Video & Transcript Research : 'probate procedure'

Page 5 of 399
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Feb 26th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Of course, he'd be on probation if he... ...be on probation.
  • We currently could suspend those 15E sentences to give probation.
  • If they're on probation for five years and they screw up, I can send them back down for 15 years.
  • And then when they're released, they're going to be under my supervision on probation.
  • For 22 years, I guess what my problem is I have a problem with probation for violent crime.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 8th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • And, in fact, the guy that they say killed my brother got 10 years probation.
  • I thought you were saying if you get probation and you are charged with a felony.
  • I know in straight probation they sometimes can extend you if you fall behind.
  • "Yes, that's standard procedure." Did you find any empty alcohol bottles? "No."
  • Do their fees, probation, and otherwise while everyone is present.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • address Senate Bill 1497, a one-sentence amendment to Article 18. 0.0215 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
  • targeted bill that gives us a clear definition of skimmers as the other parts of the criminal code procedure
  • The bill seeks to establish clear definitions and procedures for the forfeiture of digital currency.
  • So as a matter of procedural correction, Senator Huffman moved.
  • It amends Chapter 38 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by adding Article 38. which provides definition
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, the asset forfeiture procedures are primarily handled by local prosecutors in the jurisdiction
  • In 2013, the Texas Legislature enacted Article 11.073 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, commonly referred
  • that the Court of Criminal Appeals be permitted to consider subsequent writs that fail to meet procedural
  • It appears that the intent is to not procedurally bar a subsequent Article 11.073 claim if the original
  • Fourth and finally, House Bill 115 eases procedural bars that prevent courts from... ...from considering
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • However, the Code of Criminal Procedure does not currently address this issue. require the trial court
  • The Code of Criminal Procedure sets out no limitations on a court's authority to grant or declare a mistrial
  • I think it may be necessary to be said that criminal justice, criminal procedure, and criminal cases
  • We have 50... different commissioners, multidisciplinary, who bring problems and procedures that they
  • So we hope that these procedural changes add clarity where there are gaps in the statutes and improve
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, this is a cleanup bill for the Code of Criminal Procedure, and it is part of the legislative
  • Unlike the Government Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure does not require interpreters to be licensed
  • Generally, then, Senate Bill 1537 would clean up the language of the Code of Criminal Procedure by first
  • You are trained by your departments, by your academies; your policies and procedures allow you to engage
  • They're basing it on their policies and procedures.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Criminal Justice heard a series of bills focused on criminal procedure, public safety, victim protections, and law enforcement administration. SB 1537 would require criminal-proceeding interpreters to meet the same appointment standards used in the Government Code, and SB 993 would let the Comptroller’s Criminal Investigative Division seek mobile-tracking warrants directly in motor fuel theft and related tax-fraud investigations. SB 693, as substituted, would create a criminal offense for notaries who notarize documents without the signer personally appearing, with a higher penalty when real property is involved, and would add continuing education for notaries. SB 1610 would tighten rules for civilly committed sexually violent predators at the Texas Civil Commitment Office, including penalties for new crimes and assaults on staff, sex-offender registration requirements, and removal of certain provisions from the filed version; the substitute reduced some of the harsher penalties and preserved parole/community-supervision eligibility. SB 836 would expand privacy protections for sexual assault survivors by limiting livestreaming of certain trials, allowing pseudonyms earlier in the process, and protecting forensic exam evidence and invasive recordings under protective orders. SB 1563 would require county jailers to receive training on interacting with veterans, with testimony emphasizing suicide risk, PTSD, and the need for better identification and support in jails. SB 906 would give the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo authority similar to other Texas tribes to commission peace officers under state law to enforce Texas laws on tribal land. SB 781 would standardize confidentiality rules for peace officers’ personal information and create a confidential departmental file system modeled on Chapter 143 civil-service practices, though members raised concerns about whether the bill could affect disciplinary records and existing disclosure rules. Testimony was largely supportive for the bills, especially from prosecutors, law enforcement representatives, victim advocates, and agency officials. Supporters of SB 693 described widespread deed fraud tied to improper notarizations; supporters of SB 836 stressed survivor privacy and the harms of livestreamed sexual-assault proceedings; supporters of SB 1563 said jailer training could help prevent veteran suicides and improve treatment; and supporters of SB 906 said state commissioning would improve public safety and coordination on tribal lands. SB 781 drew support from police and TCOLE witnesses who said the bill would extend confidentiality protections already used in civil-service departments, while some members questioned whether the bill duplicated existing law or could be read to shield misconduct information. Public testimony included opposition to SB 1610 from a civil-rights advocate who urged waiting for Sunset review, and opposition to SB 781 from a family member of a person killed by police, who objected to expanding confidentiality for officers. Several bills were left pending after testimony because the committee lacked a quorum or chose to hold them for later action.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice (Part I) Mar 25th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, this is a cleanup bill for the Code of Criminal Procedure, and it is part of the legislative
  • Unlike the Government Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure does not require interpreters to be licensed
  • Generally, then, Senate Bill 1537 would clean up the language of the Code of Criminal Procedure by first
  • You are trained by your departments, by your academies; your policies and procedures allow you to engage
  • They're basing it on their policies and procedures.
Summary: The committee heard a series of criminal justice bills focused on victim protections, law enforcement tools, notary/deed fraud, sexually violent predators, veterans in jail, tribal policing authority, and peace officer records. Several bills were laid out, heard, and left pending because the committee lacked a quorum for final action on those items. Testimony was generally supportive on bills addressing interpreter appointments, fuel theft investigations, deed fraud, survivor privacy, veteran jailer training, tribal peace officer authority, and officer-record confidentiality, though some bills drew concerns about due process, scope, or drafting. Senate Bill 1537 would clean up criminal procedure language on appointing interpreters and align it with Government Code standards requiring licensed or certified interpreters; it received no public opposition and was left pending. Senate Bill 993 would let Comptroller Criminal Investigative Division officers directly seek warrants for mobile tracking devices in fuel-theft and tax-fraud investigations; it also drew support and was left pending. Senate Bill 693, as substituted, would create a criminal offense for notarizing documents without the signer personally appearing, with a higher penalty when real property is involved, and would add notary continuing education; a Dallas County prosecutor testified that notary fraud is a major driver of deed theft, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1610, as substituted, would address safety, registration, and criminal penalties at the Texas Civil Commitment Office for sexually violent predators, including assaults on staff and sex-offender registration issues; agency witnesses described increased assaults and operational problems, while a public witness urged waiting for Sunset review and raised due-process concerns. Senate Bill 836 would add privacy protections for sexual assault survivors by limiting livestreaming of trials, expanding pseudonym use, and protecting forensic exam and invasive-recording evidence; survivors and advocates strongly supported it, and defense lawyers said they had no opposition to the substitute. Senate Bill 1563 would require county jailer training on interacting with veterans, with testimony from the Texas Veterans Commission and veterans’ advocates emphasizing suicide risk, PTSD, and the need for better identification and support in jails; the bill was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 906, which would authorize the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribal police to be commissioned as Texas peace officers like two other federally recognized tribes in Texas; tribal leaders said the change would improve response times and coordination, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 781, as substituted, would standardize confidentiality rules for peace officer personnel and departmental files statewide, mirroring Chapter 143 civil-service practices; law enforcement witnesses supported it as a way to protect personal information and create uniform records practices, but several senators raised concerns that the bill could blur existing disclosure rules or bury misconduct complaints, and public testimony included an opposition witness describing a police shooting involving her brother.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Estate and Probate Institute, also known as T-REP.
  • Currently, most uncontested probate cases are heard by the county judge.
  • However, if a party to a probate proceeding files a motion to assign a probate judge to hear a contested
  • There's only 12 counties with a permanent probate judge. Out of 2,154, there's a...
  • Only 12 counties with a permanent probate judge.
Summary: The committee heard several probate, family law, judicial, property, and contract-related bills. Senate Bill 1335, relating to decedents’ estates, would remove outdated references to a clerk’s certificate, allow courts to remove personal representatives on their own motion with notice by qualified delivery method, and add independent administrators to provisions that referenced only independent executors; an estate-planning attorney testified in support, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1760, concerning guardianship transfer fees and procedures, was described as setting a $45 filing fee for transferred guardianship cases and clarifying completion and dismissal procedures; it received no testimony and was left pending. Senate Bill 2127 would shorten the eligibility period for retired judges to serve as visiting judges from eight years to six, restrict practice in their assigned region for two years, and require conflict-related certification; it also was left pending without testimony. Senate Bill 302 would shift the cost of a traveling probate judge to the requesting estate or parties rather than the county; one witness registered in favor, no one testified, and the bill was left pending. The committee then considered a committee substitute for Senate Bill 252, which would clarify the parental presumption in conservatorship cases, require non-parents seeking relief against a parent to file an affidavit showing significant impairment to the child if relief is denied, require courts to state specific findings when overcoming the presumption, confirm the clear-and-convincing standard, and clarify that agreed prior orders do not defeat the presumption. The substitute was explained as consensus language from a work group, public testimony was reopened, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1734, on deed fraud, would create a streamlined ex parte process for property owners to have fraudulent deeds declared void, modeled on the fraudulent lien statute; county clerk and title association representatives testified that it would provide a low-cost self-help remedy for a growing problem, and the bill was left pending subject to the chair. Senate Bill 1975 would prevent Texas contractors from being forced to litigate disputes in foreign jurisdictions and require disputes to be handled in the county where the project is located; it was presented as a repeat of a previously vetoed bill and was left pending. Finally, the committee took up a substitute for Senate Bill 1940, concerning transfer-on-death style beneficiary designations for manufactured homes. The substitute would allow one or more beneficiaries instead of only one, transfer the interest to surviving designated beneficiaries who survive by 120 hours, extend the application period for transfer to 365 days, void the designation if not timely filed, and require mailing by certified or registered mail with return receipt requested. The substitute was adopted without objection. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 10th, 2026

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • anonymous pay act that governs the compensation between local officials for county commissioners, probate
  • Between local officials for county commissioners, probate judge, sheriffs, tax assessor, tax collectors
Bills: SB249, SB259, HB67, HB214
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Feb 19th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • But if you look at all the different parts of this bill, with all the different new procedures, you know
  • But my question is procedurally... respond, but my question is procedurally: how will I get the information
  • All right, and then also the question I had was about the civil procedure part of this.
  • Okay, um, but these are more procedural techniques, right, that... ...more procedural techniques, right
  • This was brought to me by a probate judge in our area.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Transportation and Energy Committee Mar 11th, 2026

Transportation and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • on construction of any new ones until we can find and get some answers as to those policies and procedures
  • on construction of any new ones until we can find and get some answers as to those policies and procedures
  • on construction of any new ones until we can find and get some answers as to those policies and procedures
  • on construction of any new ones until we can find and get some answers as to those policies and procedures
  • and we were able as just the procedures and we were able as just the gentleman<00:28:00.480> had<
Bills: SB341, SB340