatment services recodification
  • and intensive residential treatment services recodification.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's this: we can't mandate people to treatment services that don't exist.
  • We can't mandate people to treatment services that don't exist.
  • services, health services.
  • At Stony Brook, we provide two levels of care: acute treatment services, previously referred to as detox
  • At Stony Brook, we provide very comprehensive mental health services along with our substance use treatment
Summary: The committee held its fourth public hearing of the 2025-2026 session on bills dealing with involuntary commitment and access to addiction treatment, especially proposals to move Section 35 civil commitments away from jails and prisons and into facilities licensed or approved by DPH or DMH. Chairs Velis and Domb framed the hearing as a discussion of how to support people in crisis with compassion, while also warning against using involuntary commitment as a way to remove unhoused people from public view. The hearing also touched on related concerns about discharge practices, treatment capacity, and the need for a broader continuum of care. Testimony split largely along two themes. Addiction researcher Keith Humphreys argued that many people enter treatment under pressure, that involuntary treatment can be ethically justified in the face of overdose risk, but that it should not be mandated unless high-quality services exist first; he emphasized the need for inpatient care when someone is a grave danger, followed by case management and outpatient support. MAMH’s Kate Alicante supported the bill, saying Massachusetts is the only state that commits people with substance use conditions to jails or prisons and that carceral settings add trauma and stigma; she pointed to prior legislative steps, including the Section 35 commission and the planned closure of DOC’s MESAC facility, as evidence that the Commonwealth is moving toward health-based settings. A major portion of the hearing focused on Stony Brook, a sheriff-run stabilization and treatment center in Hampden County. Boston City Councilor John Fitzgerald, several committee members, and multiple people in recovery described the facility as humane, well-run, and effective, with longer stays, medical monitoring, medication-assisted treatment, counseling, and warm handoffs to aftercare. Several witnesses said Stony Brook saved their lives or helped family members recover, and they argued that the sheriff’s office model should be expanded rather than eliminated. Others, including family members and advocates, countered that even a well-run correctional setting remains stigmatizing and that people should not be treated in facilities run by sheriffs or corrections when they have committed no crime. No vote was taken. The hearing concluded with continued testimony, including Senator Friedman’s support for Section 35 as a civil commitment tool but not in a criminal justice setting, and her separate support for a bill to speed inpatient mental health treatment.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am

Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery

Transcript Highlights:
  • It complements the work of prevention, treatment, and recovery services.
  • Often, harm reduction provides a bridge for people into treatment and recovery services, but it only
  • They also have shown increased access to substance treatment services.
  • attendance increased the likelihood of achieving any type of substance treatment services by 33%.
  • And most importantly, lack of prevention, overdose prevention services, and treatment.
Summary: The Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use, and Recovery held a public hearing on several harm reduction bills, including measures to decriminalize simple possession and paraphernalia, authorize overdose prevention centers, and expand access to naloxone for first responders. Chair Mindy Domb and Senator John Velis opened by describing harm reduction as an evidence-based public health strategy and noting Massachusetts’ recent decline in fatal overdoses. They emphasized that testimony would help shape whether and how the bills advance, and explained the hearing process, including time limits and written testimony. Testimony was sharply divided. Supporters, including Rep. Kate Donaghue, Sen. Cindy Friedman, Rep. Marjorie Decker, Rep. Manny Cruz, public health professionals, recovery advocates, and people with lived experience, argued that harm reduction saves lives, reduces stigma, and can connect people to treatment. They supported overdose prevention centers and decriminalization as tools to keep people alive long enough to enter recovery, and several speakers described personal losses to overdose or family experiences with addiction. Some supporters also framed the bills as racial justice measures, arguing that criminal penalties for possession have disproportionately harmed Black and brown communities. Opponents, including Sen. Nick Collins and several South End residents, argued that overdose prevention centers and decriminalization would worsen public drug use, crime, and neighborhood disorder, especially around Mass and Cass. They said current approaches such as Section 35, diversion, and police leverage into treatment are more effective, and they urged more treatment beds and recovery facilities instead of harm reduction sites. Committee members questioned witnesses about research, local siting, crime data, and the relationship between harm reduction and treatment, and several members said neighborhood impacts must be considered alongside overdose prevention. The committee did not take a vote during the hearing; it continued receiving testimony and announced a later break before resuming on H. 2196 and S. 1393.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 1/16/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • and coordinating placement and treatment services for clients enrolled in managed care organizations
  • include short-term inpatient hospital psychiatric treatment, intensive residential treatment services
  • Then there are direct care and treatment facilities. services for adults with mental illness services
  • This slide covers, in a great deal of detail, the services provided by Direct Care and Treatment.
  • provided by Direct Care are the services provided by Direct Care and<00:48:13.559><c> treatment</c><